
Key makers rattled by Minnesota metal ban
Key makers say they'll be locked out of Minnesota's market without an exemption from a new state ban on toxic metals.
Why it matters: A law meant to protect kids from harmful materials could also make it harder for Minnesotans to obtain or replace keys for homes, cars, boats and more.
State of play: The law, passed in 2023 as part of a broader spending bill, makes it illegal to import, manufacture, sell or offer keys and other items containing certain levels of lead and cadmium.
Other products covered by the ban include toys, clothing, kitchenware and school and art supplies.
Context: The law's backers say the goal is to reduce exposure to metals that can harm health and development, especially for children and the workers who make such products.
Ingesting cadmium, which is an increasingly popular alternative for lead, can cause vomiting and organ damage, according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).
Yes, but: Those lobbying for a change, including the auto and boat industries, say "commercially viable" alternative materials for making keys and FOBs aren't available.
Titanium, for example, would be "extremely expensive," require new machinery and risk wearing out locks and ignitions faster, the recent president of the Security Hardware Distributors Association wrote lawmakers in a letter.
What they're saying:"We don't have another option," DFL Sen. Grant Hauschild, who's pushing for the key carve-out in the Senate, told Axios. "I don't want to be in a place where Minnesota outlaws keys."
Between the lines: Critics have also pointed out that Minnesota's new standard is more stringent the European Union or California, the only other state to pass such a ban.
The other side: DFL Rep. Rick Hansen, who authored the original ban, told Axios that the state needs to reduce exposure to "dangerous elements like lead and cadmium."
"As parents know, kids put keys in their mouth," he wrote.
Zoom out: Lawmakers are also seeking carve-outs for lead-containing pens and mechanical pencils used by architects and cadmium paints and pastels that artists say are crucial for capturing vibrant colors.
"This is the only government in the universe that outlaws cadmium paint for artistic purposes," Rep. Bjorn Olson (R-Fairmont) told a committee recently of the proposal to exempt art supplies.
Friction point: MPCA doesn't support full product exemptions "due to the toxic properties of these metals and their availability to the general public," spokesperson Becky Lentz told Axios.
But it is working collaboratively with industries" to determine whether they need more time to comply with the law.
It's recommended a three-year extension for pens and FOBs, but not traditional keys.
The intrigue: A representative for the agency acknowledged in a recent committee hearing that keys are a challenging case and said it's still evaluating questions about testing and potential alternative materials.
Where it stands: Language exempting keys from the law was amended into a commerce policy bill in the Senate. Hauschild said he'll seek to add the key carve-out into a separate environmental package this week.
DFL lawmakers in the House, meanwhile, recently moved to exclude keys from draft exemption language under consideration for one of that chamber's budget bills.
What we're watching: Whether the provision ultimately makes it into a budget bill.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
Incensed House Democrats plan ICE funding war
House Democrats, incensed at being repeatedly denied access to ICE facilities, are warming to the idea of using the appropriations process to force policy changes at the agency if they retake Congress. Why it matters: ICE-focused protests and pressure from their grassroots are forcing Democrats to inch away from their instinctively defensive crouch on immigration. But there is internal division on how far to go. "You've got a situation where our base is demanding more and more of us every day," said one House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The lawmaker added that "a number of us have been told by constituents that we have to be willing to get shot" while trying to conduct oversight at ICE facilities and "be able to make news out of it." Many Democrats are still scarred by GOP attacks on the #AbolishICE movement and hesitant to take steps that appear to be aimed at dismantling or downsizing the agency. State of play: Just over the weekend, House Democrats in California and New York were refused access to ICE facilities in their respective states to perform checks on detained migrants. Reps. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) and Norma Torres (D-Calif.) have alleged that ICE officials even sprayed "some type of irritant into the air to push us back." Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) is being prosecuted by the Justice Department for allegedly assaulting law enforcement — which she denies — during a visit to an ICE facility in her state during which she was initially refused entry. What they're saying: Congressional Hispanic Caucus chair Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) said he believes Democrats should "reassess the funding possibilities. Absolutely." He said of being denied access to an ICE facility this weekend: "They ask for money, right? And then ... I go there and they don't allow us to go and check out the facilities." Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), a member of Democratic leadership, told Axios, "Everybody's on board with the fact that what's going on right now is not right, and ... reform is needed." "This administration is ... rounding people up by mistake — they don't care," said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), chair of the center-left New Democrat Coalition. "We can't let that happen." Zoom in: Key Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee signaled that ICE is on the table as part of a broader effort to scrutinize Trump administration spending. "There will be a review of everything ... looking at what are the kinds of things we can do to get our government back on track," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the panel's ranking member. Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), the ranking member of the homeland security subcommittee, told Axios: "We're going to look at all funding. ... What's happening right now is really bad." Between the lines: A clash is already brewing over how far to go — with some progressives eyeing actual funding cuts as moderate border hawks draw a bright red line in opposition to that idea. "Some of us would like to see it completely broken down ... I've been talking about reducing funding," said Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.). Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) criticized "hypocrisy" among Democrats, "where folks want to campaign against ICE when we're in the minority, but then when we're in the majority, we continue to funnel unfettered funds with absolutely no guardrails." Centrist Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), a member of the Appropriations Committee, told Axios he is "sure there will be a push," but he "will not support reducing ICE" funding. The bottom line: Even centrists like Cuellar aren't ruling out supporting potential policy riders to appropriations bills to try to reform the agency. "It's a policy. The men and women, they're the same. It just depends what policy comes down," he told Axios. Ramirez, for her part, was clear-eyed that "you're not going to see an abolishing of ICE" even though "some of us might want that."


Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
House GOP to Senate: "Touch very lightly" on Trump budget bill
House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain has a stern warning for her Senate colleagues on the House-passed Trump budget bill: "Touch very lightly" and don't force a conference process. Why it matters: Senate Republicans are determined to put their mark on the "one big, beautiful bill." But the changes they're signaling would cross red lines for House GOP holdouts. "Change it 10%, but I think 30% is a lot," McClain (R-Mich.) told Axios in a wide-ranging interview on Wednesday. McClain was responding to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who on Wednesday talked about preserving just 60% or 70% of the House-passed legislative text. "I realize the Senate has to put their fingerprints on it," McClain told Axios. "Touch very lightly." Driving the news: Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) laid out the changes he plans to make to his portion of the bill to fellow senators on Wednesday. Atop his list: Bring the SALT cap down, and make the business tax cuts permanent. They're also looking at changes to renewable energy tax credits and the number on border security. If the Senate makes substantial changes, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) will be forced to go to conference and hammer out the differences in July, with the threat of a debt default hanging over negotiations. "I really don't think there's a huge appetite to go to conference because of the timing," McClain said. Zoom out:"I happen to believe them when they say that," McClain told Axios about blue state Republicans threatening to crash the entire bill if the $40,000 SALT deduction cap is lowered. The big picture: House lawmakers want to move on a $9.4 billion rescissions package on Thursday. "If we can't pass this rescission package, we are really in trouble," she said. "I think we're going to pass it," she said, saying she expected more rescissions requests throughout the year. Go deeper: As conference chair, McClain is working to elevate her members and often does joint media appearances with them.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Bloodthirsty' Kristi Noem and Stephen Miller Want More Military on Streets
Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are two of the loudest voices in the room encouraging Donald Trump to militarize Los Angeles, a presidential aide has disclosed. Both urged the president to federalize and deploy California Army National Guard troops and send U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests against federal immigration raids, even though local officials opposed the move. 'Stephen has been clear in all the meetings: More military, faster,' a Trump adviser told Axios. Miller has called for using the military to crack down on protesters who try to block federal agents from making immigration arrests, even though federal troops are generally barred from domestic policing. He's been backed by Noem, who is 'practically bloodthirsty' in demanding tougher immigration enforcement, the adviser said. On Sunday, the homeland security secretary asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to instruct U.S. Marines to arrest rioters. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security told Axios in a statement that Noem is 'antithetical to bloodthirsty—she is trying to prevent bloodshed.' The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and DHS for comment. Trump took the extraordinary step over the weekend of deploying 4,000 National Guard troops and hundreds of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in defiance of California Gov. Gavin Newsom's warnings that sending in federal troops would only make things worse. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. The governor has sued to block the deployments. After five days of protests, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass enacted a partial curfew Tuesday night for downtown L.A. The reason, she said, was to 'stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the president's chaotic escalation.' Rioters have set off fireworks at officers, lit cars on fire, and thrown pieces of concrete at police, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Video also shows the police using tear gas, flash-bangs, and non-lethal bullets to disperse crowds downtown. City officials, however, have said that the people peacefully protesting during the day are not the same ones who are clashing with police at night. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said Sunday that Trump had called in the National Guard troops prematurely. The president has long regretted not sending in the National Guard to quell the 2020 protests that broke out in major cities nationwide after the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. At the time, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, convinced Trump not to invoke the Insurrection Act or deploy active-duty troops against the protesters. A federal law known as the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits using federal troops for domestic policing, except when expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. The main exception to the rule is the Insurrection Act, a compilation of statutes that allows the U.S. president to use the military to quash an armed rebellion or other insurrection, according to Lawfare. As of Wednesday, the president hadn't invoked the Insurrection Act, which limits the federal troops' mission to protecting federal property and personnel. According to Axios, that hasn't stopped Noem and Miller from calling for the military to do more, faster.