logo
Will the shift in Western opinion on Israel end the assault on Gaza?

Will the shift in Western opinion on Israel end the assault on Gaza?

Scroll.in17 hours ago

For decades, the West has provided Israel with an impenetrable shield. This backing reached a zenith after the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The aftermath has laid bare the moral bankruptcy of the 'rules-based international order'.
The United States, United Kingdom, European Union and others rushed to Israel's defence – not diplomatically, but militarily, politically and rhetorically. This support ranged from arms sales, intelligence-sharing, and diplomatic cover at international forums, to the complicit silence of Western governments even as Israeli bombs flattened schools, hospitals and entire neighbourhoods in the Gaza Strip.
The mainstream Western media, for its part, has served less as a watchdog and more as a megaphone for Israeli state propaganda. It has parroted the language of 'self-defence', framing Israel's military campaign as a justified response to terrorism and willfully ignoring both the context of a 75-year colonial occupation and the ongoing subjugation of millions of Palestinians.
The repeated use of euphemisms has allowed the West to mask the grotesque reality of what is unfolding in Gaza: not a war against Hamas, but a sustained, systematic assault on an imprisoned civilian population.
What the West has refused to acknowledge – until now – is that Israel's conduct is not exceptional, it is consistent. Since October 7, 2023, nearly 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, mostly women and children, have been killed. Entire families have been wiped off the civil registry. Israel has intentionally targeted civilian infrastructure, enforced a medieval siege on food, water and fuel, and repeatedly violated ceasefire agreements, including the one brokered in January.
In the West Bank, where there is no Hamas, Israeli forces have accelerated illegal settlement expansion and committed extrajudicial killings with impunity. Israel's policies, which amount to apartheid under international law, are not incidental but integral to its occupation.
Now, the mask is slipping. The gut-wrenching images emerging every day from Gaza – the charred remains of children, mass graves in hospitals, starving infants clinging to life – can no longer be explained away as unfortunate collateral damage. The once unshakeable Western consensus around Israel is beginning to crack and global public opinion, particularly in the West, is shifting.
This shift is not just rhetorical. Prominent voices, once unwavering in their defence of Israel, are reconsidering their positions. British journalist Piers Morgan, long seen as a vocal supporter of Israel's actions, has publicly acknowledged the mass suffering in Gaza and questioned the proportionality and morality of Israel's campaign. In an era of dogged polarisation, such reversals are not insignificant.
Even more telling are the recent statements from Western governments that have until now remained staunchly pro-Israel. The United Kingdom, France and Canada – all allies who have previously shielded Israel from accountability – have now expressed that they are 'horrified' by the military escalation in Gaza. They have warned of 'concrete actions' should Israel continue its offensive and block humanitarian aid. They have condemned the 'abhorrent language' of Israeli officials like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has openly advocated for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. Such statements mark an unprecedented diplomatic rebuke of Israeli policy by its closest allies.
Perhaps the most damning indictment comes from within Israel itself. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, hardly a dove by any measure, has labelled the Gaza campaign a war crime. 'Thousands of innocent Palestinians are being killed,' he wrote. 'This is now a private political war. Its immediate result is the transformation of Gaza into a humanitarian disaster area.' When former Israeli leaders speak in such stark terms, the world must take note.
The academic community, too, is weighing in with unprecedented clarity. An investigation by Dutch newspaper NRC has revealed that a growing number of leading genocide scholars now believe Israel's actions in Gaza meet the criteria for genocide. Seven internationally recognised Holocaust and genocide experts – from countries including Israel – have stated that Israel's military campaign is genocidal in nature. This is not mere hyperbole but the studied conclusion of those who have spent their lives analysing and preventing such atrocities.
For over a year and a half, the Israeli government has repeatedly used weapons supplied by America to break U.S. and international humanitarian law.
54,000 Gazans are dead. Half a million are on the brink of famine. We must pass the Block the Bombs Act and save lives. pic.twitter.com/zBzt05euTQ
— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) June 6, 2025
Public opinion is also shifting.
According to the latest polling conducted by the UK-based YouGov in Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, ' public support and sympathy for Israel have reached their lowest ebb in Western Europe'. Overall, only 13%-21% in any of the surveyed countries have a favourable opinion of Israel, in contrast to 63%-70% who have an unfavourable view. On the specific question of Israel's response to Hamas's attack, only 6–16% believed it was proportionate.
Most critically, public opinion is shifting in the United States, Israel's most steadfast ally and primary enabler. According to a Pew Research Center poll released in April, over half of American adults now view Israel unfavourably – a dramatic increase of over 10% in just a year. A separate poll by Data for Progress found that 76% of US voters support a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and 51% believe President Donald Trump should demand one. These are not fringe views but reflect a mainstream disillusionment with the narrative that has long dominated Western discourse.
Yet, despite the growing condemnation, Israel's campaign shows no signs of slowing. Why? Because the one thing that has not yet changed is bipartisan support from America's political leadership for Israel.
On June 4, the US vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza, even as all other members of the council voted in favour.
The US's fifth such veto must be seen in light of former State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller – the face of the United States's faithful endorsement of Israel under former president Joe Biden – admitting in an interview that Israeli forces have 'without a doubt' committed war crimes in Gaza. As long as the United States continues to fund, arm, and politically shield Israel, Tel Aviv will proceed with impunity.
The time for condemnations is over. Expressions of horror and sorrow do not feed the hungry, heal the wounded or bring back the dead. Western allies, especially the US, UK and EU, must act. That means an immediate end to arms sales to Israel, the imposition of sanctions, the enforcement of international law and an unequivocal demand for a permanent ceasefire.
It means lifting the siege on Gaza and committing resources to rebuild what has been destroyed. If they fail to act now, Western governments will forever bear the stain of complicity. History will remember not just what Israel has done, but who enabled it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US sanctions Palestinian charities allegedly funding Hamas, PFLP
US sanctions Palestinian charities allegedly funding Hamas, PFLP

India Today

time30 minutes ago

  • India Today

US sanctions Palestinian charities allegedly funding Hamas, PFLP

The US Treasury Department announced new sanctions on Tuesday against five individuals and five organizations it accuses of financially supporting Palestinian groups Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) under the guise of humanitarian sanctioned entities span Gaza, Turkey, Algeria, the Netherlands, and Italy. Among them are the Al Weam Charitable Society in Gaza, reportedly controlled by Hamas, and its executive director Muhammad Sami Muhammad Abu Marei. Also listed are Turkey's Filistin Vakfi and its president, Zeki Abdullah Ibrahim Ararawi. Additional organizations based in Algeria, the Netherlands, and Italy were identified for allegedly supporting terrorist to the Treasury, these groups have been channeling funds to Hamas' military wing while presenting themselves as charitable organizations. The department emphasized that this tactic exploits the credibility of humanitarian efforts, masking terrorist financing operations. A related Treasury report highlights the increasing use of online crowdfunding as a tool for terrorist financing. Because most crowdfunding efforts appear legitimate, law enforcement agencies face significant challenges in detecting illicit activity."Today's action underscores the importance of safeguarding the charitable sector from abuse by terrorists like Hamas and the PFLP, who continue to leverage sham charities as fronts for funding their terrorist and military operations," said Deputy Secretary Michael Treasury reaffirmed its commitment to dismantling financial networks that support terrorist groups, particularly as Hamas continues to hold hostages from its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard slams 'warmongers' after visit to Hiroshima
US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard slams 'warmongers' after visit to Hiroshima

First Post

time34 minutes ago

  • First Post

US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard slams 'warmongers' after visit to Hiroshima

Gabbard's visit to Hiroshima comes ahead of the 80th anniversary of the world's only atomic bombings read more Tulsi Gabbard, the US intelligence director, warned Tuesday following a tour to Hiroshima that 'warmongers' were dragging the world to the verge of nuclear war, in an unique, if veiled, call for diplomacy. Gabbard did not clarify her concerns, but Russian President Vladimir Putin has regularly threatened nuclear war as he warns Europe and the United States against supporting Ukraine. Gabbard, a former congresswoman who has previously been chastised for her views on Russia, shared a video of horrifying images from the world's first nuclear assault, as well as her reflection at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On August 6, 1945, the United States obliterated Hiroshima, killing 140,000 in the explosion and by the end of the year from the uranium bomb's effects. Three days later, a US plane dropped a plutonium bomb on Nagasaki, leaving around 74,000 people dead by the end of the year. Japan surrendered on August 15. 'This one bomb that caused so much destruction in Hiroshima was tiny compared to today's nuclear bombs,' Gabbard said. 'A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes.' 'As we stand here today closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elites and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' she said. 'Perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to.' Taking a tone more customary for a politician or activist than the director of national intelligence, Gabbard said: 'So it's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Gabbard's remarks come as aides to President Donald Trump voice growing frustration with Putin, who has refused US-led, Ukraine-backed calls for a temporary ceasefire. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom Gabbard criticized before the two entered President Donald Trump's cabinet, has warned that the United States could walk away from diplomacy over the Ukraine conflict if there are no positive signs. Gabbard, a former Democrat, faced a heated confirmation hearing but ultimately prevailed after Democrats and some Republicans questioned her past statements, including some supportive of Russian positions. She has said that the European Union and Washington should have listened to Russian security concerns about Ukraine joining NATO. Gabbard's visit to Hiroshima comes ahead of the 80th anniversary of the world's only atomic bombings. The United States has never apologized for the attacks.

Diplomacy Dies When Terror Thrives: Why The EU's New Stance Spells Trouble For Pakistan
Diplomacy Dies When Terror Thrives: Why The EU's New Stance Spells Trouble For Pakistan

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Diplomacy Dies When Terror Thrives: Why The EU's New Stance Spells Trouble For Pakistan

Brussels, New Delhi: The European Union (EU) has made its stance clear. It supports India's right to defend its people from terror. The strong message came after a high-level meeting between EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas and Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar. The meeting took place on June 10 in Brussels. It was the first-ever EU-India Strategic Dialogue. Terrorism, security and global threats were at the top of the agenda. Kallas strongly condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir. 'Every nation, including India, has the right and responsibility to protect its citizens from acts of terror,' she said. Dr. Jaishankar responded, 'Terrorism must be met with zero tolerance. It cannot be justified, excused or ignored. We thank the EU for understanding this principle.' Twenty-six innocent tourists were killed in the attack. India responded with Operation Sindoor and targeted terror bases inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. While Kallas urged continued India-Pakistan talks, Jaishankar was firm. He said talks are only possible if terrorism ends. 'Peace needs honesty. Not denial and double games,' he said. The EU and India stood united on counterterrorism. A special EU-India dialogue on counterterrorism will be held later this year. Both sides stressed the urgency to act together. Kallas welcomed India's interest in a security and defence partnership. Both sides also agreed to begin talks on a Security of Information Agreement. India and the EU also agreed to start a dialogue on space security. The first session is set for late 2025. The focus will be satellite safety, space traffic and defence collaboration. Jaishankar and Kallas praised the growing naval cooperation. This includes better links between EU operations ATALANTA and ASPIDES and the Indian Navy. 'We have built trust at sea. Now we deepen that trust in space and cyber,' said Kallas. India and the EU also discussed Russia's war in Ukraine. Both called for peace and full respect for the UN Charter. They also talked about the Middle East and urged more humanitarian aid for civilians. The two sides stressed the need to keep the Indo-Pacific open and free and rules-based. India's Indo-Pacific vision aligns with the EU's interests. In closing, both leaders reaffirmed their shared values, democracy, rule of law, stability and global peace. Kallas summed it up: 'In these dangerous times, India and the EU must work as partners who are strong, secure and united.' The message from Brussels is clear – India is not alone in this fight. The EU stands with New Delhi against terror.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store