FeedMore WNY to lose $3.5M worth of food after federal funding canceled
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — FeedMore WNY is facing a multi-million dollar loss of food after a Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) program, a main federal funding source for FeedMore, was terminated, the organization announced Wednesday.
The United States Department of Agriculture said $500 million worth of food purchases for The Emergency Food Assistance Program funded by CCC was 'permanently canceled.'
FeedMore WNY said it will lose over $3.5 million worth of food due to the cancelation.
The organization said between May and August 2025, 12 pending orders from CCC, which would include chicken, turkey, pork, cheese and eggs, have been canceled. The orders accounted for 13 percent of the total amount of food FeedMore distributed in 2024, according to Catherine Shick, FeedMore WNY's public relations manager.
'This is a significant funding cut for FeedMore Western New York and it's coming at a time when we know there is increased demand for food assistance in our community,' she said. 'We know about 2.1 million pounds of food that we distributed last year came from the funding for food purchases through CCC.'
The organization said there was a 46 percent increase since 2021 in the number of people it serves across Western New York, with last year's numbers totaling 165,722.
'FeedMore WNY is deeply disappointed to learn of the cancelation of food purchases funded by the Commodity Credit Corporation,' Collin Bishop, FeedMore WNY's chief communications officer said in a statement. 'These additional funds did not simply help us during the pandemic; they have been essential as we serve an increasing number of people who are food insecure.'
Shick said FeedMore's services are not going away and it will continue to provide food and support to the community.
Katie Skoog joined the News 4 team in April 2024. She is a graduate from the University at Buffalo. You can view more of her work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
‘We'd love it to become law next week:' What would the Massachusetts cannabis bill change?
The House unanimously passed a bill this week to update and change cannabis laws in Massachusetts. Those pushing for it believe it would modernize priorities and policies to be more in line with surrounding states and possibly keep some businesses from closing. The bill known as 'An Act modernizing the commonwealth's cannabis laws', would make it so companies can grow from three to six stores over a three-year period. Brandon Pollock, the CEO of Theory Wellness, said his company would like to expand. 'We'd love it to become law next week, but I don't know if that's realistic,' Pollock said. 'This would allow a lot of growth for our team and some opportunities for some new business.' Those pushing for the bill to become law said it would help companies make more money and also bring more investors to the state. 'I know a lot of entrepreneurs that want to sell but I can't buy them because we're at our limit of stores and then companies like Theory want to grow but we can't grow because we're at our limit of stores,' Pollock explained. In addition to increasing the license cap, the Massachusetts Cannabis Coalition said consumers would be able to purchase up to two ounces of product instead of one ounce. 'So, dispensaries will really benefit from changes like that,' the Massachusetts Cannabis Coalition Executive Director, Ryan Dominguez, said. Dominguez said another possible big change would be to the CCC, also known as the state's Cannabis Control Commission. 'This change will move the commission from five commissioners to three commissioners, and then all of those commissioners will now be appointed by the governor,' Dominguez explained. The CCC works to implement and administer laws surrounding marijuana in the state. Dominguez said having the CCC solely under the governor could help define its roles and responsibilities. 'I think we're starting to see that commissioners are starting to come up on their terms, and if they don't act quickly, we could be in a position where the CCC is down to two commissioners without a chair,' Dominguez said. 'Then there's no way for us to really operate our businesses or get any of the changes that we're looking for.' Those against the bill have warned that if the state allows certain operators to grow even more, it could hurt small and equity-owned businesses. Now, it's up to the Senate to either pick up the current legislation, make their own version of it, or delay picking it up altogether until the next legislative session. This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
House passes bill overhauling Massachusetts cannabis laws
The House approved a significant overhaul of marijuana oversight in Massachusetts on Wednesday, passing a bill that would downsize and reorient the scandal-hounded Cannabis Control Commission that has kept tabs on the legal industry since it launched almost eight years ago. The bill (H 4187), which passed 153-0 just before 4 p.m., would also regulate and tax hemp-based products, raise a cap on retail license control and make structural changes to the medical marijuana side of the industry. 'Overall, this bill provides comprehensive and reasonable reform measures to our existing cannabis laws,' Cannabis Policy Committee Chairman Daniel Donahue said on the House floor. 'We are pursuing these reforms because we want our cannabis industry to succeed and thrive, and because we want to live up to the promises explicit in our commitment to social equity when recreational cannabis was first legalized.' Frustration with the slow pace of regulatory changes, headline-grabbing internal conflicts at the CCC, and a plea from the inspector general for the Legislature to intervene at the 'rudderless agency' combined last summer to get lawmakers thinking more seriously about a response. House Speaker Ronald Mariano recounted Wednesday how he went to Donahue last year to say 'we're going to have to fix this.' He said Treasurer Deborah Goldberg's removal of CCC chairwoman Shannon O'Brien had been dragged into court by that point, a long-running saga that has shined a light on internal strife at the CCC. That directive to Donahue led to a series of hearings and conversations that resulted in the bill before the House on Wednesday. 'He did the work. You could talk to him, and he could explain the process. It got us where we thought we had to take it away from the treasurer,' Mariano said before yielding to Donahue to give a more thorough explanation of the House's thinking around accountability at the CCC. Today, the CCC is a five-commissioner independent body, with appointments made singularly and jointly by the governor, attorney general and treasurer, with the treasurer selecting the chair. Under the House-approved bill, the CCC would be consolidated entirely under the governor. The state's executive would appoint all three commissioners and select one of them to serve as chair (who would be the only full-time commissioner). The CCC would be 'subject to the laws applicable to agencies under the control of the governor.' Asked what makes the CCC's existing model unworkable, Mariano said it was a structural problem but gave a conflicted explanation. 'It was created by a ballot question that had no rhyme or reason to it ... there was no accountability,' he said. The speaker, who started his scrum with reporters by raising the subject of 'legislation by referendum' and the trend of advocates going around a slow-moving Legislature to make laws at the statewide ballot, added, 'We've been railing against government by referendum, and this is a perfect example why it doesn't work.' The CCC's existing structure is largely modeled on the Gaming Commission, where five full-time members with specific areas of expertise are appointed by the governor, treasurer and attorney general. But Mariano claimed Wednesday that 'the problem is they weren't written by the same people.' 'The gaming stuff was written by House people,' he said. 'The people in the marketplace wrote this bill, and they weren't interested in controlling it, in making sure there was accountability up and down the line. As a matter of fact, this was a rush to get into the market. Everyone thought they were going to get rich.' The 2016 ballot law that legalized non-medical marijuana here called for a three-person Cannabis Control Commission entirely under the control of the state treasurer, similar numerically to the structure the House is pursuing with the bill it passed Wednesday. By the time the Legislature delayed and then rewrote that law in the summer of 2017, lawmakers had decided to move the CCC onto an independent footing, expand it to five commissioners, and to split appointing authority three ways. Mariano, who was majority leader at the time, was the lead House negotiator on the 2017 law that structured the CCC. The structure that was put in place largely mirrored the House's approach to standing up the CCC. 'This is legislation by referendum, and this is the problem, no one really focused on the writing of the ballot question on how this would be administered. And when it hit, the public had no idea what the problems were going to be and where they were going to be,' Mariano said Wednesday. Last summer, Inspector General Jeffrey Shapiro's office said it determined that the Legislature's 2017 rewrite of the 2016 ballot law 'is unclear and self-contradictory and provides minimal guidance on the authority and responsibilities of the CCC's commissioners and staff.' The office said its review of the Legislature's 2017 rewrite 'affirmed that this confusion has contributed significantly to the current situation at the CCC.' Mariano was not available to clarify his comments Wednesday afternoon, but a spokesperson sent a statement saying his 'main point was that the Legislature was responding to a law that was passed by a referendum, which created a new industry outside of the typical legislative process, forcing the Legislature to address a number of unknowns.' 'In order to safely and effectively carry out the will of the voters, the Legislature has been forced to revise the original language multiple times. The legislation that the House is voting on today is better because of what we have learned since 2016, and establishes a new structure, different from the one that the ballot initiative spelled out,' Mariano spokesperson Ana Vivas said. The bill the House passed Wednesday also seeks to address intoxicating hemp-based products that largely fall into a gray area of the law and between the regulatory cracks by banning their sale without a license and setting up a new framework to regulate and tax them. Hemp beverages could only be sold by retailers licensed by the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission to sell all alcohol and all hemp-based products would need to be registered with the CCC. 'This ban and accompanying regulatory structure will help provide guidance and clarity on hemp products, removing those which are unregulated, of unknown origin or composition, and too easily accessible to minors,' Donahue said Wednesday. The House bill adjusts the existing cap on retail licenses any one operator can hold. The current limit is three, and the House bill would raise the cap on retail licenses to six over a three-year period (increasing first to four, a year later to five and finally to six). Opponents of that idea have slammed it as a 'gift to corporate cannabis and a death sentence for local and social equity businesses.' The existing three-license caps would remain in place for cultivation and manufacturing. On the medical side of the legal marijuana world, the bill eliminates the requirement that medical marijuana businesses be 'vertically integrated,' meaning they must grow and process all the marijuana they sell. Patients and advocates have been calling for that change for years, saying the medical-only options have become scarce across Massachusetts since cannabis was legalized for non-medical use. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
The massive cannabis regulation overhaul that just passed unanimously in Massachusetts
The House approved a significant overhaul of marijuana oversight in Massachusetts on Wednesday, passing a bill that would downsize and reorient the scandal-hounded Cannabis Control Commission that has kept tabs on the legal industry since it launched almost eight years ago. The bill (H 4187), which passed 153-0 just before 4 p.m., would also regulate and tax hemp-based products, raise a cap on retail license control and make structural changes to the medical marijuana side of the industry. 'Overall, this bill provides comprehensive and reasonable reform measures to our existing cannabis laws,' Cannabis Policy Committee Chairman Daniel Donahue said on the House floor. 'We are pursuing these reforms because we want our cannabis industry to succeed and thrive, and because we want to live up to the promises explicit in our commitment to social equity when recreational cannabis was first legalized.' Frustration with the slow pace of regulatory changes, headline-grabbing internal conflicts at the CCC, and a plea from the inspector general for the Legislature to intervene at the 'rudderless agency' combined last summer to get lawmakers thinking more seriously about a response. House Speaker Ronald Mariano recounted Wednesday how he went to Donahue last year to say 'we're going to have to fix this' as Treasurer Deborah Goldberg's removal of CCC chairwoman Shannon O'Brien dragged on in the courts and shined a light on internal strife at the CCC. That led to a series of hearings and conversations that resulted in the bill before the House on Wednesday. 'It got us where we thought we had to take it away from the treasurer,' Mariano said. Today, the CCC is a five-commissioner independent body, with appointments made singularly and jointly by the governor, attorney general and treasurer, with the treasurer selecting the chair. Under the House-approved bill, the CCC would be consolidated entirely under the governor. The state's executive would appoint all three commissioners and select one of them to serve as chair (who would be the only full-time commissioner). The CCC would be 'subject to the laws applicable to agencies under the control of the governor.' Asked what makes the CCC's existing model unworkable, Mariano said it was a structural problem but gave a conflicted explanation. 'It was created by a ballot question that had no rhyme or reason to it ... there was no accountability,' he said. The speaker, who started his scrum with reporters by raising the subject of 'legislation by referendum' and the trend of advocates going around a slow-moving Legislature to make laws at the statewide ballot, added, 'We've been railing against government by referendum, and this is a perfect example why it doesn't work.' The CCC's existing structure is largely modeled on the Gaming Commission, where five full-time members with specific areas of expertise are appointed by the governor, treasurer and attorney general. But Mariano claimed Wednesday that 'the problem is they weren't written by the same people.' 'The gaming stuff was written by House people,' he said. 'The people in the marketplace wrote this bill, and they weren't interested in controlling it, in making sure there was accountability up and down the line. As a matter of fact, this was a rush to get into the market. Everyone thought they were going to get rich.' The 2016 ballot law that legalized non-medical marijuana here called for a three-person Cannabis Control Commission entirely under the control of the state treasurer, similar to the structure the House is pursuing with the bill it passed Wednesday. By the time the Legislature delayed and then rewrote that law in the summer of 2017, lawmakers had decided to move the CCC onto an independent footing, expand it to five commissioners and split appointment authority three ways. Mariano, who was the majority leader at the time, was the lead House negotiator on the 2017 law that structured the CCC. The structure that was put in place largely mirrored the House's approach to standing up the CCC. 'This is legislation by referendum, and this is the problem: no one really focused on the writing of the ballot question on how this would be administered. And when it hit, the public had no idea what the problems were going to be and where they were going to be,' Mariano said Wednesday. Last summer, Inspector General Jeffrey Shapiro's office said it determined that the Legislature's 2017 rewrite of the 2016 ballot law 'is unclear and self-contradictory and provides minimal guidance on the authority and responsibilities of the CCC's commissioners and staff.' The office said its review of the Legislature's 2017 rewrite 'affirmed that this confusion has contributed significantly to the current situation at the CCC.' Mariano was not available to clarify his comments Wednesday afternoon, but a spokesperson sent a statement saying his 'main point was that the Legislature was responding to a law that was passed by a referendum, which created a new industry outside of the typical legislative process, forcing the Legislature to address a number of unknowns.' 'In order to safely and effectively carry out the will of the voters, the Legislature has been forced to revise the original language multiple times.' Mariano spokesperson Ana Vivas said. 'The legislation that the House is voting on today is better because of what we have learned since 2016, and establishes a new structure, different from the one that the ballot initiative spelled out.' The bill the House passed Wednesday also seeks to address intoxicating hemp-based products that largely fall into a gray area of the law and between the regulatory cracks by banning their sale without a license and setting up a new framework to regulate and tax them. Hemp beverages could only be sold by retailers licensed by the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission to sell all alcohol and all hemp-based products would need to be registered with the CCC. 'This ban and accompanying regulatory structure will help provide guidance and clarity on hemp products, removing those which are unregulated, of unknown origin or composition, and too easily accessible to minors,' Donahue said Wednesday. The House bill adjusts the existing cap on retail licenses any one operator can hold. The current limit is three, and the House bill would raise the cap on retail licenses to six over a three-year period (increasing first to four, a year later to five and finally to six). Opponents of that idea have slammed it as a 'gift to corporate cannabis and a death sentence for local and social equity businesses.' The existing three-license caps would remain in place for cultivation and manufacturing. On the medical side of the legal marijuana world, the bill eliminates the requirement that medical marijuana businesses be 'vertically integrated,' meaning they must grow and process all the marijuana they sell. Patients and advocates have been calling for that change for years, saying the medical-only options have become scarce across Massachusetts since cannabis was legalized for non-medical use. With cannabis industry struggling, Western Mass. sellers and growers seek relief from high court Holyoke Cannabis sues city, wants refund of $290,000 in host community payments Lawsuit: Woman-owned cannabis business stalled by Springfield City Hall Read the original article on MassLive.
