logo
Where the art of Edvard Munch comes alive: a city break in Oslo

Where the art of Edvard Munch comes alive: a city break in Oslo

The Guardian12-03-2025

I reach Ekeberg Park at sunset and walk along the muddy paths to find the viewpoint. The late winter sky is like a watercolour: soft blue and grey clouds layer together, with a sweeping gradient of yellow verging from tobacco stain to pale lemon above the distant, bruise-coloured hills. At the viewpoint, I look out over Oslo and listen for a scream.
In 1892, Edvard Munch took a walk in this same park as the sun was setting. Recording the experience in his diary, he wrote that he heard 'a great and infinite scream through nature'. The experience became the basis of his most enduring painting.
Nobody knows if the scream was real – there was a hospital nearby – or imagined. Today, all I hear are the delighted squeals of children playing on the hillside, amid joggers and walkers traversing the leaf-strewn footpaths of the park.
As the National Portrait Gallery holds a new exhibition of Munch's portraits, I'm in Oslo walking in the footsteps of the artist. Munch is inescapable: at Clarion Hotel Oslo, where I'm staying, an Andy Warhol version of The Scream graces the lobby – the pop artist was a huge fan – and a photograph of Marina Abramović's interpretation greets me at breakfast.
From the viewpoint, as the sky falls in a blanket around me, the city's prime Munch attraction is clearly visible. While the shapes of the islands and borders of the Oslofjord are recognisably the same as those in the background of The Scream, the Munch Museum – known as simply Munch – stands out amid the new modern buildings on the Bjørvika waterfront. The top of its striking tower is tilted, so said the architects, to look like it's bowing to the city of Oslo, the inspiration for many of Munch's works. Inside it, my guide, Sid, takes me on a tour of the extensive collection.
'Munch was unique in how he captured a shift in generations and perception,' Sid says. 'He's documenting humanity at a time when belief and institutions are collapsing.'
I'm struck by how Munch's work, much of it over 100 years old, is still relevant today: from his ability to paint the emotional landscape of his sitters with a particular focus on mental health, to his belief that there was no separation between humankind and nature.
In the gallery, three different versions of The Scream are displayed in a dimly lit rotunda for 30 minutes at a time, to preserve their colours. One of them has water-damage in the bottom-left corner: this is one of the stolen Screams, taken by daring art thieves during a daylight robbery in 2004 and damaged during storage (it was returned in 2006). In the National Museum, another version of The Scream is on display – he made eight in total – under the watchful eyes of two security guards. Another version of the painting was stolen from this gallery in 1994, when police attention was otherwise occupied by the Lillehammer Winter Olympics. That one was only absent for 12 weeks.
Other highlights of the Munch Museum include a vast room showing sketches of the Aula paintings, a series of giant artworks Munch made for Oslo University's ceremonial hall. They depict an abstract sun shattered into multicoloured rays, a nurturing mother on a rocky shoreline and a fisherman teaching a young boy, and are considered his masterworks. When the Nazis invaded Norway, these paintings were hidden in a mine. Munch's work featured on the Nazis' degenerate art list – modernist and avant garde art was considered depraved; any deviation from the norm, any challenge to the status quo, was punished. After the war, these monumental works were restored to pride of place at the university hall, which is open to the public one Saturday a month from February-May.
The next day, I take a trip to Ramme, where Munch painted two of these works. A 30-minute train ride and short taxi journey from Oslo, it's a haven for Munch lovers. You can walk around his house and outdoor studio and along the beach. There's something about the sound of the sea, the rocky shoreline of the Oslofjord and the apple trees that give a great sense of calm. For Munch, plagued by ill health and mental health issues all his life, that was the idea.
He bought the white house here in 1910, which remarkably is rented out to holidaymakers in summer, and kept it until his death in 1944. Inside, the carefully restored bright yellow walls and white lace curtains served as backdrops for many of his portraits. I walk past the apple trees to a rugged shoreline littered with mussel shells where interpretive boards show his paintings set against the views.
Back in Oslo, I take a walking tour of the lively Grünerløkka quarter. Munch's family lived in several different buildings in the area, marked with plaques, and it's in one of these that he set one of his most moving paintings, The Sick Child, inspired by his sister's death from tuberculosis. All the colours of life are here: vintage shops and hipster cafes line up along the edge of a small central park, bright blue trams streak by and the city's young and creative walk around, as punk-haired baristas make drinks at Tim Wendelboe's coffee shop. I feel I could walk past the subject of one of my favourite Munch paintings, Madonna, a raven-haired woman in a red beret.
Before I leave, I pay my respects at his grave at Our Saviour's cemetery. I wonder what he might have created were he alive today. According to walking tour guide Linda, his love of self-portraits would mean only one thing: 'He would be a selfie king.'
Laura travelled to Oslo as a guest of VisitOSLO and stayed at Clarion Hotel Oslo (doubles from £147). Transport was provided by Flytoget airport express (£36 return) and the Oslo Pass, which offers local transport as well as entry into museums and galleries (from £40 for 24h).
Edvard Munch Portraits is at the National Portrait Gallery 13 March-5 June (£21/£23.50 with donation)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I must have done something right!': dance master Jiří Kylián on his festival, fierce critics and the Ministry of Silly Walks
‘I must have done something right!': dance master Jiří Kylián on his festival, fierce critics and the Ministry of Silly Walks

The Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘I must have done something right!': dance master Jiří Kylián on his festival, fierce critics and the Ministry of Silly Walks

A gang of young dancers, their black costumes offset by colourful hats, cascade down the sloping roof of Oslo's opera house for a jubilant routine to a Prince song by the waterfront. The building's huge glass facade has become an unlikely stage for sculptures, digitally scanned from dancers' bodies, positioned as if they are plunging into the building like the nearby bathers in the fjord. Inside, there's an eclectic bill of ballets including one inspired by a painting from the Edvard Munch museum next door. In the wings of the theatre is an installation drawing on the Buddhist Zen symbol ensō. The studio space is screening short films veering from slapstick to the profound. But this sprawling festival, spanning more than two weeks and then partially touring, has a singular focus. These are all works by Jiří Kylián, the Czech choreographer-cum-renaissance man, who in one pre-show discussion declares himself 'the happiest boy in the world'. There has never been such a celebration of his work and, he suggests with wry self-effacement, there will probably never be another. When we meet for coffee, Kylián elaborates on the opportunity given to him by Ingrid Lorentzen who, as artistic director of the Norwegian National Opera and Ballet, enabled the festival. 'I'm not a spring chicken,' he says. 'I'm 78 and I know that the end of life is nearing. To be able, at my age, to have a major retrospective, but also show new things that I've created specifically for this festival, is huge.' After a choreographic career spanning around 100 pieces (a quarter of them now in the Norwegian Ballet's repertory), it has brought a degree of affirmation, he says. 'I must have done something right! I'm not a particularly confident person. It might look like I am, but I'm not really.' With an impish smile, he adds: 'If I had to write reviews about my work, you would not want to read them. I don't get so easily frightened by critics because I'm my worst critic.' There's a pause before reconsidering: 'My mother was, actually …' He trails off and winces in mock horror at her feedback: 'If you do something like that one more time, I will disown you!' However, it was Markéta Kyliánová – a former child star – who directly inspired her son. 'She was a Shirley Temple. A 10-year-old who sold out performances, dancing by herself, with her father accompanying on piano. So it must be somewhere in the genes.' Growing up in Prague, Kylián was swept away by the magic of circus acrobats, became a dancer and began to choreograph. Britain played a key part in his success. In the mid-60s, Jennie Lee – the first minister for the arts in Harold Wilson's government – visited the Prague conservatoire and saw one of his earliest works. Kylián remembers her saying to him: 'I can see that you do not only have it in your legs, but also in your head.' A scholarship at the Royal Ballet School was arranged. 'I met Margot Fonteyn, Rudolf Nureyev, I had the time of my life,' he remembers of his stint in London. John Cranko invited him to work with the Stuttgart Ballet and then Kylián led Nederlands Dans Theater as artistic director from 1975 until 1999, continuing to choreograph for the company until 2009. But this 'Praguer' who has long lived in the Hague is being feted in Oslo. 'I was introduced to this country by a composer, Arne Nordheim, who wrote music for me,' he says. The Norwegian Ballet has been staging Kylián's work for almost 40 years. Oslo's long-awaited opera house opened in 2008 with his ballet programme. 'There is no other house in the world' that could put on this festival's installations alongside the performances, he says. Those sculptures bisected by the glass facade, modelled on eight of his dancers and rendered at 138%, provide another way to invite new audiences into this most playful of opera buildings whose openly accessible roof is a popular vantage point. The figures' positioning, part inside and part outside, brings to mind the uprooted, upside-down tree that is suspended above the stage in Kylián's Wings of Wax (1997) and continues his interest in transitional states. His choreography frequently gives dancers a winged position like resting marionettes – as in Petite Mort (1991), their heads bowed, shoulders hunched and elbows out, evoking a burden but also an imminent launch to liberation. Entitled Wings of Time, the festival is promoted with a poster of Kylián as if taking flight, with one arm raised alongside its reflection, the image mirroring an airborne gull in the distance. 'We are on the way constantly,' he says of this impulse in his work. 'I say 'now',' he pauses, 'and it's already in the past.' The other installations on display evoke not just Kylián choreography but his previous productions' set designs. In the meditative, healing Ensō, set to Arvo Pärt's Spiegel im Spiegel, a mirror rotates above a calligraphic circle on the floor, casting shadows as well as a latticed light, the mirror rippling with the foaming crash of a wave that recalls the silvery wreckage of John Macfarlane's set for Forgotten Land (1981). It is that piece, opening with the sound of the wind and featuring a storm of dancers' feet and elemental percussion, that draws on the century-old Munch painting The Dance of Life. Munch's depiction of a woman at three ages – enigmatically wistful in youth, solemn in middle age, eventually mournful – gave Kylián goosebumps when he first saw it. 'Munch was a troubled soul – that kind of fight with the canvas and with your own problems, it beams out of the paintings,' he says. 'I tried to portray it as well as I could with Benjamin Britten's music.' The exhibition's use of backstage areas is fitting for a choreographer who has often challenged notions of where the playing space – and even a production itself – starts and finishes. No More Play (1988), uncannily set to Anton Webern, finds a dancer rolling across the very edge of the stage, arms spiralling into the orchestra pit, and ends with the full cast dangling there. Bella Figura (1995) begins when the audience are still finding their seats as dancers rehearse their moves, Kylián taking the stage to make the odd tweak. The performance gives a supporting role of sorts to the theatre's layered curtains which in one illusion seem to hold a dancer in mid-air and are used for an effect akin to an iris film technique, framing certain dancers and obscuring others. Kylián plays with other silent cinema tricks in a quirky screen programme featuring his long-term partner, the dancer Sabine Kupferberg, who makes a superb bowler-hatted clown in the short film Between Entrance and Exit from 2013. (That title is telling for a choreographer who loves to bring dancers on in eye-catching ways, such as under billowing sheets.) Amid his elegantly fluid explorations of time and space, and his dancers' sensitive partnering, Kylián can rarely resist a comic moment or trompe l'oeil gag such as the freestanding dresses with a mind of their own in Petite Mort. He tells me about his joy at once spotting John Cleese in a restaurant. 'I went to him and said, 'Dr Livingstone, I presume?'' Cleese immediately played along. ''Yes, absolutely!'' Kylián told him: 'I'm a choreographer and I was inspired by your Ministry of Silly Walks.' Is that really the case? 'Of course! The Czechs have a pretty good sense of humour. They're really pretty crazy.' His own sense of humour remains intact when we discuss his 'more than catastrophic' reception from London's dance world. That auspicious-seeming arrival in the 1960s was followed by 'totally negligible' representation of his works and what he calls the 'Royal snub' in the years since his choreographic debut at Covent Garden. In 2022, Forgotten Land was staged by Birmingham Royal Ballet and his piece Gods and Dogs was performed in a mixed bill by NDT at Sadler's Wells. But he picks up his tablet and shows a calendar of upcoming Kylián productions. 'This is where they are doing my ballets in the world.' Dates come up for South Korea, Poland, the US, Albania … 'Anywhere except Great Britain! I even got the Laurence Olivier award [for outstanding achievement in dance with NDT in 2000]. That didn't do the job.' Maybe it's not for him to answer but does he know why? He leans over and whispers: 'I have no idea!' If Kylián is his own fiercest critic then the late Clement Crisp of the Financial Times came a close second. 'I don't mind to be criticised, but I don't like to be insulted particularly,' he says of Crisp's vociferous reviews, then paraphrases the kind of writeup he used to receive in London. 'The first piece was by Ashton, it was like that and like that. The second piece was by Kylián, we don't need to talk about it. And the third one was by Balanchine, it was great.' How did he find running NDT for such a long stretch? The company rocketed under his leadership but balancing the roles of choreographer and artistic director was surely draining. 'It's really rough. I'd want to do a piece for six dancers and I had 32 dancers in the company. You know what happened? Six happy people and 26 unhappy people. You have to cope with it.' As well as choreography, he has often provided his own design concepts including, unusually, for the lighting. 'A terrible ballet well lit is better than a great ballet badly lit,' he says. 'I work very closely with the lighting designers and set designers and composers. I'm one of those who sticks his finger in!' He assesses one of the pieces revived in Oslo. 'The choreography is old, OK, it has maybe a bit of an old-fashioned touch. But it fits completely with the music, the choreography and the stage design. If you like it or not is another story. But it fits. It's made of one mould.' His approach to the music has changed over the course of his career. 'When I was young, I got inspired by a piece of music and tried to do steps as closely to it as possible. But later that wasn't enough. I have things to say myself.' He did not seek to reflect 'what the music is already saying' but rather add another layer. Later on, composers would create specifically for him. 'What I do usually is take an existing piece, something extraordinarily beautiful by Beethoven or Mozart or baroque. And then give it to a composer and he recomposes it. I like this bridge between the past and the contemporary.' In Chapeau, the piece performed as a flashmob by the dance students tumbling down the opera house roof, he doffs his hat to Prince. 'I love him. Genius. You know, he was in Holland and I was too shy to approach him and then he died a year or so after.' Chapeau was created for the silver jubilee of the hat-loving Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, where Kylián still resides. He and Kupferberg have been shooting a film on the Dutch island of Terschelling and he sees his future in such projects and visual art rather than creating new work for the stage. 'I'm really getting on. The energy is not enough.' We consider the chicken-or-egg question about the choreographer's job of matching music and movement. Kylián recalls creating a duet for Whereabouts Unknown (1993) to be used with Charles Ives's piece Unanswered Question. 'I choreographed it on a Sunday and did the whole six minutes in one day. Then I said, OK, let's try it with the music now. It fit like a glove: they stopped dancing exactly at the end of the music. Sometimes I really don't know how or why things happen. I look at it and think, I'm not sure if it's by me.' He gives me a slightly bashful look about this mysterious, even mystical process which he manages to suggest with both modesty and curiosity. 'I felt like it was said through me.' Kylián festival: Wings of Time is at Oslo Opera House until 14 June. Then touring 18-22 June. Chris Wiegand's trip was provided by the festival.

We in the cultural sector must stand up to Trump's attacks – if not now, when?
We in the cultural sector must stand up to Trump's attacks – if not now, when?

The Guardian

time3 days ago

  • The Guardian

We in the cultural sector must stand up to Trump's attacks – if not now, when?

In one of his recent Truth Social posts, Donald Trump appeared to fire Kim Sajet – the fearless and utterly brilliant director of the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery in Washington DC. The president used his social media platform to claim that Sajet's support for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) made her unsuitable for her role. 'Upon the request and recommendation of many people, I am hereby terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery', Trump wrote. 'She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position. Her replacement will be named shortly.' Where to start? By now, we all know the arts has become the terrain for a brutal proxy battle for hearts and minds. A culture war 2.0, where not just reputations are at stake, but institutions, whole sectors and ways of thinking. But I am hoping that even Trump's support base have begun to grow a little bored with these attacks on figures and institutions in the cultural sector. The culture war has moved beyond farce into the deeply tragic. I am sure even many of the president's most loyal supporters know deep down that the Smithsonian (a vast complex of 21 museums) is a genuine force for good, an institution that represents so much of the US at its very best. And like the Kennedy Center, the cultural institution that Trump took control of earlier this year, or the universities his administration has attacked, the Smithsonian is a fish in a barrel: easy to bully, its financial destiny in significant part tied to public funding, with limited scope to defend itself. This contrived political theatre damages critical institutions, threatens the careers of talented, dedicated people, and its repercussions will be deep and long-lasting. Good museums are not sleepy institutions trapped in heritage-aspic. Across its 178-year history, the Smithsonian has consistently evolved to reflect ambient change and address public need. Like many other national museums around the world, these changes, particularly in recent years, have been driven by an aspiration to engage and enfranchise, to broaden audiences and to catalyse national conversations. I would have thought that seeking to give value back to a greater number of the population is uncontroversial. Institutions this important, mostly sponsored by the public, must simply, continually, work to be ever more universal, inclusive and open. Left or right, that has value. In times like these, when we are, as citizens of western democracies, so riven and divided, the arts have a job to do of being a space for inclusive debate. But the truth is that DEI isn't some new-fangled indulgence. That drive to be inclusive is what good museums were created to deliver. Twenty-five years ago, I began my career at the British Museum. I still remember reading its founding purpose for the first time. The British Museum was created for 'all studious and curious persons'. I remember thinking that the word that does the really hard work in that statement is 'all'. The British Museum was created in the mid-18th century around an inclusive imperative, around the idea that we might all hope to find ourselves reflected in its spaces and concerns. Its founders must have recognised the powerful need for a national museum: it was created at a time when Britain was going through a period of existential anxiety, when Scots were rebelling; the country needed a unifying narrative. I am sure the British Museum's founders knew exactly what they were doing when they committed the institution to that beautifully enfranchising ambition of being for us all. And yes, I know museums have so often failed miserably to live up to these inclusive objectives, but we must never stop trying, nor relinquish the basis on which the public can hold us to account. Universities and museums are vital for healthy societies, and their independence, their bravery, their sometimes maddening honesty, underpins so much that is important. We undermine that at our peril. I spent a number of treasured years as a Smithsonian museum director and fell for its ethos and its dedicated people. It was founded on an ambition to propagate 'the increase and diffusion of knowledge'. It was created to enable transformational change through sharing and empowering US citizens with knowledge, with truth. I cannot think of a time when this has been more important. It is unclear whether Trump has the authority to fire Sajet. What is clear is that his move is designed to demoralise her and all my former Smithsonian colleagues. That's why, directing a different museum now, across the Atlantic, I feel moved to write. We in the cultural sector everywhere need to stand up and be counted, we need to celebrate Kim Sajet, we need to not retreat from diversity here in Britain. To my former colleagues, I say that speaking the truth and having the courage to do so when it is difficult does not make you unsuitable for your roles in a demographically complex democracy; it is probably the most important aspect of what we are called upon to do. It is easy writing the diversity action plan, but having the moral courage to stand up for those principles when they are needed – that is heroic. Gus Casely-Hayford is a curator, cultural historian, broadcaster and lecturer who is currently the director of V&A East

Trump fires National Portrait Gallery director in latest conflict with arts
Trump fires National Portrait Gallery director in latest conflict with arts

The Guardian

time30-05-2025

  • The Guardian

Trump fires National Portrait Gallery director in latest conflict with arts

Donald Trump says he is firing the first female director of the National Portrait Gallery, which contained a caption that referenced the attack on the US Capitol that his supporters carried out in early 2021. The president announced the sacking Friday through a post on his social media platform that accused Sajet – born in Nigeria, raised in Australia and a citizen of the Netherlands – of being 'a strong supporter' of diversity initiatives that his administration opposes as well as 'highly partisan'. He cited no evidence for either claim. In its collection of portraits of American presidents, the gallery had this text about Trump: 'Impeached twice, on charges of abuse of power and incitement of insurrection after supporters attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, he was acquitted by the Senate in both trials. After losing to Joe Biden in 2020, Trump mounted a historic comeback in the 2024 election. He is the only president aside from Grover Cleveland (1837-1908) to have won a nonconsecutive second term.' Sajet arrived in the US with her family in 1997, held positions at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, and the Historical Society of Pennsylvania and was appointed director of the National Portrait Gallery in 2013, according to a Guardian profile of her. The National Portrait Gallery is an art museum in Washington DC that opened in 1968 and is part of the Smithsonian Institution. It boasts the only complete collection of presidential portraits outside the White House. After beginning his second presidency in January, Trump issued an executive order directing the removal of 'improper, divisive or anti-American ideology' from the institution's storied museums. Sajet had said the gallery under her leadership tried 'very hard to be even-handed when we talk about people and that's the key'. 'Everyone has an opinion about American presidents, good, bad and indifferent,' Sajet said. 'We hear it all, but generally I think we've done pretty well.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store