logo
Rural patients face tough choices when their hospitals stop delivering babies

Rural patients face tough choices when their hospitals stop delivering babies

Miami Herald6 days ago

WINNER, S.D. - Sophie Hofeldt planned to receive prenatal care and give birth at her local hospital, 10 minutes from her house. Instead, she's driving more than three hours round trip for her appointments.
The hospital, Winner Regional Health, recently joined the increasing number of rural hospitals shuttering their birthing units.
"It's going to be a lot more of a stress and a hassle for women to get the health care that they need because they have to go so much further," said Hofeldt, who has a June 10 due date for her first child.
Hofeldt said longer drives mean spending more on gas - and a higher risk of not making it to the hospital in time. "My main concern is having to give birth in a car," she said.
More than 100 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies since 2021, according to the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, a nonprofit organization. Such closures are often blamed on shortages of staff and money.
About 58% of South Dakota counties have no birthing facilities, the second-highest rate among states, after North Dakota, according to March of Dimes. And the South Dakota health department says pregnant womenand infants in the state, especially those who are Black or Native American, experience high rates of complications and death.
Winner Regional Health serves rural communities, including parts of the Rosebud Sioux Indian Reservation, in South Dakota and Nebraska. It delivered 107 babies last year, down from 158 in 2021, said CEO Brian Williams.
The nearest birthing hospitals are in rural towns an hour or more from Winner. But several women said driving to those facilities would take them through areas without reliable cellphone service, which could be a problem if they have an emergency along the way.
KFF Health News spoke with five patients from the Winner area who planned to deliver at Avera St. Mary's Hospital in Pierre, about 90 miles from Winner, or at one of the large medical centers in Sioux Falls, 170 miles away.
Hofeldt and her boyfriend drive every three weeks to her prenatal appointments at the Pierre hospital, which serves the small capital city and vast surrounding rural area. She'll have to make weekly trips closer to her due date. Neither of their jobs provides paid time off for such appointments.
"When you have to go to Pierre, you have to take almost the whole day off," said Hofeldt, who was born at the Winner hospital.
That means forfeiting pay while spending extra money on travel. Not everyone has gas money, let alone access to a car, and bus services are scarce in rural America. Some women also need to pay for child care during their appointments. And when the baby comes, family members may need to pay for a hotel.
Amy Lueking, Hofeldt's doctor in Pierre, said when patients can't overcome these barriers, obstetricians can give them home monitoring devices and offer phone- or video-based care. Patients can also receive prenatal care at a local hospital or clinic before connecting with a doctor at a birthing hospital, Lueking said.
However, some rural areas don't have access to telehealth. And some patients, such as Hofeldt, don't want to split up their care, form relationships with two doctors, and deal with logistics like transferring medical records.
During a recent appointment, Lueking glided an ultrasound device over Hofeldt's uterus. The "woosh-woosh" rhythm of the fetal heartbeat thumped over the monitor.
"I think it's the best sound in the whole wide world," Lueking said.
Hofeldt told Lueking she wanted her first delivery to be "as natural as possible."
But ensuring a birth goes according to plan can be difficult for rural patients. To guarantee they make it to the hospital on time, some schedule an induction, in which doctors use medicine or procedures to stimulate labor.
Katie Larson lives on a ranch near Winner in the town of Hamill, population 14. She had hoped to avoid having her labor induced.
Larson wanted to wait until her contractions began naturally, then drive to Avera St. Mary's in Pierre. But she scheduled an induction in case she didn't go into labor by April 13, her due date.
Larson ended up having to reschedule for April 8 to avoid a conflict with an important cattle sale she and her husband were preparing for.
"People are going to be either forced to pick an induction date when it wasn't going to be their first choice or they're going to run the risk of having a baby on the side of the road," she said.
Lueking said it's very rare for people to give birth while heading to the hospital in a car or ambulance. But last year, she said, five women who planned to deliver in Pierre ended up delivering in other hospitals' emergency rooms after rapidly progressing labor or weather made it too risky to drive long distances.
Nanette Eagle Star's plan was to deliver at the Winner hospital, five minutes from home, until the hospital announced it would be closing its labor and delivery unit. She then decided to give birth in Sioux Falls, because her family could save money by staying with relatives there.
Eagle Star's plan changed again when she went into early labor and the weather was too dangerous to drive or take a medical helicopter to Sioux Falls.
"It happened so fast, in the middle of a snowstorm," she said.
Eagle Star delivered at the Winner hospital after all, but in the ER, without an epidural pain blocker since no anesthesiologist was available. It was just three days after the birthing unit closed.
The end of labor and delivery services at Winner Regional Health isn't just a health issue, local women said. It also has emotional and financial impacts on the community.
Eagle Star fondly recalls going to doctor appointments with her sisters when she was a child. As soon as they arrived, they'd head to a hallway with baby photos taped to the wall and begin "a scavenger hunt" for Polaroids of themselves and their relatives.
"On both sides it was just filled with babies' pictures," Eagle Star said. She remembers thinking, "look at all these cute babies that were born here in Winner."
Hofeldt said many locals are sad their babies won't be born in the same hospital they were.
Anora Henderson, a family physician, said a lack of maternity care can lead to poor outcomes for infants. Those babies may develop health problems that will require lifelong, often expensive care and other public support.
"There is a community effect," she said. "It's just not as visible and it's farther down the road."
Henderson resigned in May from Winner Regional Health, where she delivered vaginal births and assisted on cesarean sections. The last baby she delivered was Eagle Star's.
To be designated a birthing hospital, facilities must be able to conduct C-sections and provide anesthesia 24/7, Henderson explained.
Williams, the hospital's CEO, said Winner Regional Health hasn't been able to recruit enough medical professionals trained in those skills.
For the last several years, the hospital was only able to offer birthing services by spending about $1.2 million a year on temporary physicians, he said, and it could no longer afford to do that.
Another financial challenge is that many births at rural hospitals are covered by Medicaid, the federal and state program serving people with low incomes or disabilities. The program typically pays about half of what private insurers do for childbirth services, according to a 2022 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Williams said about 80% of deliveries at Winner Regional Health were covered by Medicaid.
Obstetric units are often the biggest financial drain on rural hospitals, and therefore they're frequently the first to close when a hospital is struggling, the GAO report said.
Williams said the hospital still provides prenatal care and that he'd love to restart deliveries if he could hire enough staff.
Henderson, the physician who resigned from the Winner hospital, has witnessed the decline in rural maternity care over decades.
She remembers tagging along with her mother for appointments before her sister was born. Her mother traveled about 100 miles each way after the hospital in the town of Kadoka shuttered in 1979.
Henderson practiced for nearly 22 years at Winner Regional Health, sparing women from having to travel to give birth like her mother did.
Over the years, she took in new patients as a nearby rural hospital and then an Indian Health Service facility closed their birthing units. Then, Henderson's own hospital stopped deliveries.
"What's really frustrating me now is I thought I was going to go into family medicine and work in a rural area and that's how we were going to fix this, so people didn't have to drive 100 miles to have a baby," she said.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schoolchildren struggling with headaches and vomiting from oil and gas plant pollution
Schoolchildren struggling with headaches and vomiting from oil and gas plant pollution

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Schoolchildren struggling with headaches and vomiting from oil and gas plant pollution

In Counselor, New Mexico, a routine drive home for Billton Werito and his son Amari is a stark reminder of the challenges faced by families living near natural gas operations. On a Tuesday in March, as Werito navigated the dirt road leading to their house, Amari was absent from school due to nausea and a headache. "It happens a lot," Amari explained, highlighting a recurring issue linked to the smell of "rotten egg with propane" emanating from nearby natural gas wells. This odour frequently affects Lybrook Elementary School, where Amari and around 70 other Navajo students attend classes. His younger brother also experiences similar symptoms, often leading to missed school days. Billton Werito expressed his concern, stating, "They just keep getting sick. I have to take them out of class because of the headaches. Especially the younger one, he's been throwing up and won't eat." These health issues are not only disrupting the children's education but also raising concerns about their overall well-being and academic progress. Lybrook sits in the heart of New Mexico's San Juan Basin, a major oil and gas deposit that, along with the Permian Basin in the state's southeast, is supplying natural gas that meets much of the nation's electricity demand. The gas pulled from tens of thousands of wells in New Mexico has reaped huge benefits for the entire country. Natural gas has become a go-to fuel for power plants from coast to coast, sometimes replacing dirtier coal-fired plants and, by extension, improving air quality. Locally, oil and gas companies employ thousands of workers, often in areas with few other opportunities, all while boosting the state's budget with billions in royalty payments. But those benefits may come at a cost for thousands of students in New Mexico whose schools sit near oil and gas pipelines, wellheads and flare stacks. An analysis of state and federal data found 694 oil and gas wells with new or active permits within a mile of a school in the state. This means that around 29,500 students in 74 schools and pre-schools potentially face exposure to noxious emissions, as extraction from the ground can release unhealthy fumes. At Lybrook, where Amari just finished sixth grade, fewer than 6 per cent of students are proficient at math, and only a fifth meet state standards for science and reading proficiency. Other factors could help explain students' poor achievement. Poverty rates are higher in some areas with high levels of gas development, and students at rural schools overall tend to face challenges that can adversely affect academic performance. AP's analysis found that two-thirds of the schools within a mile of an oil or gas well were low-income, and the population is around 24 per cent Native American and 45 per cent Hispanic. But research has found that student learning is directly harmed by air pollution from fossil fuels — even when socioeconomic factors are taken into account. And it's not just New Mexico where this is a risk. An AP analysis of data from the Global Oil and Gas Extraction Tracker found over 1,000 public schools across 13 states that are within five miles of a major oil or gas field. Major fields are collections of wells that produce the highest amount of energy in a state. 'This kind of air pollution has a real, measurable effect on students,' said Mike Gilraine, a professor of economics at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, who studies connections between air quality and student performance. In 2024, Gilraine co-wrote a study showing that student test scores were closely associated with air contamination. Each measured increase in PM2.5, a type of pollution created from the burning of fossil fuels, was associated with a significant decline in student test scores, Gilraine found. Conversely, researchers have documented that reductions in air pollution have led to higher test scores and fewer absences. 'To me the surprise was certainly the magnitude of the effects' of air pollution on students, Gilraine said. 'It's hard to find a similar factor that would have such an impact on schools nationwide.' America's shift to natural gas has resulted in substantial increases in student achievement nationwide, Gilraine's research shows, as it has displaced dirtier coal and led to cleaner air on the whole. But there has been little data on air quality across New Mexico, even as it has become one of the most productive states in the nation for natural gas. State regulators have installed only 20 permanent air monitors, most in areas without oil or gas production. Independent researchers have extensively studied the air quality near schools in at least two locations in the state, however. One is Lybrook, which sits within a mile of 17 active oil and gas wells. In 2024, scientists affiliated with Princeton and Northern Arizona universities conducted an air-monitoring study at the school, finding that levels of pollutants — including benzene, a cancer-causing byproduct of natural gas production that is particularly harmful to children — were spiking during school hours, to nearly double the levels known to cause chronic or acute health effects. That research followed a 2021 health impact assessment that was done with support from several local nonprofits and foundations, which analyzed the effects of the area's oil and gas development on residents. The findings were startling: More than 90 per cent of people surveyed suffered from sinus problems. Nosebleeds, shortness of breath and nausea were widespread. The report attributed the symptoms to the high levels of pollutants that researchers found — including, near Lybrook, hydrogen sulfide, a compound that gives off the sulfur smell that Amari Werito associated with his headaches. Those studies helped confirm what many community members already knew, said Daniel Tso, a community leader who served on the committee that oversaw the 2021 health impact assessment. 'The children and the grandchildren need a safe homeland,' Tso said during an interview in March, standing outside a cluster of gas wells within a mile of Lybrook Elementary. 'You smell that?' he said, nodding towards a nearby wellhead, which smelled like propane. 'That's what the kids at the school are breathing in. I've had people visiting this area from New York. They spend five minutes here and say, 'Hey, I got a headache.' And the kids are what, six hours a day at the school breathing this?' Lybrook school officials did not respond to requests for comment. Researchers have identified similar air quality problems in New Mexico's southeast. In 2023, a team of scientists from a coalition of universities conducted a detailed, yearlong study of the air in Loving, a small town in the Permian Basin. Local air quality, researchers found, was worse than in downtown Los Angeles, and the tested air contained the fifth-highest level of measured ozone contamination in the U.S. The source of the ozone — a pollutant that's especially hazardous to children — was the area's network of gas wells and related infrastructure. Some of that infrastructure sits within a half-mile of a campus that houses Loving's elementary, middle and high schools. A small group of residents has spoken out about the area's air quality, saying it has caused respiratory problems and other health issues. But for most locals, any concerns about pollution are outweighed by the industry's economic benefits. Representatives of the oil and gas industry have claimed the air quality studies themselves are not trustworthy. 'There needs to be a robust study to actually answer these questions,' said Andrea Felix, vice president of regulatory affairs for the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association (NMOGA). Felix said other sources of emissions, such as cars and trucks, are likely a larger source of air quality problems near wells. 'Companies follow the best available science' for well placement and emissions controls, Felix said, and also contribute huge amounts of money to the state's education budget through streams like royalties and direct expenditures. In the most recent fiscal year, oil and gas revenue supported $1.7 billion in K-12 spending in New Mexico, according to a NMOGA report. Officials with Loving Municipal Schools are also skeptical of the alarm over the wells. Loving Superintendent Lee White said the school district used funds from the oil and gas industry to pay for a new wing at the elementary school, a science lab for students, turf on the sports field and training and professional development for teachers. He said the industry's contributions to state coffers can't be ignored. 'Are we willing to give that up because people say our air is not clean?' he said during an interview. 'It's just as clean as anywhere else.' As White spoke, a drill rig worked a couple of miles east of Loving's elementary school while parents poured into the gymnasium to watch kindergartners collect their diplomas. White touted the district's success, saying the elementary school scores above state averages for reading, math and science proficiency, while Loving's high school students far outpace the state average for college and career readiness. But environmental groups, attorneys and residents continue to push for limits on drilling near schools. Those efforts saw a boost in 2023, when New Mexico State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard issued an executive order prohibiting new oil and gas leases on state-owned land within a mile of schools. Industry representatives decried the move, saying it added potentially insurmountable costs and barriers to drilling operators. However, AP's analysis found that relatively few wells would be impacted even if the rule applied to all of New Mexico; only around 1 per cent of oil and gas wells in the state are within a mile of a school. In the years since, residents of areas where exploration is heavy have lobbied for legislation prohibiting gas operations within a mile of schools, regardless of land status. That bill died in committee during the most recent session of the New Mexico legislature. Advocates have also sued the state over an alleged lack of pollution controls. That suit is currently pending in state court.

Novartis announces data from new subgroup analysis of Phase III NATALEE trial
Novartis announces data from new subgroup analysis of Phase III NATALEE trial

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Novartis announces data from new subgroup analysis of Phase III NATALEE trial

Novartis (NVS) is announcing data from a new subgroup analysis of the Phase III NATALEE trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Kisqali plus endocrine therapy in patients with stage II and III hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer, EBC, at high risk of recurrence across age and menopausal status. The data will be presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO, Annual Meeting. Results at median follow-up of 44.2 months show that patients receiving Kisqali continued to see consistent reductions in risk of recurrence across all efficacy measures, regardless of age and menopausal status. In this one-year post-treatment analysis, pre-menopausal and younger patients, who often present with more aggressive disease characteristics, experienced greater reductions in risk of recurrence and fewer treatment discontinuations due to adverse events than post-menopausal patients. Results include: 33% reduction in relative risk of invasive disease observed in pre-menopausal early breast cancer patients receiving Kisqali in 1-year post-treatment analysis; Tolerability remained consistent, with fewer treatment discontinuations due to adverse events among pre-menopausal patients; Separate real-world analysis presented at ASCO demonstrates differences in treatment outcomes that underscore critical need to improve care for Black patients with EBC. Confident Investing Starts Here:

There are more treatments than ever for hair loss in women. Experts weigh in
There are more treatments than ever for hair loss in women. Experts weigh in

Hamilton Spectator

time19 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

There are more treatments than ever for hair loss in women. Experts weigh in

There's nothing quite like a good hair day, with that waterfall of shine befitting a Pantene commercial. But for the up to 40 per cent of females who experience thinning by age 50, those good hair days are harder to come by as we get older. A bit of shedding every day is part of a normal hair cycle, but if you start to see an increase in the amount of hair caught in your hairbrush, or you have a widening part, recessed temples or bald patches, it might be worth making an appointment. 'Most patients don't present to their doctor until they've lost about 50 per cent of their hair,' says Dr. Michael Brandt, a facial plastic surgeon and hair restoration specialist at Form Face + Body . 'They just don't notice it.' A dermatologist, specialized doctor or certified trichologist can help you find the cause of your loss and provide treatment options, usually topicals and medications followed by in-clinic therapies as necessary. Unfortunately, there is an element of trial and error with many hair loss treatments. 'Things like PRP and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are second- or third-line options,' notes Caroline Ruggiero, IAT-certified trichologist and CEO of Truly You Hair & Scalp Clinic . 'Maybe they'll work, maybe they won't.' That's because the research on non-medical therapies often isn't as rigorous and may be funded by the companies creating the technology. Plus, they aren't subsidized by insurance. Many dermatology and trichology clinics still offer these solutions, though, because they can be very effective for some patients. Another issue with hair loss treatments is the lack of research in women compared to men — especially women with darker skin tones. 'I'm tired of companies studying their devices with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV,' says dermatologist Dr. Rénee A. Beach, founder of DermAtelier on Avenue. 'Basically, they test on white people and maybe some East Asian people, not brown and Black people.' Despite these ongoing issues in the industry, there are a wide range of treatment options — if you're willing to commit. 'There are easily 20 types of female hair loss, each with subtypes,' says Beach, noting that different types have different causes. Generally speaking, these types of alopecia (the medical term for hair loss) are grouped into two categories: non-scarring and scarring. In non-scarring hair loss, the follicles are not destroyed and can potentially regrow hair: There are also several types of scarring alopecia, where the hair follicles are destroyed and replaced with scar tissue that prevents regrowth. The cause isn't always clear, but an autoimmune condition is often a factor. There are different types of scarring alopecia, in total affecting around three per cent of people with hair loss . Yes, in many cases — especially if you catch it early. But an accurate diagnosis is key. 'I guarantee that there are people walking around with very complex disorders who think they have telogen effluvium or female pattern hair loss,' says Ruggiero. 'Without knowing what's happening, you don't know which treatments will work.' To get a proper diagnosis, see a dermatologist or certified trichologist. Trichologists are not doctors, so they will have to work with your primary-care physician to order blood work or prescribe medications. Still, they can offer educated recommendations and may be easier to book than a dermatologist. According to new research , only 38 per cent of Ontario dermatologists are accepting OHIP referrals for hair loss. Once you have your diagnosis, it's best to try just one treatment at a time. That way, you'll be able to pinpoint what's behind any improvements or, in some cases, side effects. Keep in mind that most treatments take six months to show results (be wary of so-called quick fixes!) and may require lifelong upkeep. 'That's probably one of the most disappointing things that people hear when they come to see me,' says Beach. 'If you find something that works for you, expect to continue it indefinitely.' Often, medications are the first-line response for female pattern hair loss, because they're backed by robust research (albeit primarily in men), help to retain existing hair and are often affordable. Minoxidil, whether in a topical like Rogaine or in prescription pill form, is a popular treatment that dilates the blood vessels, allowing more blood to reach the hair follicles. The pill is cheaper than the topical version and, for many people, is more convenient than rubbing Rogaine on the scalp twice per day. There's also a category of medications called 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. They help to block a hormone called DHT from shrinking the hair follicles, which is a significant factor in female pattern hair loss and can be a problem for women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. These medications work for many people, but can come with side effects (breast tenderness, headaches and decreased sex drive) and are contraindicated for anyone who has had breast cancer or a first-degree relative (mom or sister) who has had breast cancer. They may also impact egg quality, so it's rare to prescribe this medication to premenopausal women who hope to conceive. In this age group, a hormone blocker like spironolactone may be an option. For alopecia areata, one of the most effective treatments is a class of medications called JAK inhibitors, which can help to reduce inflammation. However, it has side effects and isn't typically covered by insurance. The exorbitant cost? Around $20,000 per year. Procedures like PRP, microneedling, light therapy and transplants are commonly used as adjunct therapies to oral medication. However, if someone doesn't want to risk the side effects of medication or has a contraindication, they may be the first approach. What it is: Commonly used for androgenetic alopecia and telogen effluvium, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) can be injected into the scalp to stimulate hair follicles with growth factors spun from your own blood. Scalp Botox — yes, the wrinkle-freezer — is also a newer option for treating these types of hair loss by reducing inflammation and oil production while stimulating blood flow to the follicles. What's involved in treatment: For PRP or PRF, your provider will first draw a small amount of blood from your arm and place it in a centrifuge to separate out the plasma and/or fibrin, then draw that substance up into a syringe. Numbing cream can be used before injecting PRP, PRF or Botox to reduce discomfort, which can feel like a sharp pressure. You may experience bruising, itching, redness or swelling that lasts for a few days. How many treatments are needed: For PRP and PRF, three treatments spaced four to six weeks apart, then maintenance treatments every three or four months; for scalp Botox, just like getting it in your forehead or around your eyes — about every three to four months. How much does it cost: $600 to $1,200 per session (though there are often discounts for packages). What it is: This hair loss treatment involves puncturing the scalp with tiny needles to create microchannels, which attracts oxygenated blood to the surface. These pathways allow growth-enhancing topicals like PRP, exosomes (derived from stem cells or placenta cells), or customized serums to better penetrate. There is also new regenerative technology out of Canada's own Acorn Biolabs that uses stem cells processed from 50 of your hair follicles to create a personalized secretome serum for application after microneedling. For all types of microneedling, the provider will apply an anesthetic cream to numb the area, then they'll create micro-injuries in the scalp with a dermaroller or dermapen — hand-held devices with tiny needles. You may experience some mild discomfort. Next, it's time for the chosen topical treatment, which will need to stay on for 12 or more hours. You'll be able to resume normal activities in a day or two, and may experience some redness and swelling for a couple days. How many treatments are needed: Three treatments spaced four to six weeks apart, then maintenance treatments every three or four months. How much does it cost: $500 to $1,000 per session with discounts on packages. For microneedling with a secretome serum, there's also a one-time cost of about $5,000 for stem cell collection and the production of 12 vials of serum. What it is: A device like the Alma TED uses ultrasound waves and air pressure to improve blood flow and absorption of a hair serum containing growth factors and peptides. What's involved in treatment: Your provider will apply the serum to your scalp, then will move a hand-held device over your head. It's painless and with no downtime but you'll have to leave the serum on your head for 24 hours. How many treatments are needed: Four treatments spaced one month apart, then maintenance treatments every four to six months. How much does it cost: $800 to $1,200 per session with discounts on packages. What it is: The most common laser for hair loss right now is low-level laser therapy (LLLT). It uses diffused red and near-infrared light to increase blood flow and stimulate the hair follicles. Some people — typically with short, straight hair — have good results, while others don't see a difference. On the more aggressive side of the laser spectrum, Health Canada recently cleared a non-ablative fractional laser called FoLix . It promises to stimulate hair growth by creating micro-wounds in the scalp with its tiny beams of energy, though its adoption into Canadian clinics hasn't picked up steam yet. What's involved in treatment: LLLT and FoLix each take about 30 minutes per treatment and are generally pain-free with no downtime. For LLLT, you sit with a helmet on your head and can read a book or scroll your phone. For FoLix, you lie down and your provider moves a hand-held device over your scalp, using the laser to target thinning areas. How many treatments are needed: Two to three weekly LLLT treatments for four to six weeks, then maintenance treatments every week; monthly FoLix treatments for four to six months. How much does it cost: $70 to $150 per LLLT treatment, with discounts on packages (some people choose to buy their own device [$1,500 to $5,000] if LLLT works for them); expect FoLix to ring in significantly higher per treatment. What it is: A hair transplant removes follicles from one area of the scalp (often the back of the head where hair is thicker or hair loss is less noticeable) and implants them in another. 'If there's global thinning, a hair transplant is not the answer,' notes Brandt. For candidates that have enough transplantable hair for the procedure, the follicles are traditionally harvested and implanted manually, but new technology is changing the process — and results. For example, the Artas iXi Robotic Hair Restoration system uses a robotic arm, multiple high-tech cameras and AI to improve the rate of successful transfer from 80 per cent in skilled human hands to more than 90 per cent. What's involved in treatment: Small strips of your hair are shaved at the back of your head so that the robot (or your provider) can access the follicles in the area. For women with long hair, these strips usually can't be noticed. As you lie face down, the follicles are then grafted with a scalpel, needle, or the Artas iXi, which acts kind of like a hole punch to harvest the follicles over the course of three hours. After a short break, the grafts are reinserted into the scalp's thinned-out areas, one by one. Altogether, the procedure takes six to 10 hours and nerve blocks and Ativan are used to manage pain and anxiety. After two weeks, the donor area should be fully healed, but it takes at least a year to see the full results. How many treatments are needed: One, in most cases (however, hair loss tends to be progressive and will likely continue with age). How much does it cost: $8,000 to $15,000 on average, depending on how many follicles are harvested. Recently, there's been a scalp-care boom, popularizing new serums, shampoos and conditioners designed to hydrate the scalp and strengthen hair roots to help minimize shedding. Some lean on peptides and antioxidants like you'd find in skin care, while others use ingredients like Aminexil, which is chemically similar to the tried-and-true minoxidil. You've likely also spotted caffeine-spiked serums and scalp massage tools, both designed to stimulate blood flow to hair follicles. For Ruggeiro and Beach, these products are fine complements to a treatment plan, but the pros note that there's a lack of third-party research to support the effectiveness. 'I don't think there's anything wrong with treating scalp care like skin care, but if you have a serious condition, disorder of the scalp, progressive form of hair loss or autoimmune form of hair loss, you need proper diagnosis and treatment,' says Ruggeiro. Maintaining existing hair is easier than growing new hair, so it's always a good idea to take care of your mane — just don't expect a miracle shampoo to overdeliver, says Beach. 'I don't have a problem with people using shampoos that they think are helpful, but how long do you leave your shampoo on your head? A minuscule amount of time. I have Afro-textured hair and wash it once a week. How am I going to expect a shampoo alone to stop hair thinning? The math doesn't math.' Maintenance is crucial for good long-term results. That means that the best hair restoration treatment is the one you can afford and are willing to stick with forever. 'If you have unlimited time and money, you could probably layer all of these treatments,' says Ruggiero. 'But if you can't spend $20,000 or $30,000 on your hair every year, then don't start.' Instead, pick one or two therapies — say, oral medication and PRF injections three times per year — and stick with them. For female pattern hair loss, you'll often want to start with topicals and medications. Then, if you're not satisfied with your results or don't want to take medication, you might consider PRP with or without microneedling as the next step. If you have telogen effluvium, finding and resolving the trigger is essential. That may mean changing your diet, working to minimize stress, correcting thyroid concerns or waiting out the postpartum period. To jump-start the hair growth phase, you can try PRP, microneedling, ultrasound or lasers — but you first need to treat the underlying cause of your hair loss or you're wasting your time and money.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store