So what really happened at the cartel training site dubbed ‘Mexican Auschwitz'?
MEXICO CITY — It has become a kind of rallying cry: Teuchitlán, the township in the western state of Jalisco where searchers made a macabre discovery — a ranch of horrors featuring makeshift crematoria and hundreds of abandoned shoes, backpacks, T-shirts and other personal effects.
News reports proclaimed it the 'Mexican Auschwitz,' an apparent cartel killing ground.
Now 'Teuchitlán' blares from protest banners, headlines and street graffiti, shorthand for a pervasive sense of deception and unease.
Police have arrested an alleged cartel recruiter named as the ringleader of the site and also jailed the mayor of Teuchitlán. Even so, activists for the missing accuse the government of President Claudia Sheinbaum — who vowed to uncover 'the truth' — of a cover-up.
'We all feel betrayed,' said Raúl Servín, one of the first searchers at the scene.
Authorities now insist the ranch was never a place of extermination or the large-scale disposal of bodies, but rather served as a cartel training grounds — apparently one of many such clandestine sites scattered across Mexico, providing recruits for an industry that is among the nation's most prolific employers.
But much is still unexplained: What about the charred bones found on the ranch grounds?
And what are the fates of the hundreds of cartel trainees who apparently passed through the facility? Are they still alive?
And how did state and federal authorities fail to follow up on a raid on the site last year, leaving the ranch little known until civilian searchers happened upon it?
In a country where the ranks of the 'disappeared' have soared past 120,000 — most believed to be victims of organized crime — the mystery has raised deep suspicions and sparked conspiracy theories, sentiments all captured in one word: Teuchitlán.
Jalisco is emblematic of a kind of essential mexicanidad, home to cultural markers such as tequila, mariachi and ranchera music, along with signature gastronomic dishes. The state capital, Guadalajara, is Mexico's second city, and Puerto Vallarta is among the nation's landmark coastal resorts.
But the state is also the stomping grounds of one of Mexico's most notorious organized crime syndicates, the Jalisco New Generation cartel, which runs narcotics trafficking, migrant-smuggling, extortion and other rackets — even a sophisticated, time-share fraud that targeted foreign investors looking for beach properties.
In March, a series of tips and rumors led activists to the isolated site known as Rancho Izaguirre, on the outskirts of Teuchitlán, an agricultural town of some 10,000 residents less than 35 miles outside Guadalajara.
Such search groups, or collectives — typically founded by mothers and other relatives of the disappeared — have proliferated throughout Mexico as people despair of official inaction. The searchers have become key actors in civil society, seeking out clandestine graves and putting pressure on the government to find the missing.
Mexican organized crime and confederates in local governments and police forces aren't happy about bothersome civilians shedding light on their activities. More than two dozen searchers have been slain in recent years, according to Mexican human rights groups.
Activists from a group known as the Warrior Searchers of Jalisco were out seeking remains when they arrived at Rancho Izaguirre. They found what they described as crude crematoria and charred bones — the basis for the 'Mexican Auschwitz' narrative that went viral once the searchers posted photos of their grisly finds, including what appeared to be crude cremation pits.
But what really struck a collective chord were the images of abandoned shoes, backpacks, T-shirts, jeans and other personal effects. There were L.A. Dodgers caps, basketball jerseys featuring logos of the Chicago Bulls and other teams, a Stars-and-Stripes blanket and various items emblazoned with Disney characters.
The Jalisco prosecutor's office, which was accused of botching an investigation into the ranch last year after state and federal authorities raided the site and shut it down, took the extraordinary step of photographing the discarded possessions and posting the individual images on its website. As of Friday, prosecutors had uploaded photos of 1,844 items.
What stood out most, however, were the scores of shoes, which came to symbolize the fate of Mexico's vanished multitudes.
People from throughout Mexico scoured — and continue to scour — the prosecutor's site in desperate efforts to find any clues. Individuals inundated social media with comments saying they recognized a missing loved one's sneakers, T-shirt, backpack or some other item — even as officials counseled against high expectations, noting that many of the items were commonplace.
'With all the pain in my heart, I hope that my son was there and we can rest after this torment of five years,' a woman told Imagen Televisión, explaining that relatives recognized pants, a shirt and a backpack that resembled those belonging to her son, a pharmacy worker who disappeared five years earlier. 'I'm not looking for whoever was guilty. ... I just want to find out if my son was really there.'
Some even made pilgrimages to the isolated ranch, hovering outside yellow and red police tape cordoning off the site.
'I feel that my son was here,' María Luz Ruiz said. Her son, a tequila industry worker, was kidnapped 12 years ago and never heard from again.
Another visitor, Paula Avila, said she experienced 'a sense of foreboding' when visiting.
'I felt a pain in my chest,' said Avila, whose son, an Uber driver, disappeared three years ago.
Among the most provocative elements of the Teuchitlán narrative are the conflicting reports about human remains.
After word of the ranch hit the news in March, Jalisco state prosecutors said investigators had discovered six groups of charred human bones, some hidden beneath earth and bricks.
But federal authorities were quick to deny the most sensational report: that the ranch had been the site of mass executions and the cremation of remains. Recruits may have been killed or tortured there, especially those who attempted to escape, Omar García Harfuch, Mexico's security chief, told reporters. But there was no evidence or mass murder or large-scale disposal of remains, he said.
'It's a totally distinct thing to say it's a place where some kind of homicide or torture took place — and to say it's an extermination camp,' García Harfuch said. 'An extermination camp is a place where hundreds or thousands of people are killed in a systematic manner.'
There was 'not a shred of proof' that corpses were burned at the site, Mexico's attorney general, Alejandro Gertz Manero, told reporters.
Contradicting Gertz Manero was the Warrior Searchers of Jalisco group, which said it had found 'irrefutable evidence' of human remains, including skull, femur, hip and dental fragments.
'We found those crematoria, we found those bones,' Servín said. 'One feels a great sense of impotence.'
The site, authorities said, had operated as a training and operations hub for the Jalisco cartel, possibly since 2021, until it was shut down last year when state authorities and federal National Guard troops raided the ranch.
Many recruits had apparently been tricked into coming to the site, authorities said, fooled by social media advertisements offering well-paying work in the security field. Others, though, may have enlisted willingly and completed their one-month training — including physical drills and instruction in firearms — and went on to become cartel operatives.
The ranch discoveries prompted authorities to shut down dozens of online cartel recruitment sites, García Harfuch said.
And the mounds of clothing, shoes and other effects? García Harfuch responded that, once at the ranch, recruits were issued uniforms and tactical boots and forced to relinquish their garb and cellphones. They remained incommunicado.
Authorities say the investigation continues. This month federal troops arrested José Asunción Murguía, the mayor of Teuchitlán, and accused him of being on the payroll of the Jalisco cartel and being involved in the Rancho Izaguirre operation.
The mayor was seen at the ranch on various occasions and was an accomplice of several cartel lieutenants, authorities allege. The lieutenants include José Gregorio Hermida, alias 'Comandante Lastra,' whom authorities have called a regional recruiter for the Jalisco cartel and a boss of the ranch operation.
According to Mexican authorities, Hermida is also the 'mastermind' behind the July disappearance of a pair of 18-year-old cousins — students at the University of Guadalajara — who were victims of a recruitment scheme. Prosecutors say Comandante Lastra — who was arrested March 20 outside Mexico City — reported to Gonzalo Mendoza Gaytán, known as 'The Toad,' a high-level cartel capo.
The uploaded images from the ranch certainly raised the hopes of many people desperate to learn what happened to their missing loved ones. But the identification process has dragged on, dashing expectations.
For Gerardo Díaz, a farmer in Jalisco, the entire drama of Teuchitlán has evoked a soul-crushing whirlwind of emotions.
The published images of clothing presented a promising possibility: That the family could finally clarify the fate of his brother, José Díaz, who disappeared in 2021 in the city of Tonalá, outside Guadalajara. A white-and-gray Tommy Hilfiger T-shirt on the prosecutor's website appeared to match one that his brother, then 23, was wearing when he vanished.
The family went to the prosecutor's office, Díaz said, and offered to give DNA samples to match against any DNA found on the T-shirt. They were told to be patient; this was going to be 'a long process.' More than two months later, the family has heard nothing.
'For me, this whole process has been a joke,' Díaz said. 'They are laughing at people's pain. They have no empathy for families like ours living with so much anguish. It's a true hell. We are tired of authorities who don't do anything — while the agony of the disappearance of my brother continues to consume our lives.'
McDonnell is a Times staff writer and Sánchez Vidal a special correspondent. Special correspondent Liliana Nieto del Río contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court strikes down Mexico's lawsuit against US gun manufacturers
The United States Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit from the government of Mexico that argued American gun manufacturers like Smith & Wesson failed to prevent illegal firearm sales to cartels and criminal organisations. In one of a slew of decisions handed down on Thursday, the top court decided that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act shielded the gun manufacturers from Mexico's suit. The court's decision was unanimous. Writing for the nine-member bench, Justice Elena Kagan explained that even 'indifference' to the trafficking of firearms does not amount to willfully assisting a criminal enterprise. 'Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers,' Kagan wrote (PDF). 'We have little doubt that, as the complaint asserts, some such sales take place — and that the manufacturers know they do. But still, Mexico has not adequately pleaded what it needs to: that the manufacturers 'participate in' those sales.' The Mexican government's complaint, she added, 'does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted'. The case stems from a complaint filed in August 2021 in a federal court in Boston, Massachusetts. In that initial complaint, the Mexican government — then led by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador — argued that the sheer volume of firearms illegally smuggled into its country amounted to negligence on the part of gun manufacturers. Those firearms, it said, had exacted a devastating toll on Mexican society. The country has some of the highest homicide rates in the world, with the United Nations estimating in 2023 that nearly 25 intentional killings happen for every 100,000 people. Much of that crime has been credited to the presence of cartels and other criminal enterprises operating in Mexico. The Igarape Institute, a Brazil-based think tank, estimated that Mexico's crime cost the country nearly 1.92 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) from 2010 to 2014. The US is the largest arms manufacturer in the world — and also the largest source of illegally sourced firearms. The stream of firearms that pour into Mexico and the broader Latin America region, for instance, has been dubbed the 'iron river'. Nearly 70 percent of the illegal guns seized in Mexico from 2014 to 2018, for instance, were traced to origins in the US, according to the Department of Justice. That has led countries like Mexico to demand action from the US to limit the number of firearms trafficked abroad. In its lawsuit, Mexico targeted some of the biggest names in gun manufacturing in the US: not just Smith & Wesson, but also companies like Beretta USA, Glock Inc and Colt's Manufacturing LLC. But the firearm companies pushed back against the lawsuit, arguing they could not be held responsible for the actions of criminals in another country. The Supreme Court itself cast doubt on some of Mexico's arguments, including the idea that the gun manufacturers designed and marketed their products specifically for cartel buyers. 'Mexico focuses on production of 'military style' assault weapons, but these products are widely legal and purchased by ordinary consumers. Manufacturers cannot be charged with assisting criminal acts simply because Mexican cartel members also prefer these guns,' Justice Kagan wrote. 'The same applies to firearms with Spanish language names or graphics alluding to Mexican history,' she added. 'While they may be 'coveted by the cartels,' they also may appeal to 'millions of law-abiding Hispanic Americans.'' On Thursday, an industry trade group, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), celebrated the Supreme Court's decision as a 'tremendous victory' against an unfair charge. It had filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants in the case. 'For too long, gun control activists have attempted to twist basic tort law to malign the highly-regulated U.S. firearm industry with the criminal actions of violent organized crime, both here in the United States and abroad,' the group's senior vice president, Lawrence G Keane, said in a statement. Keane added that he and others in the firearm industry felt 'sympathetic to plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence at the hands of narco-terrorist drug cartels'. But he said the issue was about 'responsible firearm ownership', not the actions of gun manufacturers.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
On a big decision day, the Supreme Court sent a message about unity
Supreme Court justices sent a message to the American public on Thursday: We're not as divided as you think. Of the six rulings that were released, four were unanimous, including the opinions in high-profile battles over reverse discrimination and faith-based tax breaks. Another decision was nearly unanimous, with just one justice peeling away on one part of the ruling. And the sixth decision had just one dissent, meaning that nearly all of the justices agreed with the plan to dismiss the case as 'improvidently granted.' Here's an overview of the six rulings released on Thursday — and a look at what's still to come from the Supreme Court in June. Ruling: Unanimous In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the court was considering whether members of a majority group, such as straight, white males, should have to meet a higher burden of proof in order to make an employment discrimination claim. The case was brought by Marlean Ames, a straight, white woman, who accused her former employer of privileging LGBTQ employees during the promotion process. Ames lost in front of lower courts, but the Supreme Court overturned those decisions on Thursday. The justices unanimously said that members of majority groups should not have to meet a higher burden of proof and sent Ames' case back to the lower courts for reconsideration. The question in this case is whether ... a plaintiff who is a member of a majority group must also show 'background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.' We hold that this additional 'background circumstances' requirement is not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in the opinion. Ruling: Unanimous In Smith & Wesson Brands v. Mexico, the court was asked to determine whether the Mexican government could sue seven gun manufacturers based in the U.S. over their role in unlawful gun sales in Mexico. The Supreme Court unanimously said on Thursday that the Mexican government's lawsuit cannot move forward 'because Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers.' 'We have little doubt that, as the complaint asserts, some such sales take place — and that the manufacturers know they do. But still, Mexico has not adequately pleaded what it needs to: that the manufacturers 'participate in' those sales 'as in something that (they) wish to bring about,'' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the opinion. Ruling: Unanimous In Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the state of Wisconsin was violating the First Amendment's religious freedom protections by denying a faith-based tax break to a group of Catholic nonprofits. The nonprofits said their service to people in need was clearly motivated by Catholic teachings, but Wisconsin officials said they didn't qualify for the religious exemption to the state's unemployment tax because they did not seek to serve only Catholics or evangelize to their clients, as the Deseret News previously reported. State officials won in front of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which said that the Catholic nonprofits' work did not serve 'primarily religious purposes.' In Thursday's unanimous decision, the Supreme Court reversed that decision, ruling that Wisconsin was violating the First Amendment by privileging certain religious beliefs and actions over others. 'It is fundamental to our constitutional order that the government maintain 'neutrality between religion and religion.' There may be hard calls to make in policing that rule, but this is not one,' Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the opinion. Ruling: Unanimous In CC/Devas (Mauritius) v. Antrix, the justices were considering under what circumstances federal courts in the U.S. can assert jurisdiction over foreign states. The case stemmed from a conflict between a company that's active in the U.S. and a corporation owned by India. The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled that federal courts did have jurisdiction over India in this dispute and reversed a decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion. Ruling: Nearly unanimous, with one justice taking issue with one part of the majority opinion. In Blom Bank v. Honickman, the court was considering whether victims of terrorist attacks or their surviving family members could reopen their case against a bank that had allegedly aided and abetted terrorists by providing financial services. The Supreme Court ruled that the people who brought the case did not meet the high standard that must be cleared to reopen the case. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, was nearly unanimous. Eight of the justices, including Thomas, joined it in full, but Jackson only joined it in part. Ruling: Dismissed as improvidently granted, with one justice dissenting to the dismissal In Lab Corp v. Davis, the justices were considering whether a federal court can certify a class action suit if some of the parties in the suit lack legal standing. A majority of the justices decided to dismiss the case as improvidently granted, meaning that they felt the court should never have agreed to weigh in. Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissented to that decision, writing that he felt it was possible — and would be valuable — to rule on the case. The Supreme Court will release around two dozen more rulings throughout the month of June as it works to wrap up its 2024-25 term by early July. The justices have yet to announce their decision in four of the five cases that the Deseret News highlighted in its list of this term's highest profile battles. The Supreme Court's next decision day has not yet been announced, but it will likely be Thursday, June 12.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court rejects Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. gun makers
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out the Mexican government's lawsuit against U.S. firearms manufacturers accusing them of aiding and abetting gun violence. The court ruled unanimously that the lawsuit is barred by a 2005 federal law that shields gun companies from legal liability. Liberal Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote the opinion, acknowledged the gun violence problem, but said Mexico had failed to make allegations that would surmount those liability protections in claiming the companies aided and abetted the unlawful sale of guns. "The question presented is whether Mexico's complaint plausibly pleads that conduct. We conclude it does not," she wrote. The 2021 lawsuit accused Smith & Wesson, Colt and other companies of deliberately selling guns to dealers who sell products that are frequently recovered at Mexican crime scenes. The Mexican government said the aiding and abetting allegations meant that the companies were not protected by the federal immunity shield, called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Mexico was seeking up to $10 billion in damages. The case at the Supreme Court involved two companies — Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms. Other manufacturers, including Glock and Colt, successfully had claims against them tossed out. A federal judge initially ruled for the manufacturers, but the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived the case last year, saying the liability shield did not extend to Mexico's specific claims. The case reached the Supreme Court following increased tensions between American and Mexican leaders after the election of President Donald Trump, who has cited drug trafficking and gang violence in Mexico amid his crackdown on undocumented immigrants. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation intended to reduce the flow of guns across the border, which they estimate to total at least 200,000 a year. This article was originally published on