
Auto dealers, UAW local leaders brace for layoffs amid tariff war: ‘Writing's on the wall'
Auto dealers, UAW local leaders brace for layoffs amid tariff war: 'Writing's on the wall'
Show Caption
Hide Caption
The impact and history of autos in Detroit, The Motor City
Here are some facts about Detroit's auto industry.
Consumer confidence has weakened, impacting car sales, as buyers grapple with potential price hikes and broader economic anxieties.
Inventory levels are elevated at many dealerships, reflecting a slowdown in sales and a decrease in lease returns.
While some industry experts believe car sales will persevere, others warn of production disruptions, price increases and potential layoffs if tariffs persist.
Ford dealer Jim Seavitt has an uneasy feeling in the pit of his stomach these days that's reminiscent of how he felt about 17 years ago.
"We're down 50% in leads. Everything's off 40% to 50%. People just aren't looking at cars right now," Seavitt, who owns Village Ford in Dearborn, Michigan, told the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network. "It reminds me of 2008 when the mortgage crisis hit. It's looking like it's the starting of a crisis. This whole uneasy feeling right now."
Seavitt was referring to the start of the Great Recession in 2008. His disquiet is shared across the industry. Many UAW local leaders at Ford Motor Co. and General Motors plants around the U.S. told the Free Press they are concerned that the tariff war will disrupt production. That, combined with volatile auto sales due to consumer uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump's policies and their potential effects on the broad economy, including a plummeting stock market, will all inevitably lead to layoffs. Some local union leaders are even advising members to start saving their money.
"I am concerned about manufacturing as a whole this year because people can't afford to buy groceries, so people aren't going to buy a $70,000 car," said a local UAW leader. "I am telling my people to start saving their money. Dealers are down 50% on sales and inventory is stacking up. I think manufacturing as a whole this year will be down."
This union leader, like the others who will speak in this article, asked to not be named because they are not authorized to speak publicly on such sensitive topics as politics, tariffs and the economy.
Automotive industry news: Auto tariffs can't realistically stick, even as Trump calls them permanent, say analysts
A struggling factory sector, lower optimism
Some industry watchers believe people will always need new transportation, and if they can find deals, car sales will carry on despite the cost of eggs.
But some signs point to a factory sector that is struggling to adjust to Trump's rapid rollout of tariffs on a growing group of imported goods. According to the Empire State manufacturing index conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, factory activity in New York state plummeted this month by the most it has in nearly two years. The study, seen as an indicator for the broad U.S. economy, showed that firms are increasingly less optimistic.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York wrote in the study: "Employment levels and hours worked continued to move slightly lower. Input prices increased at the fastest pace in more than two years, and selling price increases also continued to pick up. Optimism about the outlook waned considerably for a second consecutive month."
The UAW leader doesn't need a study to tell him what he sees when he regularly walks the factory floor. His members are worried. They approach him with fears that a shift will be eliminated, which would mean layoffs. He said he reassures his members that tariffs can redirect manufacturing to the United States, which would be a good thing.
But he's also realistic. Building a new factory takes billions of dollars and several years. Ford CEO Jim Farley told investors last month that even though carmakers are seeing 'a lot of cost and a lot of chaos' from Trump's tariff threats, Ford will not be building new plants in the United States any time soon.
Right now, labor costs amount to about 4% of the price of a vehicle, but adding more U.S. labor to production could raise that by 2%, this union leader said. The added costs, whether it be higher-priced U.S. labor or added tariffs, could mean higher new car prices at a time when affordability is already a problem for many consumers.
Cost of vehicles: Trump announces 25% auto tariffs. What it means for your next car purchase
'The writing's on the wall'
Here's where tariffs stand: Trump has increased tariffs on goods imported from China to 20%. He has imposed tariffs of 25% on Canadian and Mexican goods but has exempted auto industry companies that are compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement from the tariffs until April 2.
Earlier this month, he announced a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports from all countries, which will impact carmakers. Many countries have responded by imposing retaliatory tariffs on goods coming from the United States.
A tariff is a tax that an importer pays on a good when it crosses international borders. Carmakers buy many parts from suppliers in other countries. They must now pay the increased levy on those parts for use in the vehicles they assemble in the United States or find a way to get them domestically, if possible, to avoid the tariff. But Trump has issued so many stops-and-starts to the tariff war since Feb. 1 that it has left many local union leaders, car dealers and automakers at a loss for how to plan.
Last week, S&P Global Mobility put the probability of the auto industry experiencing an extended disruption period from the tariffs already in place at a startling 50%. That would mean several vehicle models will cease production, new vehicle prices would have to rise and product development delays could impact production for some years to come. Based on the tariffs in place so far, S&P Global gave the industry one week before production starts dropping off at a whopping 20,000 vehicles per day.
The uncertainty has shaken the broad economy. Since Trump took office, the S&P 500 has lost some $4 trillion, according to Reuters. The S&P 500 has typically soared above the stock indexes of other countries for years, but it is now trailing major markets in Europe and China, as investors have reallocated money from the United States to other indexes, according to The New York Times. Since Trump's inauguration, the S&P 500 has plummeted more than 6%, while the Dax index in Germany has risen 10% and the Europe-wide Stoxx 600 index has gained more than 4%.
Ultimately, local union leaders and Detroit car dealers believe it comes down to what's happening in the showroom.
"The consumer is the one who predicts layoffs," the union leader said, adding, "The writing's on the wall."
Big job cuts and where sales stand
Other global tremors add to the anxiety stateside. On Monday, Volkswagen announced it would cut 7,500 jobs at its luxury brand Audi in Germany by 2029 because of "immense challenges" as Germany's auto industry deals with a slowing demand for electric vehicles and rising Chinese competition, according to Reuters.
Moody's analysts said the cuts reflect the broader challenges facing the global auto industry.
'This move underscores the pressure traditional automakers face from the need for significant investments in electrification and the rapid rise of Chinese auto manufacturers, which are taking increasing amounts of global market share," said Michael Brisson, auto economist at Moody's Analytics, in an email. "Additionally, with potential tariffs looming from the U.S. in the coming months, automakers are bracing for further market uncertainties.'
Data showed that new vehicle sales in the first part of this year have held up nationwide on the momentum from a strong fourth quarter. But sales are slowing, said Mark Schirmer, director of industry insights and corporate communications at Cox Automotive.
"Our team is seeing a slowdown from that point as consumer sentiment softens and there is growing uncertainty about the economy," Schirmer said. "Ford's days' supply has been elevated of late ‒ with the industry it improved through February ‒ but Ford is definitely carrying a lot of inventory ‒ 126 days' supply in our end of February measure."
Ford pulled back on incentives the first two months of the year, which served to boost dealer inventory, Schirmer said. But, overall, the average inventory across the industry is elevated at 89 days. It is down slightly from January, but a healthy industry average is 60 days' supply.
The Asian brands, however, continue to have fast-turning, low inventory, said Tyson Jominy, vice president of data and analytics at J.D. Power. He said, nationally, retail auto sales held up in February and are poised to finish March about 14% higher than the year before.
'We're not seeing a lot of stress in the system as of yet from anything," Jominy said, but he added that "there is a drought of lease returns."
Jominy said the industry has prepared for that situation with leases. Still, he said, dealers love leases because they bring customers back in to possibly buy another car.
"So the absence of that means you have to work a little bit harder to move vehicles," Jominy said. "Detroit is one of the strongest leasing markets in the country, so they might be feeling that."
'Daily chaos in Washington' impacts consumer sentiment
Cox reported fleet sales were soft in February while retail sales held up reasonably well, even though consumer confidence fell notably in February as worries about the economy took hold.
"The daily chaos from Washington has been negatively impacting consumer sentiment and likely contributed to lackluster consumer spending in February," said Cox Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke. "The biggest worry I have for the spring continues to be the trend we've seen in interest rates, which moved higher in February.'
Smoke said consumer confidence is a key measure closely tied to auto sales. With trade and tariffs dominating the news through February, some car buyers likely decided to purchase before higher prices set in, he said. Others may have decided to sideline any big-ticket purchases over worries about broader inflationary risks.
According to Edmunds.com data, the average transaction price for a new car in February was $49,350, down from $50,103 in January, but well above the year-ago figure of $48,606.
"The trajectory was good for customers a few months ago, but discounts might be troughing out," said Ivan Drury, director of Insights at Edmunds.com. "Ditto on new vehicle lease penetration rates. Midyear 2024, we were seeing signs of life with leasing back up to 25%, but lately that figure is backing down closer to 22%, as I suspect the drop-off in repeat customers is taking a toll along with fewer lease deals."
'This is a real threat'
At Matick Automotive Group, partner Paul Zimmermann said sales in February were slow, but in the last couple of weeks it has picked up. The group owns Michigan dealerships, including Matick Chevrolet in Redford Township, Matick Buick-GMC in Southfield and Matick Toyota in Macomb.
Zimmermann credits the uptick to consumers buying to get ahead of potentially higher prices if Trump enacts 25% tariffs on auto parts and vehicles that cross the Canada and Mexico borders on April 2. Zimmermann said he worries about the uncertain economy only to the point of what he can control.
"We try to stock up on used (vehicles)," Zimmermann said. "We've had meetings with our sales staff and sales managers about making sure when you talk to a customer that you convey, 'This is a real threat, we don't know for sure, but you might want to take into consideration in your decision matrix that 30, 40, 50 days out, the price could be a lot more if tariffs take effect.' "
His day supply of vehicles is healthy across the brands he sells at about 50 days or less, so Zimmermann has no plans to cut jobs. But he admits, "Telling folks to save money, in our industry, we'd be negligent if we didn't coach folks on that because it's so cyclical."
Hoping it doesn't get 'uglier'
Across town at Village Ford, inventory is at a 90-day supply. But despite sluggish sales, Seavitt said he won't eliminate jobs.
"I won't let anyone go. I'll pay them what I have to pay them," Seavitt said. "I went through COVID and I never laid anybody off."
Part of the sales slowdown can be blamed on a lack of lease returns given that many people purchased their car off lease back in COVID-19. So those people are not coming in for a new lease or purchase.
"Instead of having 100 returnees that I normally would, I only had about 55 last month and again this month. It's been that way since November," Seavitt said.
Another challenge has been losing the Ford Edge, which was a big seller for him, Seavitt said. Ford stopped production of the Edge in April last year. The hot seller now is the Mustang Mach-E, which Ford builds in Mexico. Ford is offering good deals on the EV, Seavitt said. The problem is getting them.
"Everybody's out of them," Seavitt said. "We're trying to buy them from out of state. The 2025s aren't flowing yet. Almost every dealer is out of them."
Seavitt had hoped the tariffs would work in his favor by prompting car buyers to get vehicles now before prices potentially rise. But the economic uncertainty and the stock market volatility could be contributing to the lackluster sales, he said. Last month, the store sold 140 new cars, down from the 200 it usually sells. In used cars, it sold 47, down from the typical 80 sold. Seavitt said used car sales are picking up this month and he expects to sell 75 to 80.
Still, he worries.
'I'm concerned. I'm concerned about the economy, the market. Most of my people have 401(k)s and they're getting hurt. My salesmen, I hope they saved money. Parts and Service is doing well," Seavitt said. "The No. 1 problem with cars ‒ last June before all this crap started ‒ was affordability. I hope it doesn't get uglier."
Local UAW leaders' concern
Inside the factories, a few of the union leaders the Free Press spoke to agreed it felt reminiscent of 2008 with the start of the Great Recession.
"I think there's a fear amongst all leadership based on what we've seen here in the first two months of the (Trump) administration and, obviously, the stock market plunging like I've never seen it before," said a local UAW leader who asked to not be named due to the sensitivity of this topic. "Everything they're doing is so radical. It almost appears as though the decisions they're making is to put us into some sort of a recession. So there's a concern among the leadership. Anytime we get into a recession, sales go down and that results in layoffs."
Despite his view, the UAW International has come out in support of tariffs, believing the duties will benefit U.S. workers.
"Corporations have been driving a nonstop race to the bottom by killing good blue-collar jobs in America to go exploit some poor worker in another country by paying poverty wages," the union said in a statement earlier this month. "Tariffs are a powerful tool in the toolbox for undoing the injustice of antiworker trade deals. We are glad to see an American president take aggressive action on ending the free trade disaster that has dropped like a bomb on the working class."
The union said it is in active talks with the Trump administration to end the "free trade disaster."
Indeed, some local UAW leaders are less concerned about job losses from tariffs than others ‒ depending on what vehicle their plant builds. Also, some are quiet for the moment and are not warning workers to save money because they don't want to provoke panic.
One UAW leader told the Free Press that his counterparts at plants that make EVs are much more nervous about their near-term future than he is about his plant, which builds gasoline-powered top-selling trucks. Trump campaigned on a promise to roll back many parts of the Inflation Reduction Act that incentivized EV sales.
But the uncertainty around tariffs and the stock market's plunge give all of them some level of pause. Outside of a potential recession, the reality of prolonged tariffs could mean automakers must halt production to find new, cheaper parts stateside or because vehicles with the now more pricey parts just aren't selling. Any production pauses point to layoffs.
"In 2008, we made it through that (recession) without any involuntary layoffs. We worked really hard with the company and the union on work schedules," said the one UAW leader. "We had temporary layoffs here and there, but they were all voluntary. So nobody hit the streets involuntarily. I don't know if we can pull that off again."
Jamie L. LaReau is the senior autos writer who covers Ford Motor Co. for the Detroit Free Press. Contact Jamie at jlareau@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @jlareauan. To sign up for our autos newsletter, become a subscriber.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I'm an Economist: 4 Bits of Investing Advice Amid Turbulent Trump Market
Since President Trump took office for the second time, the market has been on a wild ride largely due to implementation of mass tariffs, causing many Americans nearing retirement and those who have already stopped working to panic for their 401(k)s. For You: Check Out: 'I looked at my 401(k) this morning and in the last two days that's lost $58,000. That's stressful,' recent retiree Victor Fettes, 54, told NBC News. 'If that continues, I can't stay retired.' With the market in continuous flux, Trump's tariffs threaten to increase prices and inflation. And Americans are feeling financially strapped. Many are worried about their golden years and whether they should invest. While there's no one size fits all answer, there are several things to consider, according to experts. It's scary to shell out money for investments when the market is uncertain. One benefit to investing during such economic instability is you can often buy stocks at a lower price and sell them at a higher cost later. However, individual situations vary. Tracy Shuchart, Senior Economist at NinjaTrader, advised to take note of Russell Investments' comprehensive analysis of 31 U.S. recessions from 1869 to 2018. 'Historical evidence strongly supports continued investment during periods of economic uncertainty, despite the counterintuitive nature of this approach,' she stated, referring to the data revealing 16 out of the 31 recessions produced positive stock market returns. She explained, 'Market timing presents significant challenges that argue against attempting to avoid volatile periods entirely and that Russell Investments' research demonstrates beating a buy-and-hold strategy over 150 years would require correctly predicting 77% of market turning points — a level of accuracy that proves elusive even for professional investors.' Looking to the past to see how the country endured previous economically challenging times can help forecast how future recessions will fare, and determine a financial path that will build long-term stability even during shaky times. Discover More: A volatile market can create a lack of confidence when it comes to investing, but there are calculated systems that can work during turbulent times such as the dollar-cost averaging strategy. It involves investing a fixed amount in regular intervals, whatever the amount is. According to Shuchart, this method 'provides both mathematical and behavioral advantages during volatile markets.' She explained further that 'this mechanism reduces the average cost per share over time, while eliminating the need for timing decisions.' Amy Pridemore, a financial wellness instructor at Virginia Commonwealth University, agreed that dollar-cost averaging is the way to go. 'This action allows individuals to create healthy savings behaviors regardless of current market trends,' she explained Pridemore went on to say that 'money will be invested when the market is down, money will be invested when the market is up — this 'set it and forget it' approach provides wins for investors all around.' Another approach Shuchart recommended was quality focus — investing in companies with solid fundamentals, consistent profitability and a strong history of growth. 'Companies with strong balance sheets, consistent earnings, competitive advantages and experienced management teams typically demonstrate greater resilience during economic stress, and often emerge stronger when conditions improve,' she explained. Quality focus can reduce the risk, while creating the opportunity for a potential big payout, according to The Economic Times. Making a big financial decision under distress can lead to a shattering outcome, and cause you to leave money on the table. According to Shuchart, BlackRock's analysis of S&P 500 performance from 2005 to 2024 demonstrated the severe consequences of missing market recovery periods: Remaining fully invested: $717,046 (from $100,000 initial investment) Missing the 5 best days: $452,884 (37% reduction) Missing the 25 best days: $158,792 (78% reduction) A rushed choice about financial matters doesn't always end well. When making investment decisions, it's vital to think long term. 'The economy has shown fluctuations and recovery,' Peter Reagan, financial market strategist at Birch Gold Group, stated. 'It will continue to do so.' He explained, 'Having investments that have shown their strength of preserving wealth across these fluctuations is something to remember before even considering selling any investments.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on I'm an Economist: 4 Bits of Investing Advice Amid Turbulent Trump Market Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I'm an Economist: 4 Bits of Investing Advice Amid Turbulent Trump Market
Since President Trump took office for the second time, the market has been on a wild ride largely due to implementation of mass tariffs, causing many Americans nearing retirement and those who have already stopped working to panic for their 401(k)s. For You: Check Out: 'I looked at my 401(k) this morning and in the last two days that's lost $58,000. That's stressful,' recent retiree Victor Fettes, 54, told NBC News. 'If that continues, I can't stay retired.' With the market in continuous flux, Trump's tariffs threaten to increase prices and inflation. And Americans are feeling financially strapped. Many are worried about their golden years and whether they should invest. While there's no one size fits all answer, there are several things to consider, according to experts. It's scary to shell out money for investments when the market is uncertain. One benefit to investing during such economic instability is you can often buy stocks at a lower price and sell them at a higher cost later. However, individual situations vary. Tracy Shuchart, Senior Economist at NinjaTrader, advised to take note of Russell Investments' comprehensive analysis of 31 U.S. recessions from 1869 to 2018. 'Historical evidence strongly supports continued investment during periods of economic uncertainty, despite the counterintuitive nature of this approach,' she stated, referring to the data revealing 16 out of the 31 recessions produced positive stock market returns. She explained, 'Market timing presents significant challenges that argue against attempting to avoid volatile periods entirely and that Russell Investments' research demonstrates beating a buy-and-hold strategy over 150 years would require correctly predicting 77% of market turning points — a level of accuracy that proves elusive even for professional investors.' Looking to the past to see how the country endured previous economically challenging times can help forecast how future recessions will fare, and determine a financial path that will build long-term stability even during shaky times. Discover More: A volatile market can create a lack of confidence when it comes to investing, but there are calculated systems that can work during turbulent times such as the dollar-cost averaging strategy. It involves investing a fixed amount in regular intervals, whatever the amount is. According to Shuchart, this method 'provides both mathematical and behavioral advantages during volatile markets.' She explained further that 'this mechanism reduces the average cost per share over time, while eliminating the need for timing decisions.' Amy Pridemore, a financial wellness instructor at Virginia Commonwealth University, agreed that dollar-cost averaging is the way to go. 'This action allows individuals to create healthy savings behaviors regardless of current market trends,' she explained Pridemore went on to say that 'money will be invested when the market is down, money will be invested when the market is up — this 'set it and forget it' approach provides wins for investors all around.' Another approach Shuchart recommended was quality focus — investing in companies with solid fundamentals, consistent profitability and a strong history of growth. 'Companies with strong balance sheets, consistent earnings, competitive advantages and experienced management teams typically demonstrate greater resilience during economic stress, and often emerge stronger when conditions improve,' she explained. Quality focus can reduce the risk, while creating the opportunity for a potential big payout, according to The Economic Times. Making a big financial decision under distress can lead to a shattering outcome, and cause you to leave money on the table. According to Shuchart, BlackRock's analysis of S&P 500 performance from 2005 to 2024 demonstrated the severe consequences of missing market recovery periods: Remaining fully invested: $717,046 (from $100,000 initial investment) Missing the 5 best days: $452,884 (37% reduction) Missing the 25 best days: $158,792 (78% reduction) A rushed choice about financial matters doesn't always end well. When making investment decisions, it's vital to think long term. 'The economy has shown fluctuations and recovery,' Peter Reagan, financial market strategist at Birch Gold Group, stated. 'It will continue to do so.' He explained, 'Having investments that have shown their strength of preserving wealth across these fluctuations is something to remember before even considering selling any investments.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on I'm an Economist: 4 Bits of Investing Advice Amid Turbulent Trump Market

Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Trump has a plan to remake the housing-finance system. It's baffling to many lawmakers and experts.
GOP lawmakers and the mortgage industry are raising questions about the Trump administration's plans to maintain government control over much of the nation's housing finance system, defying expectations that it would back off. President Donald Trump surprised the industry late last month by pledging to take public Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled companies that stand behind half the $16 trillion residential mortgage market — while preserving an implicit federal guarantee for their solvency. His top housing regulator, Bill Pulte, who oversees the companies, added to the confusion by saying the administration is exploring ways to sell shares while keeping the companies under government authority. The insistence on preserving significant sway over the two mortgage giants, which were seized by the Bush administration during the financial crisis and placed in conservatorship, is setting up a potential rift with Republicans — and possibly even some administration aides who have long worked to reduce the government's footprint in the housing market. 'I want to get them out of conservatorship,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), chair of the Senate Banking subcommittee with oversight of Fannie and Freddie. 'But I want to be very careful about how we do it, because we need the secondary market, and we need it to work,' he added, referring to the market where mortgage loans are purchased and sold to investors. Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said 'we need to continue to investigate recapitalization and releasing' the companies from government control. The question of what to do with Fannie and Freddie has bedeviled policymakers for decades, with Republicans wanting the government to take its hands off housing finance and Democrats fearing that privatizing the firms would destabilize the market and push up mortgage rates. At stake is a potential windfall of hundreds of billions of dollars for an administration that is staring at massive fiscal deficits. The government holds a roughly $340 billion liquidation preference for the two companies, by one estimate — meaning the money would go to the Treasury Department before anyone else in the event of a sale. Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, will meet with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins on June 17 to discuss the future of Fannie and Freddie, underscoring the importance of the issue. Fannie and Freddie don't make loans themselves, but rather purchase them from mortgage companies and bundle them into securities to sell on the secondary market, freeing up the lenders to make more loans. That, plus the government guarantee, helps keep mortgage rates down, supporters say. Trump was widely expected to support privatization, after his first administration worked to prepare the companies for their eventual release. But his latest comments look more like what former President Joe Biden would do, according to Jim Parrott, a nonresident fellow at the Urban Institute and a former economic adviser in the Obama White House. 'In the Biden administration, you could imagine a version of this,' Parrott said. 'The fact that we're hearing about it in this administration, I think, is catching folks by surprise.' The FHFA responded in an email that it is 'studying how, if the President elects to take Fannie and Freddie public, it can be done in the safest and soundest manner which includes keeping them in conservatorship.' It added: 'In any scenario, we will ensure the [mortgage-backed securities] market is safe and sound and that there is no upward pressure on rates.' White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields said the administration 'is committed to strengthening the Federal Housing Finance Agency to advance the President's mission of restoring the dream of homeownership for all Americans.' Keeping Fannie and Freddie in conservatorship, according to one shareholder, amounts to attaching 'training wheels' as the government figures out how to monetize its stake. 'I think Pulte has probably confused people more than anything with his message,' said Tim Pagliara, a shareholder and author of the book 'Another Big Lie: How the Government Stole Billions from the American Dream of Home Ownership and Got Caught!' 'So the idea, for example, of allowing these entities to operate in conservatorship is a strategy that they probably talked about with the investment bankers on their primary concern, which is mortgage rates going up,' he added. 'It's like putting training wheels on a bike.' The administration's pronouncements have perplexed housing finance analysts who are unsure of what a scheme to take the companies public while keeping them in conservatorship would look like — or whether there would be sufficient investor appetite to make it worthwhile. JPMorgan strategists wrote in a note that they were 'flummoxed' by the comments. 'It's just hard to imagine why anybody would think there would be strong investor interest in that kind of model, unless the government were to convey they were going to run the [government-sponsored enterprises] in a way that's investor-friendly, and I think we're a long way off from that,' Parrott said. David Dworkin, president and CEO of the National Housing Conference, a stakeholders' group, agreed. 'The most important element of a successful stock sale is a board that is truly independent and has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders,' he said. 'Under conservatorship, that is actually not even allowed. So, without an independent board with a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, there is no value to the stock.' Still, he said, 'there are far too many comments coming from major players, including the president of the United States, to avoid the conclusion that major action on conservatorship could be in the very near future.' Another housing finance analyst, granted anonymity to frankly discuss the nascent plans, also expressed skepticism about the idea that investors would bite on purchasing shares in conservatorship, with the federal government still owning the vast majority of the asset. 'The direction of that control can change at the next election,' the analyst said. 'Each administration has already demonstrated they want to use Fannie and Freddie in different ways, so what are you investing in?' For the most part, Republican lawmakers are keeping their powder dry as they wait for additional details about the administration's plans. '[Senate Banking Committee] Chairman [Tim] Scott looks forward to hearing more' from Trump and Pulte on their plans for Fannie and Freddie, spokesperson Ben Watson said. Asked if conservatorship should end, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Banking subcommittee with oversight of Fannie and Freddie, said, 'I don't know.' 'We're going to wait until the first quarter of 2026 to have that conversation,' said Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.), chair of the Financial Services housing subcommittee. 'Releasing them from conservatorship, that's one thing, but most of the folks I talked to still want the federal government on the hook.' The first Trump administration worked to build capital at the companies to prepare them for the end of conservatorship, an effort led by then-Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and former Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mark Calabria. Calabria has returned for Trump 2.0, now in a position with the White House Office of Management and Budget. Two key Treasury officials — Jonathan McKernan and Luke Pettit — also hail from the school of thought that Fannie and Freddie should be released from conservatorship. 'The Treasury Department has not really engaged on this yet — so it does not appear to me that the administration is very far into the analysis of options phase,' Parrott said. 'Until the Treasury Department really engages in any of this meaningfully, it's hard to know where all this lands.'