
What Power Does the Pope Really Have Now?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Catholics across the globe are speculating about who will follow in the footsteps of Pope Francis, who died earlier this week.
Whoever becomes the new leader of the Catholic Church will instantly become perhaps the most recognizable religious leader in the world. The pope has historically been not only a spiritual leader, but somebody who plays a major role in influencing politics. Even in 2025, when fewer Americans identify as religious, the pope will still be a moral authority—but his direct political power remains more limited, experts told Newsweek.
Why It Matters
Pope Francis frequently spoke about political issues, taking what some may view as politically progressive views on issues like immigration and climate change and more traditionally conservative viewpoints on matters like abortion. He also went further than previous popes in voicing tolerance toward the LGBTQ+ community.
His potential successors represent myriad viewpoints on some of these matters. U.S. conservatives are hoping for somebody like Cardinal Raymond Burke, who has praised President Donald Trump in the past, while some more progressive Catholics are looking to somebody like Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle of the Philippines due to his past comments supporting tolerance toward the LGBTQ+ community.
While a pope's comments on these issues are typically more about church teachings than elections or specific policy matters, they do have the ability to shape how some voters perceive political issues. The Vatican's stance on abortion—for instance—has been particularly influential.
There are an estimated 1.4 billion Catholics globally and more than 50 million in the United States.
What to Know
Pope's Symbolic Power
The pope does not necessarily possess a great deal of "hard power," but he certainly serves as a moral authority for followers and leaders across the globe. The Vatican is also an observer to the United Nations, which lends the Pope some authority on international issues as well.
Michele Dillon, professor of sociology at the University of New Hampshire, told Newsweek the pope has "important" symbolic power that may not translate directly into changing the majority of Catholics' minds on political issues.
"Ultimately, the pope has very limited political power in terms of shifting peoples' opinions on an issue," she said, noting that while people "make up their own minds," his moral guidance is still helpful to many Catholics.
Pope Francis waves to followers at the Manila Cathedral on January 16, 2015, in Manila, Philippines.
Pope Francis waves to followers at the Manila Cathedral on January 16, 2015, in Manila, Philippines.
LisaShe pointed to Francis' comments about gay rights in the church as something that "changed the discourse" on the issue for many Catholics. Pope Francis allowed for the blessings of same-sex union, urged parents to support their gay children, and allowed gay men to become priests if they stayed celibate. He said transgender people could be baptized but also spoke negatively about "gender ideology."
A 2022 AP-NORC poll found that the majority of Catholics don't necessarily look to the church to influence how they vote. The poll of 358 Catholics found that 68 percent said the church has been influential in their life, but only 35 percent said it has influenced their political views.
But when it comes to social views, 55 percent said they believe the church has been influential.
Margaret Susan Thompson, professor of history and political science at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, told Newsweek that it is rare for a pope to speak out about a particular political issue, but that their teachings may provide Catholics with a context in which to think about global issues.
"We see that with Pope Francis when he talked about the environment and taking care of the planet. That's had a pretty profound influence, although he didn't tell people who to vote for or particular agenda items that nations ought to adopt," she said. "But he talked about care for the planet, care for creation. So that's a political influence, but it's not somebody telling you who to vote for. I think that's an important distinction."
She also noted that while former President John F. Kennedy, the first Catholic president, faced questions about whether he'd have "dual loyalties," people felt that was a less important question for former President Joe Biden, who was also Catholic and said his beliefs were shaped by the church.
Robert Orsi, professor of history at Northwestern University, told Newsweek there is a "certain amount of influence [that] comes with the office" and that the response to Pope Francis' death showed he was "obviously valued and loved for his witness. Still, he said it's a "question" about whether people listen to his influence on these issues.
Opus Dei—Influential Catholic Group in Conservative Politics
The Opus Dei group has become more influential than ever during President Trump's tenure, Gareth Gore, author of Opus: The Cult of Dark Money, Human Trafficking, and Right-Wing Conspiracy inside the Catholic Church, told Newsweek.
Opus Dei is a Catholic group whose stated goal is to "contribute to that evangelizing mission of the Church, by fostering among Christians of all social classes a life fully consistent with their faith, in the middle of the ordinary circumstances of their lives and especially through the sanctification of their work," according to their website.
However, the group has been the subject of controversy and has faced allegations of wrongdoing. Gore said the group, which he described as an "abusive cult," has been accused of "serious crimes including human trafficking and labor exploitation."
"Opus Dei has spent decades seeking to infiltrate the American conservative [movement] and has poured money and resources into penetrating Washington's corridors of power—actively courting supreme court justices, senators, congresspeople and other power brokers. During the two Trump administrations, the group has become more powerful than ever before," Gore said.
He noted that individuals with alleged ties to the group, such as Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, and lobbyist Leonard Leo, have "huge influence over the way that America is on."
Gore noted that Pope Francis had been in a "standoff" with the group, which was set to vote on new statutes over the coming weeks. Prior to his death, the group put a hold on the new statute votes.
"It is clearly hoping that the next pope will be more amenable to Opus Dei, that he will water down the reforms," Gore said. "Many suspected that Opus Dei was dragging its feet in the hope that Francis might pass before he could push through serious reform of the organization. If true, that tactic may well have worked."
Pope on the Global Stage
The pope, historically, has a voice on the global stage. This was demonstrated in modern history by Pope John Paul II, who was born in Poland. His 1979 visit to the country was seen as a turning point for communism in the nation over concerns about religious freedom. He became a spiritual inspiration for the anti-communist movement.
While that is a direct example of recent papal influence, other popes have also weighed in on global matters in recent years.
Pope Francis used his position to make calls for peace amid global turmoil and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, or Israel and Hamas, making calls to protect civilians amid global conflicts. He called Gaza's only Catholic church daily amid the war.
Peter Cajka, professor at the University of Notre Dame, told Newsweek these critiques mattered and that the pope has "direct access" to politicians and world leaders, even if he isn't diplomatically involved in changing the wars.
"I'm also just struck that the violence carries on," he said. "Leaders take the critique from the pope, the critique of his moral leadership and some of his diplomatic leadership—of course, the Vatican is a diplomatic center for these things—and yet states go on and carry these things out. There's a tension there."
Orsi said the Vatican, in many ways, invented diplomacy during the Middle Ages and still has a diplomatic corps who meet with world leaders who do important work "trying to nudge governments in the direction of peace." Still, they come from "outside the local context of the world of politics."
"He's holding a transcendent standard that others can choose to follow or not," he said.
Catholic Church's 'Institutional' Power
It's not publicly known exactly how rich the Catholic Church is, as its wealth is wrapped in assets like real estate and art, but estimates suggest it's worth at least $10 to $15 billion.
Cajka said this wealth has translated into institutionalization through parishes, colleges, hospitals or immigrant services. This "institutional power" still has a "major influence on politics," Cajka said. This helps the church establish leaders, college presidents and intellectual leaders.
"The influential apparatus they create contests politics, but also gives them influence and access to power," he said. "If you just look at how many Catholics are in Congress or how many Catholics are on the Supreme Court, you can see how this Catholic influential structure is producing powerful people."
There are 150 members of the House of Representatives who identify as Catholic, according to the Pew Research Center, and six of the nine Supreme Court justices identify as Catholic.
What People Are Saying
Gore told Newsweek: "The pope is the head of the Catholic Church and the direct successor to Saint Peter, the man who quite literally—according to the Bible—holds the keys to heaven. As such, he has enormous influence and authority over the world's 1.4 billion Catholics. During his papacy, Francis successfully used that authority to shift the global political agenda on important issues of social and economic justice—as well as climate change."
Dilon told Newsweek: "It is important that church keep articulating what is required, what the common good requires...Even if the church, as it does, has limited political influence, it is important to keep articulating what it stands for on this range of issues."
Former President Barack Obama, who spoke about Pope Francis' leadership after his death in a post to X: "Pope Francis was the rare leader who made us want to be better people. In his humility and his gestures at once simple and profound—embracing the sick, ministering to the homeless, washing the feet of young prisoners—he shook us out of our complacency and reminded us that we are all bound by moral obligations to God and one another."
What Happens Next
The funeral for Pope Francis has been set for Saturday, April 26, at 10 a.m. local time (4 a.m. ET) in Saint Peter's Square.
The election of a new pope will take place after the funeral. The cardinals vote by secret ballot up to four times each day until a new pope is chosen. This will go on until two-thirds of the cardinals agree on a new pope.
Each time a pope is not chosen, the ballots will be burned with chemicals to produce black smoke to signify that voting will continue. Once the pope is chosen, the ballots will be burned with chemicals to produce white smoke.
The most recent elections have taken only a few days. Pope Francis was elected after five ballots, while it took only four ballots to elect Pope Benedict XVI in 2005.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's 'Les Miserables' Appearance Sparks Avalanche of Jokes, Memes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's attendance at a performance of Les Miserables at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, during which he received cheers and boos from sections of the crowd, triggered a wave of jokes and memes on social media. Newsweek contacted the White House and the Kennedy Center for comment on Thursday via email and online inquiry form, respectively, outside regular office hours. Why It Matters Following his second presidential inauguration in January, Trump fired most of the Kennedy Center's board of trustees, replacing them with allies and appointing himself as chairman. The president attended the show in Washington, D.C., against a backdrop of days of anti-immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles, some of which have turned violent. In response, his administration ordered 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 Marines against the wishes of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. What To Know On Wednesday, the president and first lady Melania Trump attended the opening night of Les Miserables at the Kennedy Center. Other prominent figures in attendance included Vice President JD Vance, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Attorney General Pam Bondi. Footage of the event shows Trump receiving cheers and boos from the audience. According to CNN, one woman appeared to be escorted out after shouting, "Convicted felon, rapist!" Les Miserables is a musical adaptation of the Victor Hugo novel of the same name. It is set against the backdrop of the 1832 June Rebellion in Paris, a failed insurrection against French King Louis Philippe that was suppressed by government troops. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arriving to attend the opening night of "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., on June 11. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arriving to attend the opening night of "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., on June 11. ALEX WROBLEWSKI/AFP/GETTY On X, Newsom shared a screenshot of an NBC News headline about the president's attendance, writing, "Someone explain the plot to him." The post has received more than 60,000 likes and 1.9 million views. User @BlueATLGeorgia, a pro-Democrat account with 39,000 followers, wrote: "Les Misérables is a story of social unrest, especially the June Rebellion, where young idealists rise up against inequality and government oppression. "Young people fight for justice, calling for reforms and dignity for the poor. The government responds to the rebellion with heavy force, resulting in bloodshed. Sound familiar?" A Michigan business called That Gay Guy Candle Co. wrote: "Trump's going to see Les Mis tonight? That's ironic." User @Betches_News told its 25,000 followers, "Trump and Melania watching Les Mis at the Kennedy Center tonight like." Below the caption, it shared a photo of a shocked woman asking: "Wait. Is this f*****g play about us?" User @toyjawn1 wrote, "Trump ... watching Les Mis ... with tickets upwards of the amount of an ordinary person's whole life wages," above a GIF of a man rubbing his face with an iron. During Thursday's performance, a number of drag performers sat below the presidential box in what one described as a "message of inclusivity." Before the performance, Trump attended a VIP reception with paid attendees. He told reporters that $10 million was raised for the Kennedy Center. What People Are Saying Kennedy Center Interim Director Richard Grenell, commenting on reports that some actors did not want to perform in front of President Donald Trump, said: "Any performer who isn't professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won't be welcomed. In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn't hire—and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience." Darlene Webb, a Trump supporter who was at the performance, told CNN about the jeers: "I just wanted to clap and yell over it, because at this type of performance I don't think it was good for them to do that, professionally." Cara Segur, Webb's friend, told the outlet: "Seeing some of the actors and actresses, it looked like they were singing at him, instead of just singing to the crowd. And it felt really powerful and I liked it." What Happens Next On Saturday, a military parade is due to take place in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The day also marks Trump's 79th birthday. The "No Kings" movement has organized demonstrations against Trump across the U.S., with 1,800 events planned for Saturday.

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
I was wrongfully imprisoned abroad. The US must do more to help people like me.
I was wrongfully imprisoned abroad. The US must do more to help people like me. This summer will mark five years since I was wrongfully imprisoned by the Rwandan government. For 939 days I sat in prison, cut off from family and community. It was a nightmare I couldn't escape. Show Caption Hide Caption Mother of freed Hamas-held Israeli-American hostage speaks to son The mother of Israeli-American Edan Alexander, who was held captive for 19 months by Hamas, spoke to her son for the first time since being freed. Paul Rusesabagina, known for his actions during the Rwandan genocide, was arbitrarily detained for 939 days. Arbitrary detentions of Americans abroad have risen significantly, increasing from four countries in 2001 to 27 in 2023. Rusesabagina advocates for stronger U.S. government support for detainees and their families, including clearer agency roles and improved coordination. He highlights the need for improvements to the Levinson Act, urging clearer guidelines for wrongful detention designations and responses, especially for human rights defenders. This summer will mark five years since I was kidnapped and wrongfully imprisoned by the Rwandan government. For 939 days, I sat in prison, cut off from my family and community. I was held in solitary confinement, denied medical care and often unable to speak with my lawyers. The days felt endless ‒ like a nightmare I couldn't escape. For my family, it was a different sort of nightmare. Overnight, their lives were transformed. My wife and children were left to navigate the complex web of U.S. federal offices tasked with hostage recovery. My family became full-time advocates for my return, pleading my case before U.S. government officials and sharing my story with the news media. They recruited everyone from national nonprofits and grassroots organizations to Hollywood celebrities who had first learned my story from the movie 'Hotel Rwanda.' Led by my family's passion and persistence, all of these groups played a role in securing my freedom in 2023. There are no words to describe my gratitude. Alongside that gratitude is my fierce commitment to ensure that no individual ‒ and no family ‒ goes through this alone. More Americans are being detained abroad. We can't leave them behind. Over the past two decades, there has been a significant rise in the overseas arbitrary detention of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents like me. Arbitrary detention means someone is detained without due process, and most of the time as reprisal for exercising their rights or being a member of a targeted group. In 2001, only four countries had arbitrarily detained a U.S. national. In 2023, that number had grown to 27 countries. According to the Foley Foundation, at least 54 Americans were held hostage or wrongfully detained overseas during 2024. Opinion: Terrorists killed James Foley, my journalist son, and threaten others. Democracy needs them to be safe. The stories behind these statistics are chilling. Cambodian American human rights activist Theary Seng was jailed and sentenced to six years in prison for criticizing Cambodia's dictator on social media. Russian American journalist Alsu Kurmasheva was sentenced to more than six years after the Russian government accused her of spreading falsehoods about the army. I was jailed without a fair trial and punished for speaking out against Rwandan President Paul Kagame and his repressive regime. Addressing the rise in arbitrary detention, wrongful detention and hostage-taking isn't just about justice on an individual level. It's about safeguarding the very foundation of democracy ‒ the ability to speak out without the threat of a jail cell. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Across administrations and across party lines, the United States has historically been committed to helping people who are wrongfully detained overseas, whether they are U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents like myself or citizens of other countries who are victimized by oppressive regimes. Amid an international context of increasing authoritarianism, it is more important than ever that the U.S. government provide a strong, unified front in fighting for the return of arbitrarily detained individuals and supporting the families left behind. America is capable of protecting its citizens abroad better. I know. My story proves what the U.S. government is capable of when it mobilizes resources and prioritizes democracy. To this day, my daughters speak about the State Department's above-and-beyond efforts to reunite us. For years, congressional representatives championed our cause, writing letters, speaking out and putting pressure on the Kagame regime. But there is still room for improvement. The U.S. government's ability to help detainees and their families is often hindered by the lack of clarity on the specific roles of various government agencies and the logistical difficulty of coordinating with all of those different groups. My family and I recently worked with Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the leading nonprofit that took my case to the United Nations when I was detained, to create a new guide that provides strategies and best practices for engaging with the U.S. government on arbitrary detention cases. It's my sincere hope that this resource helps individuals and families who find themselves in our position, desperately trying to secure the return of their loved one. Opinion: Hamas released me. But with my partner still held hostage, I cannot be truly free. Aside from independent resources, we need stronger federal guidance and coordination. The U.S. law that governs hostage recovery, the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act, was passed in 2020 and significantly expanded the U.S. legal framework around arbitrary and wrongful detention. But for all its benefits, the Levinson Act doesn't give enough clarity on how the secretary of State makes wrongful detention designations, which is a crucial component of recovery efforts. It also doesn't provide a clear system for how the United States responds to arbitrary detention, particularly in cases involving human rights defenders. Organizations like the Foley Foundation that work closely with arbitrarily detained people and their families have spent years advocating for changes within the U.S. government. Their recommendations range from establishing a direct line of communication among the president, the special presidential envoy and the director of the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell to creating a more comprehensive reintegration support program for returning hostages and wrongful detainees. Admittedly, there is no one catch-all solution. Arbitrary and wrongful detention is a complex challenge, and addressing it requires ongoing collaboration within the government, strong recovery efforts, effective international relations and prevention strategies that tackle root causes. But all of this starts at home, with domestic policies that protect U.S. nationals and safeguard human rights defenders abroad. I escaped that Rwandan prison because of a powerful joint effort among individuals, nonprofit organizations and government agencies. There were many people who stood up and who fought for my freedom. That community saved my life. In a perfect world, no individual or family would ever go through what I did. But until we get to that point, we must stand alongside arbitrarily detained individuals and their families. The U.S. government has an opportunity to continue being a beacon of hope. Paul Rusesabagina is a Rwandan humanitarian activist and former hotel manager whose actions during the 1994 genocide inspired the film "Hotel Rwanda." He has since become an outspoken critic of authoritarianism in Rwanda and a global voice for justice and peace.