logo
Facebook Enables Extremist Views. Should I Quit and Risk Losing My Friends There?

Facebook Enables Extremist Views. Should I Quit and Risk Losing My Friends There?

New York Times16-05-2025

Although I am 'Generation Facebook,' I do not use the social network much, except for everything around my hobby: social dancing. Within the dancing community, almost all event planning and communication is done via Facebook. So I am very dependent on both the main app and Messenger for this part of my life.
With Meta's recent moves to endorse political extremism, hate speech and general nastiness, I am no longer comfortable supporting their business. But keeping in touch with my friends and engaging in shared activities would become onerous, even impossible, if I had to use other routes. What is the ethical thing to do? — Name Withheld
From the Ethicist:
I'm not an expert on Meta's internal workings, but like many, I've long assumed that social media plays a role in political polarization. Meta's platforms, notably Facebook, are engineered to keep users engaged, and outrage would seem to be a reliable tool for doing that. Still, recent research complicates the picture. A study published in Science found that during the 2020 election cycle, Facebook users who were switched to a raw, chronological feed were no less politically polarized than those using the algorithmic one.
That doesn't let Facebook off the hook — some of its design choices have clearly intensified the worst dynamics online. A telling example: In 2017, not long after the 'angry' emoji was introduced, Facebook's algorithm gave it five times the weight of a 'like,' figuring that stronger emotion meant stronger engagement. Internal research later showed that anger-generating posts were often hateful or misleading; maybe a bigger problem for Facebook was that users didn't like seeing that emoji on their posts. By 2020, the company zeroed out its weight. A result was less misinformation — and, reportedly, no drop in engagement. The people at Facebook didn't set out to promote extremism, but its model encouraged it, until they decided to course-correct.
Some people are worried that Facebook is now drifting in the opposite direction — making more room for political extremism and hate speech. Earlier this year, Meta rolled out 'community notes' for U.S. users, a crowdsourced system for 'adding context,' modeled on an X feature and replacing the use of professional third-party fact checkers. Many see this as a response to sustained conservative pressure, particularly to the charge that Facebook's fact checkers disproportionately targeted right-wing content. (Fact checkers have countered that conservative outlets simply produced more misinformation.)
Meta's revised content guidelines have raised further concerns. One recent change, for instance, allows users to impute mental illness or call people 'weird' on the basis of gender or sexual orientation, citing 'political and religious discourse' and 'common nonserious usage.' Now, I support broad latitude for free expression online. If someone wants to call someone else 'weird,' for any reason, I don't think Facebook needs to step in. I'd just block the user if this became a habit. But this proviso appears to single out L.G.B.T.Q. people. That's, well, a little weird. It doesn't suggest a principled commitment to openness; it looks like ideological appeasement.
Allowing speech, to be sure, isn't the same as endorsing it. A platform truly committed to viewpoint neutrality could permit a wide range of views without signaling approval. But critics say some of Meta's policy changes feel less like viewpoint neutrality and more like tactical political realignment.
So, given your concerns, what should you do? There's a personal argument for leaving — maybe you're finding more nasty surprises in your feed and find it unsettling. Or maybe you simply don't want to be complicit in a system that accommodates and even rewards cruelty or disinformation. Those are both serious considerations.
But unless your departure is part of a larger movement, it won't affect Meta's behavior. And leaving might cut you off from people you care about — like your dance partners. Holding your nose and staying could be wiser. That doesn't mean soaking in the cesspool. You can tweak your settings and treat Facebook more like a group chat than a broadcast.
In the end, Facebook isn't a neutral public square, but it's not a cartoon villain either. It's a business, shaped by incentives, feedback loops and pressure. If we want better platforms, we need to be clear not just about what we reject but also about the kind of digital world we'd like to see. You can't ask that a large public arena be restricted to those who share your values; you can ask for rules that are transparent, just and evenly applied. Fairness and freedom don't always dance well together — but if people with different views are going to share the floor, we need to make sure there's room for everyone to move.
A Bonus Question
I am a federal employee who is eligible for retirement. I have a job that is intellectually challenging, gives back to the public and is personally rewarding. As federal government employees in my department face potential layoffs, is it ethical for me to defer retirement? There would be no negative impact for me, and I am certain I would be offered other jobs because of my expertise. — Name Withheld
From the Ethicist:
You may believe that retiring would spare someone else from being laid off, but in reality, it's hard to know whether your departure would do so. Work-force reductions are typically complex, and the ripple effects of one departure are difficult to predict.
There are, in the meantime, countless ways to help others without stepping away from work that you value. Just for example, it has been estimated that donating $3,000 — about $50 a week for a year — could save a life through organizations like the Malaria Consortium. (With the recent evisceration of our global health programs, private donations to effective charities are more vital than ever.)
And your continued service has worth — to you and to the agency. The presence of someone skilled, experienced and committed to public service could strengthen the agency, at a time when the federal work force faces unprecedented strain. Staying can help stabilize the 'ship of state' — an important benefit in these turbulent times.
Readers Respond
The previous question was from a reader who was mulling the ethics of buying used books and music, knowing the creator won't receive proceeds of the sale. He wrote: 'Is it ethical to buy used books and music instead of new copies that will financially reward the author or artist? What do consumers owe to producers of art?'
In his response, the Ethicist noted: 'Artists can benefit from secondary markets in real, if less tangible, ways. Works that circulate widely can enhance the artist's reputation, whether it's a book read and passed along, a record rediscovered in a thrift shop or a painting resold at auction. Enthusiastic new audiences, prominent displays and word-of-mouth appreciation can all contribute to a creator's stature.
'What artists, especially the good ones, are owed is not a cut of every encounter we have with their work but a system that gives them a real opportunity to sell their work, to build a career, to find a public. After that, their creations rightly become part of the wider cultural world, as with books in a library or paintings in a museum, where countless people can enjoy them freely across the generations.' (Reread the full question and answer here.)

Thank goodness that people can buy used books. Not every person has access to a public library, and many school libraries only allow students one book for a week. And let's face it, if you are not rich, free or cheap books are a godsend to readers. I grew up in a reading family, even though we had little money. We delighted in books. Two of us became librarians! — Leda

The artist agreed with and made a contract with the original publishing company. If we assume the artist received their agreed payment, then they've already been paid for their work. From the consumer's point of view, I was never going to purchase their book full price, so they were never going to receive money from me regardless. — Al

Most of the world's books are out of print. May all those who run secondhand bookshops be blessed: While you exist, those words and themes aren't lost. — Jackie

The ripple effect of buying used books or music to raise an artist's profile calls to my mind the Grateful Dead's policy of allowing the taping of their shows. Tapes, which brought the band no direct income, were widely distributed, growing the band's audience into the juggernaut it became. — Bob

Writers write to be read. Only a fool would believe that a traditionally published writer will make a living at writing. We writers' best chance to have our work read (in traditional book form) is through the sale of used copies of our books. Aside from thrift shops and other secondhand stores, there are wonderful online marketplaces for used physical books. These have provided a lifeline to writers who previously had little chance of their out-of-print work being purchased and read. Now their entire output is probably, and affordably, available to the public. An unread book is a paper corpse. An opened book springs immediately to life. You don't have to pay us. But please, read us. — Jim

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Downtown L.A. curfew goes into effect after California Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses ICE protests
Downtown L.A. curfew goes into effect after California Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses ICE protests

CBS News

time11 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Downtown L.A. curfew goes into effect after California Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses ICE protests

California Gov. Gavin Newsom delivered a statewide address on Tuesday in the wake of immigration operations that sparked days of protest in Los Angeles and the deployment of hundreds of National Guard and U.S. Marines troops to the area by President Trump. "Trump, without consulting California leaders, commandeered 2,000 of our state's National Guard members to deploy on our streets illegally and for no reason," Newsom said. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president enflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers and even our National Guard at risk." The speech came on the heels of Mayor Karen Bass' decision to implement a curfew in downtown Los Angeles after five nights of unrest in the city center, and an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order filed by the state in its lawsuit to block further deployment of troops. That curfew resulted in dozens of arrests on Tuesday, with law enforcement swarming the impacted area as soon as it went into effect. Sporadic arrests followed. It was unclear how many were made in all. Since Friday, when the first operations took place in several downtown locations, protesters have taken to the streets to denounce the arrest of dozens of people. In some instances, protests have escalated into violent clashes that left an aftermath of destruction, including graffiti, looting, vandalism and debris. The next night, Mr. Trump declared that the National Guard would be deployed to Los Angeles to help quell the turmoil, despite opposition from California politicians who said it was largely unnecessary. That order was then followed by the deployment of 2,000 more National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines to the area as the protests continued, something Newsom called "fanning the flames even harder." "The President, he did it on purpose. As the news spread throughout L.A., anxiety for family and friends ramped up and protests started again. By night, several dozen lawbreakers became violent and destructive, they vandalized property, they tried to assault police officers," Newsom said. "This situation was winding down and was concentrated in just a few square blocks downtown. But that, that's not what Donald Trump wanted." "What we're witnessing is not law enforcement — it's authoritarianism. What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence, to be complicit in this moment," Newsom said. "Do not give into him." Los Angeles police and protestors face off in Downtown L.A. on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 in Los Angeles, CA. Jason Armond Curfew issued During an evening press conference, Bass said that since demonstrations have continued to escalate into violence, resulting in dozens of arrests and more than 20 businesses looted, she would impose a curfew. "The curfew will be in place tonight from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m.," she said. "We certainly expect for it to last for several days." It runs for one-square mile in the downtown area from the 5 Freeway to the 110 Freeway and from the 10 Freeway to where the 110 Freeway and 5 Freeway merge. "The city of Los Angeles is a massive area, 502 square miles," Bass said. "The area of downtown, where the curfew will take place, is one square mile ... Some of the imagery of the protest, of the violence gives the appearance as though this is a citywide crisis and it is not." Protesters gather in front of California National Guard soldiers and LAPD officers guarding the Edward R. Roybal Federal building as protests continue in Los Angeles on June 10, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. / Getty Images Demonstrations continue Tuesday Dozens gathered once again Tuesday, but police were quick to close in on the growing crowd near the Metropolitan Detention Center. With the CBS Los Angeles helicopter overhead, multiple people were seen being detained and loaded onto buses by officers. At around 4 p.m. a small crowd moved towards the 101 Freeway, briefly entering southbound lanes before they were met by the California Highway Patrol. Some officers stopped traffic as others formed a skirmish line to prevent the pedestrians from moving further into the road. Despite law enforcement blocking offramps and onramps for the thoroughfare, the crowd was able to gain entry through a hole that had been cut in a chainlink fence. On Sunday, hundreds of demonstrators flooded the same stretch of freeway, where they clashed with CHP officers. At around 7:30 p.m. CBS News Los Angeles reporters said that tensions again escalated outside of the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, where people in the crowd began hurling projectiles towards a line of National Guard troops stationed out front. When the curfew went active 30 minutes later, dozens of LAPD officers arrived outside of the building, which prompted much of the crowd to begin leaving the area. Still, dozens of people attempted to hang around, resulting in their arrests. It's unclear exactly how many people were taken into custody. With the CBS News helicopter overhead, a group of dozens were seen still moving through the area, some stopping to tag the side of buildings and Metro buses. By 11 p.m. most of the people who had previously gathered downtown appeared to have left the area. A crowd of protesters outside of the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles on June 10, 2025. KCAL News How it started The protests began Friday night after several immigration raids took place in the Westlake District, downtown and South LA. The CBS News Los Angeles helicopter flew over the locations where crowds quickly formed, and protesters attempted to prevent federal agents from placing individuals into vans. One of the 45 people arrested that day was local union leader David Huerta. The protests that took place over the weekend were declared unlawful assemblies and people were ordered to disperse and clear the area. In each case there were small pockets of the demonstrations that turned chaotic, which included hundreds of people converging on the 101 Freeway to block traffic on Sunday afternoon. That same day, several Waymo vehicles were torched to the ground by one group of people. The day prior, hundreds of demonstrators clashed with law enforcement in Paramount and Compton. Reporters on the ground saw as law enforcement and troops dressed in riot gear attempted to clear crowds by using tear gas, beanbag rounds and flash bangs into crowds to try and disperse people. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted on X that people who "lay a hand" on law enforcement officers will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. So far, nearly 400 people have been arrested in the series of demonstrations, Newsom said on Tuesday. Protesters gathered in downtown Los Angeles on June 10, 2025, marking the fifth consecutive day of anti-ICE protests. KCAL News National Guard and military in Los Angeles The Marines began arriving in the LA area on Tuesday morning, a defense official said, joining the thousands of National Guard troops already in the area to respond to the protests. Acting Defense Department comptroller Bryn MacDonnell testified before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense and said the deployment of the National Guard will cost about $134 million. On Tuesday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta asked a federal judge to provide a temporary restraining order to stop Mr. Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the U.S. Department of Defense from using the military and the National Guard to patrol the region and protect federal officers and facilities. The day before Bonta filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing the orders are unlawful and exceed the federal government's authority under the Tenth Amendment. "President Trump's order calling federalized National Guard troops into Los Angeles — over the objections of the Governor and local law enforcement — is unnecessary and counterproductive. It's also deeply unfair to the members of the National Guard who are hard at work every day protecting our state, preparing for and responding to emergencies, and training so that, if called, they can fight our nation's wars," Bonta said. Bass blamed the unrest in LA on the federal government's involvement, saying that before immigration enforcement actions last week, the city was "peaceful." During a speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday, Mr. Trump called the protests "a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and a national sovereignty. He said that if it weren't for his calling in the National Guard, L.A. would be "burning to the ground right now" and that the majority of the demonstrations were allegedly "carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country" and that he would "liberate" L.A. Democratic California Sen. Alex Padilla spoke with CBS News' Major Garrett on Tuesday regarding the actions of immigration enforcement and the several days of protests. He said that while the majority of the demonstrations have been peaceful, "the folks that show up after dark and are involved with the looting and the vandalism ... we denounce that." He called the ongoing situation a "crisis of Donald Trump's making." "The increasingly aggressive and cruel tactics of the immigration enforcement is what's prompting the response of people who are passionate about speaking up for our fundamental rights and due process, because the enforcement operations have gone far beyond just the violent criminals or the dangerous criminals that Donald Trump has promised," Padilla said. "It's raking in people who are otherwise innocent, hardworking women and men, children." He also denounced the deployment of military troops to the area. "The National Guard, to your point, it's not only not necessary here, it's counterproductive. Their presence is what's causing people to feel a little bit more on edge," he said. "As things have been quieting down a little bit more each day, now he's capturing that, not with a deescalation, but now potentially sending the Marines. Donald Trump is escalating the situation." Padilla, who grew up in the Pacoima area, served as president of the Los Angeles City Council and represented the San Fernando Valley in the state Senatre, says that the matter is "personal to me." "Los Angeles is my home. I am the proud son of immigrants from Mexico who worked so hard, who sacrificed so much to live their American dream. That's what the immigrant community is fighting for," he said. Protests take place across California Demonstrations have also taken place in cities across California in response to the events in Los Angeles. On Monday, a crowd of over 100 people gathered in Santa Ana outside the complex of federal buildings in the downtown area, some of which threw fireworks towards law enforcement officials who used crowd dispersal methods like smoke-filled canisters and pepper balls in return. The situation was much more peaceful on Tuesday, with a smaller group of people protesting in the same area without incident. "When a peaceful demonstration escalates into rocks, bottles, mortars, and fireworks being used against public service personnel, and property is destroyed, it is no longer a lawful assembly. It is a violation of the law," said a statement from Santa Ana Police Chief Robert Rodriguez. "We will not stand by while our City is put at risk. Santa Ana Police officers, along with our mutual aid partners, are actively working to restore order. We urge everyone to go home." Tensions grew in San Francisco Monday night when police said two small groups of individuals committed vandalism and other criminal acts. Police said multiple people were arrested and detained after refusing to comply.

Sacramento City Council approves revised $1.6 million city budget
Sacramento City Council approves revised $1.6 million city budget

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Sacramento City Council approves revised $1.6 million city budget

Sacramento city leaders have reached the culmination of a months-long process, voting to pass a revised $1.6 billion city budget and close a $62 million funding gap. In the revised budget, the City of Sacramento says it will not lay off any city employees. Though funding for vacant positions was cut, the mayor says no one is out of a job. "We adopted our budget, which was the number one thing cities must do every year. We had to make some tough decisions but by and large, residents won't see any major impacts in their communities," Mayor Kevin McCarty told CBS Sacramento after the vote. " We didn't adversely cut public safety funding from police and fire. The budget also restores money for youth violence prevention funding. However, ahead of the vote, what we heard in public comment was frustration and doubt from most of the public speakers who said the budget doesn't have enough money for the community or youth. Councilmembers Lisa Kaplan and Mai Vange opposed the revised budget. "I don't think we are doing what we need to do to be readily transparent, implement our values, and show a two-year budget when we know the minute this passes, which I know this will, that we are already $60 million in the hole," Kaplan said ahead of the vote. The mayor added that the council will be back to address a deficit next year, saying that the problems aren't over.

Jimmy Kimmel Calls Trump an ‘Arsonist With a Hose'
Jimmy Kimmel Calls Trump an ‘Arsonist With a Hose'

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Jimmy Kimmel Calls Trump an ‘Arsonist With a Hose'

Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night's highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now. Fake News On Wednesday, Jimmy Kimmel, who's based in Los Angeles, mocked the idea that protests against immigration raids have turned the city into 'some kind of totalitarian hellscape' — a notion pushed by President Trump (and some cable news outlets) as he sent in Marines and the National Guard. 'He wants there to be a war going on here, and he doesn't care who gets hurt in it. There's no riot outside. We have more so-called 'unrest' here when one of our teams wins a championship.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Not only is it not an apocalypse, they're having a Disney Pixar movie premiere right now, for 'Elio,' a movie about aliens. Don't tell Trump, he'll send the Green Berets in, too.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'You know, when we had the wildfires that devastated big chunks of our city, he did absolutely nothing. Now that we're in the middle of a nonemergency: 'Send in the National Guard!'' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Putting out a fire you purposely start doesn't make you a firefighter, it makes you an arsonist with a hose.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Yes, nothing calms down a situation like a military invasion.' — DESI LYDIC 'You know, I'm beginning to wonder if Trump is intentionally trying to escalate this situation because more chaos allows him to portray blue states as centers of crime, while positioning himself as the strongman that the country needs to rally around. No, that's silly. I'm sure he's just doing what's best for everyone.' — DESI LYDIC 'Now, as we speak, Trump has sent thousands of troops into downtown L.A. to quell what historians will remember as the Battle of That Video of a Burning Waymo Car They Kept Showing on Cable News.' — STEPHEN COLBERT 'And to those of you in the National Guard who have been thrust into this: When Donald Trump orders you to do something that you know is immoral, try to get your dad's podiatrist to write a note to say you have bone spurs.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'The president of the United States has been tougher on L.A. than on Russia. Remember that two-week deadline he gave Putin to sit down for peace talks with Ukraine? As of tomorrow, it's two weeks. But, by all means, send the Marines to The Grove.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Trump's terrible policy has generated a huge backlash, which he's responded to by overreacting, which is going to generate another backlash. We don't know how this is going to end, but at least we know it'll be a huge waste of money.' — DESI LYDIC 'I just want to say, thank God for President Trump and the heroes at ICE for protecting us from these bloodthirsty fruit stand vendors, spreading their dangerous pineapple chunks and mangos with a squirt of lime all over the city.' — JIMMY KIMMEL The Punchiest Punchlines (Meanwhile on Fox News Edition) Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store