Pentagon watchdog to review Hegseth's use of Signal app for Houthi strike plans
The Pentagon's acting inspector general has announced that he will review defence secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the Signal messaging app to convey plans for a military strike against Houthi militants in Yemen.
The review will also look at other defence officials' use of the publicly available encrypted app, which is not able to handle classified material and is not part of the department of defence's (DoD) secure communications network.
Mr Hegseth's use of the app came to light when a journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic, was added to a Signal text chain by national security adviser Mike Waltz.
The chain included Mr Hegseth, vice president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and others, brought together to discuss military operations against the Iran-backed Houthis.
In a notification letter to Mr Hegseth, Steven Stebbins, the acting inspector general, said: 'The objective of this evaluation is to determine the extent to which the Secretary of Defence and other DoD personnel complied with DoD policies and procedures for the use of a commercial messaging application for official business.
'Additionally, we will review compliance with classification and records retention requirements.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bipartisan House proposal aims to speed up defense acquisition work
A pair of key House lawmakers introduced bipartisan legislation Monday designed to simplify the defense acquisition process with the goal of speeding the fielding of new systems and technology to the military's front lines. The measure — dubbed the Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery Act, or SPEED Act — is the latest approach in a flurry of actions over the last few months by policymakers to cut the bureaucracy surrounding how the Defense Department buys equipment. But the latest proposal is sponsored by the top Republican (House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Ala.) and top Democrat (committee ranking member Adam Smith, D-Wash.), making it a rare bipartisan priority in the chamber and an expected focal point of the annual defense authorization bill debate. In looming Hegseth hearings, Republicans may air their budget peeves 'The current [system] is too slow, rigid, and bureaucratic to meet today's urgent needs,' the pair wrote in a bill summary provided to reporters Monday. 'The requirements process alone can take well over two years. This is followed by a rigid budget process that adds another three years, and then a lengthy contracting process. 'All told, more than a decade can pass between identifying a capability gap to equipping our warfighters with a solution. By then, the threat has changed, the technology is outdated, and the program is over budget.' The sweeping legislation would establish a new Requirements, Acquisition, and Programming Integration Directorate (RAPID) to serve as a decision hub led by the senior defense leaders, providing new authorities to quickly test, approve and purchase new military systems. That change, along a host of new streamlined program requirements, could help reduce the program validation process from about 800 days now to three months, bill supporters said. The sponsors argue the acquisition issue is about more than efficiency and cost savings. They said the current system — 'optimized to avoid failure, rather than to rapidly deliver capabilities to the warfighter' — is endangering national security because the country lacks the surge capacity in its industrial base to sustain its forces during a prolonged military conflict. House officials said they do not see an inherent conflict between the SPEED Act and the Fostering Reform and Government Efficiency in Defense (FORGED) Act introduced by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., late last year. That legislation also focuses on updates to the acquisition process, with an eye toward faster development and production timelines. The White House in April also announced its own effort to reform how the Pentagon buys weaponry, stating that 'our defense acquisition system does not provide the speed and flexibility our armed forces need to have decisive advantages in the future.' Work consolidating all of those ideas into a single reform package will likely begin in the House Armed Services Committee, which is expected to offer its draft of the annual defense authorization bill in the next few weeks. That bill is one of the few legislative certainties in an increasingly partisan Congress, passing for more than 60 consecutive years. Wicker and Rogers are expected to work on compromise language for the balance of the summer. Regardless of the final legislation, House officials said that boosting the defense industrial base will also take significant financial investment from the government, money they hope will be approved as part of ongoing budget discussions.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump rejects Iran's counter-proposal in nuclear negotiations: 'it's just not acceptable'
President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed he spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding Iran and the ongoing negotiations. In speaking to reporters after the call he said he reiterated to Netanyahu Washington's push to make a deal avoid direct conflict. "We're trying to make a deal so that there's no destruction and death. And we've told them that, and I've told them that, and I hope that's the way it works out," Trump said. "But it might not work out that way. "We'll soon find out," he added. Trump claimed that Iran had already returned a counter-proposal to the U.S. following its rejection of a proposal given to them last week, though the president said "it's just not acceptable" and that more negotiations are needed, particularly regarding enrichment-related demands. The call came after the United Nation's nuclear watchdog, which is charged with monitoring all nations' nuclear programs, warned on Monday that it cannot verify whether Tehran's program is "entirely peaceful" despite the regime's claims. Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, on Monday issued a warning statement that the agency has not only long been barred access to old and new nuclear sites, but that Iran has scrubbed locations in an apparent move to cover up its activities. In 2020, the IAEA found man-made particles of enriched uranium at three sites, including Varamin, Marivan and Turquzabad. The locations were previously utilized in Iran's nuclear program and gave the agency credence to believe Tehran had once again turned to deadly nuclear ambitions. "Since then, we have been seeking explanations and clarifications from Iran for the presence of these uranium particles, including through a number of high-level meetings and consultations in which I have been personally involved," Grossi said. "Unfortunately, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided technically credible answers to, the Agency's questions. "It has also sought to sanitize the locations, which has impeded Agency verification activities," he added. Grossi, who confirmed during an April trip to Washington, D.C. that the IAEA has not been involved in nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, said on Monday that he has been working "closely and intensively" with both parties in "support of their bilateral negotiation[s]." The warning comes after the IAEA in a report late last month, also confirmed that Iran had drastically increased its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium by nearly 35% in three months. In February, the IAEA assessed that Tehran possessed 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds) worth of uranium enriched to 60%, but on May 17th it found Iran now has some 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) – meaning the regime is just a technical step away from being able to make up to 10 nuclear warheads. Last week, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei came out in strong opposition to a U.S. proposal submitted to Tehran to end its nuclear program, though it remains unclear what details were included in the document, including on enrichment capabilities, and on Sunday, Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf claimed the proposal didn't include any sanction relief. The White House has remained tight-lipped about what was included in the document, though according to some reporting, President Donald Trump gave Iran until June 11 to reach a deal with the U.S., though Fox News Digital could not independently verify these claims. On Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that "The U.S. proposal is not acceptable to us. It was not the result of previous rounds of negotiations." "We will present our own proposal to the other side via Oman after it is finalized. This proposal is reasonable, logical, and balanced," Baghaei reportedly said. Some reporting has also suggested Iran might submit their proposal as soon as June 10, though the Iranian UN mission in the U.S. would not comment on or confirm these claims.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
700 Marines on high alert to deploy to Los Angeles amid ICE protests
The military has put about 700 Marines on high alert to possibly deploy to Los Angeles, three U.S. officials told CBS News, two days after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said they could be sent to the city "if violence continues." The Marines could be mobilized in the coming days to support National Guard troops already in the city, the officials said. Hegseth said Saturday night he had placed Marines on "high alert." This is a developing story; it will be updated.
