Jon Stewart: Trump will ‘burn' country down for ‘insurance money'
Jon Stewart said President Trump's legal woes with media companies amount to an effort to tear down the country for 'insurance money.'
He referenced Trump's defamation lawsuit warranting a $15 million payout from ABC and first lady Melania's $40 million documentary deal with Amazon as proof of funds in exchange for 'protection.'
'They just put money into the pot. So ultimately, at the end of this, does Trump burn our fucking country down for insurance money? Like, where are we headed?' Stewart said during a Friday appearance on The Bill Simmons podcast.
He said large-scale settlements set a poor precedent for future court battles with the Trump administration.
'Now [Trump will] go after Harvard or Comcast or whatever the hell else he does because a policy of appeasement always leads to more conquest,' Stewart said.
Throughout Trump's second stint in office, he has clashed with Harvard over their campus culture, alleging the school harbors students with antisemitic views.
He has pushed to have one of the country's oldest institutions stripped of their tax exempt status and said their ability to welcome international students should be revoked.
'Harvard's going to have to change its ways,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday.
As the president encourages a nationwide educational overhaul, Stewart has suggested Democrats prepare for the next presidential race in 2028.
He urged the party to 'overcome the stink' in the next election cycle to regain support from voters after November's landslide loss.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
ICE Agents Could Be Banned From Wearing Masks Under New Proposal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California lawmakers are looking to stop local police officers and federal agents from wearing face masks or coverings while carrying out operations in the state. A move a leading Republican told Newsweek was made just to "score political brownie-points." The "No Secret Police Act" was introduced by Democrats in the state's Senate on Monday, following criticism that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were trying to hide their identities while carrying out raids in Los Angeles. "The recent federal operations in California have created an environment of profound terror. If we want the public to trust law enforcement, we cannot allow them to behave like secret police in an authoritarian state," state Senator Scott Wiener said in a press release. Why It Matters There has been growing criticism of ICE in recent months for allowing its agents to carry out targeted enforcement operations in plain clothes and face coverings. ICE officials argue that the masks are crucial to protect the identities of agents and their families from death threats. The agency is facing increased scrutiny as President Donald Trump directs his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status. Federal agents in Portland, Oregon, on June 28, 2018. Federal agents in Portland, Oregon, on June 28, 2018. Alex Milan Tracy/Sipa via AP Images What To Know Democratic state Senators Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Jesse Arreguin of Oakland announced Monday that they will introduce SB 627, a bill that would prohibit local, state, and federal law enforcement officers from concealing their faces during interactions with the public. The lawmakers said the bill would include exemptions for SWAT teams and officers wearing medical masks during natural disasters like wildfires. Transparent riot gear would also be allowed, as it does not obscure the face. Law enforcement officers who conceal their faces while performing official duties could be charged with a misdemeanor under the new proposal. "Our first responders are responsible for vital work in protecting our communities, and trust and accountability are a key aspects in keeping our neighborhoods safe," Arreguín said. Across the aisle, California Republicans criticized the proposal, accusing their colleagues of attempting to "legislatively dox" ICE agents. "At a time when federal agents are literally under attack in our state, California's leaders should be rallying behind law enforcement, not seeking to score political brownie-points by putting them and their families at risk with legislation to publicly expose their identities," Senate Minority Leader Brian W. Jones told Newsweek. The legislation comes amid growing resistance in California to Trump's plans to carry out what he describes as the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. What People Are Saying? California Senate Minority Leader Brian W. Jones, a Republican, told Newsweek: "This bill is nothing more than an attempt to legislatively dox our law enforcement officers. In the name of liberal virtue signaling and pandering to his progressive base, Senator Wiener has introduced a bill that endangers the very men and women who've committed their lives to keeping us safe. "Thankfully, this bill has zero chance of being enforced as the California Legislature has no authority to impose requirements on federal officers, but the mere suggestion of such a dangerous policy is another disappointing sign of the left's distain for law and order in California." State Senator Scott Wiener said in a press release: "Law enforcement officers do critically important work to keep our communities safe, and they should be proud to show their faces and provide identifying information when doing so. It boosts trust in law enforcement, which makes it easier for law enforcement to do their jobs and makes California safer for all of us." State Senator Jesse Arreguín said in a statement. "This bill will ensure that law enforcement are easily identifiable, maintaining that trust and accountability." Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS: "It's for the safety of those individuals or the work that they're doing as far as protecting their identity so they can continue to do investigative work." What Happens Next? The bill is likely to pass in a Democratic-controlled legislature in the state of California.
Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Global Markets Mostly Fall; Oil Price Rises on Fresh Iran, Israel Attacks
Oil prices headed higher again Tuesday as Iran and Israel launched fresh attacks against each other. The latest strikes came after President Trump left the Group of Seven summit early to deal with the crisis and after social-media posts in which Trump urged an immediate evacuation of Tehran. Investors retreated from risky assets–U.S. stock futures fell and Treasury yields eased.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Putin's energy point man says there is a need for more oil volumes globally
By Vladimir Soldatkin MOSCOW (Reuters) -Russian President Vladimir Putin's energy point man said on Tuesday that there was a global need for more volumes of oil and that OPEC+ remained ready to be flexible if needed amid the conflict between Israel and Iran and a trade war. Crude prices have jumped in recent days on concern of a major war in Middle East after Israel struck Iran, and U.S. President Donald Trump urged people to leave Tehran. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said that volatility had been sown in oil markets by the risk of supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz, the global economic recovery and the trade wars unleashed by Washington. "Historically, affordable prices have provoked additional demand for oil with continued global fuel competition. And in general, there is a need for additional volumes of raw materials in the world," Novak told the Vedomosti newspaper in an interview. OPEC+ countries, he said, were "in constant contact, monitoring the market situation and are ready to flexibly and promptly respond to any changes in market conditions." "If necessary, the transaction parameters can be adjusted in the future to ensure an optimal supply and demand ratio," Novak was quoted as saying. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
