Ukraine conflict a NATO ‘proxy war'
Russian President Vladimir Putin is right in considering the Ukraine conflict a proxy war against Russia, US President Donald Trump's special envoy Keith Kellogg told Fox News in an interview on Sunday.
He said that while he believes the peace process will ultimately succeed, 'escalatory issues' remain. Kellogg referred to comments by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who last month indicated that Berlin would be open to supplying Kiev with Taurus cruise missiles.
Kellogg addressed Russian President Vladimir Putin's perspective, saying 'he considers this a proxy war by NATO. And frankly… in a way it is.'
'The escalatory issues are still there,' Kellogg said. 'Chancellor Merz has said: well, I'm going to give the Ukrainians the Taurus missile system.'
The German cruise missiles have a range of roughly 300 miles (482 km), which can allow Ukrainian strikes to reach deep into Russian territory, Kellog said. He added that Putin has made it clear: if such weapons are supplied to Ukraine, Russia will regard the suppliers as a party to the conflict.
'He considers this a proxy war by NATO. And frankly… in a way it is.'
Russia can clearly see the other Western military support Ukraine is receiving, Kellogg added.
'Everybody has got to be willing to step back a bit,' and compromise, to get the peace process 'to an end state,' the envoy said.
Last week, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted that Merz's 'provocative' statements 'hinder peaceful efforts.' Moscow has stressed that any Ukrainian use of German Taurus missiles against Russian territory will be viewed as Berlin's direct involvement in the Ukraine conflict, as the armaments' use is impossible without the participation of Bundeswehr service members.
Last year, after Trump's predecessor Joe Biden allowed the use of US ATACMS ballistic missiles in long-range strikes on Russian territory, Moscow retaliated by revamping its strategic doctrine and lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons. Russia now considers any strike by a non-nuclear state backed up by a nuclear one as a joint attack.
Both Kellogg and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio have previously characterized the conflict as a proxy war.
'Frankly, it's a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia,' Rubio said in March, noting that the current White House administration is eager to see it end.
Moscow has long designated the Ukraine conflict as a Western proxy war against Russia and repeatedly condemned arms supplies to Kiev as counterproductive to the peace process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Russia to increase gas supplies to European country
Moscow and Belgrade are negotiating a long-term deal for increased gas deliveries to Serbia after the current contract expires in September, the Russian Embassy in Belgrade has told Izvestia. The landlocked Balkan country relies heavily on Russian energy supplies, and has refused to support Western sanctions on Moscow over the Ukraine conflict. The existing agreement, which allows Belgrade to buy gas at a favorable price, was recently extended through September, ensuring continued deliveries amid ongoing negotiations for a long-term contract. 'Negotiations on the continuation of Russian gas supplies to Serbia after this date are underway,' the embassy told the news outlet on Monday. Under the terms of the extension, Gazprom will supply Serbia with 6.1 million cubic meters of gas per day at a price of €290 per 1,000 cubic meters. The rate is below the current European average of around €360, according to Dusan Bajatovic, the CEO of Srbijagas, Serbia's state-owned gas importer and distributor. Serbian Ambassador to Russia Momcilo Babic also confirmed that the new supply contract is being discussed, adding that boosting gas deliveries was agreed upon at a meeting in Moscow between Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and Russian President Vladimir Putin on May 9. Vucic visited the Russian capital last month to attend the Victory Day celebrations. 'This question was resolved at the meeting of the two presidents,' he was quoted as saying. Babic said, however, that no date has been set for signing the deal and that the specific volumes of future supplies have yet to be determined. Serbia currently receives Russian gas via the TurkStream pipeline, which transits through Türkiye and Bulgaria. The country relies on Russian gas for over 80% of its consumption. Energy experts cited by Izvestia have warned that raising gas volumes may not be technically possible without reopening major transit routes such as Nord Stream, the Yamal-Europe pipeline, or restoring flows through Ukraine.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
UK threatens to sue Russian tycoon over money for Ukraine
The British government has warned it could sue Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich if he fails to approve the transfer of £2.5 billion ($3.4 billion) to Ukraine from the sale of Chelsea football club. The threat came from Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy in a joint statement on Monday. Abramovich sold Chelsea to a consortium of American investors in May 2022, shortly after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict and after being sanctioned by London over alleged Kremlin ties. The tycoon, who denied the accusations and has acted as a mediator between Moscow and Kiev on several occasions, intended the proceeds to be used to help victims of the Ukraine conflict on both sides. London, however, has been pushing for the money to go solely to Ukraine, ignoring the businessman's wishes. 'The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine,' the statement from Reeves and Lammy read. They added that the UK is 'deeply frustrated' that it has been unable to reach an agreement with Abramovich more than three years after the sale. 'While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible,' they stated. The money remains frozen in a UK bank account, pending Foreign Office license for its release abroad. Due to sanctions, Abramovich cannot access the funds but remains their legal owner and must approve any distribution. UK government sources told The Guardian in March that a 'fundamental disagreement' exists between London and Abramovich over the allocation of the funds. They said officials had held multiple discussions with the businessman's representatives, legal advisers, and international partners, and are determined to resolve the issue, including through legal action. Abramovich's representatives did not respond to media requests for comment. Western nations imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia after the Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022, freezing over $300 billion of its international reserves and seizing assets from individuals accused of profiting from the conflict. Western officials have repeatedly suggested using the frozen assets to fund Ukraine's reconstruction. Moscow has condemned the freezing of its assets, denouncing the asset seizure proposals as 'outright theft' and warning of reciprocal action against Western holdings in Russia. A number of countries, including in the West, have also warned that confiscating frozen Russian funds would violate international law, set a dangerous precedent, and damage the credibility of Western financial institutions.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Berlin court bars police from turning migrants away at border
A Berlin court has barred German border police from rejecting asylum seekers arriving from neighboring EU countries without reviewing their claims. The ruling deals a blow to Chancellor Friedrich Merz's recent efforts to reduce asylum-related land migration. Last month, shortly after Merz took office, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt introduced a policy under which undocumented migrants arriving at land borders were to be turned back – unless they are unaccompanied minors, pregnant women, or otherwise vulnerable individuals. The move aimed to fulfill Merz's campaign promise to curb migration amid heightened public concern following a series of high-profile crimes involving asylum seekers. On Monday, however, the Berlin Administrative Court ruled against the policy. The decision came in response to a legal challenge brought by three Somali nationals who tried to enter Germany last month but were returned to Poland without any examination of their claims. The court found Dobrindt's policy to be unlawful under the Dublin Regulation, which governs how EU member states handle asylum applications. The rules require that asylum seekers apply in the first EU country they enter. If they later apply in another member state, such as Germany, that country can seek to transfer them back to the original state. In its ruling, the Berlin court emphasized that Germany cannot reject asylum seekers at the border without first checking whether they have submitted a claim, and whether the Dublin rules apply. It noted that while Germany is not obligated to accept all asylum seekers at the border, it also cannot summarily return individuals without reviewing their applications. As noted by the New York Times, the German authorities could fulfill these requirements by holding applicants in processing centers until it can be determined which EU state is responsible for their claims. Dobrindt responded to the court's ruling by arguing that it applies only to the specific case of the three Somali migrants and does not undermine the government's broader policy. 'We stand by our legal opinion and do not consider it to have been undermined in this instance,' he told reporters on Monday night. Efforts to curb migration to Germany intensified following a series of violent crimes, including the 2024 knife attack in Solingen, where a Syrian asylum seeker fatally stabbed three people and injured eight others during a summer festival. The attacker had originally entered the EU through Bulgaria. German officials failed to deport him because they could not locate him at his assigned asylum residence.
