Police And Health NZ Continue To Implement Mental Health Response Changes
Phase Two of the Police Mental Health Response Change Programme is set to be extended with a second group of districts implementing Phase Two from 19 May.
The tranche two districts have been jointly assessed for their readiness and the multi-agency Mental Health Response Change Programme Governance Group has endorsed their implementation.
Included in this second tranche will be:
Police districts Auckland City, Canterbury, Kaikōura as part of Tasman, Wellington, Bay of Plenty (excluding Tokoroa and Taupo), Eastern (excluding Wairoa), and Southern (excluding Waitaki and Central Lakes), and
Health NZ districts Auckland, Canterbury, South Canterbury, Capital Coast & Hutt Vally, Wairarapa, Bay of Plenty, Lakes (excluding Taupo), Hawke's Bay (excluding Wairoa), Tairāwhiti, and Southern (excluding Waitaki and Southern Lakes).
Police and Health NZ will continue to work closely with these teams and districts to support their preparation and implementation for the changes and will continue work with remaining districts to get them ready to start Phase Two.
The agencies anticipate tranche three districts will implement Phase Two changes on 16 June, pending final readiness assessments and governance group endorsement.
Police Assistant Commissioner Mike Johnson says we remain committed to our joint efforts towards a system that supports mental wellbeing and gives people access to the best help that works for them.
'Safety is always Police's number one priority. Police have always, and will always, respond when there is an immediate risk to life or safety.This will not change.
Outside of an emergency, Police have a threshold for what mental health related work sits with police and what doesn't.
'This supports us all to clarify roles and responses, ensuring Police are only involved where it's appropriate. That means where there is an offence identified (that we would attend through normal prioritisation) or where there is an immediate risk to life or safety,' says Assistant Commissioner Johnson.'
Health NZ Director of Specialist Mental Health and Addiction Karla Bergquist says agencies are committed to getting it right and have been working together to ensure the changes are well implemented.
'The safety and well-being of patients and our staff is paramount as we work to ensure people requiring mental health support receive the right care at the right time.
'We have adopted a staged approach and extended our timeframes for Phase Two, introducing it in a planned and safe way. As part of this planning work, we have developed new procedures with clinical input and created training materials for staff to support them through this change.
'We are focussed on continuous improvement and will keep listening to feedback from our teams and stakeholders and take a joint approach to review learnings as we go.'
'We'd like to assure the public that as always, there is a range of services to help people in serious mental distress or those who are concerned about whānau. You can free call or text 1737 , contact your local crisis assessment team or in a life-threatening situation, call 111.'
Phase One of the joint agency approach commenced on 4 November 2024, and Phase Two roll-out commenced in some districts on 14 April 2025. The changes will see an increased health-led response, enabling Police more time to do the work that only Police can, which the community expects them to do.
Notes:
Contact numbers for local crisis assessment teams are available online at: https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/services-and-support/health-care-...(link is external)
Phase Two of the mental health response changes began on 14 April in Police districts Waitematā, Counties Manukau, Waikato, and Tasman (excluding Kaikoura) and Health NZ districts Waitematā, Counties Manukau, Waikato (excluding Tokoroa and Taumarunui), Nelson-Marlborough, and West Coast.
The Phase Two changes remain the same and include:
60-minute handover detained persons in EDs – Police who have detained a person under the MH Act and transported them for an assessment will remain in the ED for a maximum one hour before departing, unless they consider there is an immediate risk to life or safety.
Changes to mental health assessments in custody – If someone is placed under the MH Act while in a Police custody suite, they will need to be taken to a health facility within 30 minutes. Custody rules will ensure people in distress are assessed appropriately, preferably in a health setting.
NZ Police and Health NZ districts are not the same (Police has 12, Health has 20), so there are some parts of a Police district which are not included in the comparable Health NZ district or vice versa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
‘Drinking, Urinating, Littering': Most Back Larger Alcohol Ban Area In Gisborne
With a "growing trend" of booze-fuelled incidents in the Gisborne suburb of Kaiti and in Gisborne's central city, a proposed alcohol ban extension is gaining public support. Gisborne District Council has proposed an extension to the existing alcohol ban area to cover more of the city centre and create a new ban in the Kaiti area. Submissions on the plan raised concerns around "congregating and drinking, urinating and littering" in public spaces covered under the proposed bans. According to the hearings report on the topic, 77 percent supported extending the current alcohol ban in Gisborne City to include areas east of the Taruheru River and Gisborne Cenotaph, 18 percent disagreed and five percent gave no clear response. Additionally, 80 percent supported a new alcohol ban area to include Kaiti Memorial Park, Kaiti Hub and the area outside Kaiti School, while 10 percent disagreed, and the remaining were either neutral or other. The public consultation ran through April, with 39 submissions received, including one verbal submission from Te Whatu Ora Tairāwhiti Medical Officer of Health Dr Douglas Lush and compliance officer Cheanne Johnson. During hearings on the alcohol control bylaw on Thursday, Lush and Johnson said Health NZ supported the proposed ban areas. Almost half (44.9 percent) of drinkers in Tairāwhiti were considered hazardous compared with the national average of 27.1 percent, said Johnson, quoting a 2022 report. "We know that Māori experience a higher rate of alcohol-related harm and hazardous drinking." Lush said there would be ongoing concerns about how the bylaw would be enforced and the drinkers moving to other areas, but the proposed amendments would reduce public exposure to drinking and denormalise alcohol consumption, particularly with Kaiti Mall being close to Kaiti School. According to the hearings report, almost all commenters who took a supportive position on the Kaiti ban emphasised "protecting children and families". Additionally, two written submissions suggested the area needed to include both sides of Rutene Rd up to Craig Rd, as this area was used by children commuting to school. During the hearings, councillor Colin Alder asked about potential unintended consequences of the ban, including how it could affect alfresco dining in the city or businesses like the Tatapouri fishing club, where - on busy occasions - patrons could drink outside, as long as they did not cross a designated line. Strategic planning manager Charlotte Knight said the bylaw could get a little bit "hazy", but it did not include licensed premises or their footprints. She said the police enforced the bylaw, which was a complaints-based response. Intermediate policy adviser Makarand Rodge said police had advised that they would "exercise a lot of discretion". The hearings report notes that an internal submission, written by a council staff member, described how a group of day-drinkers verbally abused council staff and contractors repeatedly, while they installed benches and picnic tables in Kelvin Park, Marina Park and Rose Gardens. The group also interfered with their tools and worksites, and created "ongoing staff-safety concerns". "Within two weeks of installation, the new furniture had been defaced with graffiti." The cost to remediate the damage was "a recurring financial burden". Overall, the hearing report said the reasons for supporting the city centre extension included reducing "unruly or abusive behaviour", and that intoxicated behaviour at the Gisborne Cenotaph or river "undermines the memorial's importance and public comfort". Submitter Gael Alderton wrote that they were sick of seeing "congregating and drinking, urinating and littering" in the public spaces outside the museum, council building, cenotaph and along the river banks. "[It's] unpleasant for residents and not good for visitors to the city. Puts normal folk off sitting down or having lunch in these areas." However, submitters in opposition suggested it was better to address the source of the problem "by helping at-risk drinkers or homeless people". Submitter Daniel Blair said the ban might target people "enjoying a glass of wine, while having a picnic near the river". "Drunk and disorderly is another story, which covers the entire region already, and police respond accordingly," he wrote. "The more bans we have, the more freedoms we lose." Police data suggested "a growing trend of alcohol-related incidents in these locations, highlighting the need to consider options to extend the current alcohol ban", according to the hearing report. At an October council meeting, councillors decided to review the current Alcohol Control Bylaw 2015. The amended proposals also included updating the maps in the bylaw for clarity, with which 82 percent agreed, three percent disagreed and 15 percent were neutral. Depending on the panel discussion and suggestions, staff will prepare a report for the council for final approval at the next sustainable Tairāwhiti or council meeting. Areas in the current bylaw that are not addressed in the amended proposals remain unchanged.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
'Drinking, urinating': Majority back extending Gisborne alcohol ban
With a "growing trend" of booze-fuelled incidents in Gisborne's central city and Kaiti, a proposed alcohol ban extension is gaining public support. Gisborne District Council has proposed an extension to the existing alcohol ban area to cover more of the city centre and create a new ban in the Kaiti area. Submissions on the plan raised concerns around "congregating and drinking, urinating and littering" in public spaces covered under the proposed bans. According to the hearings report on the topic, 77% supported extending the current alcohol ban in Gisborne City to include areas east of the Taruheru River and Gisborne Cenotaph, 18% disagreed, and 5% gave no clear response. Additionally, 80% supported a new alcohol ban area to include Kaiti Memorial Park, Kaiti Hub, and the area outside Kaiti School, while 10% disagreed, and the remaining were either neutral or other. ADVERTISEMENT The public consultation ran through April, with 39 submissions received, including one verbal submission from Te Whatu Ora Tairāwhiti Medical Officer of Health Dr Douglas Lush and compliance officer Cheanne Johnson. During hearings on the alcohol control bylaw on Thursday, Lush and Johnson said Health NZ supported the proposed ban areas. Almost half (44.9%) of drinkers in Tairāwhiti were considered hazardous compared with the national average of 27.1%, said Johnson, quoting a 2022 report. "We know that Māori experience a higher rate of alcohol-related harm and hazardous drinking." Lush said there would be ongoing concerns about how the bylaw would be enforced and the drinkers moving to other areas. The image on the right shows the proposed alcohol ban area in Kaiti. The one on the left shows the proposed ban extension in the CDB. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) However, the proposed amendments would reduce the public exposure to drinking and denormalise alcohol consumption, particularly with Kaiti Mall being close to Kaiti School, he said. ADVERTISEMENT According to the hearings report, almost all commenters who took a supportive position on the Kaiti ban emphasised "protecting children and families". Additionally, two written submissions suggested the area needed to include both sides of Rutene Rd up to Craig Rd, as this area was used by children commuting to school. During the hearings, councillor Colin Alder asked about potential unintended consequences of the ban. Including how it could affect alfresco dining in the city, or businesses such as the Tatapouri fishing club, where, on busy occasions, patrons could drink outside as long as they did not cross a designated line. Strategic planning manager Charlotte Knight said the bylaw could get a little bit "hazy," but it did not include licensed premises or their footprints. She said the police enforced the bylaw, which was a complaints-based response. Intermediate policy adviser Makarand Rodge said police had advised that they would "exercise a lot of discretion". The hearings report notes that an internal submission written by a council staff member described how a group of day-drinkers verbally abused council staff and contractors repeatedly while they were installing benches and picnic tables in Kelvin Park, Marina Park and Rose Gardens. ADVERTISEMENT The group also interfered with their tools and worksites, and created "ongoing staff safety concerns". "Within two weeks of installation, the new furniture had been defaced with graffiti." The cost to remediate the damage was "a recurring financial burden". Overall, the hearing report said the reasons for supporting the city centre extension included reducing "unruly or abusive behaviour" and that intoxicated behaviour at the Gisborne Cenotaph or river "undermines the memorial's importance and public comfort". Submitter Gael Alderton wrote that they were sick of seeing "congregating and drinking, urinating and littering" in the public spaces outside the museum, council building, cenotaph and along the riverbanks. "[It's] unpleasant for residents and not good for visitors to the city. Puts normal folk off sitting down or having lunch in these areas." However, submitters in opposition suggested it was better to address the source of the problem "by helping at-risk drinkers or homeless people". ADVERTISEMENT Submitter Daniel Blair said the ban might target people "enjoying a glass of wine while having a picnic near the river". "Drunk and disorderly is another story, which covers the entire region already, and police respond accordingly," he wrote. "The more bans we have, the more freedoms we lose." Police data suggested "a growing trend of alcohol-related incidents in these locations, highlighting the need to consider options to extend the current alcohol ban," according to the hearing report. At a council meeting in October, councillors decided to review the current Alcohol Control Bylaw 2015. The amended proposals also included updating the maps in the bylaw for clarity, with which 82% agreed, 3% disagreed, and 15% were neutral. Depending on the panel discussion and suggestions, staff will prepare a report for the council for final approval at the next sustainable Tairāwhiti or council meeting. Areas in the current bylaw that are not addressed in the amended proposals remain unchanged. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Police pull-back from mental crisis callouts continues
The police's planned retreat from mental health crisis callouts will reach another milestone on Monday. Photo: RNZ / Richard Tindiller The police's staged retreat from responding to mental crisis callouts reaches another milestone on Monday, with a 60-minute limit on patient handovers at emergency departments taking effect nationwide. That change - along with a requirement for people in mental distress to be assessed in health settings, not police cells - is the second of four stages in a year-long programme announced by former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster last August. The rollout has been slower than planned , due to the fact health services in some regions were not ready. Phase Two changes take effect from Monday in the third and final group of regions: Police assistant commissioner Mike Johnson said police and health remained committed to "joint efforts towards making sure people have access to the right help at the right time, which works best for them". "Police have always, and will always, respond when there is an immediate risk to life or safety. The change is about an increased health-led response, enabling our staff more time to get back into our communities do the work that only police can." Health NZ director of specialist mental health and addiction Karla Bergquist said a range of mental health support was available "for those who need it". "This change is about ensuring people requiring mental health support receive the right care at the right time, while maintaining the safety and well-being of patients and our staff. "I'd like to assure the public there is a range of services to help people in mental distress or those who are concerned about the mental health of whānau. "If a person is in serious mental distress or crisis, support is available from their local crisis team." Phase Two had "generally gone well" in districts with strong local partnerships between police and health, she said. Bergquist said detailed planning for Phase Three was underway and it was hoped to confirm new implementation dates soon. "We will continue communicating with each district to ensure a successful, joint approach to Phase Three for both NZ Police and Health NZ and the people who come into contact with our services. "An implementation date for Phase Four is unconfirmed but it will follow Phase Three." Phase Three - which was initially to begin April to June - involves police applying a "new response thresholds" to requests for assistance from health practitioners, or to help with missing person reports from mental health wards and facilities. Phase Four - originally scheduled to take effect between July and September - will cut ED handovers to 15 minutes, unless there is an immediate safety risk, and fewer welfare checks "when there is no risk of criminality or to life or safety". Police said there were "a lot of complexities to these changes" and further consideration and consultation would occur before any final decisions were made. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
