
Judge dismisses some counts in suit alleging abuse by SSD teacher, allows others
A federal judge allowed a lawsuit alleging abuse of a disabled student by a Scranton School District special education teacher to proceed on some counts, but dismissed others.
U.S. District Judge Karoline Mehalchick did not rule on the credibility of the suit's allegations concerning teacher Erica Stolan or others named in the civil complaint attorneys Joseph Grady and Todd O'Malley filed in U.S. District Court in February 2024 on behalf of the student and his parents. In addition to Stolan, it named the school district, South Scranton Intermediate School Principal Joseph Lalli, former Principal Daniel Gilroy and district Director of Special Education Ann Genett as defendants.
Among other claims, the plaintiffs allege that the student with multiple disabilities, including autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, was assaulted by Stolan in her classroom at South Scranton Intermediate School. The complaint specifically alleges that Stolan sprayed liquid in the child's face on Jan. 2, 2023, then, a day later, shoved him out of his chair and directed and encouraged other special education students to forcibly remove him from the classroom.
A behavior support professional witnessed the alleged conduct and reported it to Gilroy in writing, according to the complaint, which notes a ChildLine report originated from the district and district officials removed Stolan from the school on Jan. 4, 2023. But Stolan, now a special education teacher at Charles Sumner Elementary School, was allowed to return to the intermediate school in the spring of 2023, according to the complaint.
The plaintiffs contend Stolan's conduct was 'open, widespread and known' by district staff and administrators and that the district, its officers and employees allowed her abusive behavior to continue 'unabated and unsupervised.'
Attorneys representing the district and other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in April 2024, arguing the 13 separate counts in the plaintiffs' complaint should be dismissed for a variety of reasons. Among other arguments, they contended that Stolan and the other defendants are immune from liability, the court lacks jurisdiction in the case and the plaintiffs aren't entitled to punitive damages.
In their motion, attorneys John Freund, the district's solicitor, and Alyssa Hicks argued the court lacks jurisdiction because the plaintiffs failed to exhaust 'administrative remedies' available under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. They also argued the plaintiffs didn't specify how the actions of the individual defendants 'demonstrate that they knew their actions violated (the student's) rights' and failed to establish that the student's disability 'was the cause of the denial of benefits.'
In an order late last month, Mehalchick dismissed several of the complaint's 13 counts, some with prejudice and some without, but allowed others to proceed.
For example, the judge denied the defendants' motion to dismiss certain federal claims alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, allowing those counts to continue. She also denied a motion to dismiss a separate count alleging violations of rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, allowing that claim to proceed while declining during the pleading stage of the civil action to address the defendants' claims of qualified immunity.
It is 'premature' at this point to determine whether Stolan and the other defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, the judge's order notes.
But Mehalchick did dismiss a pair of counts against individual defendants other than Stolan, noting in her order that the plaintiffs failed to allege in the relevant counts 'willful misconduct' by those individuals 'beyond mere deliberate indifference.' She also dismissed the same counts against the school district, finding that the Pennsylvania Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, which shields government agencies from liability for actions committed by their employees under certain circumstances, bars those counts.
The judge denied a motion to dismiss several counts against Stolan, including counts alleging assault and battery and the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
'Please understand that the judge did not find anyone liable,' Freund said in a recent statement to the newspaper. 'The decision merely means that the plaintiff's complaint stated sufficient allegations for the case to move forward.'
Robert Moran, an attorney for the plaintiffs, also issued a statement addressing the judge's order.
'We are pleased with Judge Mehalchick's thorough and well-reasoned opinion,' he said. 'The facts underlying the allegations should shock every parent, particularly those with children suffering a disability. We look forward to this case proceeding.'
Mehalchick also did not dismiss the plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages in the case, noting such a dismissal would not be appropriate 'at this preliminary stage of litigation.' She also granted the plaintiffs an opportunity to file an amended complaint to potentially cure deficiencies related to claims dismissed without prejudice.
The plaintiffs are still evaluating whether to file an amended complaint, Moran said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

3 hours ago
Jury awards more than $500,000 to Guatemalan men who said they were exploited on Michigan farms
DETROIT -- A jury has awarded more than $500,000 to five men from Guatemala who said they were exploited and underpaid by a labor contractor that brought them to Michigan to plant and harvest fruit and vegetables. Much of the verdict last week — $450,000 — was in the form of punitive damages against Purpose Point Harvesting for violating an antitrafficking law. Interpreters translated Spanish to English as the five men testified in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids. They recalled three seasons as laborers who handled asparagus, apples, cherries and other crops in Oceana and Newaygo counties, from 2017-19. They sometimes worked 100 hours a week but never got paid for more than 60, wore headlights to pick asparagus after midnight and slept on couches, attorney Teresa Hendricks said Wednesday. 'They were told if they didn't like it, it was better than what they could earn in Guatemala,' she said. 'They're some of the bravest men I know,' Hendricks added. 'They had to come to this country to stand up for their values and speak the truth in a strange courtroom, in a town they're not familiar with, in front of a jury and lay it out bare.' An attorney for Purpose Point said other workers contradicted the claims. 'Ultimately the jury makes a decision based on the facts they're allowed to see. We still deny the allegations and look forward to the appeals,' Robert Alvarez said. The men entered the U.S. under a federal program, known as H-2A, that allows farms to use foreign labor if they can't find domestic workers. Purpose Point serves as a middleman, recruiting people to fill jobs at Michigan farms and handling payroll. The head of the company is a native of the Malacatán area in Guatemala, the workers' same home region, Hendricks said. She said it's difficult to find foreign farmworkers who are willing to speak up about wages and working conditions. Hendricks recalled meeting one of the men in a cornfield late at night. 'The retaliation of being deported early, losing their jobs and visas — those were all real fears,' she said.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iowa egg supplier denies allegations of human trafficking, harassment
An Iowa industrial egg supplier is denying allegations that it engaged in human trafficking or threatened immigrant workers with deportation in retaliation for their complaints. In March, attorneys for six Guatemalan citizens sued Iowa's Centrum Valley Farms and company manager Jose Cornejo in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. The plaintiffs, all of whom lived in Belmond, Eagle Grove, Clarion or Webster City while working for Centrum Valley Farms, seeks unspecified damages for harassment, discrimination and retaliation; wrongful discharge; human trafficking related to forced labor; violations of wage-and-hour laws related to overtime pay; and violations of the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act. The plaintiffs — Kenny Augusto Tetzaguic Lux, Gerver Noel Marroquin Argueta, Isaias Tevalan Lopez, Consuelo Esperanza Lux Tepaz, Cecilia Angelica Bernal Cobo and Juan Carlos Tetzaguic Lux – claim Centrum Valley Farms recruited them to work at the company's Clarion egg farm and packaging facility and helped them obtain work-authorization documents from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, with Cornejo acting as their supervisor. On a daily basis, Cornejo, who is Mexican, made 'repeated unwelcome comments disparaging the plaintiffs for their Guatemalan national origin,' the lawsuit claims. Cornejo is accused of telling the plaintiffs all Guatemalans were lazy and that he wanted to replace them with Mexicans or Americans. When the Guatemalans complained about Cornejo to other managers, the lawsuit claims, the harassment allegedly grew worse with Cornejo threatening to have them deported. 'Cornejo even brought a firearm to work, showed it to the plaintiffs, and displayed it in his office to intimidate the plaintiffs and silence their complaints,' the lawsuit claims. Cornejo also is accused of threatening to turn the Guatemalans in to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement if they tried to voluntarily leave their positions at the company. The company eventually terminated the Guatemalans' employment 'in retaliation for their complaints,' the lawsuit adds. On Jan. 25, 2023, Cornejo allegedly brought a firearm to his office and displayed it on his desk to intimidate Lux and the other Guatemalans, according to the lawsuit. One of the other plaintiffs alleges Cornejo referred to him as his 'faithful dog,' his 'slave' and as his 'Guatemalan wetback,' while making him apply pesticides in chicken houses without the necessary protective equipment. In response to the lawsuit, Centrum Valley Farms has denied any wrongdoing and claimed more than a dozen affirmative defenses. For example, the company alleges the plaintiffs failed to take advantage of corrective or preventative opportunities to avoid any harm, and that the Guatemalans' claims of harassment are barred because the workers cannot show that any such conduct was so severe or pervasive that it affected their employment. To the extent that any discriminatory or retaliatory conduct was committed by an employee of Centrum Valley Farms, the company states, the conduct fell outside the scope of the employee's authority and was contrary to Centrum Valley Farm's 'good-faith efforts to comply with state and federal law.' A trial date has yet to be scheduled. Find this story at Iowa Capital Dispatch, which is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions:kobradovich@ This story was updated to add a video. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Centrum Valley Farms in Iowa denies allegations of human trafficking

Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted following ICE protest
A grand jury indicted Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) on a trio of charges, interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba said Tuesday. The indictment continues the Trump administration's legal attacks against opponents of its immigration policies. And it comes as the administration has sent troops into Los Angeles over immigration protests. The indictment is a required step for prosecutors to keep pressing felony charges announced last month following a scuffle outside an immigration detention facility in Newark involving McIver, two other Democratic members of the New Jersey congressional delegation, the city's mayor and a group of federal law enforcement agents. The three counts, which allege McIver forcibly interfered with law enforcement officials, come with a maximum sentence of 17 years in prison. 'As I have stated in the past, it is my Constitutional obligation as the Chief Federal Law Enforcement Officer for New Jersey to ensure that our federal partners are protected when executing their duties,' Habba said in a social media post. 'While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve.' In response, McIver said the legal case was 'an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do.' 'The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation,' she said in a statement. The indictment follows a previously announced pair of charges against McIver. It was not immediately available on Tuesday night from a website for the federal courts. Habba's office previously charged Mayor Ras Baraka with a misdemeanor trespassing charge that it has since dropped. A federal judge criticized Habba's office for 'worrisome' and 'embarrassing' blunders in that case. Baraka is now suing Habba. Habba's announcement of the indictment came as polls in the New Jersey gubernatorial primary were about to close, with Baraka on the ballot as a Democratic candidate for governor. A criminal complaint that telegraphed the indictment, filed last month in U.S. District Court in Newark, alleged McIver 'slammed her forearm' into one agent and 'forcibly' grabbed him after they moved to arrest Baraka. The mayor had been invited into a gated area then told to leave it. After he left the gated area, the indictment alleges McIver went outside towards the agents and attempted to thwart the arrest. McIver was also accused of using 'each of her forearms to forcibly strike' another officer, according to the previous complaint, which included multiple photos from video cameras worn by officers, as well as others mounted outside the facility. Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez were also there. Menendez said he saw an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shove McIver, a moment which was also filmed. The new charges add a misdemeanor count that appears to cover McIver's alleged interference with other federal officers during the May 9 incident beyond the two identified in the criminal complaint last month. While the Justice Department under President Donald Trump has publicly vowed not to engage in plea bargains in some cases, Habba's post Tuesday did not say her office would push for McIver's conviction on all charges. Instead, she called the indictment 'the next step in a process that my office will pursue to a just end.'