logo
One state tried algebra for all eighth graders. It hasn't gone well

One state tried algebra for all eighth graders. It hasn't gone well

Yahoo20-02-2025

BRAHAM, Minn. — It was fourth-period Basic Algebra 8 class on a gray October morning at Braham Area High School. Teacher Rick Riccio had assigned an exercise on converting large integers to scientific notation, but fifteen minutes in, some students had lost focus. Two girls at a back table sang, their worksheets empty. Two boys pulled up games on their laptops, as two other girls discussed what they'd name their children someday.
Riccio tried to reel them in as he walked around answering questions. "You're a little too crazy today," he said to the girls in the back. "You gotta settle down and get this done."
Not all eighth graders are ready for the abstract concepts—like variables, linear functions, slope—that come with Algebra I, some experts and teachers say. Those more complex ideas also require extended concentration, which is difficult for many middle schoolers.
"Eighth grade, they're just in full-on puberty, hormones," said Zach Loy, another math teacher at the high school, an hour's drive from Minneapolis. "Are they capable of sitting down and focusing on one thing for two, three minutes at a time without getting distracted? I see that as being the hardest barrier."
But under a 2006 Minnesota law designed to boost the number of students going into math and science careers, all eighth graders were required to take Algebra I. At the time, legislators argued that getting more kids through algebra before starting high school would ensure they were on a path to graduate, having taken calculus, often seen as a gateway for entry to selective colleges and to well-paying jobs in fields like engineering and medicine.
There was a logic behind that: In a traditional course sequence, finishing calculus is easier if students take Algebra I by eighth grade since they can continue on to geometry, Algebra II, precalculus or trigonometry, and then calculus their senior year.
But a Hechinger Report analysis of federal data shows Minnesota's law hasn't worked out as planned. Between 2009 and 2017, the share of the state's students taking calculus did rise modestly, from 1.25% to 1.76%. But other states saw far larger gains, and Minnesota dropped from sixth to 10th place among states for calculus enrollment as a share of total enrollment. (2017 is the latest year for which there are compiled federal data on calculus enrollment, according to U.S. Department of Education spokesperson Alberto Betancourt.)
On the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a national test done every two years, Minnesota fell from second place among the 50 states in 2009 on eighth-grade math scores to eighth place in 2022, the latest year of available data.
Braham and other districts report that there's been no change in the number of their students taking calculus, in part because many students just aren't interested in STEM-heavy careers, administrators say. In addition, state education leaders responded to the 2006 mandate by introducing a policy in 2007 that enabled students to take Algebra I over two years instead of one, neutralizing the effect of starting the course earlier.
In many school districts around the country, algebra has become a hot-button issue, with some parents pushing their kids to take it in eighth grade—and school districts to offer it then—because of the opportunities it may unlock in high school and beyond. But the share of students in eighth-grade algebra who are Black or Hispanic has remained low. A few districts have tried eliminating the eighth-grade algebra option altogether as a way to increase equity and get rid of separate advanced and standard math tracks, stirring parent opposition.
Minnesota went the opposite route, effectively giving students the same opportunities by placing everyone on an accelerated track. Its experience suggests early universal algebra isn't a cure-all for boosting the share of students in advanced math.
"That replicates what most of the studies have found," said Scott Peters, senior research scientist at educational assessment organization NWEA. Early algebra does appear to slightly boost enrollment in advanced math courses in the short term—for example, more 10th graders taking Algebra II—but the effect fades as students get older, he said.
And there could be a downside. A 2015 study found that a brief experiment by California to enroll all eighth graders in algebra backfired, lowering test scores in large districts, though it had little effect on small and mid-sized ones. "If you push a kid too far, too fast, they might be either less interested or feel defeated, or it hurts their self-efficacy and confidence in math," study co-author Andrew McEachin said.
The roots of universal eighth-grade algebra go back to the late 1990s, when policymakers began promoting it to get more students through calculus in high school. That, in turn, would boost their college and career chances—especially for Black and Latino students and those from low-income households—and help U.S. competitiveness, went the thinking. Between 2000 and 2005, the share of U.S. eighth graders enrolled in algebra shot up from 27% to 42%, according to the Brookings Institution. (By 2020-21 it was less than 24%, according to the Department of Education.)
Minnesota legislators took notice. In 2006, a state education bill required for the first time that the state's eighth graders take Algebra I, starting in the 2010-11 school year. "I remember people saying they wanted to make sure students could complete algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and calculus in high school," said former state Sen. Steve Kelley, the bill's co-author. "To do that, we needed to have them take Algebra I in eighth grade."
Many math experts warned against the move. "This whole idea is a very naive belief that if we just kind of make it for everybody, everyone will learn," Brookings education researcher Tom Loveless told the St. Paul Pioneer Press in 2008. That same year, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics recommended against mandating Algebra I at a prescribed grade level. "Exposing students to such coursework before they are ready often leads to frustration, failure, and negative attitudes toward mathematics and learning," the group wrote.
But Minnesota kept universal algebra in eighth grade and is the only state that's adopted and stuck with the policy to date. California mandated its plan in 2008 but reversed course in 2010 after a court-ordered postponement and pressure to adopt the Common Core standards, which recommended that eighth graders take pre-algebra, not algebra. About 6.4% of school districts around the country, most of them in Minnesota, report having policies mandating algebra in eighth grade.
At Braham and other Minnesota districts, the algebra-to-calculus pipeline hasn't materialized. In some districts, not many students head into careers that require calculus, and that's been true both before and after the mandate, said district leaders. Most students pursue fields in which calculus isn't needed, like nursing, education, business, or dental hygiene, said district social worker and career advisor Staci Kuhnke. Isanti County, where Braham is located, has about 70 manufacturers, an energy company headquarters, a hospital, and a community college.
This year, in a senior class of 47 students, just one is taking calculus, through an arrangement with a local community college, she said. Most students do not take a math course in their senior year.
Braham ninth grader Savannah Gudilias, 14, said she wished she'd waited till ninth to start Algebra I. She struggled so much that it hurt her confidence in math. "I didn't understand it and still don't," she said. She wants to be a nurse. "Actually, that takes too much math," she said. "Maybe a teacher. But not a math teacher."
Caden Rivera, a 16-year-old junior, said middle school was the beginning of a math slide for her. She got As in elementary school math, but her grades fell once she hit algebra in eighth grade. "I was just really immature and didn't pay attention," she said. "And I needed more time—some people learn slower and others faster." After high school, she wants to get a culinary degree and knows she'll need more math, but she has no interest in calculus.
Others are doing well in the course. Sean Oldenburg, an eighth grader, wants to someday get a job at the BNSF Railway Company, where four generations of his family have worked. He thinks he'll pursue an engineering degree, which would mean he'd take calculus in high school. Algebra I in eighth grade has been a stretch. "I could do multiplication tables, all that stuff great," he said. "Then you started adding these symbols, and I didn't get it." But he's confident he'll master it. "It just takes time," he said.
When it comes to math, Braham's leaders have worries that are more basic than getting students to calculus. District scores on state eighth-grade math tests have lagged behind the state average most years since 2010. The district, which at fewer than 800 students is small, is 87% white and has a poverty level in the low-to-middle range, with 44% of students getting free and reduced-price lunch.
Ken Gagner has been Braham's superintendent since 2015. Gagner, trim and graying, is mostly neutral on eighth-grade algebra for all—he said it's good for students to be exposed to increased rigor but worries those who aren't ready for the course could be turned off to math completely. What the district really needs to address its math gap, he and other administrators said, are more certified math teachers, and math tutors to help those struggling and smaller class sizes. Gagner said when the district advertises for math teachers he would be happy "if we would get four applicants."
At Pillager Public School District, 100 miles northwest of Braham in another rural town, eighth-grade Algebra I has played out much the same way. Ryan Krominga, the district director of curriculum and instruction, said the mandate came with little direction from the state. So districts simply took their ninth-grade algebra textbook and content and started using it in eighth grade, he said.
Many eighth graders aren't developmentally ready for the more complex concepts involved in algebra, he said. They don't get enough time with the concrete elements of math, such as multiplication and division, because there's pressure to get to algebra so quickly, he added.
"In my experience, it hasn't worked out," he said of the requirement. "I haven't seen that kids have this huge understanding of mathematics or that they've increased their algebraic thinking." And the district has seen no increase in the number of students taking calculus, he said. Some years, they don't offer the class because they don't have enough students who want it.
Not all districts dislike the policy. Jeremy Larson, assistant superintendent of learning and accountability at Moorhead Area Public Schools in the state's far west, said two years of algebra gives the district flexibility to slow down eighth graders who may have been accelerated too fast into Intermediate Algebra, the second part of the district's two-course Algebra I sequence. "If they're in Intermediate Algebra as an eighth grader and it's just kind of difficult, we say, 'Hey, let's just take a step back,'" said Larson.
And unlike the other two districts, Moorhead's calculus numbers have increased, though not by much: An average of 1.3% of students in the district were enrolled in calculus in the three years before the eighth-grade requirement took effect in 2010. Today it's about 1.5%, or 13 more students per year in a district with total enrollment of about 6,200.
The Minnesota Department of Education contends that the state's drop in calculus enrollment and eighth-grade math scores compared to those of other states isn't representative of its larger efforts. "These are two of many measures of student success that MDE looks at to guide our support of school communities," said spokesperson Anna Arkin in an emailed response to Hechinger's findings. "We are invested in every student receiving a world-class education and thriving in school."
There's been no pressure to change the mandate. That's in part because of the 2007 revision legislators made to the state education standards, enabling schools to stretch algebra over two years, said Mike Weimerskirch, associate professor at the University of Minnesota's School of Mathematics. Weimerskirch said the issue didn't come up during the latest state committee revision of the math standards. "It's been long enough now that it's just kind of become accepted, become part of the culture, and we've learned to deal with it," he said.
Back in Riccio's eighth-grade algebra class a day later, slowing down made a difference. Riccio decided that it would be a catchup session because so many students struggled with scientific notation the day before. "Looking at some of these papers that you guys handed in, a lot of you have not gotten this concept," he said. He went through the procedures again and put an integer on the whiteboard. "So what is our number then?" he asked.
"Would it be 5 times 10?" offered one student. "Why is it 5? No," said Riccio, as students started cross-talking. "Everybody pay attention. Everybody quiet. Focus." He wrote another large integer on the whiteboard. "What if I give you something like this? Any volunteers?"
"Can I try it?" said James Belland, a tall 14-year-old in a red T-shirt. "Jimmy, take a stab at it please," said Riccio. Belland came to the whiteboard and wrote the conversion.
"You got it Jimmy," said Riccio. "Everybody give him a round of applause." The kids clapped and cheered. Riccio put up another problem and asked whether anyone else wanted to try. Ten hands shot up.
"It's nice when these kids start getting it," said Riccio afterward.
This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education, and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: STEM's Grand Challenges — And Opportunities
Opinion: STEM's Grand Challenges — And Opportunities

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: STEM's Grand Challenges — And Opportunities

Never in our history have science and technology figured so prominently in our economic well-being and national security. STEM jobs and products dominate the economy, accounting for 69% of the U.S. gross domestic product. Emerging technologies across energy, information, transportation, healthcare, agriculture, and every other aspect of life are now battlegrounds of capable, competitive nations. In his recent letter to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, President Donald Trump charged his Office of Science and Technology Policy to 'cement America's global technological leadership and usher in the Golden Age of American Innovation.' Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Tha means the administration will do all it can to bolster the STEM K-12 talent pipeline, right? And Americans will surely support policies aimed at equipping youth for high-demand and mission-critical career paths, eh? U.S. STEM education faces eight ornery, grand challenges, each conceivably conquerable if we rally. 1. America's STEM Education imperative is being eclipsed by an AI exigency. The stakes associated with leading in artificial intelligence blow the 1958 Sputnik crisis out of the sky. The Trump administration recently released an AI-in-education executive order. The STEM education community should seize leadership of a chaotic AI-in-education landscape, leveraging vast networks and partnerships as testbeds. STEM gives AI context and purpose. Many leading AI developers and funders are investing strongly in K-12 technology education. 2. Federal education research and development funding has been sharply diminished lately. STEM education leaders are going to miss the data and research that flowed from the Institute of Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education through its now-diminished National Center for Education Statistics, including the hobbled National Assessment of Educational Progress and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. But as plans for carving up federal education grant programs into state block grants emerge, state STEM networks will be well-positioned to advance this sort of analysis. Related 3. Teachers of STEM subjects from pre-K to college level may not be career-ready for the modern teaching job. Systems of teacher preparation and professional development remain largely discipline focused, while the messiness of real-world issues meshes the disciplines. The President's termination of ED grants for Teacher Quality and Teacher Leadership, as well as Effective Educator Development, exacerbate the challenge of changing how we prepare educators. But state block grants could represent an opportunity for supporting STEM-focused educator development. 4. Well-documented STEM education innovations dot the U.S. education landscape, but progress toward scaling is inequitable and frustratingly incremental. A recent National Academies report examined hurdles, including decentralization and lack of incentives to scaling proven practices in STEM were familiar: increased federal investments in professional development, more data collection, and broadened connections for partnerships and collaborations. In reality, evidence-based practices identified by research have often been ignored by public school districts and the education schools that prepare teachers. If the estimated $1.5 billion annual federal education R & D investment were carved into 50 chunks for states, STEM leaders could make the case for devoting tens of millions of dollars to bringing innovations to scale. 5. Standards for K-12 science, mathematics, technology, are great for leveling the playing field, but may inhibit STEM innovation. The entire K-12 galaxy spins on a standards axis: curricula, professional development, assessment and grading, publishers, performance reviews. But when organizations and states define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level, rarely do they feature the more integrated aspects of STEM (see challenge #3). Standards-driven systems favor efficiency and conformity (i.e., teach to the standards) over creativity and inventiveness. It's time to flip the script from emphasizing content (What do you know?) to practices (What can you do?), which are hallmarks of STEM education. 6. Now that the acronym is target practice for many folks in power at the national and state level, that puts at risk the STEM community's consensus objective to broaden the talent pipeline. The shift is starkly evident at the National Science Foundation, where updated priorities state that 'Awards that are not aligned with NSF's priorities have been terminated, including but not limited to those on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)….' Is there room to continue prioritizing outreach to the underserved and underrepresented? Yes, says NSF 'so long as these programs do not preference or limit participation based on these protected characteristics.' STEM for all. 7. The skills and attributes that STEM education aspires to imbue – teamwork, curiosity, ideation, negotiation, accountability and 95 more – are tough to measure. Simulations, portfolios, interviews, and AI chatbot diagnostics are so far questionably valid, reliable, and equitable at distinguishing learners' acquisition of soft skills, a.k.a. employability skills, 21st century skills, or durable skills. Competency born of practice is the ideal route for STEM education, and now that all 50 states permit competency-based assessment, STEM can lead a culture shift. 8. American STEM education faces a public awareness problem. The 1958 Sputnik scare was Tinker Toys compared to today's global competition to own quantum, AI, and other emerging technologies. A functionless, beeping satellite spurred a multi-billion-dollar investment in STEM, while today's government shrinks science budgets and dismisses experts. What's lacking is a jolt 'to snap the U.S. out of its complacency.' But unlike 1958, we have today a vast array of university STEM centers, local and regional STEM ecosystems, STEM specialty schools, and STEM learning centers across the continent. If public awareness of the nation's STEM imperative were prioritized as a mission action by all, the jolt could spark a STEM rally. This ornery octet of challenges faced by the STEM education community is surmountable if we work at it. A 'golden age of American innovation' sounds great but calls for a strong system of STEM education to fuel the talent pipeline and to wisely manage profound human inventiveness.

Untangling Who Should Take Algebra — And When
Untangling Who Should Take Algebra — And When

Yahoo

time14-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Untangling Who Should Take Algebra — And When

When it comes to access, readiness and placement in Algebra I, states and districts across the country have ping-ponged between extremes for decades, often without clear evidence to back up drastic and frequent policy shifts. A new report attempts to untangle the policy pendulum swings and provide states and districts with concrete evidence for what's most effective. But to really understand what's at stake, consider a history lesson – more a cautionary tale, really – set in San Francisco schools. Nationally, only 16% of eighth-grade students took Algebra I in the mid-80s — and as one might imagine, the well-resourced schools that offered the advanced math subject in middle school overwhelmingly catered to wealthy white students. The 90s was marked by efforts to address those inequities and increase access to Algebra I, which was seen as a gateway to academic success and college access but one that often locked out marginalized students. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Swept up in California's 'Algebra for All' push in the late 1990s, San Francisco schools shifted away from placing high-achieving students on advanced math tracts and attempted to enroll all eighth-graders in Algebra I. But the results were lackluster at best. By significantly increasing enrollment, including students who were not academically prepared for the subject, achievement plummeted. Some research even suggests a harmful backsliding for the lowest-performers, who often had to repeat the course. So, San Francisco course-corrected once again. In 2015, they rolled out new and rigorous math standards, but took away the ability for students to take Algebra I in eighth-grade, making it a ninth-grade subject. Then, after a wave of criticism from parents fearing their kids weren't being challenged or properly prepared for more advanced mathematics, they reintroduced Algebra I to eighth-graders this year, piloting three different ways of offering the subject in middle school to pinpoint the most effective way to do so. San Francisco isn't alone in its Algebra I pendulum swings — not by a long shot. Today, the subject has become a bellwether for equity and college access, and unexpectedly, one of the most hotly debated topics in American education. With district and school leaders clamoring for more meaningful guidance about who should take the class, when, and with what types of support, a new report from EdResearch for Action and the Annenberg Institute at Brown University tackles those issues head-on. 'Over the past few decades, the research that has come out of those policy swings — from everyone should take it in eighth grade to no, we should make everyone take it in ninth grade — has kind of shown that that one-size-fits-all uniform push to algebra one is not meeting the needs of all students,' says Elizabeth Huffaker, a fellow at Stanford University's Center for Education Policy Analysis and author of the report. 'A lot of states and districts are experimenting with new models, and we wanted to bring to bear what we do know as states and districts try to do that.' Here's what the report found and what state, district and school leaders should examine as they think about the most effective ways to set students up for success with Algebra I and beyond. In deciding who should take algebra, districts should attempt to strike a balance between expanding early access to the subject in 8th grade and ensuring students are academically ready. The goal should be to broaden participation while preventing course failure, disengagement, and long-term setbacks. Research shows that long-term academic success is higher when students are enrolled in Algebra I based on academic readiness rather than grade level. But whether schools should embrace acceleration among students with uncertain readiness depends on the level of academic support a district can provide as well as the proportion of students considered borderline ready. Enrolling too many students who aren't fully ready can be disruptive and ineffective, whereas a small number who are also bolstered by tutoring programs, for example, would likely be successful. Related Students who are not academically ready need significant support to be successful. When it comes to making placement decisions, research shows the best way to do so is with a combination of test scores, rather than relying solely on subjective referrals or a single test score. This has been shown to improve participation and achievement, especially for historically underserved students. For example, when schools in Wake County, North Carolina, replaced subjective placement factors with a cutoff score based on multiple academic measures, it led to increased enrollment, especially among Black, Hispanic, and low-income students. 'Tracking,' the practice of assigning students to courses based on their proficiency level, is controversial since it assumes students have fixed academic abilities. That's a narrative that's particularly harmful for low-income students and students of color who come into K-12 with far less access to advanced coursework. Yet the practice is widespread, especially in older grades and for placement in advanced classes: Nationally, about 25% of 4th graders and 75% of 8th graders attend schools that use tracking. Supporters argue that it improves learning by targeting instruction to students' individual needs, and research seems to bear that out, with classrooms grouped by proficiency levels allowing more targeted instruction. However, research also shows that tracking tends to benefit higher achievers while also widening achievement gaps and increasing segregation. Moreover, students in lower tracks are typically aware of their placement, which can hurt confidence, motivation and effort. Meanwhile, mixed-proficiency classrooms offer all students access to rigorous coursework, but risk discouraging lower achievers by introducing material that's too advanced while also slowing progress for high achievers because the material isn't advanced enough. And while differentiated instruction can benefit all students, effectively supporting a wide range of academic abilities requires teachers to have advanced skills. The best approach is to provide extra support to students who aren't quite ready for algebra through tutoring, offering two periods of math each day (also known as 'double-dose') or providing summer programs, research shows. Tutoring, especially when delivered in small groups, multiple times per week, and during the school day, is one of the most effective short-term and long-term academic interventions. A meta-analysis of 21 randomly controlled trials found that math tutoring generates about a 10 percentile learning gain, on average, which is a large effect for an educational intervention. 'Double-dose' algebra gives students two math periods a day and has been shown to improve outcomes. When Chicago Public Schools required underprepared 9th-grade students to take two periods of algebra instead of one, student test scores increased. It also led to longer-run gains in college entrance exam scores, high school graduation rates, and college enrollment rates. Research also shows that summer bridge programs help students build the study skills and confidence needed for success in algebra. One 19-day Algebra I bridge program in California raised the share of algebra-ready students from 12% to 29%. Increasing enrollment in Algebra I in middle school involves nuanced decision-making that includes evaluating the readiness of students and educators and the capacity of the district to provide support. What districts should avoid, the research shows, are policy shifts that either delay Algebra I for all students or accelerate them without strong, integrated support, and enrollment policies that rely on one static test score or subjective teacher recommendations. 'There should be an emphasis on raising the floor, not lowering the ceiling when we're thinking about balancing access and achievement,' Huffaker says. Related Most recently, districts have been turning to auto-enrollment policies, which allow students to opt out and support those who may not be academically ready with either tutoring or a second math class. Research shows that it increases participation and completion rates, particularly among underrepresented students. Bottom line, Huffaker says, is that there are always going to be trade-offs when it comes to how and when to introduce Algebra I. 'We always say that supported acceleration is a great way to get all or most of your students on an advanced pathway. And it sounds really great to have everyone kind of on that early Algebra I one trajectory. But districts face significant resource constraints and staffing. So I think our real goal here was to provide a framework where districts could come in with their local priorities and resources mapped and see what's realistic for them.'

Completion of Reading High School Innovation Academy in jeopardy
Completion of Reading High School Innovation Academy in jeopardy

Yahoo

time25-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Completion of Reading High School Innovation Academy in jeopardy

Completion of the new Reading High School Innovation Academy is in jeopardy, the Reading School District announced. The U.S. Department of Education in March revoked more than $51 million in previously approved federal funds designated for the project, the district said in a news release, noting the significant funding gap could delay or jeopardize construction of the academy. 'It has been recommended that we stop progress on the Innovation Academy,' Dr. Jennifer Murray, district superintendent said Wednesday at the school board's voting meeting. The new facility, underway at Ninth and Douglass streets, is designed to reduce overcrowding at Reading High and expand science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, academic opportunities for students. 'Our community has made tremendous progress, and this facility is critical to continuing that upward trajectory,' Murray said in a statement. 'To lose these funds now would not only harm our students, but it would also reverse years of work to provide them with the opportunities they deserve.' The district is working with its solicitor, the state Department of Education, state and federal legislators, representatives of Gov. Josh Shapiro's office and others, Murray said. 'Anybody who will listen to us,' she noted. 'We are waiting for guidance.' Earlier this month, Gov. Shapiro joined a multistate lawsuit with 15 other states and the District of Columbia challenging the Trump Administration's decision to abruptly revoke $185 million in funding owed to Pennsylvania, much of which the U.S. Department of Education had already approved for distribution. These funds include $183.6 million owed to 116 Pennsylvania school districts, charter schools, intermediate units and career and technical centers, and $1.8 million owed to the Pennsylvania Department of Education, according to the state website. Last week, local and state leaders, including U.S. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan and state Sen. Judy Schwank, toured the partly built academy to observe construction progress and meet with district leaders. Houlahan praised the facility's potential but expressed concern about the loss of federal support, the district said. 'Let me be clear: our government must stand by its word,' Houlahan said in a statement. 'These federal funds, secured by the American Rescue Plan Act that I proudly voted for in 2021 and duly appropriated by Congress, must be distributed as promised. For President Trump and his administration to claw back Congressionally approved and appropriated funding is illegal.' Houlahan said she fully supports Gov. Shapiro's lawsuit to challenge this decision in court. 'If these funds are not delivered as promised, the people of Reading will suffer financial consequences and that's not right,' Houlahan said. The students of Reading want and deserve a high school to prepare them for the competitive jobs of the 21st century, she said. 'That's exactly what they will gain with a STEM education,' Houlahan said. 'There's nothing efficient about a halfway built school. The Trump administration's decision is absolutely punitive and foolish.' The district was originally awarded more than $104 million in American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, or ARP ESSER, funds. Of that, approximately $77 million has been spent or committed to the academy and other construction projects, including heating, ventilating and air conditioning improvements across the district. The initial deadline for expenditure of the funds was September 30, 2024, with additional 90 days to distribute all the funds, but the district was granted an extension for another 14 to 18 months to complete the project, Murray said Wednesday at a meeting of the school board. The extension was needed primarily due to the unexpected discovery of bedrock that required blasting at the academy site, she said, and post pandemic issues with obtaining adequate building supplies. U.S. D.E.P. has now reversed its earlier decision on the extension, citing regulatory timelines and a shift in federal priorities post-pandemic. As a result, Murray said, the district risks losing more than $51 million in total. This includes $23.8 million already spent but not yet reimbursed, and another $27.5 million in pending obligations. 'We followed every guideline and were granted an extension that aligned with our project timeline,' said Wayne Gehris, district chief financial officer. 'Now we've told those funds are no longer available. This puts the future of the Innovation Academy in question and creates a financial challenge we haven't seen in more than a decade.' Despite the challenge, district leaders say they are committed to exploring every available option to close the funding gap. The district said it is also evaluating potential legal options. 'Our students deserve access to state-of-the-art learning environments, just like students in other communities,' said Gehris. 'We're doing everything we can to ensure this building is completed.' For updates on the RHS Innovation Academy project, visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store