
Voting ends in Albania's election amid bid to join EU
Voting has ended in Albania's parliamentary election after a boisterous campaign dominated by the country's uphill effort to join the European Union and Prime Minister Edi Rama's bid for a fourth term.
Polls closed on Sunday evening, and vote counting is expected to conclude within 48 hours.
Because of mass emigration, the country of 2.8 million people has about 3.7 million eligible voters.
For the first time, those in the diaspora — about 191,000 so far this time — could vote, casting their ballots by mail.
Voters were electing 140 lawmakers to four-year terms, choosing from 2,046 candidates representing 11 political groupings, including three coalitions.
The preliminary turnout at 6pm local time was 41.41 per cent, four per cent lower than in 2021.
Rama's Socialist Party says it can deliver EU membership in five years, sticking to an ambitious pledge while battling conservative opponents with public recriminations and competing promises of pay hikes.
Opening up the election to voters abroad for the first time has added to the volatility, along with the appearance of new parties, a shift in campaigning to social media and a recent TikTok ban.
Voting was largely peaceful, with just a few skirmishes involving candidates and some of their supporters around the country.
"For the most part, excluding some sporadic cases, the process has been in line with the rules and standards," said Ilirjan Celibashi, the head of the Central Election Commission.
Rama, 60, who secured the start of EU membership negotiations last October, highlighted achievements in infrastructure and justice reform in his campaign.
"Today is the people's words. Let's wait for the people to speak," said Rama after voting.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is pressing Albania to continue reforms — particularly in governance and anti-corruption efforts — to stay on track for EU membership.
Rama's main challenger is Sali Berisha, 80, a former president and prime minister, who argues that Albania still isn't ready for EU membership.
He started the campaign borrowing from US President Donald Trump's slogan, which he changed to "Make Albania Great Again," but eventually settled on "Grandiose Albania."
Economic concerns have been central to the campaign.
The Socialists say they will accelerate a tourism boom, from 10 million arrivals in 2024 to 30 million by 2030, diversifying destinations by expanding infrastructure projects.
The Democrats argue that the government's dismal performance has driven more than one million Albanians to leave the country over the past decade.
After casting his ballot, Berisha called on Albanians to vote "for themselves, for their children, their pensions and salaries, employment, business, their farm".
Both parties made similar promises on minimum pensions, an average monthly salary and a minimum wage – all about 20 per cent or higher than current levels.
But analyst Lutfi Dervishi considered that scenario unlikely.
"It's a campaign without debate and results without surprises," he said.
"Elections won't shake up the current scene — neither the system nor the main actors."
Despite Albania's significant improvement in Transparency International's corruption index — rising from 116th in 2013 to 80th in the ranking in 2024 — corruption remains the country's Achilles' heel and a stumbling block for European integration.
Sweeping judicial reforms launched in 2016 with support from the EU and US led to investigations and prosecutions of senior officials.
Several former ministers, mayors and high-ranking officials have been jailed, while others face ongoing investigations.
Despite promises of cleaner governance, both major parties are fielding candidates facing corruption allegations.
Berisha himself has been charged with corruption and is awaiting trial.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
El Salvador returns mistakenly deported man to face people smuggling charges in the US
Washington: The man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, has returned to the United States to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said. Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case has become a flash point for escalating tensions between the presidency and the judiciary, which has blocked a number of Trump's signature policies. The US Supreme Court had ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Garcia's return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his 'warrantless arrest'. The return marks a turning point in a case that became a broader symbol of criticisms of US President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policies. Critics, including many congressional Democrats, pointed to it as a sign that the administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations. But the administration insisted that Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers denied. It later said it had sent the man accidentally and couldn't bring him back. On Saturday (AEST), administration officials portrayed his indictment by a grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach – even though the charges were filed on May 21, more than two months after his March 15 deportation. At a press conference, Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele agreed to return Garcia to the after US officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. 'The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring,' Bondi said at a press conference. Garcia will have the chance to enter a plea in court and contest the charges at trial. If he is convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said.

The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
El Salvador returns mistakenly deported man to face people smuggling charges in the US
Washington: The man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, has returned to the United States to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said. Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case has become a flash point for escalating tensions between the presidency and the judiciary, which has blocked a number of Trump's signature policies. The US Supreme Court had ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Garcia's return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his 'warrantless arrest'. The return marks a turning point in a case that became a broader symbol of criticisms of US President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policies. Critics, including many congressional Democrats, pointed to it as a sign that the administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations. But the administration insisted that Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers denied. It later said it had sent the man accidentally and couldn't bring him back. On Saturday (AEST), administration officials portrayed his indictment by a grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach – even though the charges were filed on May 21, more than two months after his March 15 deportation. At a press conference, Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele agreed to return Garcia to the after US officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. 'The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring,' Bondi said at a press conference. Garcia will have the chance to enter a plea in court and contest the charges at trial. If he is convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said.

Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'More punches to come': Bitter feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump predicted to develop even further
A feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has exploded this week, but a US commentator believes there may yet be "more punches to come". A war of words erupted between the pair after Musk, who finished his tenure with the administration overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency, lashed the leader of the free world's signature "big beautiful bill" which would unleash trillions in tax cuts and slash spending. Musk this week hit out, describing the bill as a "disgusting abomination" and criticised those who voted for it after it was passed by the House of Representatives last month. United States President Donald Trump has threatened to cut off government contracts with companies owned by Elon Musk in retaliation. Trump claimed Musk was angry because the bill removed an electric vehicle tax break, introduced by Joe Biden which benefited his company Tesla. Co-host of Steve Bannon's War Room Natalie Winters told Sky News' Rowan Dean she believes there will be 'more punches' to come amid the public arguments between the pair. 'I definitely think this is going to evolve,' Ms Winters said on Friday. 'MAGA diehards, who I think are sort of trying to come to terms and understand where exactly they fall in MAGA diehards overwhelmingly are going to be on President Trump's camp. 'On principle, this bill, Elon is sort of in the right.' Musk continued to attack Trump on social media on Thursday, going as far as alleging the President's name is in the Epstein files. The New York Post's Washington correspondent Diana Glebova said the allegation was a "bombshell" claim but that there may be more to the story than what the public knows. "We don't know the extent that Trump is, of course, involved in these files. They haven't been released, and it is up to the Department of Justice to release them," she told Sky News' Steve Price. "We haven't seen those yet. But the White House said today that Musk's claim was nothing new, that Trump was on the flight logs. But of course we don't the whole story here, so we'll just have to see. "I mean, for Musk to know this information, that would be really interesting if there is something there. Again, the White House is denying that there's a (story) there right now." Glebova said the Democrats would be enjoying the "drama" between Trump and one of his biggest supporters throughout the campaign. She added that Musk would be short on support, having potentially put some Republican supporters offside with his remarks about the President. " I think Democrats are eating this up because, you know, it's drama. It's exciting. And I don't think that many people are supporting Musk right now," she said. He lost a lot of his support from Democrats when he joined Trump on the campaign trail and we saw all those protests against Tesla. You know, he was getting death threats. They were going after his vehicles, like lighting them on fire. "The Republicans were supporting Musk because he was so close to Trump, his right-hand man. But now that Musk has departed from Trump, I mean, I don't know who's supporting him right now."