Trump administration taunts detained migrants with ICE alligators at proposed Florida prison
The Department of Homeland Security taunted detained migrants with an AI-generated meme depicting alligators guarding a proposed Florida prison, what critics called a 'horrendous lack of humanity.'
Work has begun on the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center that's expected to cost $450 million a year in the heart of Florida's Everglades.
'Coming soon!' DHS said in a post on X Saturday, with the meme of the alligators donning Immigration and Customs Enforcement baseball caps.
The department was called out on social media for the post.
'A horrendous lack of humanity,' wrote former U.S. diplomat and Georgetown lecturer Brett Bruen.
Christopher Burgess, a global security expert and former CIA officer, simply said: 'Disgusting.'
'This is not a joke, it's psychological warfare dressed as meme culture,' another person said. 'This isn't a warning. It's a threat and DHS just made it official propaganda.'
Some Trump administration supporters were also not impressed. 'This administration is doing good things, but the utter lack of seriousness of your comms team really sucks,' one person said. 'No one takes you seriously with posts like this.'
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, an ally of President Donald Trump, boasted this week in a social media video that the center will require minimal additional security due to its remote, swampland location, which is home to dangerous wildlife, including alligators and pythons.
'Alligator Alcatraz' would detain roughly 1,000 people in a facility on an abandoned airfield in the heart of the sprawling conservation area made up of mangrove forests and 'rivers of grass.'
The idea recalls Trump's own suggestion during his first term that a medieval moat be built alongside his still-unfinished southern border wall, inhabited by deadly creatures.
Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the move to open the facility.
The government's plan has not been through an environmental review as required under federal law, and the public has had no opportunity to comment, the groups claim in the suit, which named the Department of Homeland Security, ICE and the Florida Division of Emergency Management as the defendants.
'The site is more than 96 percent wetlands, surrounded by Big Cypress National Preserve, and is habitat for the endangered Florida panther and other iconic species,' Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, said.
'This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect,' she added.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said the state would oppose the lawsuit.
'Governor Ron DeSantis has insisted that Florida will be a force multiplier for federal immigration enforcement, and this facility is a necessary staging operation for mass deportations located at a pre-existing airport that will have no impact on the surrounding environment,' Bryan Griffin, the governor's spokesman, said. 'We look forward to litigating this case.'
State Republicans have also been flogging 'Alligator Alcatraz' T-shirts, baseball caps, and beverage coolers from $15 to $30 on their website.
More than 56,000 people are being held in immigration detention, the highest level in years and what may be an all-time record.
There were 56,397 people are currently jailed in immigrant detention, according to Syracuse University's TRAC database.
Internal government data obtained by CBS News suggests an even higher figure, with roughly 59,000 immigrants behind bars — or 140 percent of the agency's ostensible capacity to hold them.
The figures top both the 39,000 people held in the final days of Joe Biden's administration, and the previous recent record of 55,654 in August 2019, set during the first Trump administration, which is pushing an aggressive anti-immigration agenda to revoke legal status for tens of thousands of people with a goal of arresting thousands of immigrants a day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
American politician issues a wake-up call for Anthony Albanese - and what he needs to do for Trump
Two US congressmen have urged Anthony Albanese to visit the White House in order to meet Donald Trump and save the wavering AUKUS pact. Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney are the co-chairs of the Friends of Australia Caucus, which is pushing for AUKUS to go ahead after Elbridge Colby, the US defence under-secretary for policy, announced a review of the nuclear submarine deal. McCaul said on Monday it was crucial for Albanese to develop a personal rapport with Trump. 'For (Albanese) to come to the White House would be a great gesture on the prime minister's part, that I think would go over very well,' he told the Australian Financial Review. 'That would be very sound advice for him to do that.' Meanwhile, Courtney said Albanese should highlight the significant investment Aussie companies were making in US shipyards, set to hit $4.6billion AUD. He also emphasised that Australia would pay a fair price for the several nuclear submarines set to be acquired from 2032. 'This really takes it out of the sort of America First criticism of security agreements... where President Trump felt that other countries weren't pulling their own weight,' Courtney said. 'It's a case that is very unique that the prime minister can articulate. '(Albanese) is a very personable and socially savvy person, kind of like (UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer, who does seem to have succeeded with the personal interaction.' Albanese was stood up by the US President at the G7 Summit in Canada earlier this month, and instead met with members of Trump's senior economic team. Trump left the summit early due to the Israel-Iran conflict, scotching planned meeting with several world leaders including Albanese, who has only ever spoken to the US President on the phone. The prime minister also did not attend last week's NATO Summit, where political observers had hoped he would have a second chance to meet with Trump. In a win for the US President, members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation - which Australia is not a part of - agreed at the summit to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP over 10 years. The White House later indicated it expects its allies in the Asia-Pacific - including Australia - to also increase their defence funding. This means that Albanese may be pressured to increase defence spending if he wants to shore up the AUKUS deal, and to secure a reprieve from punishing tariffs imposed by the US on imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. In this year's Budget, the Albanese government raised defence spending to 2.2 per cent of GDP, aiming for 2.3 per cent by 2034 - well short of the 3 per cent of GDP that the Trump administration has previously demanded of Australia.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'
Donald Trump on Sunday threatened to cut New York City off from federal funds if favored mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, 'doesn't behave himself' should he be elected. Mamdani, meanwhile, denied that he was – as the president said – a communist. But he reaffirmed his commitment to raise taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers while saying: 'I don't think that we should have billionaires.' In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump argued that a Mamdani victory was 'inconceivable' because he perceived the candidate to be 'a pure communist'. He added: 'Let's say this – if he does get in, I'm going to be president, and he's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money. He's got to do the right thing or they're not getting any money.' More than $100bn flows to the city from the federal government through different entities and programs, according to the city's comptroller last year. Speaking Sunday with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Mamdani said, 'no, I am not' a communist. He also said that he had 'already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am – ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for'. Mamdani said he was inspired by the US civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, who once remarked: 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.' He then reiterated his intent to raise taxes on New York's wealthiest as part of a campaign pledge 'to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods'. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality – and ultimately what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani said. 'And I look forward to work with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.' Mamdani said the proposal reflected 'a description of what we see right now'. 'It's not driven by race,' he said. 'It's more of an assessment of what neighborhoods are being undertaxed versus overtaxed. 'It is not to work backwards from a racial assessment of neighborhoods or our city. Rather, it's to ensure that we actually have an equal playing field.' Many New Yorkers and moderate Democratic politicians have expressed concern over Mamdani's win over former governor Andrew Cuomo in the 24 June primary for the Democratic nomination. Among those to endorse him was progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But he has not been endorsed by many other prominent Democratic party figures, including the New York governor, Kathy Hochul, who said coolly after his win: 'Obviously, there's areas of difference in our positions, but I also think we need to have those conversations.' Mamdani said on Sunday that he was looking forward to discussions with Hochul, saying: 'Ultimately, my policies, my vision, it's driven by an assessment of what's actually happening.' Asked if he thought moderate Democrats were afraid of him, Mamdani said: 'I think that people are catching up to this election. 'Ultimately what we're showing is that by putting working people first, by returning to the roots of the Democratic party, we actually have a path out of this moment where we're facing authoritarianism in Washington DC' under the Trump administration. In his comments on Mamdani's having secured the Democrats' nomination in the heavily Democratic city, Trump said: 'It's shocking.' 'I used to say we will never have a socialist in this country,' the president said, in part. Asked about Mamdani's proposals to oppose his administration's immigration crackdown and to arrest Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York, Trump said the mayoral candidate would 'be very unsuccessful' on both counts. 'He's a radical left lunatic,' Trump said. Mamdani, for his part, said Democrats 'need to be a party that's not just against Donald Trump – but also for something'. 'And our campaign was for working people, bringing dignity back into those lives,' Mamdani said.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
How Keir Starmer's feeble grip on power got weaker
If love means never having to say you're sorry, then the affair between Keir Starmer and the British voter is, like, so over, as the kids might say. His government sidles towards its first anniversary full of regret for mistakes made, begging for one more chance to get things right, desperate to forestall the dread words already forming on the electorate's lips: 'I really thought we could make it work, but maybe we need a break.' The prime minister's latest apologia comes in newspaper interviews in which he professes that his speech last month launching the government's white paper Restoring control over the immigration system, was a mistake because it contained the assertion that, without strict rules and a fall in the pace and scale of migration, 'we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together'. These wholly reasonable remarks were criticised by some, including within his party, as redolent of Enoch Powell's 1968 'rivers of blood' speech, in which the Tory shadow cabinet member asserted that many white Britons 'found themselves strangers in their own country' as a result of rapid Commonwealth immigration. • Keir Starmer on the benefits U-turn and his toughest week yet Until now, Starmer and his ministers have staunchly defended his words. In this latest change of heart, his explanation is that, distracted by other events, he had failed to read his text properly before delivering it. It is true that he had endured a punishing return from Ukraine. And on the morning of the speech, the porch of his former family home, occupied by a relative, had been fire-bombed. It would be churlish to discount the stress under which any prime minister lives. But I simply do not believe that anyone as diligent and smart as Starmer — who, in opposition, time and again attacked his rival Boris Johnson for 'winging it' — read out words he did not understand or mean to say. Second, the text is not a complicated treatise — it is about the length of this article. A distinguished barrister, a KC, should have been able to spot infelicities in his sleep. For example, one phrase that would instantly have stuck in the craw of an arch Remainer occurs half a dozen times: 'take back control'. Starmer must have used it knowingly and deliberately to emphasise that he would be at least as tough on Channel crossings as Nigel Farage. He knew exactly what he was saying. Third, the claim that neither he nor his speechwriters understood the echo of Powell's polemic is credible only if you think that the dozen or more ministers and aides through whose hands the text passed are all political naifs or illiterates. It is not to No 10's credit that ministers like Yvette Cooper and Seema Malhotra were sent on to the airwaves to defend their boss and have now been casually thrown under the bus. Fourth, the phrase 'an island of strangers' is a rhetorical device that dates back long before Powell. In The Strangers' Case, thought to be written by Shakespeare around 1603, Sir Thomas More enjoins the apprentices of London to refrain from attacking Flemish immigrants. But the most important issue is this: did the prime minister believe the words he read out or not? They are in plain English. I have more than a passing interest in the answer, because perhaps Starmer's writers, being young, drew on a more recent reference. Speaking after the 7/7 suicide bombings in London, which murdered 52 and maimed hundreds almost 20 years ago, the then chair of the Commission for Racial Equality said: 'We are sleepwalking our way to segregation. We are becoming strangers to each other, and we are leaving communities to be marooned outside the mainstream.' Guilty as charged. And I would not change a word of the speech I made that year. What baffles me is why the prime minister feels he needs to apologise so abjectly for making the case for integration. It matters little who used what words when; what matters is what he believes now. Last week's about turn leaves us none the wiser. It is an unusual kind of reverse ferret. For the most part, politicians retreat from unpopular positions. In this case, polling by YouGov the day after Starmer's speech showed that 41 per cent of the nation agreed both with the sentiment and the language of his remarks; 12 per cent felt uncomfortable about the words but backed their meaning. A survey of over 13,000 Britons by More In Common weeks earlier revealed that 44 per cent said they 'sometimes feel like they are strangers in their own country'. It is a sentiment shared equally by white and Asian respondents, suggesting the problem we face is no longer one of straightforward white bigotry but an even more alarming ethnic fragmentation of what was once a united kingdom. There is, of course, a simple explanation for Starmer's mea culpa, what the political strategist Lynton Crosby called a dead cat: toss it on the table and nobody pays attention to anything else — for example the Labour revolt on welfare reform. But I don't think this government is that cynical. Or that clever. • Keir Starmer's plan to win back 'authoritarian-leaning' voters Many wiseacres in political circles blame Starmer's close adviser, Morgan McSweeney, for the government's woes, accusing him of chasing Reform voters, as though this were a slightly seedy, disreputable pursuit. There is no shame in trying to win back Labour voters, unless as some in the Labour hierarchy apparently believe, Farage's double-digit lead consists largely of Tory defectors who were probably racists and have now found their natural home. They are wrong. McSweeney's task is to explain to the Labour hierarchy that if you signal to your own tribe that you find their views on immigration faintly disgusting, they'll get the message. They won't hang around. And if you lecture them that their suspicions around the costs of net zero are evidence of their inability to do sums and that they'll thank you in the long term, don't be surprised if they turn to politicians who offer them a less punishing lesson in climate science. They've read Keynes and they know that in the long run we are all dead. The damaging U-turns on winter fuel, gender identity, welfare and now immigration all point to a single conclusion: this is a government that can be pushed around by the clamour of activist there is no sign that Labour will make popular U-turns — dumping the effort to limit free speech with a fresh definition of Islamophobia, for example, or the continued showering of largesse on wealthy pensioners at the expense of hard-pressed working families. This weekend's retreat on migration is possibly the most alarming signal that this Labour administration remains, at heart, a liberal pressure group, adrift from its roots, ready to be blown hither and thither by the breeze of fashionable opinion, in office but still not in power.
