Trump's former surgeon general is now one his most pointed critics
Jerome Adams, President Trump's first-term surgeon general, is becoming one of the most prominent voices speaking out against the public health policies and decisions carried out in the president's second term.
Adams, known as a relatively low-profile member of the Trump administration during his tenure, has in recent weeks gone on something of a media campaign against the White House's health care choices.
During the pandemic, Adams at times broke from Trump, such as when the president downplayed the death toll of SARS-CoV-2 or suggested injecting bleach to combat infections.
But now that he's on the outside looking in, the criticism is becoming more frequent.
Adams has made veiled criticisms against Trump's latest surgeon general nominee, and he's spoken out directly against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to fire every member of a key vaccine advisory panel.
The ex-surgeon general has focused his criticism on the lack of credentials of those being placed in top administration positions and what that might mean for public health.
'While I typically try to focus on policies over personalities, it has become necessary to directly address the role of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the head of HHS,' Adams said when reached by The Hill.
'His position means he is directly involved in shaping the policies that affect national and global public health, which is why my most recent Times op-ed and social media posts specifically mention him,' he added. 'However, I remain focused on the broader implications of these policies rather than solely on RFKs motivations and actions as an individual.'
The Adams criticism has been on a few different topics.
Casey Means
Soon after Trump replaced Janette Nesheiwat with Casey Means as his surgeon general nominee, Adams took to social media to highlight how Means lacks the credentials of past surgeon generals.
Means co-founded Levels, a health technology company that focuses on tracking health information through devices, after leaving a five-year residency program in Oregon. Means then garnered a large following online by expounding on health information aligning with the Make America Healthy Again movement.
She is also the sister of Calley Means, who works as an adviser to Kennedy in the Department of Health and Human Services.
Opponents of Means's nomination have highlighted her decision to not complete her residency program as well as her medical license having lapsed. Both Trump and Kennedy have backed Means, though Trump has acknowledged he does not know her well.
Adams has repeatedly argued for maintaining certain standards for the position.
'The Surgeon General's position as a trusted public health authority and physician makes full training and licensure a critical expectation in addition to an implicit legal requirement,' he wrote on the X after Means was nominated.
While initially careful not to mention Means by name, Adams has since made it clear that he does not support her nomination.
'I do not know and have nothing against Dr. Means – but I feel strongly that the person who is leading America's Public Health Service should be held to the same standard as the people he or she is leading,' Adams said online.
In an op-ed published by Stat, Adams, a licensed anesthesiologist, noted the past four confirmed U.S. surgeon generals had extensive experience and training relevant to public health policy. Adams before his own confirmation obtained a master's degree in public health and was the health commissioner for Indiana.
'Given the critical nature of this role, it is imperative that the surgeon general possess the requisite qualifications and experience,' he wrote. 'While the president has the prerogative to nominate individuals for public office, the Senate holds the responsibility to confirm these appointments.'
Adams isn't the only former surgeon general to oppose Means. One of his predecessors, Richard Carmona who served under former President George W. Bush, said in an op-ed for The Hill that confirming Means to the position would 'undermine the office.'
'We owe it to the American people — and to those who built the Public Health Service on a tradition of merit and mission — to demand the very best,' wrote Carmona. 'Our health, our security and our future depend on it.'
In the face of backlash, Kennedy has highlighted Means's atypical background as an asset rather than a disadvantage.
'She walked away from traditional medicine because she was not curing patients,' Kennedy told Fox News anchor Brett Baier. 'She couldn't get anybody within her profession to look at the nutrition contributions to illness, and she said, 'If we're really going to heal people, if we're healers, we can't just be making our life about billing new procedures.''
Derailed vaccine policy
When Kennedy announced he was getting rid of the entire sitting Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Adams was quick to denounce the decision.
In an op-ed for Time published the day after the firings, Adams specifically cited Kennedy's pledge that, 'We won't take away anyone's vaccines.'
He cited the ACIP firings along with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) new framework limiting access to COVID-19 vaccines and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer recommending the shot for children and pregnant women.
'ACIP has been a trusted, science-driven body that ensures vaccines are safe and effective, saving countless lives through its transparent recommendations. Its members, rigorously vetted for expertise and conflicts of interest, provide independent guidance critical to public health. Removing them without clear evidence of misconduct risks replacing qualified scientists with less experienced voices,' he wrote.
On social media, he shared concerns he's received that 'HHS officials may have committed perjury during confirmation hearings.' Though he didn't name anyone specific, he did repost epidemiologist and health economist Eric Feigl-Ding who accused Kennedy of telling 'lies, damn lies.'
'We are witnessing what appears to be a coordinated effort to dismantle the United States' vaccine infrastructure,' Adams told The Hill. 'This trend, which began with changes at the FDA, is now extending to the CDC and encompasses issues beyond just COVID-19 vaccines.'
'I have heard concerns from health and medical colleagues, Republican donors, and individuals on Capitol Hill regarding the direction we are headed, and am trying to help give voice to those concerns,' he added.
Kennedy on Wednesday announced eight new picks to replace the 17 ACIP members he fired. Among them were some noted spreaders of COVID-19 misinformation.
Adams has also expressed ethical concerns about Kennedy's new rule requiring placebo-controlled trials for new vaccines.
'If a vaccine for a serious disease (e.g., measles, polio) already exists and is proven effective, giving participants a placebo instead of the vaccine could expose them to preventable harm or death. This violates ethical principles like 'do no harm' outlined in documents such as the Declaration of Helsinki,' he wrote on X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
10 minutes ago
Judge extends block on Trump ban prohibiting Harvard students from entering US
A temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump barring foreign Harvard University students from entering the U.S. will remain in effect until next Monday while a federal judge considers arguments made for a preliminary injunction. The temporary block was due to expire on Thursday before being extended Monday by U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs. Harvard's lawyers argued Trump's proclamation violates its First Amendment rights and is outside the authority of the executive branch. Listing the actions taken by the government against Harvard in recent weeks, attorney Ian Gershengorn argued in a court hearing Monday in Boston that the move was retaliation and viewpoint discrimination against the institution. Gershengorn argued the president is not restricting entry, but instead limiting what you do and who you associate with after you enter. The permissible way to classify a class of aliens is based on the character of the alien, he argued. The government pushed back, arguing the administration does not "trust" Harvard and that it did not monitor the "aliens" that it brought into the U.S. The government said bringing in foreigners is a privilege not a right, according to Tiberius Davis, counsel to the assistant attorney general. "We don't trust Harvard to vet, host, monitor or discipline" foreigners, Davis argued. Davis also raised concerns about Harvard's "foreign entanglements" with the Chinese government and said it did not provide sufficient information to the government on foreign students -- which Harvard has denied. Harvard University filed the lawsuit against the government after U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced it was canceling Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which would bar the school from enrolling foreign students. The suit was later amended to include the proclamation and Harvard moved to request a second block on Trump's proclamation. That would have gone into effect for at least six months before it was blocked by Burroughs. The judge questioned arguments made by the government over its concerns about Harvard that motivated the proclamation. "I can't imagine that anything that you just described applies only to Harvard," Burroughs said. Davis argued the government is free to investigate other institutions and said that "a lot of these other universities are willing to" do more to address issues on campus. Davis also argued that different government agencies chose to terminate grants with Harvard because they believed the institution was not following the law, saying that move was not retaliation either. Davis also said Harvard is not being singled out with grant terminations because other institutions have suffered the same. The government argued it is not singling out Harvard, but rather other institutions have been more willing to take action to address issues on campus, while Harvard has not, Davis said. "There's a lack of evidence of retaliation here," Davis said in court. Burroughs said if the point is to root out antisemitism, "Why aren't we letting in people from Israel?" Davis argued antisemitism was just one part of the issue, along with foreign entanglements and not providing sufficient information to the government. Because of their other conduct on campus and their inattentiveness to it "we don't trust them," Davis said. "They don't have to pull over everybody who's speeding. Frankly they can't do that," Davis said. Pushing back on arguments that it did not monitor its students, Harvard said it is the government's responsibility to vet students being allowed into the country. "The vetting is done by the State Department in their visa process," Gershengorn said. At one point in the Monday hearing, the judge asked Harvard's attorneys why it did not name the president in its lawsuit, asking if he needed to appear in this case. Gershengorn said it sued the people who are tasked with implementing the proclamation. Gershengorn argued Trump's usage of the proclamation to block entry of foreign Harvard students is a "vast new authority to regulate the domestic conduct of domestic institutions," a departure from how this proclamation has been used in the past. Gershengorn said it has been used to block the entry of individuals or nationals of a country that have "done something bad." The question is not whether the action is lawful or not, Gershengorn argued. If lawful action is taken as a First Amendment-motivated action, it is no longer lawful, he added. Gershengorn said what Harvard has suffered over the last two months is probably the most "irregular" and "improper" action any institution has suffered. Harvard pushed back against claims there is widespread violence on campus, saying the story the government cites identified two incidents of violence on the basis of religion. The government is "throwing things at the wall to see what sticks," Gershengorn said. Harvard has alleged that the administration is in an "escalating campaign of retaliation" against the school. After Harvard publicly refused to comply with demands made by the Trump administration, the administration responded by freezing more than $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to the school.
San Francisco Chronicle
13 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump fires Democratic commissioner of independent agency that oversees nuclear safety
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has fired a Democratic commissioner for the federal agency that oversees nuclear safety as he continues to assert more control over independent regulatory agencies. Christopher Hanson, a former chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said in a statement Monday that Trump terminated his position as NRC commissioner without cause, 'contrary to existing law and longstanding precedent regarding removal of independent agency appointees.' The firing of Hanson comes as Trump seeks to take authority away from the independent safety agency, which has regulated the U.S. nuclear industry for five decades. Trump signed executive orders in May intended to quadruple domestic production of nuclear power within the next 25 years, a goal experts say the United States is highly unlikely to reach. To speed up the development of nuclear power, the orders grant the U.S. energy secretary authority to approve some advanced reactor designs and projects. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told reporters that 'all organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction' and that the Republican president reserves the right to remove employees within the executive branch who exert his executive authority. Trump fired two of the three Democratic commissioners at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, an independent federal agency responsible for enforcing federal laws that prohibit discrimination in the workplace. In a similar move, two National Labor Relations Board members were fired. Willie Phillips, a Democratic member and former chairman of the independent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, stepped down in April, telling reporters that the White House asked him to do so. Trump also signed an executive order to give the White House direct control of independent federal regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission. New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the the House Energy and Commerce Committee, called Hanson's firing illegal and another attempt by Trump to undermine independent agencies and consolidate power in the White House. 'Congress explicitly created the NRC as an independent agency, insulated from the whims of any president, knowing that was the only way to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the American people," Pallone said in a statement. Senate Democrats also said Trump overstepped his authority. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, Patty Murray and Martin Heinrich said in a joint statement that 'Trump's lawlessness' threatens the commission's ability to ensure that nuclear power plants and nuclear materials are safe and free from political interference. Hanson was nominated to the commission by Trump in 2020. He was appointed chair by President Joe Biden in January 2021 and served in that role until Trump's inauguration to a second term as president. Trump selected David Wright, a Republican member of the commission, to serve as chair. Hanson continued to serve on the NRC as a commissioner. His term was due to end in 2029. Wright's term expires on June 30. The White House has not said if he will be reappointed. Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, called Hanson a dedicated public servant and a strong supporter of the NRC's public health and safety mission. Firing Hanson is Trump's 'latest outrageous move to undermine the independence and integrity' of the agency that protects the U.S. homeland from nuclear power plant disasters, Lyman said in a statement. The NRC confirmed Hanson's service ended on Friday, bringing the panel to two Democrats and two Republicans. The commission has functioned in the past with fewer than the required five commissioners and will continue to do so, the statement said. ___
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Immigration Raids Deepen Construction's $10.8 Billion Labor Crisis
Building walls breaks industry. Protests erupt over President Trump's immigration crackdowns. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes) President Trump's fortune rose from building glitzy towers brandishing his name. His political star ascended by railing against illegal immigration. But construction, his original cash cow, leans on those immigrants' labor, whether they are documented, or not. Immigrants make up 34% of the construction workforce, according to the Associated General Contractors of America. In states like California, Texas, New Jersey, Florida, Georgia and New York, they account for about half. Construction drives 4.5% of U.S. gross domestic product, making it the country's tenth largest industry. Broaden the view and the impact grows. Residential housing, once you include rent and utility payments, fuels 15 to 18% of GDP, according to the National Association of Home Builders. Add commercial building to the mix and construction rises to the top of the chart. That reliance on foreign born workers is now a growing risk. The trades were already short on workers, with too few young people entering the field to meet demand. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids are making the gap worse. Builders across the country are bracing for deeper shortages, higher costs and delayed projects. The pain will not be spread evenly. Big firms with market clout will find ways to adapt. Small builders and contractors may not. The roots of the construction labor shortage run deep. 'We lost about a million and a half workers during the Great Recession,' says Robert Dietz, chief economist at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), a trade group that represents builders of single-family and multi-family housing. Many of those workers left the industry and never came back. Since then, fewer young people have entered the trades, with more choosing college instead. Competition from other industries, including a fracking boom in the mid-2010s, pulled more workers away. Meanwhile, productivity growth in construction has lagged far behind the rest of the economy, leaving builders trying to do more with fewer hands. What we've ended up with is 'a persistent shortage of workers,' Dietz says, and longer build times that are, according to a recent Home Builders Institute study, already adding $10.8 billion in costs to the market each year while reducing single family home construction by 19,000 units in 2024 alone. Yet, even as the industry struggles to attract enough workers, construction offers wages that outpace many comparable fields. 'Construction is not low paying compared to other jobs that require the same education or training level,' says Ken Simonson, chief economist at the Associated General Contractors of America. On average, construction workers earn about 19% more than other production and non-supervisory workers, Simonson says, a gap that has widened in recent years as firms compete for scarce labor. High wages, however, do little to ease the disruption caused by worksite ICE raids. Small builders are already feeling the strain. David Knott and Saul Alvarez, co-owners of San Francisco Remodel, said the crackdown has shaken their workforce. Three workers they had hired in the past were recently deported. The fear has spread across their job sites. Some workers now avoid certain tasks or stay home. Knott and Alvarez say they do their best to check paperwork and keep everything above board. But even workers in good standing during the Biden administration are getting swept up. The result is fewer available workers, higher prices and growing delays. 'Mexico is the backbone of construction throughout the U.S.,' Knott says. 'It's impossible to do what we used to do, there's a scarcity in terms of finding guys.' One reason the industry leans so hard on undocumented labor is that there are few legal pathways to bring in foreign workers. But unlike agriculture, which has a well-established visa system for seasonal labor, construction lacks a comparable program. That gap has left the industry exposed. When enforcement ramps up, there are few options for replacing the workers who disappear. This is why the National Association of Home Builders is pushing for immigration reform. The group wants a new visa program for construction workers, with limits set by market demand, not fixed caps. It also supports pathways to legal status for workers already on the job and opposes rules that would make builders liable for the immigration status of their subcontractors' employees. The goal is to secure the border without gutting the workforce needed to build the country's housing. But until then, homeowners and builders alike will be left competing for fewer workers. Some of the trades most likely to show up on your job site rely heavily on immigrant labor. According to the Associated General Contractors of America, 61% of plasterers and stucco masons, 61% of drywall installers and 52% of roofers are foreign born. More than half of painters are too. The numbers drop in more regulated trades. Just 16% of electricians and 18% of plumbers are immigrants, in part because these jobs require licenses. But for much of the work that gives a house its character, the labor pool could shrink fast. The big public single-family homebuilders aren't immune. In response to heightened rhetoric about mass deportations during the 2024 presidential election, three of the largest public homebuilders warned investors about the risk. PulteGroup ($20.9 billion market capitalization), Lennar Corporation ($29.5 billion) and Toll Brothers ($10.9 billion) all added language about immigration enforcement to their most recent annual reports (none of the three responded to requests for comment). Each relies heavily on subcontractors for labor. All three said tighter immigration enforcement could shrink the pool of skilled tradespeople, push up labor costs and slow projects. PulteGroup identified it as a 'material risk.' Lennar flagged the potential for 'widespread deportations' and legal exposure tied to subcontractors. Toll Brothers warned that labor shortages could affect the skilled workers it needs for high-end homes. These warnings are new. None of the companies had included them in prior filings. However, some analysts covering the industry don't see an imminent problem. 'Builders don't actually build the homes. They use subcontractors,' says Jay McCanless, senior vice president of equity research at Wedbush, covering homebuilders and building products. Builders expect subs to follow state rules on verifying workers, but can't guarantee it happens every time. Crews have been raided at sites in California, Florida and elsewhere. Even so, McCanless says today's enforcement is nowhere near the scale seen under the Obama administration in 2009 and 2010. Builders weathered that storm, helped by the collapse in housing demand after the Great Financial Crisis. This time, they may catch another break. The slowdown in multi-family construction is freeing up more crews. The risk may grow, and already the stocks of home builders have suffered. Year-to-date, Lennar's stock is off 17%, Toll Brother's is down 14% and Pulte is down 6%. The S&P 500 has gained 3.3% year to date. They may get another break yet. Even President Trump is hearing from business owners about the risks of losing workers. In a June 12 post on his Truth Social account, Trump acknowledged complaints from farmers and hotel operators who say immigration enforcement is taking away long-time workers and leaving jobs hard to fill. He blamed the Biden administration for letting in 'criminals' who are now applying for those roles, and said, 'Changes are coming.' By the end of the weekend, President Trump was seemingly backing down on the worksite raids targeting those industries, saying that they were 'taking very good, long time workers away from them.' A memo was subsequently sent out to ICE field offices to turn their attention away from such raids and to avoid arresting undocumented workers who aren't suspected of engaging in other crimes like drug dealing or human trafficking. For now, it isn't clear what those changes will mean for construction. But the industry, unlike politics, runs on labor, not slogans. Without workers, no one is pouring concrete in Trump developments or anywhere else. More from Forbes
