Elon Musk's DOGE Staffer 'Big Balls' Was Involved in Cybercrime Ring
The teenage DOGE employee who went by the online username 'Big Balls' used to run a company that provided tech support to a cybercrime group, according to Reuters.
In 2022, Edward Coristine ran a company called DiamondCDN that provided network services. One of its users was a group of cybercriminals known as EGodly, who openly bragged about stealing phone numbers and cryptocurrency, hacking law enforcement emails in South America and Eastern Europe, cyberstalking an FBI agent in Delaware, and trafficking other stolen data. The group, now retired, even thanked Coristine's company for its support in 2023.
'We extend our gratitude to our valued partners DiamondCDN for generously providing us with their amazing DDoS protection and caching systems, which allow us to securely host and safeguard our website,' the group said. Coristine did not reply to Reuters's request for comment.
It should be alarming that a teen who used to work with a cybercrime group now has wide access to the inner workings of the federal government and the personal information of millions of Americans.
Elon Musk, who has expressed support for Big Balls in the past, has yet to comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge in Harvey Weinstein trial declares mistrial on rape charge following sex abuse conviction
By Jack Queen and Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -The judge overseeing Harvey Weinstein's criminal trial in Manhattan on Thursday declared a mistrial on a rape charge against the former Hollywood movie mogul, after one of the jurors refused to continue deliberations. The mistrial came a day after the jury convicted Weinstein on a separate sex abuse charge. It also acquitted him on a different sex abuse charge. Weinstein, once one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood, faced a retrial that began on April 23 after a New York state appeals court last year overturned his 2020 conviction. He was accused by prosecutors in this case of raping an aspiring actress and assaulting two other women. Weinstein, 73, pleaded not guilty and has denied assaulting anyone or having non-consensual sex. The jury found Weinstein guilty on one of the three counts he faced, which stemmed from his alleged assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. The jury found Weinstein not guilty of a charge stemming from his alleged assault of Kaja Sokola in 2002 when she was a 16-year-old aspiring actress. Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber declared a mistrial after the judge said the jury could not reach a verdict on a third count, which charged him with raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013. Weinstein faces up to 25 years in prison when he is sentenced. He has separately been sentenced to 16 years in prison following a rape conviction in California. In a startling development on Wednesday, the jury foreperson told Farber that other members of the panel were shouting at him and threatening him for refusing to change his vote on the rape count. Farber sent jurors home for the day to give them time to cool down and instructed the foreperson to arrive in court separately on Thursday. In closing arguments on June 3, the prosecution told the 12 jurors that the evidence showed how Weinstein used his power and influence to trap and abuse women. The defense countered that the accusers lied on the witness stand out of spite after their consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer failed to result in Hollywood stardom. A jury found Weinstein guilty in February 2020 of raping Mann and sexually assaulting Haley. Sokola's allegation was not part of that case. The conviction was a milestone for the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct by powerful men. But the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, threw out that conviction in April 2024. It said the trial judge erred by letting women testify that Weinstein had assaulted them, though their accusations were not the basis of the criminal charges. Though the conviction was thrown out, Weinstein, who has had a litany of health problems in recent years and attended the retrial in a wheelchair, has remained behind bars because of his California conviction. He is appealing that verdict. More than 100 women, including famous actresses, have accused Weinstein of misconduct. He co-founded the Miramax studio, whose hit movies included such Academy Award winners as "Shakespeare in Love" and "Pulp Fiction." Weinstein's own eponymous film studio filed for bankruptcy in March 2018, five months after sexual misconduct accusations against him became widely publicized.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The FBI raided the wrong house. The Supreme Court says the family is allowed to sue
A family whose home was mistakenly raided in the middle of the night by the FBI eight years ago will be permitted to continue their damages lawsuit after the Supreme Court on Thursday sent their case back to a federal appeals court for additional review. The outcome represents a technical win for the family, which had been barred by lower courts from suing the government over the incident. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for a unanimous court. Curtrina Martin, her partner and her then-7-year-old son were startled awake in 2017 when a six-agent SWAT team – believing that they were targeting the home of a gang member – smashed her front door with a battering ram, detonated a flash-bang grenade and rushed into their suburban Atlanta home. At some point after Martin was dragged from the closet where she was hiding and held at gunpoint, agents realized they had the wrong house. The federal government is generally immune from lawsuits, but Congress carved out an exception for some situations involving negligent or wrongful acts of government employees. That law was amended in 1974, following a series of other high-profile raids at the wrong house, to expand the ability of Americans to sue federal law enforcement agents. But the Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government, holding that the Constitution's Supremacy Clause barred tort claims against the federal government in circumstances where an official's actions had 'some nexus with furthering a federal policy' and could 'reasonably be characterized' as within the range of federal law. The Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law group that represented the Martin family, argued that outcome would completely undermine the intent of Congress. Lawmakers strengthened the Federal Tort Claims Act following a pair of high-profile wrong-house raids in Collinsville, Illinois, in the early 1970s. During arguments before the Supreme Court in April, the FBI's handling of the Martin raid drew particular scorn from Justice Gorsuch, a conservative and sometimes-skeptic of federal government power. 'You might look at the address of the house before you knock down the door,' an incredulous Gorsuch pressed the lawyer representing the Justice Department. 'How about making sure you're on the right street? I mean, just the right street? Checking the street sign? Is that, you know, asking too much?' The Justice Department argued in part that it should not be liable because federal law bars tort suits when a federal employee is exercising discretion in carrying out their work. In this case, the government argued, the agents had to exercise discretion in how they confirmed they were at the correct house. This story is breaking and has been updated with additional details.
Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Elon Musk's entourage forces drastic move from the government
When Elon Musk joined President Donald Trump's White House as the head of the non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency, he did not have to go through the same vetting process as other cabinet members. Presidential cabinet members must be vetted and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, but "special government employees" like Elon Musk and top economic advisor Peter Navarro do not. Related: Elon Musk and Donald Trump's war of words forces allies to pick side But those roles are also limited in their scope and what they can do for the president. Musk's time at the White House concluded earlier this month, probably permanently, after the 130 days a presidential advisor is allowed to work for the president in any calendar year expired. Since then, Musk has done his best to burn every connection he has to Trump and the White House, criticizing his main legislative agenda and even saying that the reason the White House hasn't released the government files on Jefferey Epstein, as was promised during the campaign, is because the president is featured in the report. Despite the unfettered access Musk and DOGE have to millions of Americans' personal data, he was never vetted. At least not by this administration. Image source: Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images Last year, as foreign nationals came to visit Elon Musk at his various properties, U.S. government agents monitored their movements. In 2022 and 2023, several government agencies, including the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, tracked foreign nationals who visited Musk in an investigation. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the feds were watching to see if the people visiting Musk from countries in Eastern Europe were trying to influence him. Of the five companies he runs, SpaceX has access to the most sensitive government data and contracts and has had unprecedented access to top government officials, according to the Journal. Related: Elon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment People familiar with America PAC, the political action committee Musk started to help elect Trump, said they had to institute extensive vetting to keep foreigners in Musk's entourage out of their business. Musk has been in regular contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin since late 2022. His contact with foreign nationals has even forced his lawyers to advise him against seeking higher security clearance, according to the report, due to fear that he'd have to explain his relationships or have his clearance revoked entirely. Elon Musk became the first lieutenant to break ranks following his departure from the inner circle of the West Wing. Last month, Musk made it a point to wear a red hat emblazoned with the words "TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING" to a cabinet meeting. The gesture was part of the Trump administration's ritual of having the members say something effusive about the president at the beginning of each cabinet meeting. However, some distance from the White House seems to have changed Musk's mind about just how effective the president's policies have been in achieving what seems to be Musk's biggest political goal: balancing the budget. To get his way, Musk has gone full scorched earth, suggesting that the reason the federal government has not released its file on Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted pedophile who befriended some of the world's richest and most powerful people, is because President Trump is featured in the files. Elon Musk has been taking shots at the White House recently about the "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" that Trump is currently trying to get through Congress. The bipartisan Congressional Budget Office expects the bill to add between $2.4 trillion and $3.8 trillion to the U.S. deficit over the next decade. Related: Elon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
