Letters to the Editor: Law School dean pens elegant defense of arrested former student's 1st Amendment rights
To the editor: Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at UC Berkeley, is absolutely correct ("Mahmoud Khalil's pro-Palestinian comments are protected speech, not grounds for deportation," op-ed, March 11). We cannot selectively apply the protections of constitutionally guaranteed free speech only to those whose speech we like or agree with. I despise hate speech of any kind, especially antisemitic speech. It is despicable, ugly and almost any pejorative one can think of.
But we should defend to the death all people's right to speak freely, without fear of punishment, deportation or retribution. Otherwise our democracy is truly dead. The founding fathers weren't perfect but they were on the right track, given the times. We cannot allow this kind of government-sanctioned behavior.
Diana Wolff, Rancho Palos Verdes
..
To the editor: I agree with Chemerinsky that arresting former graduate student Mahmoud Khalil may have been an overreach; however, President Trump's cutting $400 million in funds to Columbia University is an excellent deterrent to universities that do not take antisemitism seriously. Many universities tolerated illegal behavior and a few of their presidents were forced to resign as a result.
David Waldowski, Laguna Woods
..
To the editor: Chemerinsky gives a detailed analysis of the events surrounding the activities of political activist Khalil as they relate to the 1st Amendment and free speech. Given his position as dean of the UC Berkeley Law School, I would expect Chemerinsky to be aware of the Immigration and Naturalization Act regarding activities of foreign nationals who, as the White House alleges in this case, support terrorist organizations, but he ignores the act in its entirety in his analysis. Perhaps he believes the act does not apply in this instance, but its omission creates a clearly biased approach to the issue.
Scott Perley, Irvine
..
To the editor: When Chemerinsky speaks, we should all listen. Trump is dangerous. He is a threat to democracy, America and our very way of life. His actions regarding Khalil are blatantly unconstitutional. MAGA supporters are thrilled, I'm sure, but will they be thrilled when he comes for them? Because he will.
Scott Hughes, Westlake Village..
To the editor: For all those readers who are still applauding the arrest and detention of Khalil, even after digesting the arguments set forth in Chemerinsky's commentary, please consider the following:
What are you willing to condone or think necessary the government do with all of the Americans, particularly those identifying as Jewish, who wrote, spoke, marched and demonstrated in support of the very same causes as those expressed by Khalil? In the course of forming a thoughtful response, I would suggest reading "First They Came" in the mirror, one more time.
Ted Rosenblatt, Hancock Park
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
RFK's anti-vax agenda endangers the entire Trump reform drive
Word of warning to Health Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr.: Restoring Americans' trust in the feds' public-health decisions means hiring truly fair-minded, science-driven folks — not anti-vax crackpots. RFK Jr. last week canned all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), saying: 'A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science.' Most of them got appointed just last year to terms that would last through 2028, so Kennedy would've had to fire at least some to have much impact on the panel — and President Joe Biden set clear precedent for axing supposedly bi- and non-partisan advisory-board members. Advertisement Yes, ACIP members are supposed to be unbiased experts, but vaccine recommendations nonetheless plainly did get politicized in the Biden years (along with a lot of other public-health 'science,' such as guidelines for reopening schools). Not only did CDC and FDA officials cover up negative side-effects of COVID vaccines, they prompted top career officials to resign over the psuedo-scientific 'findings' that everyone should get vaxxed and re-vaxxed. Happily, several of the eight new ACIP members RFK announced later in the week look to be solid scientists, such as biostatistician Martin Kulldorff, a co-author of the anti-lockdown Great Barrington Declaration, and pediatrician Cody Meissner, who's served on the panel before. Advertisement But at least one pick raises serious alarm bells: Vicky Pebsworth served on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vax outfit that fearmongers about 'vaccine injuries and deaths.' Plus: In announcing the firings, Kennedy announced the federal health department will now prioritize 'public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda.' Huh? It should be pro-vaccine, albeit in a 'trust but verify' mode, because the jabs overall are objectively a life-saving public good. Just ask the victims of the current measles breakout, which anti-vax propaganda has made worse. Advertisement Naming Pebsworth to ACIP is a clear sign RFK still has at least one foot in the anti-vax conspiracy-theory camp; if he keeps it up (he's got 11 more slots to fill on the panel), he'll prove that all who opposed his confirmation were right. The White House needs to keep Kennedy on a short leash, lest he alienate rational Republicans and give Democrats ammunition for undermining the entire Trump agenda.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Over 30 More Countries Could Be Put on Travel Ban by US—Reports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is floating the idea of adding 36 more countries to its travel ban that began earlier this month, according to an internal State Department cable reviewed by The Washington Post and Reuters. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in a Sunday email: "The Department does not comment on internal deliberations or communications, but we are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws." Why It Matters Earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation restricting travel by foreigners from 12 countries and partially restricting entry from an additional seven countries. The ban, which Trump said is to "protect the nation from foreign terrorist and other national security and public safety threats," went into effect on June 9. Since his inauguration on January 20, Trump has cracked down on foreign nationals in the United States, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration enforcement as a key pillar of his agenda. During his first administration, Trump imposed a ban that barred people from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S. Critics then and now, have called out the restrictions as xenophobic and racist. What To Know The internal cable, which was signed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, "identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days," as reported by Reuters. The weekend memo was first reported by The Washington Post and includes 25 African nations, as well as several Pacific Island nations, Caribbean, and Central Asian. The countries mentioned in the cable that may face a potential partial or full ban are: Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Bhutan Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Cote D'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Djibouti Dominica Ethiopia Egypt Gabon The Gambia Ghana Kyrgyzstan Liberia Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Sao Tome and Principe Senegal South Sudan Syria Tanzania Tonga Tuvalu Uganda Vanuatu Zambia Zimbabwe Some of the countries under consideration, such as Egypt, are key U.S. diplomatic partners and receive American military aid. When asked earlier this month why Egypt wasn't on the original list, Trump responded, "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control." Djibouti hosts Camp Lemonnier, the only permanent U.S. military base in Africa. The countries would be in addition to the 12 fully restricted countries of Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, and the seven partially restricted, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, that Trump already limited. There are, however, some exceptions to the restrictions, including certain visas. The Washington Post identified the benchmarks in the memo as regarding lack of "competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents," or experiencing "widespread government fraud." Immigration also played a role in their potential selection, with some reportedly having large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the U.S. The memo also touched on ideology, reportedly saying, there were accounts of "antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States" by some people from those countries. Trump announced the first version of the ban earlier this month after citing national security concerns following a recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, when Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, carried out a firebombing attack at a pro-Israel rally, injuring 12 people. Trump has detained several vocal pro-Palestinian voices, most notably Mahmoud Khalil. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12 in Washington, D.C. AP Photo/Alex Brandon What People Are Saying A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek in an email Sunday: "The Department of State is committed to protecting our nation and its citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process." Amnesty International's Secretary General Agnès Callamard said in a press release on June 5: "President Trump's new travel ban is discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel. By targeting people based on their race, religion, or nationality, from countries with predominantly Black, Brown and Muslim-majority populations, this blanket ban constitutes racial discrimination under international human rights law. It also spreads hate and disinformation, reinforcing the misleading idea that certain populations are more likely to pose security risks or engage in acts of violence." Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, wrote in a June 4 X, formerly Twitter, post: "This is Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again. Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the U.S. from the rest of world. Bigotry is not a national security strategy." What Happens Next? It remains unclear whether the State Department will move forward with the additions or when the countries might face restrictions if they fail to meet certain requirements.
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Denmark allocates millions of dollars to attract African students in strategic immigration program
According to LocalDenmark, the Nordic country aims to host 230 African students annually for the next eight years, primarily to foster deeper cultural and diplomatic integrations. As stated by its Foreign Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, " It's clearly in our interest that African countries look towards Europe when considering their future paths. With this new program, we're not just investing in education, but in relationships that build a vital bridge between Denmark and Africa." The program is also expected to strengthen ties between Danish and African universities, promoting knowledge exchange and collaborative research initiatives. Meanwhile, some 430 million Danish kroner ($61 million) has been allocated since 2024 to support this initiative, underscoring Denmark's commitment to its pro-Africa immigration policy and strategy. This move by Denmark is part of a broader European effort to maintain relevance and influence in Africa, amid growing competition from China and Russia, particularly as the US continues to enforce strict immigration policies targeting African migrants. According to Minister for Higher Education and Science Christina Egelund, " Africa has enormous potential, which we can help unlock through education. By 2050, a third of the world's youth will live in Africa, and the continent's geopolitical importance is growing rapidly." In return, Denmark also hopes to see more of its own students pursuing studies and exchange programmes in African institutions. ' There's immense potential in Africa. Education is a two-way bridge, ' Løkke said The scholarship provides comprehensive support, covering tuition fees, living expenses, and potentially including travel assistance. Successful applicants may also be eligible to participate in the EU's Erasmus+ program, offering additional exchange opportunities. Denmark's Africa strategy Denmark is known for having some of the strictest immigration policies in Europe, with conditions growing increasingly rigid since the 1990s. While this tough approach has achieved its intended effects, it has also introduced new challenges. During a visit to Ghana last year, Denmark's Foreign Minister and former Prime Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen hinted at a shift in immigration policy. He framed the change as a way to safeguard Denmark's core interests, noting that Europe is shrinking—not just in population, but also in its share of the global economy. This perspective is central to the Danish government's new Africa strategy, unveiled on 26 August 2024. The strategy focuses on deepening ties with African nations through expanded trade, investment, and educational exchanges. One of its key goals is to attract top talent from Africa to pursue education in Denmark, thereby fostering a network with long-term political and economic benefits for the country. For many African students, this initiative offers a gateway to high-quality education in Europe, while also fostering stronger partnerships in areas such as science, technology, innovation, governance, and sustainable development between Africa and Denmark.
