N.S. scoops up land at Shannon Park for $16.8M, expects 600 affordable units to be built
Two parcels of federal land purchased for 'well below market value,' says provincial government
Caption: Although the former military housing was demolished in 2017, the area has sat largely empty except for the existing Shannon Park Elementary. (Brian MacKay/CBC)
The Nova Scotia government is wading into the redevelopment of Shannon Park in Dartmouth, confirming to CBC News it is purchasing land for affordable housing at the former military site that has been largely vacant since 2017.
An order-in-council dated March 6 authorized the minister of public works to purchase the land from Crown corporation Canada Lands Company, but details are scarce about the Nova Scotia government's plan for its new property.
"We expect about 600 units of affordable housing will be built there," Gary Andrea, a spokesperson for the Department of Public Works, said in an email.
Andrea said the province paid $16.8 million for the property, which is "well below market value." He said the two parcels of land off Princess Margaret Boulevard total more than 9,000 square metres, which is approximately the size of two football fields.
Interview requests for Minister of Public Works Fred Tilley and Colton LeBlanc, the minister in charge of housing, were declined.
The grassy area the size of 63 football fields on the waterfront near the base of the MacKay Bridge has been sitting largely empty for almost a decade since the demolition of military housing was completed in 2017.
In 2023, the Halifax Regional Municipality approved a permanent housing development at the site, as well as a commercial space, a transit hub and two large parks. Canada Lands Company owns the property and is in charge of the redevelopment, which is set to include 3,000 housing units.
Canada Lands told CBC News last year the redevelopment of the 34-hectare property will include at least 20 per cent affordable units, which amounts to around 600 homes.
At the time, the company said it is working with the municipality to get the required approval to subdivide the property to sell off parcels of land to developers, with construction expected to begin in the fall of this year.
'More affordable housing, faster'
Canada Lands Company told CBC News on Friday it is unable to comment on its activities during a federal election period, so it cannot provide an update.
Andrea said on Wednesday that the purchase is being completed and the land will be acquired "in the coming days."
Another spokesperson would not say whether the province plans to build its own housing on the land it is buying, or if it will work with affordable housing providers to do so.
"The land purchase at Shannon Park is an exciting next step in getting more affordable housing, faster for Nova Scotians," Amy Wagg, a spokesperson for the Department of Growth and Development, wrote in an email.
"It is premature to comment on the affordable housing aspect of this land purchase."
Non-profit housing hopes
Trish McCourt, executive director of the Nova Scotia Non-Profit Housing Association, said she doesn't know what the province is planning, but she hopes non-profit housing providers are involved.
"Then that will also mean ... affordable housing in perpetuity, which is really where the greatest need is for housing right now," McCourt said in an interview Friday.
McCourt said some non-profit housing providers have the ability to build housing, but it could also work if the province built the housing and a non-profit ran it. She is hoping to see rents that are 30 per cent of the household's income.
"What we really need to be focused on right now is to have the biggest bang for our buck when it comes to government funds, when it comes to community funds, so that we can ensure that we find our way out of this homelessness crisis as quickly as we can," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
6 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Meness: Tewin development signals a return for Algonquin people
There is a troubling tendency in this city to speak of reconciliation as a principle to be applauded, but not lived. Too often, Indigenous ambition is mistaken for overreach, and Indigenous vision dismissed as inconvenience. The Tewin project — slated for land southeast of the urban core — has been drawn into this recurring pattern, and it's time to break the cycle. Article content Article content Let's be clear: Tewin is not a conventional development. It is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the Algonquin people to reclaim space, purpose and visibility in a capital that was built on our unceded territory — territory that includes the traditional lands of Grand Chief Pierre Louis Constant Pinesi. Article content Article content A respected leader in the early 19th century, Chief Pinesi allied with the British during the War of 1812, leading Algonquin warriors more than 500 kilometres to help defend what is now Canada. His family's traditional hunting grounds spanned what we now call Ottawa: roughly 1,800 sq. km. bordered by the Ottawa and Rideau Rivers and extending south to Kemptville. These were not just lands; they were lifeways, relationships, ecosystems and stories. Article content Before roads and farms, this was a living landscape: forested, biodiverse and travelled by birchbark canoe in summer and by snowshoe in winter. But waves of settlers soon transformed these lands, cutting forests, killing off game, building towns. Despite his loyalty and repeated petitions to the Crown, Chief Pinesi never saw recognition of Algonquin land rights. No treaty was signed. The land was taken: settled without consent, logged without compensation, governed without representation. Article content Article content Tewin is a response to that legacy. It is rooted in Algonquin values, designed around sustainability, and is a true partnership where Indigenous people have a seat at the table. It is not urban sprawl; it is a deliberate, planned community grounded in the internationally recognized One Planet Living framework. It will be compact, connected and climate-conscious, built with environmental sensitivity and long-term infrastructure planning. Article content Still, some residents and City of Ottawa councillors continue to cast doubt on the project's legitimacy, or on the Algonquins of Ontario (AOO) themselves, many of whom are direct descendants of Grand Chief Pinesi. That is not a policy critique; it is a microaggression. It echoes the long, tired refrain that not only must we justify ourselves, but now we must justify our presence in our own lands.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Old NFB head office in Montreal to get new lease on life with mixed-use development
The former home of the National Film Board on Côte-de-Liesse Road in Montreal's Saint-Laurent borough has sat vacant since 2019, but that could soon change. The Canada Lands Company unveiled its plans for the site on Thursday, which includes transforming the area —equivalent in size to approximately six football fields — into a mixed-use residential, commercial and cultural hub. Christopher Sweetnam-Holmes, the Crown corporation's senior director of real estate for Quebec and the Atlantic, said after 30 months of consultations with the public, the project has changed to better answer the community's needs. Issues raised by the community, Sweetnam-Holmes said, included a need for more housing, stores within walking distance and more parks for kids to play in. "So first, we're going to insert 700 units of new residential housing, of which half will be non-market housing," Sweetnam-Holmes said. "So that means social housing, affordable housing, non-profit housing. Then, we're going to repurpose 80 per cent of the buildings on the site, only demolishing 20 per cent." The plans include room for retail and office space, as well as more green space including a big community park centre in the middle of the housing development. And to preserve the legacy of the NFB, Sweetnam-Holmes said there will be a place "where art gets made" and people can take part in cultural activities. Also, the future Côte-de-Liesse REM station, which is slated to open later this year, is less than a kilometre away. Sweetnam-Holmes is hopeful the project will be transformative. "I think it's going to bring a lot of new life," Sweetnam-Holmes said. "Because you're going to have all these new people, you're going to have kids, you're going to have people working here, it's going to become like this really dynamic place." In an interview with CBC, Robert Shearmur, a professor of urban planning at McGill University, struck an optimistic tone when discussing the project. WATCH | What is co-op housing and can it help alleviate housing crisis: How co-operatives could become a hack to Canada's housing crisis 17 days ago Duration 5:18 People who live in them say they offer an attractive, low-cost alternative as the price of renting and buying property rises. Here's how housing co-ops work and why we might start hearing more about them in Canada. He said the Canada Lands Company has a good track record when it comes to listening to communities and coming up with good development ideas and proposals. He did, however, raise a few areas of concern. "These are all wonderful ideas if they work," he said, but added they need to be properly scaled. "There's a very small residential area right next to it. So, for a population of, let's say a couple of thousand people, how much culture, how much community space do you need or would be used?" Shearmur asked. The same question applies to retail and office space. Shearmur said he doesn't believe the population size will necessarily warrant having a big grocery store and people will likely have to do their weekly shopping elsewhere. Which brings us to the issue of cars and where to park them. In its current form, the site will have 350 indoor parking spots for residential use, 180 indoor and 60 outdoor spots for commercial use. Shearmur said that might not be enough. "Unless people happen to work along the REM line, getting to work ... typically requires a car," he said. "I suspect that housing units will be more difficult to sell without at least one space per unit." Meanwhile, housing advocates worry about how affordable the new units will be. " The market prices right now are crazy if you look at the prices in Montreal, and even in Quebec," said FRAPRU coordinator Catherine Lussier. "Even if you go below the market, how much below the market?" Even at 80 per cent, Lussier said tenants risk being priced out. Meanwhile, Sweetnam-Holmes said its impossible at the moment to know what the rents might look like. "All that we know is that they will meet the standards of both the City of Montreal and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) in terms of what they define as affordable housing," he said. According to the CMHC website, "housing is considered affordable if it costs less than 30 per cent of a household's before-tax income." Later this year, Canada Lands Company will start taking proposals from developers who want to make the vision a reality. It says the first residents could start moving in in 2028.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Ontario lawsuit underscores Indigenous anger over being left out of resource decisions
Saugeen Ojibway Nation is taking Ontario to court, arguing decades of unpaid salt royalties and a pattern of exclusion from key decisions about stone and sand quarries in its territory reflect a broader problem: resource development that leaves Indigenous nations left out of the conversation. The First Nation spoke to CBC News on Wednesday, the first time it has spoken publicly about the issue since filing its lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court last July. The suit accuses the Ontario government of reaping decades of royalties from the world's largest salt mine in Goderich, Ont., while at the same time sidestepping the First Nation in the opening and operation of an some 500 sand and gravel quarries within their 1.5 million-acre traditional territory. Saugeen Ojibway Nation (SON) is asking the court for $167.6 million in damages related to back payment of salt royalties, the alleged breach of the Crown's treaty obligations and a failure to offer meaningful consultation, according to the latest court filings. The case highlights renewed Indigenous outrage as Parliament Hill and the Ontario Legislature push to fast-track development through Bill C-5 and Ontario's Bill 5 — both of which have been slammed for weakening environmental protections and expanding Crown powers at the expense of Indigenous rights. Ontario's Ministry of Natural Resources said it would not comment, as the matter is before the courts. Quarries fuelled Ontario's building boom The new legislation will only deepen what has long been a sore point in the relationship between SON and the Crown, according to Chief Greg Nadjiwon of the Chippewas of the Nawash Unceded First Nation — a community that, along with the Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, makes up SON. A chunk of salt from the Goderich mine, which falls within the traditional territory of Saugeen Ojibway Nation. (CBC) "We don't receive any kind of fair payment for the extraction of resources in our homeland," he said. The lawsuit claims that, between 2004 and 2017, the Crown allowed hundreds of stone and sand quarries to open on SON's sprawling traditional territory, which spans from Tobermory in the north to Goderich in the south to Alliston in the west. Court documents suggest the quarries supply the province with some 300,000,000 tonnes of aggregate each year. Aggregate is a vital raw ingredient in countless construction and infrastructure projects across Ontario — from the expansion of major highways such as the 401, to crossings, such as the Gordie Howe International Bridge, to the slew of skyscrapers that have sprouted like weeds as part of a recent vertical land rush in Ontario's major cities. This map of shows the First Nation's traditional territory in southwestern Ontario. (Saugeen Ojibway Nation) As quarries have helped fuel an urban building boom, the Saugeen claim those operations have also had a damaging impact on their environment and culture — destroying wildlife habitats, threatening archaeological sites, disturbing ancestral resting places and razing forests that provide their people with traditional medicines. "The landscape is changing on a daily basis," Nadjiwon said. First Nations argue that both the federal and Ontario bills erode their constitutional right to be m,eaningfully consulted on projects in their traditional territories. Tensions have escalated and not just in courtrooms. Ontario Premier Doug Ford elicited fury this week while defending Bill 5 when he said he was willing to give First Nations what they want in exchange for their support on mining projects, but added they "can't keep coming hat in hand all the time to the government" for more money. The remark drew immediate backlash, with Indigenous leaders condemning it as racist. Amid mounting pressure, Ford apologized Thursday. "I get pretty passionate and I just want to say I sincerely apologize for my words, not only [did it] hurt all the chiefs in that room, but all First Nations." Also on Thursday, Prime Minister Mark Carney defended Bill C-5, calling it "enabling legislation." He promised that Indigenous people would not only be consulted, they would be able to help define what he called "a nation-building project." "That is how you build a nation. That's very much how we've designed it," he said. "That's how we'll be moving forward." Except Indigenous leaders don't necessarily see it that way. Randall Kahgee, an Indigenous rights lawyer, band councillor and former chief of Saugeen First Nation says both pieces of legislation, which both give governments the option of sidestepping the consultation processes, are akin to stacking the deck in the government's favour. "This is the frustrating part. You seem to have some momentum and then someone changes the rules of the game or they shift the goal post." Kahgee says the legislation adds insult to injury, especially as Indigenous people often struggle to overcome a perception they are unwilling to do business, when it reality their communities are only evaluating ways to mitigate risk to their way of life. "Anything less than that is taking."
