Public support for Israel in western Europe at lowest ever recorded by YouGov
Public support and sympathy for Israel in western Europe has hit the lowest level ever recorded by YouGov, the pollster has said, with fewer than a fifth of respondents in six countries holding a favourable opinion of the country.
As negotiations over a US ceasefire proposal continue, Israel's offensive in Gaza – resumed after it broke a previous ceasefire in mid-March – has been ramped up, accompanied by a humanitarian blockade that has led to famine-like conditions.
More than 54,000 people have been killed in Gaza since Israel launched its war on the besieged Palestinian territory on 7 October 2023, in retaliation for the Hamas attack on the same day in which the group killed about 1,200 people and took 250 hostages.
The survey found net favourability towards Israel in Germany (-44), France (-48) and Denmark (-54) was the lowest since polling on the question began in 2016, while in Italy (-52) and Spain (-55) it was also at its lowest or joint lowest, albeit from 2021.
In the UK, net favourability was at -46, a fraction higher than its low of -49 late last year.
Overall, only between 13% and 21% of respondents in any country polled had a favourable view of Israel, compared with 63%-70% whose views were unfavourable.
Similarly, of all six countries surveyed, only between 6% (Italy) and 16% (France) agreed that Israel 'was right to send troops into Gaza and has generally responded in a proportionate way to the Hamas attacks', down on an earlier survey last October. The figure for the UK was 12%.
Between 29% (Italy) and 40% (Germany), on the other hand, agreed that Israel was 'right to send troops into Gaza, but has gone too far and caused too many civilian casualties'. The UK figure was 38%. Between 12% (Germany) and 24% (Italy) – with the UK on 15% – felt Israel should not have gone into the territory at all.
The Eurotrack survey showed fewer and fewer western Europeans still see Israel's continuing military operations in Gaza as justified: only about a quarter of respondents in France, Germany and Denmark (24%-25%), compared with 18% in Britain and just 9% in Italy.
At the same time, the number of respondents who said they thought the Hamas attacks of October 2023 were justified continues to be low in each country, ranging from 5% to 9% – although it has increased marginally in the UK (from 5% to 6%) and Italy (from 6% to 8%).
The polling also found that fewer people now say they 'side' with Israel. Between 7% and 18% of respondents said they sympathised more with the Israeli side – the lowest or joint-lowest figure in five of the six countries surveyed since the Hamas attacks.
By contrast, between 18% and 33% of respondents said they sympathised more with the Palestinian side – figures that have increased in all six countries since 2023. Only in Germany were the figures for each side similar (17% for Israel; 18% for Palestine).
Perhaps unsurprisingly, most western Europeans believe permanent peace in the Middle East remains a distant prospect. The French were the most optimistic that this may happen in the next 10 years, but even then only 29% said they believed it.
The Danes were the least optimistic, at about 15%. Across all six countries surveyed, expectations that a lasting peace was realistically possible have fallen by between four and 10 percentage points since late 2023.
Such views are not confined to Europe. Polling by the Pew Research Centre in April found that US views of Israel had turned more negative over the past three years, with more than half of US adults (53%) now expressing an unfavourable opinion of Israel, up from 42% in March 2022.
A Data for Progress survey last month found 51% of voters opposed to Israel's plans to send more troops into Gaza and relocate Palestinians, while 51% thought Donald Trump should 'demand that Israel agree to a ceasefire'. About 31% believed he should instead 'support Israel's military operation'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Free school meals for half a million of England's poorest children
An extra half a million children will benefit from a free meal every school day after the government announced a major expansion of the policy, which they said would lift 100,000 pupils out of poverty and put an extra £500 in parents' pockets. From the start of the 2026 school year, every child whose household is on universal credit will be entitled to free school meals, the government announced on Thursday. Since 2018, children have only been eligible for free school meals if their household income is less than £7,400 per year, meaning hundreds of thousands of children living in poverty have been unable to access them. As of January last year, nearly 2.1 million children in England were eligible for free school meals. The Department for Education claimed that the expansion will lift 100,000 children across England out of poverty. It comes two years after The Independent 's Feed the Future campaign, in which we called for free school meals to be extended to all schoolchildren in England – both primary and secondary – who lived in households on universal credit but missed out on free school meals. The latest move will be seen as a major concession to Labour MPs who are concerned about the direction of the government, with rebellion brewing over the party's upcoming welfare cuts and calls for Sir Keir Starmer to scrap the two-child benefit cap. The chancellor Rachel Reeves also announced on Wednesday that more people will get fuel payments 'this winter' as she pledged to raise the level of the means test. Announcing the expansion of free school meals, education secretary Bridget Phillipson said 'background shouldn't mean destiny', adding: 'Today's historic step will help us to deliver excellence everywhere, for every child and give more young people the chance to get on in life.' She continued: 'It is the moral mission of this government to tackle the stain of child poverty, and today this government takes a giant step towards ending it with targeted support that puts money back in parents' pockets.' The move was welcomed by campaigners and unions, with the Child Poverty Action Group saying it will be a 'game-changer for children and families'. Kate Anstey, head of education policy the campaign group, said: 'At last more kids will get the food they need to learn and thrive and millions of parents struggling to make ends meet will get a bit of breathing space. 'We hope this is a sign of what's to come in autumn's child poverty strategy, with the government taking more action to meet its manifesto commitment to reduce child poverty in the UK." Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union, said the expansion of free school meals eligibility was a 'necessary and overdue first step' that would help address child hunger in schools. He said the current threshold, which had been unchanged since 2018, meant 'hundreds of thousands of children in poverty were missing out on the nutrition they need to thrive'. Mr Kebede added: 'As teachers, our members know the positive impact of children eating and learning together – how it breaks down stigma and inequality, and ensures greater community cohesion. Ensuring that a free school meal is available to all children is the next urgent step that must be taken.' Meanwhile, Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, welcomed the move to expand free school meals to all families on universal credit, saying 'no child should ever have to go hungry due to their parents' financial circumstances'. But he also called for auto-enrolment and wider support to tackle the broader impact of poverty on children's education. Children's commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza echoed his call, urging the government to make sure every eligible child is 'automatically enrolled for free school meals, rather than putting the onus on parents to sign up'. 'When children talk to me about their family lives, I am struck by how acutely aware they are of their parents' worries and of the impact these have on their daily lives - and their education', she said. 'That's why we need solutions that reflect children's experiences, reduce the shame too many have told me they feel about their circumstances, and break the link between their backgrounds and their opportunities, by giving them communities that are safe, supportive and aspirational.' Last week, The Independent revealed that demand for help from baby banks from parents struggling to feed their children has surged by more than one-third in a year, amid record -high levels of child poverty. New data showed that more than 3.5 million essential items were handed out in 2024, including nappies, clothes and cots – an increase of 143 per cent on the previous year. The announcement came just hours after Sir Keir sidestepped questions over the two-child benefit cap, amid growing calls for him to lift the limit. Critics of the policy say removing it would be the most effective way of tackling child poverty amid warnings that as many as 100 children are pulled into poverty every day by the limit. However, it is thought the cap will not be lifted until the government publishes its child poverty strategy, which has now been delayed until the autumn. Grilled on the policy at Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir said he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty but declined to give further details ahead of the publication of the government's strategy.
North Wales Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire
The resolution before the UN's most powerful body also did not condemn Hamas's deadly attack in Israel on October 7 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other US demands. The 14 other members of the 15-nation council voted in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. The US vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, again because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a US proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable'.
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US vetoes resolution for unconditional Gaza ceasefire at UN security council
The United States has vetoed a United Nations security council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza while the 14 remaining countries on the council voted in favour. The vetoed resolution also called the situation in Gaza 'catastrophic', and demanded the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale, including by the UN and humanitarian partners'. It was the fifth time that the US has vetoed a security council draft ceasefire resolution in order to protect Israel. Washington vetoed a similar resolution in November, under the Biden administration, on the grounds that the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas. The text was co-sponsored by Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Somalia. Russia, China, France and the UK also voted in favour. The US representative, Dorothy Shea, called the draft resolution 'unacceptable' saying that the United States 'would not support any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza'. Israel also welcomed the US veto. 'I thank @POTUS and the U.S. administration for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council,' wrote Gideon Saar, Israel's minister of foreign affairs. 'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal.' The UK supported the resolution. In a statement, its ambassador, Barbara Woodward, called Israel's new aid system 'inhumane' and said that Israel 'needs to end its restrictions on aid now'. 'This Israeli government's decisions to expand its military operations in Gaza and severely restrict aid are unjustifiable, disproportionate and counterproductive,' she said. 'And the UK completely opposes them.' The resolution was put up for a vote as the UN and aid agencies have warned of famine conditions in Gaza after a protracted embargo on aid and the shambolic rollout of a US- and Israeli-backed scheme called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). 'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' said the UN relief chief, Tom Fletcher, on Wednesday. GHF, which has murky political backing and funding, announced that its distribution centres in Gaza would remain closed for a second day on Thursday morning. At least 27 people were killed and hundreds injured on Tuesday by Israeli fire as they waited for food at a GHF distribution point. Woodward, the UK permanent representative to the UN, voiced support for a UN call for 'an immediate and independent investigation into these events and for perpetrators to be held accountable'. 'Israel needs to end its restrictions on aid now: let the UN and humanitarians do their job to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,' she said.
