New Mexico eliminates parole fees
Starting on June 20, New Mexicans who are on supervised release from prison will no longer have to pay parole fees under a new law Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed on Monday.
The Fines and Fees Justice Center, a criminal justice advocacy group, praised Lujan Grisham's enactment of Senate Bill 375 in a news release on Tuesday morning, calling the new law a 'smart on crime initiative' to lift unnecessary financial barriers that stop people from returning home.
The group said that parole supervision fees can prevent people from successfully reintegrating into their communities when they get out, racking up large debts for the families of people on supervision across the U.S.
Under the old law, New Mexico charged between $25 and $150 per month, with a yearly cap of $1,800, and incarcerated people could not get out on parole until they paid the fees.
About 2,400 New Mexicans were out on parole in 2023, according to the Prison Policy Initiative.
'Every dollar spent on a parole fee could have been a dollar put towards food, childcare or supporting local businesses,' New Mexico State Director Monica Ault said in a statement. 'Ending these fees isn't just the right thing to do — it's smart fiscal policy that can reinvigorate local economies.'
Sen. Antonio 'Moe' Maestas (D-Albuquerque), who sponsored SB375, said Tuesday that ending parole fees 'lifts a huge financial burden off people who have already paid their debt, giving them a real chance to prioritize their families and rebuild their lives.'
'Family is everything to New Mexicans,' Maestas said in a statement. 'This law is the next step in our push to make our communities strong, safe, and prosperous for all.'
New Mexico Corrections Department Cabinet Secretary Alisha Tafoya and her staff wrote the bill, the Fines and Fees Justice Center said.
'We believe that alleviating this financial burden will reduce recidivism by removing barriers for individuals transitioning from prison facilities to communities,' Tafoya Lucero said in a statement. 'This change allows them to, instead, direct their financial resources toward essential needs like housing and transportation, which are key elements for stability and avoiding criminal activity.'
The Fines and Fees Justice Center noted on Tuesday that New Mexico joins dozens of state and local governments in eliminating harmful criminal legal system fees, including the state of Maryland, which scrapped certain supervision fees last October while the governor there erased more than $13 million in outstanding court debt.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
5 days ago
- New York Times
In One of the Country's Poorest States, Crippling Budget Cuts Loom
To understand how a state heavily dependent on Washington might be affected by President Trump's far-reaching domestic policy law, consider New Mexico. The state is among the biggest per capita recipients of federal money, taking in $3 for every dollar it sends in taxes. About 39 percent of its residents are on Medicaid — one of the highest rates in the country — and 23 percent receive food assistance. Nearly a third of the state, 24.7 million acres, is public land. The Trump administration has made it clear that it regards such extensive subsidies as untenable. The plan to shift more costs to state and local governments means that states like New Mexico will be forced to find more money, or plan for what could be significant reductions in services. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and the state's congressional delegation, all Democrats, warn that their state, one of the country's poorest, will be hard-pressed to make up the shortfall. 'You couldn't design a budget-reconciliation package that would be worse for the state of New Mexico,' Senator Martin Heinrich said at a health care forum. But after years of robust federal spending in the state, some Republican legislators, who are in the minority in both chambers, are predicting that the new domestic policy bill will help root out waste and provide some tax relief. 'Just take a deep breath,' said State Representative Mark Duncan, a Republican who sits on a new legislative subcommittee on federal funding. 'This is not going to happen tomorrow, for the most part.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
03-08-2025
- Yahoo
Seven House Democrats making day trip to New Mexico amid redistricting battle
This article was adapted from our premium politics newsletter, The Blast, which delivers exclusive reporting, nonpartisan analysis and the first word on political moves across the state. Subscribe today. Members of the Texas House Democratic Caucus have gone to New Mexico for the day to meet with Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. It's not a quorum break — unlike the last time Texas Democrats sent a contingent to New Mexico — but another chance for Democrats to lock arms nationally against the mid-decade redistricting effort in the Lone Star State. House Democrats headed to Santa Fe on Tuesday include: Speaker Pro Tempore Joe Moody of El Paso Jon Rosenthal of Houston, vice chair of the Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting John Bucy of Austin Salman Bhojani of Euless Erin Elizabeth Gámez of Brownsville Josey Garcia of San Antonio Christian Manuel of Port Arthur It's the THDC's third such expeditionary force this special session after members traveled to California and Illinois on Friday to meet with Govs. Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker. Democrats frame the coalition as a national 'firewall' against Texas' map redraw pushed by President Donald Trump and called by Gov. Greg Abbott as Republicans look to retain the U.S. House in 2026. U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York will travel to Austin on Wednesday, underscoring the national spotlight on Austin. Unlike Newsom and Pritzker, Lujan Grisham isn't considering retaliatory redistricting because there's no more juice to squeeze out of New Mexico. The state's three congressional seats are already held by Democrats. Instead, Texas Democrats are using the trip to argue that Abbott and Republicans are wasting time with redistricting as opposed to prioritizing a legislative response to the recent Central Texas floods. Flash floods have hit the New Mexico mountain town of Ruidoso three times in less than a month during the ongoing monsoon season. One of the floods killed three people. The town is expected to get more rain Tuesday. 'We're traveling to meet with leaders who put people first in a crisis,' Moody said in a statement, contrasting New Mexico with Texas' focus on redistricting. 'We're seeking serious, productive conversations with other governors about how to solve the real problems Texans expect and deserve their leaders to solve.' Flood response is on Abbott's call for the special session, but the Republican-controlled Legislature could adopt a new congressional map first, making it politically unpalatable for Democrats to break quorum with flood debate still to come. Additionally, the day trip teases the possibility that House Democrats could leave Austin for longer, grinding the special session to a halt by denying the Legislature enough members to conduct business. House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu of Houston last week suggested a quorum break is on the table as the minority weighs its options to thwart redistricting. Between the trips to California, Illinois and now New Mexico, 22 Democrats have taken a trip out of state during the special session under threat of being compelled back to Austin. It would take 51 of the caucus' 62 Democrats to successfully break quorum. 'Our message to leaders across the country has been simple: if they can steal five seats in Texas by breaking the rules, your state is next,' Rosenthal said in a statement. The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
CBS News
03-08-2025
- CBS News
Transcript: New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Aug. 3, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Democratic New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Aug. 3, 2025. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to New Mexico's Democratic Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. She joins us from Santa Fe. Governor, two out of five New Mexicans are on Medicaid. You've got a lot of rural hospitals. Have you figured out how to implement everything Dr. Oz just laid out? GOV. LUJAN GRISHAM: Absolutely not. There is no real way to implement this. It's more paperwork for everyone. It's more paperwork for federal government, for state governments, for county governments, for local hospitals, for independent providers. And you know what Americans really hate, Margaret? When you go to your primary care physician and you spend 20 minutes sitting at a chair, not even on the exam table, while they are inputting data into a computer. So this doesn't make any sense. We should be a society and a country that is connecting people to healthcare providers. I think the one thing that Dr. Oz represents that's a fair representation, is we should be healthier as Americans. All right. We need to be moving out of poverty. We need drug prices- we should talk about that, to come down. So go after insurance companies. Do manufacturing here. Make sure we can negotiate fair prices. Let states do that, because I guarantee you, we'll do a better job than the federal government. And lastly, get people early, easy access today, more than half, or about half, our small businesses don't even offer health care coverage. So you can get a job. but now what? MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, well, you said, though- in your state, because as a governor, you're going to have to figure this out. You have reserve cash from some oil and gas revenues, as I understand it, that have been put aside. Doesn't that show it is possible for the federal government to shift more responsibility back to the states? That's the argument conservatives are making. GOV. LUJAN GRISHAM: They are and it's temporary. There is no way any state, including this one—which, frankly, I am really proud of, we are in really good financial shape that takes planning and effort. You know, our job projections continue to be met and exceed, unlike the federal jobs report, which is going in the opposite direction. So I don't know where all these jobs are going to be in this anemic economy. I mean, it's so bad. The last time it was this bad, I was in college, and let me tell you, that was a very long time ago. And so yes, temporarily we can do that. But you can't do it over the long haul. The lost minimally to New Mexico over less than a decade is between 12 and $13 billion dollars and when, not if, rural hospitals and local providers close their doors. I can do this better than any other state. The last governor completely canceled behavioral health. Six years later, we are still reeling from trying to rebuild. We put a billion dollars into behavioral health just this last legislative session. It is not so easy to rebuild something out of nothing. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the $50 billion Rural Health Care Fund under this Republican law is supposed to give people the— your—states like yours, the ability to come and say, we need this extra cash. Are you going to have to ask for that? GOV. LUJAN GRISHAM: I'm going to ask for every dollar the federal government has put aside anywhere that benefits a New Mexican. So you got 50 billion. That's $1 billion for each state, if it was even. Do you know how much money it would take to shore up rural hospitals? More than a billion. And to put that in perspective—let me do this, it's a billion just for behavioral health, it's a billion plus just to keep people's coverage, it's another billion for prescription drugs, it's a billion dollars for rural provider delivery investments, and that's only 50 hospitals. You have hundreds of hospitals. Hundreds. 400 rural hospitals across America that will shutter. So that's the number at it is. We are- how do we pick these rural hospitals? And if you pick a Southeastern rural hospital in New Mexico, what about the rural hospital in western New Mexico. Economies fail. People have to move away. You don't have any OBGYN care. That whole area collapses, and they are reducing rural health care delivery by about 134 billion. So the 50 billion is just to make someone somewhere feel like they recognize that this is a disaster. $900 billion out of Medicaid is catastrophic, straight up. MARGARET BRENNAN: Governor, we ran through a lot of material here. I have more questions for you, but very quickly—can you tell me—you deployed the National Guard to counter unrest in New Mexico. How is that different from what the president did in California? GOV. LUJAN GRISHAM: Well, they're not policing. They're doing the back end work so that trained community policing, and members of that training, right—those local police officers, they're on the streets. What we have in this country is a shortage of police officers. What I have in New Mexico is a partnership. So they're doing all of the—they answer all of the emergency calls. They handle all the traffic clearance when we've got a crash. And it is working, we're beginning to see more productive fentanyl drug dealing high end arrests than we did without the guard. And I'm really proud of that work. This is about partnering and leveraging, not about indiscriminately going after individuals who have not committed serious crimes. MARGARET BRENNAN: Thank you for your time today. 'Face the Nation' will be right back.
