Opinion - Suddenly, immigration enforcement is job one for the entire federal government
President Trump has decided that the most important mission, across the federal government, is immigration enforcement — not investigating serious crimes of drugs or guns, terrorists or tax evaders, or preparing our military for missions overseas.
His administration has shifted unprecedented federal resources to this mission — the biggest such reorganization since 9/11. But is it making America safer, or leaving us more vulnerable?
Trump's executive orders use language evocative of the period after 9/11 and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. The orders refer to a migration emergency, invoke the language of war — 'invasion' and 'predatory incursion' — and designate as terrorist organizations the cartels that have been facilitating this migration.
But even after 9/11, emergency warlike powers were not invoked against immigration to this extent.
Several of Trump's executive actions have redirected the missions and resources of not only DHS but also the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State to prioritize immigration enforcement.
One is designed 'to ensure that the Armed Forces of the United States prioritize the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the United States along our national borders.' Trump's orders declaring an 'invasion' of migrants are the basis for this redirection of military activity.
The same order gives the military command with responsibility for the defense of North America the mission to 'seal the borders' and a mandate to create mission plans and guidance for the use of the Force to repel 'forms of invasion, including unlawful mass migration, narcotics trafficking, human smuggling and trafficking, and other criminal activities.'
Note the recognition that these are 'criminal' activities, although they are described as an 'invasion.' A longstanding law, the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, prevents the military from engaging in civilian law enforcement inside the United States, with an exception under the Insurrection Act of 1807 — which the Trump administration has threatened to use.
These changes have led to a significant redeployment of military and federal law enforcement resources toward immigration enforcement inside the United States. On the military side, these include using Department of Defense facilities to detain arrested migrants, employing Department of Defense aircraft to deport migrants, deploying Navy warships to the Gulf of Mexico to manage illegal immigration, and using Air Force reconnaissance planes to monitor the southern border.
Another recent action reassigned a 60-foot strip of federal land along the border in New Mexico and Texas as a military zone, which allows the military to arrest migrants crossing there. Military resources have been used at the border in the past, but never to this extent in modern times.
Arrests at the border have reached record lows, raising questions about this continuing use of military assets. Arrests inside the country are high, disruptive and fear-generating, even though deportations haven't reached Biden-era levels. The fiscal costs are also high, forcing the Department of Homeland Security to reconsider using military aircraft for deportations.
Meanwhile, federal law enforcement resources across the government are also being redirected. The office of Homeland Security Investigations within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was specifically redirected back to immigration enforcement as its primary mission. This reversal leaves its work investigating human trafficking, counter-proliferation, drug smuggling and other missions as secondary.
Another executive order directed the attorney general and the secretary of Homeland Security to supplement available personnel to secure the southern border and enforce immigration laws, essentially ordering law enforcement officers from the Drug Enforcement Administration; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives; FBI; and the U.S. Marshalls Service to serve as immigration agents.
The Homeland Security secretary also requested that IRS criminal investigators assist with immigration enforcement and deputized the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service as immigration officers. And recent reports even have U.S. Postal Service Inspectors being used in immigration investigations.
On the prosecutions side, the Department of Justice has been ordered to prioritize prosecution of all criminal penalties authorized under immigration law, including many offenses that have not been criminally prosecuted in decades, such as misdemeanor fines or imprisonment for failing to report a change of address.
These actions raise questions about whether other crucial law enforcement functions are being de-emphasized: Are the Drug Enforcement Administration's drug cartel investigations, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives' illegal gun tracking, FBI's serious crimes and terrorism investigations, ICE's child trafficking investigations, and the Department of Justice prosecutions being affected? How long is this redeployment expected to last?
Yes, the increase in immigration during the Biden administration created significant challenges at the border and in U.S. cities, with some entrants posing criminal or security threats. However, most immigrants do not fall into these categories. That makes the Trump administration's singular focus on immigration enforcement questionable.
Despite the administration's claim it is going after 'the worst of the worst,' it also is deporting student protestors, families, and those fleeing persecution. And the actions of the vast majority of immigrants do not support the administration's claims that we are facing an 'invasion' or terrorist threat so existential as to call for several national emergency declarations. At least one federal judge has agreed.
Of course, we should take all legitimate threats to our homeland and our borders seriously. But those are not limited to the realm of immigration. In zeroing in on immigration enforcement, the administration risks neglecting other serious threats to national security — to our peril.
Theresa Cardinal Brown is a fellow at the National Immigration Forum, a Council on National Security and Immigration leader and a veteran of the Department of Homeland Security who served in the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
ICE protests nationwide come as agency scrambles to meet Trump's immigration arrest quotas
Protests unfolding nationwide against President Donald Trump's immigration agenda come as Immigration and Customs Enforcement races to meet White House arrest quotas. Since Trump took office, ICE, which had previously been operating with a set of guidelines focused on public safety and national security threats, has had to pivot as the key agency at the core of the president's campaign promise to carry out mass deportations. While the administration has touted its immigration crackdown publicly, privately officials have come under fire for failing to meet White House arrest quotas, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions, For some agents, the greater latitude was a welcome move, allowing them to have more discretion on who they arrest. Still, agents have continued to come under pressure from senior Trump officials to arrest more people, including those with no criminal records. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, architect of the administration's most hardline immigration policies, communicated that urgency in a meeting last month with senior ICE officials, telling agents to search anywhere and everywhere for undocumented immigrants, according to multiple sources. ICE agents have shown up at routine immigration checks, immigration courts, and worksites, among other locations. The speed at which agents are trying to arrest migrants in the United States has raised alarm among immigrant advocates and former ICE officials. White House border czar Tom Homan maintained this week that despite protests, ICE operations to enforce Trump's immigration policies would continue. 'They'll continue every day, not only in California, Los Angeles, they're gonna continue every city across the country – we have teams throughout the country that are out there looking for those in the country,' Homan told CNN's Kaitlan Collins Monday on 'The Source.' 'We're in every city and country, and ICE is going to be out every single day and will continue to be there regardless what's happening in LA.' The arrests have also strained ICE detention, serving as yet another reminder of the logistical challenges the administration still faces as it tries to ramp up deportations. As of Monday, there were about 55,000 people in ICE custody. The agency, which relies in part on cooperation with local jails, is only funded for 41,500 beds.
New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Newsom Tells Nation That Trump Is Destroying American Democracy
Gov. Gavin Newsom made the case in a televised address Tuesday evening that President Trump's decisions to send military forces to immigration protests in Los Angeles have put the nation at the precipice of authoritarianism. The California governor urged Americans to stand up to Mr. Trump, calling it a 'perilous moment' for democracy and the country's long-held legal norms. 'California may be first, but it clearly won't end here,' Mr. Newsom said, speaking to cameras from a studio in Los Angeles. 'Other states are next. Democracy is next.' 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes — the moment we've feared has arrived,' he added. Mr. Newsom spoke on the fifth day of protests in Los Angeles against federal immigration raids that have sent fear and anger through many communities in Southern California. He said Mr. Trump had 'inflamed a combustible situation' by taking over California's National Guard, and by calling up 4,000 troops and 700 Marines. The governor is considered a possible Democratic presidential candidate in 2028, and his Tuesday night speech, called 'Democracy at a Crossroads,' sounded national in scope. It aired on some national networks and on Mr. Newsom's social media accounts. The current political standoff has made it possible for Mr. Newsom to have a wider platform, and he has jousted with President Trump and Republicans for several days in interviews and on social media. 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves.,' Mr. Newsom said in his speech. 'But they do not stop there. Trump and his loyalists thrive on division because it allows them to take more power and exert even more control.' The address was an unusual move for Mr. Newsom, who has dyslexia and dislikes reading from a teleprompter to deliver formal speeches. But he has been using every communication channel possible to raise alarms about the extraordinary measures Mr. Trump has taken to mobilize the military for domestic uses. Not since the civil rights movement in the 1960s has a president sent National Guard troops to quell unrest without the support of the state's governor. 'I ask everyone to take the time to reflect on this perilous moment,' he said, 'a president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetrating a unified assault on American traditions.'
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Associated Press seeks full appeals court hearing on access to Trump administration events
The Associated Press on Tuesday asked for a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, seeking to overturn a three-judge panel's ruling that allowed the Trump administration to continue blocking the AP's access to some presidential events — a four-month case that has raised questions about what level of journalistic access to the presidency the First Amendment permits.
