Letters: Despite good experience, S.F.'s building department is still problem-plagued. Here's a fix
Regarding 'Entrepreneur visited S.F.'s notorious building department 80 times in 6 months: 'I got so much support' ' (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, May 4): I'm happy to hear that Vy Tran had a good experience working with San Francisco's Department of Building Inspection on her escape room project. On my one trip there, I too found the staff to be helpful.
However, the story also points outs the department's glaring shortcomings, namely that 'a typical multifamily applicant waits 627 days after approvals to obtain a full set of permits' and that 'the city's building code is 1,000 pages, with decades of lawmakers layering on requirement after requirement, while rarely getting rid of obsolete codes.'
Is this any way to run a city, or should I say ruin a city?
I propose that Mayor Daniel Lurie create a task force to whittle the city's building code down to something closer to the size of an average novel (300 to 400 pages), then assign it as a summer reading assignment to his entire staff.
Stan Barnett, San Francisco
Supervisor deserves recall
Regarding 'Did S.F. moderates 'rile up' Chinese Americans on recalls only to abandon them?' (Opinion, SFChronicle.com, May 4): Residents of San Francisco's District 4 are pretty forgiving: We didn't recall two supervisors who ended up in prison or those who voted in ways we disagreed with.
But previous supervisors met with residents in public meetings, heard their arguments, openly informed them ahead of time what they were planning and took the heat for their decisions.
Supervisor Joel Engardio did none of these when he decided to ditch the widely accepted weekend closure compromise to support entirely closing the Great Highway.
It's not just that Engardio proposed and endorsed Proposition K; it's the underhanded way he went about it that amounts to what many in the Sunset consider 'high crimes and misdemeanors' — to the point where a recall is warranted.
We can't wait until the next election. He doesn't think he did anything wrong, so he'll ignore us again with future important issues affecting our lives.
The Chinese American Democratic Club is quite correct, as quoted in the article, Engardio, 'has shown us time and time again that he isn't a leader.'
We need a supervisor now who honorably represents District 4.
John Higgins, San Francisco
Product misrepresented
Regarding 'How to know if a charity can be trusted with your money? This one thing can tell you' (No-Nonsense Money, SFChronicle.com, May 4): Cecilia Diem, director of the Center for Civil Society, claims in the story that Charity Navigator's ratings only indicate the financial transparency of nonprofit groups. This misrepresents our comprehensive evaluation framework, which specifically addresses leadership quality and operational effectiveness.
Our Encompass Rating System includes assessments across four areas influencing nonprofit success, and only one focuses on finance.
Diem also incorrectly claims that Charity Navigator's ratings 'aren't going to tell you anything about leadership or operations.' Our team relies on IRS research and analysis and evaluates organizational effectiveness using evidence-backed metrics.
Our Causeway Initiative offers estate planning solutions that leverage Charity Navigator's rating to ensure donations remain effective and aligned with donors' intentions.
While we appreciate the Chronicle's focus on informed charitable giving, perpetuating misconceptions about nonprofit evaluation tools undermines donors' ability to make truly educated giving decisions.
Michael Thatcher, president and CEO, Charity Navigator, New York
Be vigilant about tyranny
Winston Churchill called the Battle of the Bulge 'the greatest American battle of the war.' It was the last major German offensive launched against the U.S. Army in World War II in a snowbound forest in Belgium during the Christmas season of 1944.
In one of the bloodiest battles in the fight against tyranny, the Allied forces prevailed, eventually leading to the surrender by Germany on May 8, 1945, Victory in Europe Day.
In celebrating the 80th anniversary of this historic capitulation, Americans and Europeans would be wise to recognize that tyranny tends to fester and is never fully vanquished. It feeds on the indifference and passivity of those who would allow the emergence of an autocrat to go unchecked.
Jane Larkin, Tampa, Fla.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
This governor vetoed a bill that would ban China from purchasing land. Here's why
Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs is facing criticism for vetoing a bill that would have prevented China from buying land in the state. In her veto letter, dated June 2, Hobbs said she considered protecting infrastructure important. 'However, this legislation is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets,' she said in the letter. 'Additionally, it lacks clear implementation criteria and opens the door to arbitrary enforcement.' Foreign entities own about 40 million acres, or 3%, of U.S. farmland as of 2021. Out of this, China owns 1%, much lower in comparison to Canada, which owns 33%, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This may seem like a small percentage, but it carries sizable national security implications, whether it's over concerns of who is controlling U.S. assets or whether the land could be used to conduct espionage. The bill in Arizona set out to address these concerns. In Arizona's Maricopa and Pinal counties, more than 294,000 acres of agricultural land is owned by Chinese corporations, as per the USDA Farm Services Agency. When Hobbs announced her decision to veto the bipartisan bill, she faced pushback. Arizona state Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp claimed the veto was 'politically motivated' and 'utterly insane.' Shamp introduced the bill to protect the 'state's military, commercial and agricultural assets from foreign espionage and sabotage,' per the text of the legislation. She claims China attempted to lease land next to Luke Air Force Base, where the military trains fighter pilots. Michael Lucci, the CEO and founder of State Armor Action, a nonprofit organization that is pushing 70 bills targeting China in states across the country, said Hobbs hung an ''Open for the CCP' sign on Arizona's front door,' and made critical assets like Luke Air Force Base, Palo Verde nuclear power plant and Taiwan Semiconductor factory more vulnerable. 'Allowing Communist China to buy up land near our critical assets is a national security risk, plain and simple,' Lucci told Fox News. 'Gov. Hobbs is substantively and completely wrong when she says that SB 1109 'is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets.'' The White House attempted to ban China from buying U.S. land. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins confirmed this move earlier in February. 'One of the very, very top of the list perhaps is the Chinese purchase of our farmland. A lot of that land is around some of our military outposts,' Rollins told Breitbart News. Many states, especially the ones led by Republicans, are taking note. As of March 17, 27 states are considering 84 bills that restrict foreign property ownership in some way, according to Committee of 100, a nonprofit that advocates for Chinese Americans. Twenty-two states passed nearly 40 bills that restrict foreign property ownership, 17 of which became law last year. The idea of curbing investments from foreign adversaries into the U.S. for national security reasons isn't new. The U.S. restricted Chinese-based telecommunication company Huawei from doing business with American companies. Beijing-based social media app TikTok has so far survived a ban passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court, thanks to President Donald Trump, who extended the deadline for its Chinese parent company ByteDance to divest the app's assets in the U.S. It's possible Trump will extend the deadline a third time ahead of June 19, considering the app has 170 million users in the U.S. Still, the idea of restricting certain foreign investments isn't as popular in the Western U.S. as it is in the Midwest and the South. Only Idaho and Utah have laws on the books against international property buyers. Meanwhile, Nevada, California, Arizona, Oregon, Colorado and New Mexico do not. In the Beehive State, foreign-owned land is less than 40,000 acres. But it ranks in the top five in the country for the amount of acreage at risk due to the number of key military installations it hosts, including Hill Air Force Base, the Utah Test and Training Range and Dugway Proving Ground, as the Deseret News previously reported. Utah's foreign investment restriction laws attempt to nip the problem in the bud instead of letting it fester. Last year, the GOP-held state Legislature passed HB516, which prevents some countries — North Korea, China, Iran and Russia — from buying land in Utah. As the Deseret News previously reported, this bill sought to address national security concerns. The Utah Department of Public Safety is tasked with documenting these land holdings and compiling a database to reverse foreign investments. Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, originally cosponsored a bill that would address this issue on the national level. In 2023, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed another bill, the Restrictions on Foreign Acquisitions of Land Act, that prohibits or restricts foreign investments and landholdings in Utah. In 2023, the Idaho Legislature codified a law that would restrict foreign governments or foreign-government owned businesses from buying farmland in the state or holding claims to any mineral or water. The Legislature fell short of enacting any enforcement for this law but remedied this two years later. In April, Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed a law that authorized the state's attorney general to enforce the foreign ownership law.
San Francisco Chronicle
16 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: What can Democrats do to win presidential elections again?
Regarding 'What Newsom understands about power that other California Democrats don't' (Open Forum, June 3): Stay true to values Justin Ray's op-ed reveals an ignorance of history, politics and language. He blames the Democrats for asserting 'moral clarity' and implies that they are a left party. The Democratic Party is really a centrist, capitalist party pretending to be a 'big tent.' Its failure is that, representing capitalist interests, it cannot achieve moral clarity. Sen. Bernie Sanders and President Donald Trump are more popular individually than the Democratic leadership because they run on moral clarity. I despise the ruthless immorality of the fascist tendencies of Trump, but his culture war doesn't lack moral clarity. Yes, Gov. Gavin Newsom's fascism light is based upon pragmatism, but contrary to the punditry we are sold, most Americans are starving for an honest culture war with moral clarity on the side of human decency, justice, equality and history. People are sick of being fooled, including those fooled into voting for Trump and the once-upon-a-time Medicare for all champion and former vice president. Marc Sapir, Berkeley Don't be only liberal The commentary about Gov. Gavin Newsom reminds me of when I was a campus coordinator at San Jose State College in 1972 for George McGovern's presidential campaign. We all loved Sen. McGovern and believed that he would be a great president but forgot one thing: He wasn't going to win a national election. McGovern wanted to end the Vietnam War at a time when most Americans disagreed and wanted to fight communism in another country. He wanted to ensure that there was a guaranteed minimum income, which, yikes, was socialism and made it seem like that is all liberals want. Democrats must avoid being perceived as only liberal. They can do this by supporting policies such as temporarily halting Medi-Cal expansion for undocumented immigrants. That's the only way they can get some Republicans and independents to vote Democratic. Gralen Britto, Corte Madera Peace is the way Justin Ray misses the mark when he says that the Democrats should turn right to win the next election. Kamala Harris didn't lose the presidential election to Donald Trump because she was too far left; she lost because of her and former President Joe Biden's extreme pro-war policies, including Israel's siege of Gaza, according to polling by the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project and YouGov. In six battleground states, 20% of previous Democratic voters polled cited Biden's policies on Gaza as the primary reason for not voting for their party, and 36% of 2020 Biden voters would have voted for Harris if she had pledged to withhold further weapons from Israel. Meanwhile, Trump campaigned on ending the war in Ukraine, and in his first term, he reached out to North Korea and did not start any wars. From former President Barack Obama's pivot to Asia, which shifted 60% of our naval forces to the region, to Democrats' endlessly pushing the red lines of Russia and China, and fear of nuclear war, a critical base of Democratic voters was lost. The Democratic Party must return to its pro-peace base to survive. Michael Wong, vice president, Veterans For Peace San Francisco chapter Work for the working class Justin Ray's op-ed seems to be endorsing the same old move-to-the-middle strategy that has brought ruin on the Democratic Party. Kamala Harris ran as a moderate — campaigning with Republican Liz Cheney, cozying up to tech billionaires, ignoring the LGBTQ community and doing nothing to separate herself from former President Joe Biden's unquestioning support for the Palestinian slaughter in Gaza. Being Republican Light is what got us into this mess. What we really need is for Democrats to return to their Franklin D. Roosevelt roots as champions of the working class. Robert Leeds, Oakland
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Taking Harvey Milk's name off Navy ship won't silence what he stands for
Regarding 'Trump reportedly to strip Harvey Milk name off naval vessel' (Politics, June 3): The order to remove Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship is a stunning and shameful act of political erasure. Milk, a Navy veteran who served during the Korean War, was assassinated after becoming one of America's most courageous and pioneering LGBTQ+ civil rights leaders. To claim that his name no longer reflects 'the Navy's values' or the 'warrior ethos' is not just revisionist — it's malicious. The timing is no accident. On the first days of Pride month, this move speaks volumes about the stories the Trump administration seeks to silence. This decision is not about standards. It's about politics and an insult to every LGBTQ+ American who has served this country with honor. I am the beneficiary of Milk's groundbreaking efforts to have LGBTQ+ people treated with respect, dignity and the opportunity to love who we choose. The name Harvey Milk endures — in the hearts of those who carry his legacy forward and in every Pride flag raised this month. Jonathan Finck, San Francisco Stand with veterans On Friday, the anniversary of D-Day, I'll be in Washington, D.C., marching alongside thousands of other veterans and families at the Unite for Veterans rally. We're not showing up to make noise. We're showing up because we believe in something worth defending: the promise this country made to those who served. I served in Afghanistan as an Army infantry officer. I've spent my civilian career working to improve systems for veterans, at a Bay Area tech company and at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and I can tell you this: Undermining veteran care doesn't reduce waste, it reduces access, stability and dignity for those who earned it. The Department of Veterans Affairs is under threat. The systems veterans rely on for health care, housing and mental health are being hollowed out. At the same time, disinformation is spreading about how these systems work and who they serve. This isn't about one party or one president. It's about priorities. We've never hesitated to invest in national defense and caring for veterans is part of that commitment. So I'm standing up. And I'm asking others to do the same. Demand that this country keep its word to those who wore the uniform. George Chewning, San Francisco Train not so smart Regarding 'Enthusiasm 'sky high' as Sonoma-Marin rail service expands northward' (Bay Area, May 31): The story about SMART train reaching Windsor reads like a promo piece. A deeper look shows that the boom in ridership occurred after SMART started giving free rides to kids and seniors. And even with that incentive, it has yet to reach the 5,000 riders a day to which it aspires. SMART has been a huge boondoggle. It's a single-track rail line that runs through flood-prone fields, utilizing diesel engines, with no flexibility in case of earthquake or fire (unlike unsexy buses). The policy seems to be to build so much infrastructure that citizens will feel they must send good money after bad, but they're not consistently biting. Jean Arnold, Mendocino Learn more languages The more languages you know fluently, the better you understand your native language. I helped write courses of study for many languages. My granddaughters attended Spanish immersion classes and are now bilingual, opting to study additional languages. While I agree that English literacy should be better, students are immersed in English all day long though social media is eroding their grammar and punctuation. This is a separate battle that won't be improved by outlawing immersion classes. To improve communication and alternate ways of organizing reality, I say we should offer more immersion classes.
