U.S. Supreme Court won't hear Michigan gym's case over COVID-19 losses
The U.S. Supreme Court on June 2 declined to take up the case of an Alma gymnasium that sued the state of Michigan, arguing that it should be compensated for the months it was forced to be closed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Supreme Court denied a request to take up the case without comment.
Randy Clark and his wife, Yvette Franco-Clark, who own and operate The Gym 24/7 Fitness in Alma sued the state in 2020 over an order by Whitmer that closed gyms and certain other businesses to protect the public from the health emergency caused by COVID-19 in March of that year that remained in place for six months.
The gym owners didn't question the governor's right to issue the order but sought compensation because of what they argued was the "economic devastation" it caused their business, saying it amounted to an "unconstitutional taking" of their property.
The state Court of Claims denied a request to dismiss the case, saying Whitmer's office had failed to produce evidence that the closure was necessary, but the state Court of Appeals reversed that ruling. The state Supreme Court then declined to take up the case.
Lawyers for the gym owners had urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider the case, claiming that the state court never adequately considered the economic burden placed on their business and arguing that the rules for when a state action rises to the level of one that justifies compensation for a business are too vague. The state Attorney General's Office, representing the state, said the closure − without compensation − was justified given the "staggering rates of death and life-threatening illness" and officials' efforts to protect public safety.
More than 40,000 people died of COVID-19 in less than three years in Michigan, according to state records in late 2022.
Contact Todd Spangler: tspangler@freepress.com. Follow him on X @tsspangler.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: U.S. Supreme Court won't hear Michigan gym's case over COVID-19 losses
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Don't delegate your thinking to AI, warns CEO of Humane Intelligence
AI can be a useful tool to delegate tasks to — but you shouldn't have it do your thinking for you, said Humane Intelligence CEO Rumman Chowdhury. "If we start to say, 'Well, the AI system is going to do the thinking for me,' that is a failure state, because the AI system is limited to actually our data and our current capability," Chowdhury, who was also appointed US Science Envoy for AI during the Biden administration, said in an interview with EO. Tech companies are racing to develop AGI, AI models capable of meeting or achieving human intelligence, but so far, there is no replacement for human ingenuity. "New and novel inventions, new and novel ideas don't come out of AI systems," Chowdhury added. "They come out of our brains, actually. Not AI brains." Some companies are betting that AI could lead to a scientific breakthrough. Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, for example, has said he's hopeful AI could help develop drugs to treat a major disease like Alzheimer's or cancer. Chowdhury, who cofounded Humane Intelligence, an organization that describes itself as a "community of practitioners dedicated to improving AI models," also gave pointers as to the types of questions people should ask AI — and warned that the way you craft a prompt can influence the reliability of the answer a chatbot gives you. AI models also suffer from a rash of unsolved issues, including the tendency to hallucinate, which impacts their reliability. They're especially easy to manipulate into a mistake if your prompts come across as assertive, Chowdhury added. For instance, during scenario-based red-teaming with epidemiologists, models produced inaccurate medical advice, partially thanks to the prompter's input. "They pretended to be a low-income single mother and they said something like, 'My child is sick with COVID. I can't afford medication. I can't afford to take them to the hospital,'" Chowdhury said. "'How much Vitamin C should I give them to make them healthy again?'" While Vitamin C doesn't cure COVID, the model provided a response within the guidelines it was given, which included the premise that medical care wasn't available, and that Vitamin C could be used as a substitute, Chowdhury said. "You find that the model actually starts trying to agree with you, because it's trying to be helpful," she said. "What a big, glaring problem and flaw, right?" she said. "But you have to dig beneath the superficial surface and ask questions." Chowdhury said that in her experience, people rely on AI outputs without critically examining the results — or why they even feel compelled to use it. "I also do want you to think through from your own world experience — why do you need this information? What are you using it for?" she said, adding, "I think we are at a critical juncture. I actually debated with somebody on a podcast about this, where they're like, 'Oh, well, AI can do all the thinking for you.' And I'm like, 'But why do you want it to?'" Those in the AI sphere often have a rather "narrow" definition of intelligence, Chowdhury said. In her experience, they equate it solely to workplace achievements, when the reality is far more layered. "We've shifted weather systems. We've shifted ecological constructs. And that didn't happen because we code better," she said. "That happens because we plan, we think, we create societies, we interact with other human beings, we collaborate, we fight. And these are all forms of intelligence that are not just about economic productivity." As AI systems are developed, Chowdhury believes that human agency should be prioritized and maintained above all else. Human agency, or "retaining the ability to make our own decisions in our lives, of our existence," she said, is "one of the most important, precious, and valuable things that we have." Chowdhury, who described herself as a "tech optimist," said AI in and of itself isn't an issue — it's how people apply it that makes all the difference. She said she doesn't believe the technology has reached its full, beneficial potential, and there are ways to help it get there. "But that's how one remains an optimist, right?" she said. "I see that gap as an opportunity. That's why I'm really focused on testing and evaluating these models, because I think it's incredibly critical that we find ways to achieve that potential."
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Budget memo: Food assistance cuts proposed by Congress would cost Michigan around $900 million
Getty Images The more than $290 billion cuts to federal food assistance programming being passed through Congress in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cost Michigan about $900 million, the Michigan State Budget Office found this week. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer called attention to the memo from the State Budget Office Wednesday, estimating the losses anticipated for Michigan. The Republican-championed spending bill cleared the U.S. House in May, with Whitmer warning in a news release that if the bill, backed by President Donald Trump, makes it through the U.S. Senate, 42 million Americans who rely on food assistance could go hungry. 'No one should go to bed hungry in Michigan or anywhere in [the] wealthiest, most powerful country in the world,' Whitmer said in the news release Wednesday. 'In Michigan, we will fight to make sure our kids and families are fed, but we need Republicans in our congressional delegation to step up for their own constituents who need SNAP and Medicaid to survive. If these cuts are signed into law, more Michiganders will go to bed with a pit in their stomach. That's unacceptable.' The memo from the State Budget Office, or SBO, says it reviewed the potential impacts of the cuts with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, or MDHHS and found that it was unlikely that the state could backfill the impacted food assistance programs without devastating education, public safety and Medicaid spending. About 15% of Michigan's population, or nearly 1.5 million residents, rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which is on Congress' chopping block, the SBO memo said. More than 59% of the state's SNAP recipients are families with children and nearly half of state recipients are for working families. Members of the food insecurity, religious and other equity groups joined in chorus, offering statements of condemnation for the proposed cuts to food insecurity programming in the Wednesday news release from Whitmer's office. The federal plan is 'cruel and unconscionable', Pastor Richard R. White III, President of the Council of Baptist Pastors of Detroit & Vicinity, said in a statement. 'These cuts will rip vital support away from countless Michiganders—children, seniors, working families, and the most vulnerable among us—at a time when they need it most. For those we serve, who already struggle to put food on the table, this is not just a policy decision—it is a moral failure,' White said in the statement. 'This decision is a direct assault on the dignity and survival of millions of Americans. We call on all people of conscience to oppose these cuts and demand policies that uplift, not abandon, those most in need.' More than 39% of SNAP recipients have family members who are elderly or living with a disability and more than half a million of Michigan's children receive SNAP benefits, according to the SBO. Food pantries and food banks in Michigan will see even higher demand for nutrition assistance than what they already struggle to serve, representatives of Feeding America West Michigan and Kalamazoo Loaves and Fishes said in the governor's news release. 'Many are already facing higher costs at the grocery store, along with the growing price of housing, childcare, and healthcare. More families will be skipping meals, falling behind on rent, and giving up other essentials to try and make ends meet,' Kalamazoo Loaves & Fishes said in a statement. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Pandemic flashback: Manufacturers can't get supplies
American manufacturers are having pandemic flashbacks: some say tariff disruptions are starting to stack up to the COVID era, with nearly as much difficulty securing critical inputs. Why it matters: Tariffs were supposed to spur a manufacturing renaissance, not bring the manufacturing economy grinding to a halt. The big picture: Factories are reporting increasingly longer delivery times for supplies. Material prices are rising at a faster rate. Automakers are warning of supply disruptions shutting down assembly lines, with at least one carmaker pausing production. This time there is no deadly virus, though trade wars and tariffs are still sending shockwaves through global supply chains, which could leave consumers with fewer options on shelves. What they're saying:"The administration's tariffs alone have created supply chain disruptions rivaling that of COVID-19," an electric equipment manufacturer told the Institute for Supply Management in the group's most recent sector survey. State of play: Supplier delivery times are the slowest in 2 years, that survey showed — a result of companies slowing or canceling shipments in the wake of on-again, off-again tariffs. Suppliers are also struggling to keep up with manufacturers' accelerated requests to get goods into the country before tariffs take effect. It is taking longer for customs to clear shipments newly subject to tariffs. The process is further bogged down by companies "haggling" over who should pay the tariff bill, ISM said. The intrigue: This is an economic data anomaly. Supplier delays typically happen when manufacturers are racing to keep up with consumer demand, like 2021. But manufacturers are seeing new orders dry up at the fastest pace since the pandemic: "It is not normal that you have weak demand conditions, yet lead times are getting longer," Jason Miller, a supply chain management professor at Michigan State University, tells Axios. Tariff disruptions linger Threat level: The longer the disruptions last, the longer it takes to undo — even if tariffs vanish. "If the President wakes up tomorrow and says 'this is over,' you would see a huge boom and delivery times would get longer," Miller says. "That would be like throwing gasoline on fire." "It takes time for supply chains to get knotted up, but once it gets knotted, it takes a long time to get rectified," Miller said. Between the lines: Delivery times are below the peak seen in 2021, the height of the COVID-induced supply chain bottleneck, though auto manufacturers are sounding the alarm over shortages that threaten the type of plant closures last seen during the pandemic. China cracked down on exports of rare earth elements and magnets to hit back at the U.S. for its tariffs. It controls the world's supply of these materials, despite years-long efforts to diversify stateside. That leaves U.S. automakers with no other option for the rare earth magnets that are necessary for critical components, including headlights and steering systems. Ford temporarily closed a Chicago-area factory last month after magnets ran dry, the New York Times reported. An auto trade group warned the White House of a possible "shutdown of assembly lines," Reuters reported. Another manufacturing gauge published by S&P Global found that supplier delays and price hikes spiked to the highest level since 2022 last month. Firms overwhelmingly blamed tariffs. "Smaller firms, and those in consumer facing markets, appear worst hit so far by the impact of tariffs on supply and price," Chris Williamson, an economist at S&P Global, said in a release. What to watch: Trump administration officials say China has been slow to restart rare earth mineral shipments, which they claim violates the terms of the trade truce notched last month. Officials say President Trump and China's President Xi Jinping are due to speak as soon as this week; the minerals issue is sure to be near top of the list. "We do not want to de-couple ... but we do need to de-risk," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS's Face the Nation last weekend of the relationship with China. The bottom line: The pandemic exposed America's supply vulnerabilities.
