logo
Texas judge rejects temporary injunction seeking gender testing in NCAA women's sports

Texas judge rejects temporary injunction seeking gender testing in NCAA women's sports

Yahoo27-03-2025

LUBBOCK, Texas − A Lubbock district judge on Tuesday denied a request for temporary injunction that would require the NCAA to impose genetic testing on athletes to determine their sex or have the organization and its affiliates remove the word "women" from women's competition.
In the State of Texas v. the NCAA, filed in December in Lubbock County, state attorney general Ken Paxton says the NCAA has been "engaging in false, deceptive, and misleading practices by marketing sporting events as 'women's' competitions, only to then provide consumers with mixed sex competitions where biological males compete against biological females."
The suit sought an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from "allowing biological males to compete in women's sporting events in Texas or involving Texas teams, or alternatively requiring the NCAA to stop marketing events as 'women's' when in fact they are mixed sex competitions."
Advertisement
In December, NCAA President Charlie Baker told a Senate panel that about 510,000 athletes compete in the NCAA and he knows of fewer than 10 who are transgender.
Judge Les Hatch denied the injunction in Lubbock's 237th District Court.
"I'm not commenting about the NCAA policy, whether it was right or wrong at that time," Hatch told the plaintiffs' counsel, "but you've asked me to order SRY gene testing or remove the word 'women,' but I don't think we're there yet. I don't think SRY testing is going to accomplish with 100% certainty what you want it to. Or at least I didn't hear that it does."
President Donald Trump, on Feb. 5, signed an executive order designed to keep transgender athletes out of women's sports.
Advertisement
Hatch made his ruling at the end of seven hours in the courtroom. Most of the proceedings centered on testimony from women who are recent former NCAA athletes who said they'd been adversely affected by having to compete — in one case, unknowingly — with or against a transgender athlete.
Former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines testified by Zoom from Wisconsin. Testifying in the courtroom were former San Jose State volleyball player Brooke Slusser, her mother, Kim Slusser, former North Carolina State swimmer Kylee Alons and former Kentucky swimmer Kaitlynn Wheeler.
Hatch said he'd anticipated hearing a lot about SRY gene testing and that he expected it to be "a science hearing as much as anything."
"I do know the executive order does not set out what type of testing President Trump wants in his order," Hatch said. "Instead, he has ordered various people, agencies, to confer to figure out what is a proper methodology to determine male and female — because even the SRY gene, which was abandoned by the Olympics in 1996, because they tested 3,400 women, found eight to have the SRY gene, but then later, upon further investigation, found them to be more female than male due to androgen insensitivity."
Advertisement
He went on to say, "Before I started delving into this lawsuit, I figured there was a test out there that was black and white, that was 100%, but I think if that were the case, that would have been included in the executive order. It's just not there."
The NCAA issued an updated policy on transgender athlete participation on Feb. 6, the day after the Trump executive order. Attorney Tom Riney, part of the defense team, pointed out that some of the women who testified as supporting witnesses for the state, had initially praised the NCAA policy change. The women who had done so said on the stand, however, they didn't immediately grasp the nuances and changed their opinion after reviewing it more carefully.
The Independent Council on Women's Sports (ICONS), in a statement sent to media, says the new NCAA policy is "even more permissive than before.' It noted the NCAA has removed itself from eligibility monitoring, leaving it to schools.
Swimmers, volleyball player Brooke Slusser testify
Gaines, Wheeler and Alons told the court they felt angered and violated having to compete at NCAA swim meets against Lia Thomas, who is transgender.
Advertisement
Alons said she felt "on edge," "uncomfortable" and "vulnerable" sharing a locker room with Thomas and used a dirty, dimly lit storage closet to change into her competition swimsuit.
Brooke Slusser said her senior season at San Jose State was disrupted by the presence of a transgender teammate.
"Especially with the fact that I found out after sharing a locker room and a hotel room and an apartment with this person, I think it affected me a lot," Slusser said. "I felt betrayed."
From left, Kim Slusser, Kaitlynn Wheeler and Brooke Slusser are shown outside a Lubbock, Texas, courtroom. They testified on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, as supporting witnesses in Texas v. the NCAA. A district judge denied the state's request for a temporary injunction.
The hearing and Hatch's ruling came as March Madness, the NCAA Tournament for Division I basketball, was starting. The NCAA Tournament for Division II and Division III are already three rounds deep.
Advertisement
In his opening statement, Riney said the state's complaint made references to NCAA policy being problematic for "over a decade."
"So for over a decade this has been going on," Riney said, "they filed a suit in December of 2024, and here we are after some of the (NCAA) tournaments have already started and it's somehow an emergency that they say demands injunctive relief."
Riney circled back in his closing argument to the disruption an injunction would cause.
"The tournaments have already started," he said. "How is this court going to implement that testing immediately? They've given you no evidence of what that test would require, who would be required to perform it, whether or not it's reliable, whether or not people could cheat on that. They're just asking basically to disrupt the tournament."
Advertisement
Further, Riney said, an injunction requiring references to women be removed presumed late changes would be needed to tournament tickets, logos and merchandise.
This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Judge denies temporary injunction in suit tied to transgender athletes

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment
Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment

Washington Post

time27 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul's refusal to support the president's signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, 'You were not invited,' ' Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday. While he said he did now know exactly who left him out, he added, 'I think that it's somebody acting in a very petty way.'

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law
Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Fox News

time39 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Eight women's college soccer, volleyball and track and field athletes have filed an appeal challenging the House v. NCAA antitrust settlement. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week, clearing the way for direct payments from universities to athletes. The eight women argue female athletes won't receive their fair share of $2.7 billion in back pay for athletes barred from making money off their name, image and likeness (NIL). Kacie Breeding of Vanderbilt; Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Haas, Savannah Baron and Elizabeth Arnold of the College of Charleston; and Kate Johnson of Virginia lead the appeal. They all previously filed objections to the proposed settlement. Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. "We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion," Hare said. "Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports." The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. "This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes," Hare said. "Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case." The appeal, filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, was first reported by Front Office Sports. It will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Summer McIntosh breaks third world record in five days, a Phelpsian feat
Summer McIntosh breaks third world record in five days, a Phelpsian feat

NBC Sports

timean hour ago

  • NBC Sports

Summer McIntosh breaks third world record in five days, a Phelpsian feat

Summer McIntosh is the first swimmer to break a world record in three different individual events at one long course meet since Michael Phelps at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. McIntosh, a triple 2024 Olympic gold medalist, lowered her own 400m individual medley world record on Wednesday at the Canadian trials for the World Championships in Singapore in July and August. She clocked 4 minutes, 23.65 seconds, beating her previous record of 4:24.38 set at the 2024 Canadian Olympic Trials. Earlier at this meet, McIntosh reclaimed the 400m free world record (Saturday) and broke a 10-year-old world record in the 200m individual medley (Monday). She also swam the third-fastest time in history in the 800m free (Sunday) and the second-fastest time in history in the 200m butterfly (Tuesday). For Thursday, the last day of the meet, she is entered in the 200m free, not one of her primary events, in Victoria, British Columbia. McIntosh, an 18-year-old from Toronto, has put together one of the best single-meet performances in history. The list starts with Phelps' eight-gold-medal effort at the 2008 Beijing Games. There, he broke world records in the 200m and 400m IMs, the 200m fly and the 200m free. Phelps is the only swimmer to win five individual events at a single Olympics (2008) or World Championships (2007). McIntosh can match that at this summer's worlds. She has said she plans to swim five individual events: her three Olympic gold-medal events — both IMs, 200m fly — plus the 400m free and one of the 200m free, 200m backstroke or 800m free. After worlds, McIntosh plans to move to Austin, Texas, and start being coached by Bob Bowman, who coached Phelps for his entire career. Nick Zaccardi,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store