Former Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, politicians, community mourn Lincoln Díaz-Balart's passing
Lincoln Díaz-Balart, the longtime South Florida congressman and fierce advocate for a free Cuba, has died at 70. His passing was announced Monday by his brother, U.S. Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart.
His death prompted an outpouring of tributes from political leaders and community figures who hailed his legacy as a statesman and defender of human rights.
Mario Díaz-Balart: 'We Will Miss Him Infinitely'
Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart released a family statement honoring his brother's life and contributions.
"Defender of the silenced and oppressed, author of the democracy requirement for the lifting of U.S. sanctions against the Cuban dictatorship... Lincoln's legacy of achievements will endure for generations," he said.
The family confirmed that a public memorial mass will be announced soon.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen: "An intellectual giant"
Former Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who served alongside Díaz-Balart, described him as one of the most influential voices in shaping U.S. policy toward Cuba.
"The oppressed people of Cuba had no greater advocate for their freedom than Lincoln," she said. "His debate skills were unparalleled and he left those on the other side of an issue speechless."
She praised his role in passing significant legislation targeting Cuba's government, calling him "the author of the most consequential pieces of legislation to punish the oppressors of the Cuban people."
Carlos Giménez: "A titan and patriot"
Congressman Carlos Giménez said Díaz-Balart's leadership was "an example to follow."
"Lincoln's leadership has always been an example to follow, & he has inspired so many of us with his unwavering fight for a free Cuba," Giménez said. "His advice, counsel, passion & sincere friendship were staples throughout my career in public service, and I will miss him tremendously."
Rick Scott: "A profound impact on so many lives"
Florida U.S. Senator Rick Scott called Díaz-Balart a role model and friend.
"Lincoln made a profound impact on the lives of so many Floridians and Americans, including myself," Scott said. "Words could never do justice to describe the legacy he has left behind."
Ron DeSantis: "No Greater enemy to Communism"
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said the world is better for his efforts.
"Florida mourns the loss of Lincoln Diaz-Balart. He was a leader in the Cuban American community and respected in our state. There was no greater enemy to Communism than he was, and the world is better for his efforts against it. May his memory be a blessing to family and friends."
Alina García: 'A trailblazer for democracy'
Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections Alina García praised Díaz-Balart's lasting influence.
"He championed policies that supported those fleeing dictatorship, strengthened our electoral system and reinforced democratic values in the United States and beyond," she said. "His legacy will continue to inspire future generations in the fight for democracy and freedom."
J.C. Planas: "A statesman and an amazing Individual"
Former State Rep. J.C. Planas, a Democrat, emphasized that Díaz-Balart's impact transcended political divisions.
"No matter what side of the political aisle you are on, Lincoln Díaz-Balart was a statesman and an amazing individual," he said. "Prayers for his family. May he always rest in power."
Ninoska Pérez Castellón: "One of the best public servants we've ever had"
Political commentator Ninoska Pérez Castellón, a longtime friend, fought back tears as she began her daily radio show with the news of his passing.
"He was always a person you could say knew about solidarity. He was decent, firm," she said. "I think he was one of the best public servants we've ever had in this community."
Díaz-Balart is survived by his wife Cristina, son Daniel and extended family. His first son, Lincoln Gabriel, preceded him in death.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jan. 6 attack gets in the way of Republican talking points on ICE protests
Reflecting on the recent protests in Los Angeles, Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin told CNN that he considered it 'absolutely insane' to see protesters 'carrying a foreign flag.' When 'State of the Union' host Dana Bash reminded the Oklahoma senator that carrying a flag 'is not illegal,' Mullin quickly interjected, 'A foreign flag while you're attacking law enforcement, it's pretty bad.' Of course, during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, Americans also saw foreign flags and rioters attacking law enforcement, and much of the Republican Party now treats those violent criminals as victims and heroes. A day before Mullin's on-air comments, U.S. Customs and Border Protection used its social media platform to issue a statement that read, 'Let this be clear: Anyone who assaults or impedes a federal law enforcement officer or agent in the performance of their duties will be arrested and swiftly prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Attack a cop, and life long consequences will follow!' That certainly seemed like an uncontroversial sentiment, except, again, Jan. 6 rioters assaulted and impeded law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties. And while they were arrested and prosecuted, and it appeared that many of them might face serious consequences, Trump returned to the White House and started handing out pardons — including to those who were convicted of violent assaults. And then there was FBI Director Kash Patel, who published a related online item of his own over the weekend: 'Hit a cop, you're going to jail ... doesn't matter where you came from, how you got here, or what movement speaks to you.' Not only did the president who appointed Patel come to the opposite conclusion when handing out Jan. 6 pardons, but the comment also brought to mind this Mother Jones report published after Patel's Senate confirmation hearing earlier this year. [Patel] hailed January 6 rioters convicted of violence against police officers as 'political prisoners.' ... Several Democrats pressed Patel on his work with the J6 Prison Choir, a group of January 6 rioters who recorded a version of the national anthem mashed up with Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. The song became a mainstay at Trump's campaign rallies. Patel told Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) that he promoted the song to raise money for the families of January 6 attackers. To be sure, 'Hit a cop, you're going to jail' seemed like an undebatable point. The trouble is, in the Trump administration, it's a maxim that comes with some important fine print: 'Hit a cop, you're going to jail, unless the president likes the reason you hit a cop, in which case you're getting a pardon.' This article was originally published on
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
What is the Insurrection Act? Here's what Trump has said about invoking it amid LA protests
What is the Insurrection Act? Here's what Trump has said about invoking it amid LA protests Show Caption Hide Caption California officials take on Trump over National Guard deployment California officials accuse President Donald Trump of inflaming protests by mounting a federal response. Protests continued to roil Los Angeles, California for three days straight over the weekend, as demonstrators clashed with law enforcement across the greater area over a series of federal immigration raids. The protests began Friday, June 6 after Homeland Security officials detained dozens of people across multiple locations in the city. By that evening, more than 100 people gathered at a downtown Los Angeles federal detention center where some immigrants had been held. The demonstrations gained steam throughout the weekend in response to a Saturday morning gathering of Border Patrol agents the Latino suburb of Paramount and as National Guard troops deployed by President Donald Trump arrived in downtown Los Angeles Sunday, June 8. Live updates: Gov. Newsom blames Trump for unruly protests Timeline: LA protests went from small to substantial over three days. Here's what unfolded The National Guard deployment, along with statements from Trump and other officials, has raised the specter of further executive actions while the administration takes a heavy hand in responding to the demonstrations and tensions escalate. Trump was asked about the potential of invoking the Insurrection Act, an unprecedented move in recent memory, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement. Here's what to know. What is the Insurrection Act? The Insurrection Act is an 1807 law that empowers a president to deploy the U.S. military to suppress events like civil disorder. 'The Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy the military inside the United States and use it against Americans, making it one of the executive branch's most potent emergency powers,' according to a 2022 report by the Brennan Center for Justice. It's also one of the oldest emergency powers available to the president, the center says, traced back to the Calling Forth Act of 1792. It's Congress's authority under the Constitution to 'provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions,' and is the primary exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, the center's experts say, under which federal military forces are generally barred from participating in civilian law enforcement activities. What has Trump said about invoking the Insurrection Act? In a social media post on Sunday, Trump called the demonstrators "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and said he was directing his cabinet officers "to take all such action necessary" to stop what he called riots. When asked on Sunday by reporters if he was considering invoking the Insurrection Act, he said, "It depends on whether or not there's an insurrection." Prompted as to whether he thinks there currently is an insurrection, he said, "No, no, but you have violent people and we're not going to let them get away with it." In Trump's presidential memorandum deploying "at least" 2,000 National Guard troops, he said the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and referred to the demonstrations as a 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the U.S. government. It is the first time in decades a president has moved to deploy troops in such a manner without a governor's consent or explicit invitation, Reuters reported, and the move has prompted California Gov. Gavin Newsom to say he plans to sue the administration over the deployment. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on X Friday that active duty Marines at its West Coast base were on 'high alert' and would be mobilized if 'violence continues,' claiming the demonstrations were a national security risk. In his statement on X, Hegseth repeated the unfounded claim of an invasion by immigrants facilitated by criminal organizations, a once-fringe theory that now undergirds the administration's immigration crackdown. Senior White House aide Stephen Miller on Saturday condemned protests, posting on X: "This is a violent insurrection." More: Videos show Waymo cars on fire amid LA protests; service reportedly suspended Has the Insurrection Act been used before? In 230 years, the Act has been invoked in response to 30 crises, according to the Brennan Center for Justice report, but it has not always led to the actual deployment of troops. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the U.S. in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War, the Brennan Center says in a report that lists out the history of the act's use. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, also in response to unrest and demonstrations in California. Unlike the current immigration raid protests, the governor of California at the time requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial, after four white Los Angeles police officers were acquitted in their trial for beating the Black motorist. The unrest had already been mostly quelled by state-controlled National Guard troops before the federal troops arrived, the Brennan Center said. Contributing: Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Business Insider
40 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X
Mark Cuban criticized Bluesky for becoming an echo chamber, warning it was driving some users away. Engagement on Bluesky has plunged since February, with far fewer daily unique users. Cuban questioned BlueSky's future, citing vanishing nuance and an absence of some topics. In a series of Bluesky posts, the billionaire investor and entrepreneur criticized the platform for fostering an echo chamber that he said was driving users away and inadvertently boosting traffic back to Elon Musk 's X. "The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage," Cuban wrote, linking to a Washington Post opinion piece headlined "BlueSky's decline stems from never hearing from the other side." Once known for "great give-and-take discussions on politics and news," Cuban said Bluesky had become a monoculture where dissent was unwelcome and nuance was vanishing. "Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to 'agree with me or you are a Nazi fascist,'" he posted. A graph of Bluesky's unique daily posters supports his concern. On February 28, Bluesky had more than 1 million unique users daily. Since then, engagement has plummeted, with June 7 and 8 hovering well below that peak at about 670,000 daily posters. The Musk factor BlueSky's rise accelerated following the election of President Donald Trump, whom CEO Musk backed financially, and after X introduced new terms of service. Many X users migrated to Bluesky, with some 2.5 million joining in one week in November. Some were seeking a friendlier, more open platform with less hate speech and misinformation, and more control over what content is shown in their feeds. A startup, BlueArk, even sprang up to help users migrate their X/Twitter histories to Bluesky, porting over millions of posts and creating the illusion of continuity on a new platform. At the time, Cuban told Business Insider he preferred Bluesky over alternatives due to its variety of content and growing engagement. Now, some of the earliest and most visible converts, including Cuban, are questioning whether the migration created a new community, or just repackaged the same silos. "Why would anyone stop using Twitter if the only topic that is acceptable to you is news and politics?" he asked. Cuban also criticized the platform's culture, saying: "The replies on here may not be as racist as Twitter, but they damn sure are hateful." Posts about AI, business, or healthcare — traditionally strong areas for Cuban — often gain little traction or were met with outright hostility, he added.
