logo
Jaw-dropping moment police boss defends officers who bungled the initial stages of Audrey Griffin's murder investigation - as the teenage victim's parents reveal how they were forced to do the detective work

Jaw-dropping moment police boss defends officers who bungled the initial stages of Audrey Griffin's murder investigation - as the teenage victim's parents reveal how they were forced to do the detective work

Daily Mail​04-05-2025

The top cop in NSW has defended detectives after Audrey Griffin's mother revealed she pleaded with them to make her daughter's murder a priority in the days after her body was found in a NSW creek.
The 19-year-old was found dead at Erina Creek on the Central Coast on March 22 following a night out celebrating with friends at Gosford Hotel. An initial autopsy indicated the talented athlete had drowned.
The report found no evidence of trauma or sexual assault, so detectives deemed the death misadventure. But Audrey's parents Kathleen Kirby and Trevor Griffith pushed for further investigations.
Ms Kirby begged to be shown CCTV from the area, and it was only when they were then going through the footage did they notice a man who appeared to be following Audrey as she walked home from the hotel.
A CCTV image was then released more than three weeks after Audrey's body had been found, prompting a woman to contact police and tell them the man looked like her ex-husband who had threatened her on the night Audrey died.
Adrian Noel Torrens, 53, was then arrested and charged with murder following police catching him confessing to the murder while under surveillance. Days later he took his own life in Silverwater jail.
Commissioner Karen Webb said on 60 Minutes on Sunday night that initial confusion over the cause of the 19-year-old's death was because there was so little evidence.
She acknowledged police had mistakenly ruled Ms Griffin's death as 'misadventure' before her mother pleaded with officers to review security footage. 'That was based on the medical advice,' Ms Webb said.
Commisioner Webb claimed that all that police had to go on was the report from the postmortem.
'[It] didn't suggest any foul play. There's no evidence that she was strangled, there's no evidence that she was sexually assaulted and there's no evidence of trauma.
'So they really didn't have a lot to go on other than a postmortem that said misadventure.'
She claimed officers had a 'cop instinct' and doggedly kept pursuing the case despite no details getting released to the media and Ms Kirby having to go into the station and push for the CCTV to be reviewed.
The state's Homicide Squad detectives also remained sidelined from the case for a number of weeks, despite consultation from local detectives.
Asked whether the case could have been better handled, Ms Webb said: 'Could this be better, more perfect? Yes.
'But, did we catch a killer? Yes.'
Officers only identified Torrens after circulating a CCTV image of him via the media.
Ms Webb conceded officers had trawled the CCTV vision from Gosford on the night of March 22 only after Audrey's mother pleaded with local police to have a look at it herself.
Ms Kirby also said a friend of hers had spotted a suspicious man poking around the spot where Audrey was found at Erina Creek five days after she died, well before police reviewed the CCTV.
'A girlfriend of mine was driving to work at 5 o'clock in the morning, heading towards Sydney at the entrance road and sees a man at 5 a.m. in the morning with a red singlet and white shorts and a white stick poking around,' she said.
The description was a match for what Torrens had been wearing on the night of Audrey's death.
She added that she also noticed mud underneath Audrey's fingernails when identifying her, which further fueled her belief it was not misadventure.
'Well, they were going back through the CCTV [because] the mum obviously wanted us to do as much as we can,' Ms Webb said.
She said Torrens' ex-partner's call identifying him as the man in the video was 'gold' for detectives.
Ex-partner Michelle told the program she would have called police sooner about the threats mae against her if she had more faith in their ability to respond.
It previously took police months to find him after he breached an AVO for him only to then be let out by the courts on a Community Corrections Order.
'We wouldn't be in this position, I wouldn't be having this conversation with you, Audrey wouldn't be dead if he had have been held in custody,' Commissioner Webb said.
'He should have been locked up. A Community Corrections Order for someone who has a violent history is no answer.'
She argued 'soft' sentences should be reviewed.
'I can say as the police commissioner, I'm certainly frustrated because a get out of jail free card is no the answer for people like Torrens,' Ms Webb said.
When police brought Torrens into custody, they called Kathleen and Trevor into the station.
'That moment where police tell you that they've arrested a man over your daughter's death, it was like she died again,' Mr Griffith said.
'So I said, "has he said that he's done anything to Audrey, and they said we haven't been able to speak to him yet because he's sleeping. But we have enough evidence",' Ms Kirby said.
Both Mr Griffin and Ms Kirby said they had wanted more from the justice system.
They couldn't believe Torrens – who has an extensive criminal history including theft, fraud, intimidation, drugs and AVO offences – had been in the community on a CCO.
'It's outrageous. It's outrageous that he can walk the streets after doing so many offences over the years,' Mr Kirby said.
'Why was he out? Why was he allowed out?' Ms Kirby asked.
'The government are too weak. And the justice system. It's as if they're breeding monsters,' Mr Griffin said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's rejects CBS's attempt to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit
Trump's rejects CBS's attempt to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit

Daily Mail​

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's rejects CBS's attempt to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit

President Donald Trump has rejected a multimillion-dollar offer from CBS News to settle his lawsuit over an allegedly doctored 60 Minutes interview. Nearly a month into settlement talks over Trump's explosive $20 billion lawsuit against the network, sources confirm that Paramount Global has quietly offered $15 million to make the scandal disappear. But Trump has blasted the network's proposal as 'not even close,' and is demanding tens of millions more (at least $25 million) together with a formal apology. The lawsuit, filed last October, accuses CBS, its parent company Paramount and its flagship program 60 Minutes of deceptively editing a high-stakes interview with then–Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris just weeks before the 2024 election. Trump alleges the footage was manipulated to 'tip the scales' in Harris's favor and irreparably damage his image with voters. CBS denies the claim and said the broadcast was 'not doctored or deceitful.' It has called the allegations 'completely without merit.' But the legal and political aftershocks are now threatening to derail a much bigger deal: Paramount's $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, which is currently under review by Trump's Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The rejection of the settlement offer from CBS comes as Trump threatens to block billions in federal approvals for Paramount's merger with Skydance Media and insiders say the president is nowhere near backing down. The footage at the heart of the lawsuit was aired on 60 Minutes in October 2024, and featured CBS correspondent Bill Whitaker interviewing Harris in a prime-time election special. Trump's lawsuit claims CBS selectively removed a series of stammering, confused answers from Harris on topics including the Israel–Hamas war, replacing them with cleaner responses from a different part of the interview. Legal analysts note that the First Amendment gives CBS broad protections, and say the lawsuit likely wouldn't survive in court. But the fear of retaliation from a sitting president - and one who's threatened to revoke broadcast licenses and jail journalists - has changed just how much risk CBS/Paramount are prepared to bear. The lawsuit has now ballooned into one of the largest defamation-related claims ever filed against a media company. CBS is facing a $20 billion damage claim, a federal probe by the FCC into potential 'news distortion,' and a growing internal revolt as journalists accuse Paramount of trying to appease Trump to save the merger. According to The Wall Street Journal, Paramount floated a $15 million offer to Trump's legal team, citing similar settlements in other media-related suits. But Trump's recent victories against other media companies have emboldened him to push CBS harder and demand much more. He not only wants a significantly larger financial payout, but also a formal public apology from CBS News. Trump has already won multi-million dollar settlements from other media companies, including Meta, which paid him $25 million in January, ABC News, which agreed to a $15 million settlement in December and X, which paid $10 million in February. 'This was not just a bad edit,' one source close to the Trump team said. 'It was election interference. You don't settle that quietly.' Paramount, under the leadership of chairwoman Shari Redstone (pictured), has entered mediation to try to resolve the conflict. Redstone, 71, is said to be personally involved in weighing whether to settle quickly even as legal experts warn that any payout could be seen as a 'bribe' to fast-track FCC approval of the Skydance deal. 'If settling Trump's demands looks like a payoff, Paramount could be opening the door to criminal liability and shareholder lawsuits,' one media attorney told The New York Post. 'This is legally radioactive.' The legal saga has already claimed major casualties inside CBS. Wendy McMahon (pictured right), CEO of CBS News, announced her abrupt resignation earlier this month, citing 'differing views on the path forward.' In a memo to staff, she wrote, 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward. It's time for me to move on and for this organization to move forward with new leadership.' Before her departure, Bill Owens (pictured), longtime executive producer of 60 Minutes, also stepped down, citing concerns over 'editorial independence.' And during a broadcast, anchor Scott Pelley stunned viewers by saying on air that 'Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways,' suggesting interference from corporate leadership. These resignations have deepened fears among CBS journalists that Redstone and the Paramount board are sacrificing the newsroom's integrity to preserve a corporate merger. Sources now say Redstone is prepared to offer up to $50 million to settle the lawsuit and move on with her life, possibly walking away with $2 billion if the Skydance sale is completed. Award-winning television newsmagazine broadcast 60 Minutes, which pulls around 10 million viewers weekly, is a leading target of Trump's offensive against the media. The program has continued to air investigations critical of the Trump administration since his return to the White House. In response, Trump has called for its cancellation, while his billionaire advisor Elon Musk has said he hoped the team behind 60 Minutes would receive long prison sentences.

Trump's brutal response to CBS' offer to settle $20 billion 60 Minutes lawsuit
Trump's brutal response to CBS' offer to settle $20 billion 60 Minutes lawsuit

Daily Mail​

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's brutal response to CBS' offer to settle $20 billion 60 Minutes lawsuit

President Donald Trump has rejected a multimillion-dollar offer from CBS News to settle his lawsuit over an allegedly doctored 60 Minutes interview. Nearly a month into settlement talks over Trump's explosive $20 billion lawsuit against the network, sources confirm that Paramount Global has quietly offered $15 million to make the scandal disappear. But Trump has blasted the network's proposal as 'not even close,' and is demanding tens of millions more (at least $25 million) together with a formal apology. The lawsuit, filed last October, accuses CBS, its parent company Paramount and its flagship program 60 Minutes of deceptively editing a high-stakes interview with then–Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris just weeks before the 2024 election. Trump alleges the footage was manipulated to 'tip the scales' in Harris's favor and irreparably damage his image with voters. CBS denies the claim and said the broadcast was 'not doctored or deceitful.' It has called the allegations 'completely without merit.' But the legal and political aftershocks are now threatening to derail a much bigger deal: Paramount's $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, which is currently under review by Trump's Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The rejection of the settlement offer from CBS comes as Trump threatens to block billions in federal approvals for Paramount's merger with Skydance Media and insiders say the president is nowhere near backing down. The footage at the heart of the lawsuit was aired on 60 Minutes in October 2024, and featured CBS correspondent Bill Whitaker interviewing Harris in a prime-time election special. Trump's lawsuit claims CBS selectively removed a series of stammering, confused answers from Harris on topics including the Israel–Hamas war, replacing them with cleaner responses from a different part of the interview. Legal analysts note that the First Amendment gives CBS broad protections, and say the lawsuit likely wouldn't survive in court. But the fear of retaliation from a sitting president - and one who's threatened to revoke broadcast licenses and jail journalists - has changed just how much risk CBS/Paramount are prepared to bear. The lawsuit has now ballooned into one of the largest defamation-related claims ever filed against a media company. CBS is facing a $20 billion damage claim, a federal probe by the FCC into potential 'news distortion,' and a growing internal revolt as journalists accuse Paramount of trying to appease Trump to save the merger. According to The Wall Street Journal, Paramount floated a $15 million offer to Trump's legal team, citing similar settlements in other media-related suits. But Trump's recent victories against other media companies have emboldened him to push CBS harder and demand much more. He not only wants a significantly larger financial payout, but also a formal public apology from CBS News. Trump has already won multi-million dollar settlements from other media companies, including Meta, which paid him $25 million in January, ABC News, which agreed to a $15 million settlement in December and X, which paid $10 million in February. 'This was not just a bad edit,' one source close to the Trump team said. 'It was election interference. You don't settle that quietly.' Paramount, under the leadership of chairwoman Shari Redstone, has entered mediation to try to resolve the conflict. Redstone, 71, is said to be personally involved in weighing whether to settle quickly even as legal experts warn that any payout could be seen as a 'bribe' to fast-track FCC approval of the Skydance deal. 'If settling Trump's demands looks like a payoff, Paramount could be opening the door to criminal liability and shareholder lawsuits,' one media attorney told The New York Post. 'This is legally radioactive.' The legal saga has already claimed major casualties inside CBS. Wendy McMahon, CEO of CBS News, announced her abrupt resignation earlier this month, citing 'differing views on the path forward.' In a memo to staff, she wrote, 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward. It's time for me to move on and for this organization to move forward with new leadership.' Before her departure, Bill Owens, longtime executive producer of 60 Minutes, also stepped down, citing concerns over 'editorial independence.' And during a broadcast, anchor Scott Pelley stunned viewers by saying on air that 'Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways,' suggesting interference from corporate leadership. These resignations have deepened fears among CBS journalists that Redstone and the Paramount board are sacrificing the newsroom's integrity to preserve a corporate merger. Shari Redstone, the heiress of CBS parent Paramount Global, has sought to settle the ongoing suit while pursuing a massive media merger with Skydance Sources now say Redstone is prepared to offer up to $50 million to settle the lawsuit and move on with her life, possibly walking away with $2 billion if the Skydance sale is completed. Award-winning television newsmagazine broadcast 60 Minutes, which pulls around 10 million viewers weekly, is a leading target of Trump's offensive against the media. The program has continued to air investigations critical of the Trump administration since his return to the White House. In response, Trump has called for its cancellation, while his billionaire advisor Elon Musk has said he hoped the team behind 60 Minutes would receive long prison sentences.

The moment Erin Patterson blatantly lied to cops is revealed in video shown to mushroom murder trial jury
The moment Erin Patterson blatantly lied to cops is revealed in video shown to mushroom murder trial jury

Daily Mail​

time6 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

The moment Erin Patterson blatantly lied to cops is revealed in video shown to mushroom murder trial jury

Erin Patterson 's recorded interview with police following the deadly beef Wellington lunch has been aired in open court for the very first time. Wearing a grey jumper and seated across the table from Homicide Squad Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall, Patterson was asked if she owned a dehydrator or knew anything about them. 'No,' was the response. It was a lie the jury has previously heard Patterson now admits to. On Tuesday, the jury was shown photographs of a manual for a Sunbeam food dehydrator found in a drawer in Patterson's Leongatha home. 'I've got manuals of lots of stuff I've collected over the years,' Patterson told the detective on August 5 2023 following the search of her home. 'I just keep them all.' On the opening day of the trial, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy, SC told the jury Patterson had lied about having cancer and did dump a dehydrator later found to have traces of death cap mushrooms. 'She panicked because she was overwhelmed because there were four people that had become so ill because of the food she served them,' he said. Asked by Senior Constable Eppingstall - the last witness to be called by the prosecution - if she had ever dehydrated mushrooms before, Patterson shook her head in denial. Pressed for information, the detective asked if Patterson had ever foraged for mushrooms. 'Never,' she responded. Patterson had claimed she had bought the dried mushrooms used in her beef Wellingtons from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's south-east. Under questioning, Patterson mentioned her 'co-operation' with the hunt to find that Asian grocer. 'I'm sure you understand too that I've never been in a situation like this before, and I've been very, very helpful with the health department through the week, because I wanted to help that side of things as much as possible, because I do want to know what happened,' she said. 'I've given them as much information as they've asked for, and offered up all the food and all the information about where the food came from the house.' The jury heard Patterson was questioned about the reason for the lunch and why she had invited her in-laws over. 'Because I've got no other family,' she said. 'I want to maintain those relationships in spite of what's happening with Simon, I love them a lot.' The jury has previously heard Patterson's relationship with her estranged husband had become frosty towards the end of 2022. Patterson, 50, is accused of killing her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, with death cap mushrooms served in the pastry dish during a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Pastor Ian Wilkinson was the only one to survive the lunch, with an attempted murder charge related to his alleged poisoning also in play. Patterson told Senior Constable Eppingstall that Don and Gail had always been good to her. 'They always said to me that they would support me with love and emotional support even though Simon and I were separated,' she said. 'They're the only family I've got.' Patterson told the detective she had tried to maintain her relationship with Simon's parents for the good of her children despite their separation. 'Nothing that's ever happened between us, nothing he's ever done to me, will change the fact that they're good decent people that have never done anything wrong by me, ever,' she said. Before the 20 minute record of interview was played, the jury heard that the police tasked with raiding Patterson's home had seized just one plate from her home. That plate was retrieved from the kitchen fridge and contained nothing more than fruit. In opening the trial, Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers told the jury that Patterson had invited everyone over to ask them how she ought to tell her children she had ovarian cancer. Prosecutors said that Patterson served beef Wellington - and ate from a different plate to the others, distinguishing her meal from those alleged to have been poisoned. There were four large grey dinner plates on the table, while Patterson ate from a smaller, tan orange dish, according to Pastor Ian Wilkinson, who became sick but survived. Homicide Squad Detective Sergeant Luke Farrell told the jury that while detectives were interested in Patterson's plates, they had not taken photos of them all after executing a search warrant on August 5, 2023. Nor had they measured any of the various plates found inside her Leongatha property. Instead the jury was taken to screen grabs of a video a detective took of Patterson's kitchen. The jury observed images that showed several plates which were red on top and black on the bottom in addition to a white plate with some colour on it. Another image showed a stack of four dark-coloured plates and a single white plate with stripes of blue, black and orange. The pastor gave evidence to the jury on May 6, describing in detail what happened at the lunch. Mr Wilkinson recalled the meal consisted of mash potato, green beans and beef wellington. 'I could see them (the plates) between Heather and Gail, there were four large grey plates, one smaller plate - a different colour, an orangy-tan color,' he insisted. 'Gail picked up two of the grey plates and took them to the table, Heather picked up two of the grey plates and took them to the table, Erin picked up the odd plate and put it at her place at the table.' Detective Senior Constable Eppingstall, who spearheaded the investigation into Patterson, later told the jury police had not located any grey plates as described by Mr Wilkinson during their search of the house. Sgt Farrell had been conducting the search on Patterson's home when police allege she factory reset her mobile phone. The jury heard Patterson had been allowed to hang onto her phone throughout the search and spent up to 20 minutes alone with it in a sealed room. On Tuesday, the jury watched video of the moment Sgt Farrell asked Patterson for her phone while they were both seated at her dining table. 'I asked for it and she gave it to me,' Sgt Farrell told the jury. 'I asked her if there was a pin code to open the phone and she provided (two codes) she thought it might've been, but I didn't require a code to access the phone.' The phone was later erased remotely while sitting in a secure locker within the Homicide Squad's headquarters. The jury was shown several images of items seized from Patterson's home. These items included an instruction manual for a Sunbeam dehydrator, a set of digital scales and a glass bowl. Sgt Farrell said a RecipeTin Eats cookbook which contained a recipe for beef Wellington was also photographed and seized. The investigator said he opened the book and found a recipe for beef Wellington in a section of 'spattered pages'. Police also seized a jug of gravy and a fruit platter from the fridge. Sgt Farrell said police discovered a Cooler Master personal computer in Patterson's son's room, which was later found to have stored internet searches on death cap mushrooms. Patterson had been unaware anyone had died from eating her lunch at the time the search warrant was executed. Sgt Farrell said that before he commenced the search, he spoke to Patterson and told her police had come to search her home in connection to the 'death of two people'. 'Who died?,' Patterson asked. Earlier, the jury was taken through the public health scramble to locate the dried mushrooms Patterson had told health officials she used to make the beef Wellington. Health official Sally Ann Atkinson told the jury Patterson claimed the mushrooms she purchased came in a clear bag that carried a white label without any kind of commercial packaging. While a council investigator found one shop in Oakleigh, south-east of Melbourne, that contained bagged mushrooms similar to what Patterson described, she said health officials never found any traces of death cap mushrooms being sold. 'It's highly unlikely the commercial mushroom supply chain was contaminated with amanita (poisons),' Ms Atkinson said. She further said there were no 'issues' found with the other foods served in Patterson's lunch and the risk to the public was deemed 'low'. The officer also noted 'no food recalls were deemed warranted'. The trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store