Anthony Albanese resists calls for federal intervention into two aboriginal deaths in Northern Territory police custody
The Prime Minister has pushed back against calls for federal intervention following two Aboriginal deaths in custody in the Northern Territory.
NT Police are investigating the death of a 68-year-old man who was taken into protective custody by Australian Federal Police officers on May 30.
Police said the man was taken into custody after he was too intoxicated to board a flight from Darwin Airport.
He was taken to the Palmerston Watchhouse where he was assessed and it was deemed he should be taken to the Royal Darwin Hospital.
The man was unconscious on his arrival at the hospital but was resuscitated and admitted to the intensive care unit.
Police said the man died on Saturday, more than a week after he was first taken into custody.
His death follows the death of 24-year-old Kumanjayi White, who died after he was arrested by plain-clothed police officers at the Coles Supermarket in Alice Springs on May 26.
Labor politicians including Minister for Indigenous Australians Malarndirri McCarthy and Special Envoy for Remote Communities Marion Scrymgour have been among those calling for an independent investigation into Kumanjayi White's death.
Ms Scrymgour called for the AFP to take over the investigation.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told the National Press Club he was unconvinced federal intervention was the best way forward.
'Now, in general, the idea of federal intervention which is frankly, an easy thing that people come up with, why aren't you sending the AFP, why aren't you doing that, without then saying where it leads,' he said.
'I'd need to be convinced that people in Canberra know better than people in the Northern Territory about how to deal with these issues, is my starting point, I think it comes up all the time with a range of issues.'
'But we do need to engage directly and constructively with First Nations people. People voted clearly in the referendum on the model that was put forward by First Nations people themselves in the Uluru Constitutional Convention in 2017, but we need to find different ways of engaging respectfully, of listening in a different form as well.'
Vigils and protest rallies have been held around the country since Kumanjayi White's death.
The man who died in Darwin at the weekend has been identified as a senior leader from the remote Indigenous community of Wadeye.
Northern Territory deputy opposition leader Dheran Young said the man was a close friend who had walked him into Parliament on his first day.
'I know the community are in deep, deep shock with what has occurred but what I do know is there are organisations out there on the ground supporting the family,' he said.
Justice Not Jails spokesman Stephen Enciso told Sky News both deaths in custody should be investigated independently of police.
He said government had still failed to implement most of the recommendations of the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody.
"The Royal Commission was very clear that arrest should be a measure of last resort for intoxication and there should be sobering up facilities and all sorts of non-custodial alternatives when somebody is intoxicated so there are big questions to be asked,' he said in reference to the man's death in Darwin at the weekend.
'Why was he taken to the Palmerston Watchhouse and not straight to the hospital, this is another case where police should not be involved in the investigation."
The NT Government has said it is appropriate for the NT police and the coroner to investigate the deaths.
It says it will continue its justice reforms 'that put the rights of victims ahead of offenders'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Rogue senator Dorinda Cox accuses Greens of ‘deep racism' in scathing resignation letter
Senator Dorinda Cox has accused the Greens of being 'deeply racist' in a blistering resignation letter, years after she left Labor for patronising women of colour. Ms Cox previously said she chose to quit the minor party to join the Albanese government after some 'deep reflection' about her personal values. In a blistering resignation letter, revealed by the ABC on Wednesday, Ms Cox said the Greens had tolerated racism and failed to protect First Nations women. "In my experience, the Greens tolerate a culture that permits violence against First Nations women within its structures,' she said in the formal letter. 'In this respect, the party is deeply racist.' The letter followed Ms Cox's 2020 claims that she quit the Labor Party to join the Greens because Labor had a 'patronising attitude towards women and people of colour'. Ms Cox's dramatic defection to the Labor Party last week came after her unsuccessful bid to become the Greens' deputy leader. She was the party's only Indigenous senator at the time of her resignation, after independent senator Lidia Thorpe also quit the Greens in 2023. Ms Cox's accusations include claims that the Greens ignored her reports of serious incidents. This included an altercation at Perth Airport in 2023 involving former ACT Greens candidate and Blak Greens leader Tjanara Goreng Goreng. Ms Cox also claimed that there were further incidents involving staff who were 'isolated by the state and other MP's offices'. — Australian Greens (@Greens) October 17, 2021 A Labor MP told Sky News that Ms Cox's resignation exposed a deeper hypocrisy within the Greens' approach to Indigenous representation. The MP said that the Greens 'pretended' to represent Indigenous voices but in truth had done nothing to help Aboriginal communities. They also pointed to the defection of Aboriginal woman Lidia Thorpe from the party, who quit over disagreements surrounding the Voice to Parliament referendum. Ms Thorpe agreed with Ms Cox that there was racism within the Greens when asked about the resignation letter on Wednesday. 'I think there's racism everywhere in this country. And there's a lot of work that the Greens and answer other organisations need to do to stamp that out,' she told the ABC. Sky News has contacted the Greens for comment. Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young blasted her former colleague last Thursday, calling on her to quit the Senate. 'I always think that it's not fair to the voters and indeed any of the parties involved that if somebody is elected to one party and then jumps ship later on,' she told reporters. 'I do think the honourable thing is to resign from the parliament, but that's not the rules, and so we're left where we are.' The comments follow a spate of criticism surrounding Ms Cox's abrupt resignation. Ms Cox only announced she would leave the party after she lost a deputy leadership ballot 9–3 to Senator Mehreen Faruqi. She then claimed 'deep reflection' had led her to realise her values were more closely aligned with Labor's. Greens leader Larissa Waters condemned her former colleague's decision and said she had only been informed of the move an hour before it was announced. 'The Greens are disappointed in Senator Cox's decision to leave the Greens and join the Labor party as a backbencher,' Ms Waters said at the time. Ms Cox's sudden transformation has met skepticism and accusations of political opportunism, particularly given her scathing past criticisms of the Labor Party. In 2020, Ms Cox said she left Labor because it was 'patronising to women and people of colour' and accused the party of caring more about donors than members. More recently, she accused Labor of having 'spectacularly failed' the public through its support for the North West Shelf gas project. Also resurfacing was her support for the controversial slogan 'from the river to the sea' - a phrase Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has publicly condemned. Adding to the controversy was another leaked 2023 text message in which Ms Cox referred to One Nation leader Pauline Hanson as a 'f---ing retard'. Labor's apparent willingness to accept Ms Cox, despite these incidents, has drawn comparisons to Mr Albanese's prior treatment of former Labor Senator Fatima Payman. Ms Payman was hounded by Mr Albanese after she quit the Labor Party last year to form her own party, Australia's Voice. 'There is a bit of hypocrisy, of course, about how Labor has responded to this,' Ms Hanson-Young said. 'It wasn't okay to jump ship for Fatima Payman, but apparently when it's people coming to them, it's all okay.' Ms Payman herself chimed in, saying she was surprised Ms Cox had not suffered the "smear campaign' which she endured after her exit from Labor. Meanwhile, internal alleged complaints of staff bullying continue to hang over Ms Cox's legacy in the Greens. More than 20 staff reportedly quit her office, the SMH revealed, prompting an internal investigation—but the probe was abandoned following her defection. 'There has been a process, and an internal process is hard to run if somebody's gone to another party,' Ms Hanson-Young said. Former Labor minister Stephen Conroy added to criticism, calling for Ms Cox to 'resign from the Senate' and seek Labor preselection through the proper channels. 'She shouldn't steal something from the Greens; she should resign and ensure that it's passed back to the Greens,' Mr Conroy told Sky News.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Rogue Senator Dorinda Cox accuses Greens of 'deep racism' in scathing resignation letter
Senator Dorinda Cox has accused her ex-party of tolerating racism after she quit the Greens to join the Labor Party. Ms Cox previously said she chose to quit the minor party to join the Albanese government after some 'deep reflection' about her personal values. In a blistering resignation letter, revealed by the ABC on Wednesday, Ms Cox said the Greens had tolerated racism and failed to protect First Nations women. "In my experience, the Greens tolerate a culture that permits violence against First Nations women within its structures,' she said in the formal letter. 'In this respect, the party is deeply racist.' The letter followed Ms Cox's 2020 claims that she quit the Labor Party to join the Greens because Labor had a 'patronising attitude towards women and people of colour'. Senator Dorinda Cox has accused her ex-party of tolerating racism after she quit the Greens to join the Labor Party. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Gary Ramage Ms Cox's dramatic defection to the Labor Party last week came after her unsuccessful bid to become the Greens' deputy leader. She was the party's only Indigenous senator at the time of her resignation, after independent senator Lidia Thorpe also quit the Greens in 2023. Ms Cox's accusations include claims that the Greens ignored her reports of serious incidents. This included an altercation at Perth Airport in 2023 involving former ACT Greens candidate and Blak Greens leader Tjanara Goreng Goreng. Ms Cox also claimed that there were further incidents involving staff who were 'isolated by the state and other MP's offices'. A Labor MP told Sky News that Ms Cox's resignation exposed a deeper hypocrisy within the Greens' approach to Indigenous representation. The MP said that the Greens 'pretended' to represent Indigenous voices but in truth had done nothing to help Aboriginal communities. They also pointed to the defection of Aboriginal woman Lidia Thorpe from the party, who quit over disagreements surrounding the Voice to Parliament referendum. Ms Thorpe agreed with Ms Cox that there was racism within the Greens when asked about the resignation letter on Wednesday. 'I think there's racism everywhere in this country. And there's a lot of work that the Greens and answer other organisations need to do to stamp that out,' she told the ABC. Sky News has contacted the Greens for comment. Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young blasted her former colleague last Thursday, calling on her to quit the Senate. 'I always think that it's not fair to the voters and indeed any of the parties involved that if somebody is elected to one party and then jumps ship later on,' she told reporters. 'I do think the honourable thing is to resign from the parliament, but that's not the rules, and so we're left where we are.' The comments follow a spate of criticism surrounding Ms Cox's abrupt resignation. Ms Cox only announced she would leave the party after she lost a deputy leadership ballot 9–3 to Senator Mehreen Faruqi. She then claimed 'deep reflection' had led her to realise her values were more closely aligned with Labor's. Greens leader Larissa Waters condemned her former colleague's decision and said she had only been informed of the move an hour before it was announced. 'The Greens are disappointed in Senator Cox's decision to leave the Greens and join the Labor party as a backbencher,' Ms Waters said at the time. Ms Cox's sudden transformation has met skepticism and accusations of political opportunism, particularly given her scathing past criticisms of the Labor Party. In 2020, Ms Cox said she left Labor because it was 'patronising to women and people of colour' and accused the party of caring more about donors than members. More recently, she accused Labor of having 'spectacularly failed' the public through its support for the North West Shelf gas project. Also resurfacing was her support for the controversial slogan 'from the river to the sea' - a phrase Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has publicly condemned. Adding to the controversy was another leaked 2023 text message in which Ms Cox referred to One Nation leader Pauline Hanson as a 'f---ing retard'. Labor's apparent willingness to accept Ms Cox, despite these incidents, has drawn comparisons to Mr Albanese's prior treatment of former Labor Senator Fatima Payman. Ms Payman was hounded by Mr Albanese after she quit the Labor Party last year to form her own party, Australia's Voice. 'There is a bit of hypocrisy, of course, about how Labor has responded to this,' Ms Hanson-Young said. 'It wasn't okay to jump ship for Fatima Payman, but apparently when it's people coming to them, it's all okay.' Ms Payman herself chimed in, saying she was surprised Ms Cox had not suffered the "smear campaign' which she endured after her exit from Labor. Meanwhile, internal alleged complaints of staff bullying continue to hang over Ms Cox's legacy in the Greens. More than 20 staff reportedly quit her office, the SMH revealed, prompting an internal investigation—but the probe was abandoned following her defection. 'There has been a process, and an internal process is hard to run if somebody's gone to another party,' Ms Hanson-Young said. Former Labor minister Stephen Conroy added to criticism, calling for Ms Cox to 'resign from the Senate' and seek Labor preselection through the proper channels. 'She shouldn't steal something from the Greens; she should resign and ensure that it's passed back to the Greens,' Mr Conroy told Sky News.
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
The key to ending racism? It's right here in these PMs' speeches
Time is the marker of everything. In a civic context, we use time to understand what policies, actions, and even words have changed our lives - for the better or worse, or not at all. This helps us find ways to make our futures safer, healthier, and more just. I want to find a way to a future free of racism. And, at this point in time, I can't help but think of the words of two prime ministers - in speeches delivered half a century apart. First, let's go back to this week in June 1975, when Australia enacted the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). With the White Australia Policy only recently abolished, this was a landmark moment in our history. It was the first Commonwealth law that focused on human rights and discrimination, setting a new vision for Australian society that sought to shake off the racial segregation that had defined it. In a speech at the RDA's proclamation, then prime minister Gough Whitlam said our nation must "spell out in enduring form ... the principle that all Australians, whatever their colour, race or creed, are equal before the law and have the same basic rights and opportunities." But has Whitlam's aspiration to "entrench new attitudes ... in people's hearts and minds" been realised? The answer is yes and no. A legislative framework around racial equality has helped shine a spotlight on employers in workplace discrimination cases, provided remedy pathways for people who've experienced racial hatred, even invalidate laws that discriminated against First Nations peoples, such as the famous case of Mabo v Queensland. It also set a precedent for similar anti-discrimination laws around age, sex, and disability that were passed in the years that followed. Over the past 50 years, we have seen monumental progress in our society, and its shape has changed significantly. These are achievements to remember, to celebrate. But, sadly, racism remains entrenched in many parts of our society. Systems and institutions designed to serve us all are still infected by racist attitudes and practices in place well before the RDA's inception. Racism continues to affect everyday life. People are confronted with it through verbal attacks or left isolated by policies or practices that disadvantage them. This includes people with "foreign sounding" names being less likely to be selected for a job interview or having their work more scrutinised than colleagues; over-policing in some communities; and cultural biases within the medical system that can prevent people of colour receiving the same standards of care as everyone else. First Nations people still suffer the fundamental racism of a denial of self-determination. This has consistently been confirmed by consultation, research, and work led by advocacy groups. The work of the Australian Human Rights Commission confirms it too. There is no doubt that urgent reform is needed. And, half a century since Whitlam's address, a speech by another Prime Minister - our current one - touched on what I believe will help drive the solution. In his election victory speech last month, Anthony Albanese spoke of what he believed were the Australian values the majority of people had voted for. "For the strength," he said, "to show courage in adversity and kindness to those in need". Courage and kindness. For me, this has always been at the heart of who are - or who we should aspire to be. Reform takes courage. It takes kindness. Changing systems and institutions to eliminate racism requires our leaders to take courage. In November last year, I released the National Anti-Racism Framework, a roadmap for widespread government-led reform to defeat racism in 10 years. Its 63 recommendations take a whole-of-society approach to eliminating racism, across our legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors as well as for businesses. Courage and kindness could manifest in action by the government supporting these recommendations. This would see the principles of the RDA truly realised. But after 50 years, the RDA also needs an update. One of the framework's proposed changes is introducing a legal responsibility on employers to proactively prevent racism in the workplace. Similar to the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act, it means taking reasonable steps to eliminate racism, rather than only reacting once a complaint is made. Kindness is recognising privilege and the advantages bestowed by race. It means having difficult but respectful conversations, listening to uncomfortable truths without defensiveness, and finding ways to move forward together. Kindness is one of the greatest examples of strength one could show. In 50 years' time, when people look back at this moment, I hope it's seen as another landmark moment when we made an active commitment to implementing the framework to eliminate racism. The moment our leaders and community had the courage to choose dignity, respect and fairness - to ensure we are all truly equal with the same rights and opportunities. Time is the marker of everything. In a civic context, we use time to understand what policies, actions, and even words have changed our lives - for the better or worse, or not at all. This helps us find ways to make our futures safer, healthier, and more just. I want to find a way to a future free of racism. And, at this point in time, I can't help but think of the words of two prime ministers - in speeches delivered half a century apart. First, let's go back to this week in June 1975, when Australia enacted the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). With the White Australia Policy only recently abolished, this was a landmark moment in our history. It was the first Commonwealth law that focused on human rights and discrimination, setting a new vision for Australian society that sought to shake off the racial segregation that had defined it. In a speech at the RDA's proclamation, then prime minister Gough Whitlam said our nation must "spell out in enduring form ... the principle that all Australians, whatever their colour, race or creed, are equal before the law and have the same basic rights and opportunities." But has Whitlam's aspiration to "entrench new attitudes ... in people's hearts and minds" been realised? The answer is yes and no. A legislative framework around racial equality has helped shine a spotlight on employers in workplace discrimination cases, provided remedy pathways for people who've experienced racial hatred, even invalidate laws that discriminated against First Nations peoples, such as the famous case of Mabo v Queensland. It also set a precedent for similar anti-discrimination laws around age, sex, and disability that were passed in the years that followed. Over the past 50 years, we have seen monumental progress in our society, and its shape has changed significantly. These are achievements to remember, to celebrate. But, sadly, racism remains entrenched in many parts of our society. Systems and institutions designed to serve us all are still infected by racist attitudes and practices in place well before the RDA's inception. Racism continues to affect everyday life. People are confronted with it through verbal attacks or left isolated by policies or practices that disadvantage them. This includes people with "foreign sounding" names being less likely to be selected for a job interview or having their work more scrutinised than colleagues; over-policing in some communities; and cultural biases within the medical system that can prevent people of colour receiving the same standards of care as everyone else. First Nations people still suffer the fundamental racism of a denial of self-determination. This has consistently been confirmed by consultation, research, and work led by advocacy groups. The work of the Australian Human Rights Commission confirms it too. There is no doubt that urgent reform is needed. And, half a century since Whitlam's address, a speech by another Prime Minister - our current one - touched on what I believe will help drive the solution. In his election victory speech last month, Anthony Albanese spoke of what he believed were the Australian values the majority of people had voted for. "For the strength," he said, "to show courage in adversity and kindness to those in need". Courage and kindness. For me, this has always been at the heart of who are - or who we should aspire to be. Reform takes courage. It takes kindness. Changing systems and institutions to eliminate racism requires our leaders to take courage. In November last year, I released the National Anti-Racism Framework, a roadmap for widespread government-led reform to defeat racism in 10 years. Its 63 recommendations take a whole-of-society approach to eliminating racism, across our legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors as well as for businesses. Courage and kindness could manifest in action by the government supporting these recommendations. This would see the principles of the RDA truly realised. But after 50 years, the RDA also needs an update. One of the framework's proposed changes is introducing a legal responsibility on employers to proactively prevent racism in the workplace. Similar to the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act, it means taking reasonable steps to eliminate racism, rather than only reacting once a complaint is made. Kindness is recognising privilege and the advantages bestowed by race. It means having difficult but respectful conversations, listening to uncomfortable truths without defensiveness, and finding ways to move forward together. Kindness is one of the greatest examples of strength one could show. In 50 years' time, when people look back at this moment, I hope it's seen as another landmark moment when we made an active commitment to implementing the framework to eliminate racism. The moment our leaders and community had the courage to choose dignity, respect and fairness - to ensure we are all truly equal with the same rights and opportunities. Time is the marker of everything. In a civic context, we use time to understand what policies, actions, and even words have changed our lives - for the better or worse, or not at all. This helps us find ways to make our futures safer, healthier, and more just. I want to find a way to a future free of racism. And, at this point in time, I can't help but think of the words of two prime ministers - in speeches delivered half a century apart. First, let's go back to this week in June 1975, when Australia enacted the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). With the White Australia Policy only recently abolished, this was a landmark moment in our history. It was the first Commonwealth law that focused on human rights and discrimination, setting a new vision for Australian society that sought to shake off the racial segregation that had defined it. In a speech at the RDA's proclamation, then prime minister Gough Whitlam said our nation must "spell out in enduring form ... the principle that all Australians, whatever their colour, race or creed, are equal before the law and have the same basic rights and opportunities." But has Whitlam's aspiration to "entrench new attitudes ... in people's hearts and minds" been realised? The answer is yes and no. A legislative framework around racial equality has helped shine a spotlight on employers in workplace discrimination cases, provided remedy pathways for people who've experienced racial hatred, even invalidate laws that discriminated against First Nations peoples, such as the famous case of Mabo v Queensland. It also set a precedent for similar anti-discrimination laws around age, sex, and disability that were passed in the years that followed. Over the past 50 years, we have seen monumental progress in our society, and its shape has changed significantly. These are achievements to remember, to celebrate. But, sadly, racism remains entrenched in many parts of our society. Systems and institutions designed to serve us all are still infected by racist attitudes and practices in place well before the RDA's inception. Racism continues to affect everyday life. People are confronted with it through verbal attacks or left isolated by policies or practices that disadvantage them. This includes people with "foreign sounding" names being less likely to be selected for a job interview or having their work more scrutinised than colleagues; over-policing in some communities; and cultural biases within the medical system that can prevent people of colour receiving the same standards of care as everyone else. First Nations people still suffer the fundamental racism of a denial of self-determination. This has consistently been confirmed by consultation, research, and work led by advocacy groups. The work of the Australian Human Rights Commission confirms it too. There is no doubt that urgent reform is needed. And, half a century since Whitlam's address, a speech by another Prime Minister - our current one - touched on what I believe will help drive the solution. In his election victory speech last month, Anthony Albanese spoke of what he believed were the Australian values the majority of people had voted for. "For the strength," he said, "to show courage in adversity and kindness to those in need". Courage and kindness. For me, this has always been at the heart of who are - or who we should aspire to be. Reform takes courage. It takes kindness. Changing systems and institutions to eliminate racism requires our leaders to take courage. In November last year, I released the National Anti-Racism Framework, a roadmap for widespread government-led reform to defeat racism in 10 years. Its 63 recommendations take a whole-of-society approach to eliminating racism, across our legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors as well as for businesses. Courage and kindness could manifest in action by the government supporting these recommendations. This would see the principles of the RDA truly realised. But after 50 years, the RDA also needs an update. One of the framework's proposed changes is introducing a legal responsibility on employers to proactively prevent racism in the workplace. Similar to the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act, it means taking reasonable steps to eliminate racism, rather than only reacting once a complaint is made. Kindness is recognising privilege and the advantages bestowed by race. It means having difficult but respectful conversations, listening to uncomfortable truths without defensiveness, and finding ways to move forward together. Kindness is one of the greatest examples of strength one could show. In 50 years' time, when people look back at this moment, I hope it's seen as another landmark moment when we made an active commitment to implementing the framework to eliminate racism. The moment our leaders and community had the courage to choose dignity, respect and fairness - to ensure we are all truly equal with the same rights and opportunities. Time is the marker of everything. In a civic context, we use time to understand what policies, actions, and even words have changed our lives - for the better or worse, or not at all. This helps us find ways to make our futures safer, healthier, and more just. I want to find a way to a future free of racism. And, at this point in time, I can't help but think of the words of two prime ministers - in speeches delivered half a century apart. First, let's go back to this week in June 1975, when Australia enacted the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). With the White Australia Policy only recently abolished, this was a landmark moment in our history. It was the first Commonwealth law that focused on human rights and discrimination, setting a new vision for Australian society that sought to shake off the racial segregation that had defined it. In a speech at the RDA's proclamation, then prime minister Gough Whitlam said our nation must "spell out in enduring form ... the principle that all Australians, whatever their colour, race or creed, are equal before the law and have the same basic rights and opportunities." But has Whitlam's aspiration to "entrench new attitudes ... in people's hearts and minds" been realised? The answer is yes and no. A legislative framework around racial equality has helped shine a spotlight on employers in workplace discrimination cases, provided remedy pathways for people who've experienced racial hatred, even invalidate laws that discriminated against First Nations peoples, such as the famous case of Mabo v Queensland. It also set a precedent for similar anti-discrimination laws around age, sex, and disability that were passed in the years that followed. Over the past 50 years, we have seen monumental progress in our society, and its shape has changed significantly. These are achievements to remember, to celebrate. But, sadly, racism remains entrenched in many parts of our society. Systems and institutions designed to serve us all are still infected by racist attitudes and practices in place well before the RDA's inception. Racism continues to affect everyday life. People are confronted with it through verbal attacks or left isolated by policies or practices that disadvantage them. This includes people with "foreign sounding" names being less likely to be selected for a job interview or having their work more scrutinised than colleagues; over-policing in some communities; and cultural biases within the medical system that can prevent people of colour receiving the same standards of care as everyone else. First Nations people still suffer the fundamental racism of a denial of self-determination. This has consistently been confirmed by consultation, research, and work led by advocacy groups. The work of the Australian Human Rights Commission confirms it too. There is no doubt that urgent reform is needed. And, half a century since Whitlam's address, a speech by another Prime Minister - our current one - touched on what I believe will help drive the solution. In his election victory speech last month, Anthony Albanese spoke of what he believed were the Australian values the majority of people had voted for. "For the strength," he said, "to show courage in adversity and kindness to those in need". Courage and kindness. For me, this has always been at the heart of who are - or who we should aspire to be. Reform takes courage. It takes kindness. Changing systems and institutions to eliminate racism requires our leaders to take courage. In November last year, I released the National Anti-Racism Framework, a roadmap for widespread government-led reform to defeat racism in 10 years. Its 63 recommendations take a whole-of-society approach to eliminating racism, across our legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors as well as for businesses. Courage and kindness could manifest in action by the government supporting these recommendations. This would see the principles of the RDA truly realised. But after 50 years, the RDA also needs an update. One of the framework's proposed changes is introducing a legal responsibility on employers to proactively prevent racism in the workplace. Similar to the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act, it means taking reasonable steps to eliminate racism, rather than only reacting once a complaint is made. Kindness is recognising privilege and the advantages bestowed by race. It means having difficult but respectful conversations, listening to uncomfortable truths without defensiveness, and finding ways to move forward together. Kindness is one of the greatest examples of strength one could show. In 50 years' time, when people look back at this moment, I hope it's seen as another landmark moment when we made an active commitment to implementing the framework to eliminate racism. The moment our leaders and community had the courage to choose dignity, respect and fairness - to ensure we are all truly equal with the same rights and opportunities.
