logo
A Los Angeles Gallery Brings Bold Art, and Vision, to Miami Beach

A Los Angeles Gallery Brings Bold Art, and Vision, to Miami Beach

New York Times03-12-2024

'I've been asking myself, 'What's the point of art?'' said Esther Kim Varet in a video interview, the day after the United States presidential election.
The day before, not long after she had returned from canvassing for the Kamala Harris campaign in Michigan, Kim Varet, a busy gallery owner, had admitted she was nervous about how close the race looked. After the election had been called for Donald J. Trump, she let slip that even she wasn't necessarily thinking about art — or its function in society.
Kim Varet's politics are particularly evident at Various Small Fires, the contemporary art gallery she founded and operates. Based in Hollywood, south of the Los Angeles hills, Various Small Fires focuses on championing artistic voices that Kim Varet feels have been traditionally overlooked by galleries — such as those of Asian, Indigenous, Black and Latino descent.
She opened the gallery in 2012, in an industry historically dominated by white male gatekeepers (such as those running the galleries atop Art Land's tracker of top contemporary galleries). Now, as she enters her 40s, Kim Varet is preparing to return to Art Basel Miami Beach, a testament to her gallery's growing reputation.
'I just want to push conversations forward,' she said, of the gallery's mission.
Kim Varet's sense of drive has deep roots. 'I'm a first-generation Korean American,' she explained, recounting how her grandparents escaped North Korea, and her parents, raised in South Korea, immigrated to Texas, where they became involved with the Southern Baptist Church.
'I was taught to stick with my own' and to be suspicious of others, Kim Varet said of her upbringing in the conservative church. She reflected that growing up under such strict conditions 'can give you this thing where you want to break every barrier, power structure, and fight like hell for what's morally right.'
It's a personal history that underscores Kim Varet's stance on art and galleries in a nation that is increasingly polarized and shifting toward conservatism.
Right now, 'with so much outspoken intolerance for others, this work of bridging disparate world views is needed more than ever,' Kim Varet said, adding, 'That's the point, isn't it?'
Underdog mentality
Various Small Fires has become a destination in Los Angeles for these types of dialogues because of the panels it hosts — on topics that include sustainable agriculture and stopping hate against Asians — and the artists Kim Varet shows. 'I'm drawn to people who have historically been the underdog,' she said. 'I want to elevate vulnerable voices.'
This curatorial approach has led to the discovery and career revivals of artists like Jessie Homer French, a self-taught artist in her 80s known for her folksy paintings addressing ecology and the environment; Diedrick Brackens, whose woven tapestries examine being Black and queer; Dyani White Hawk, a Minneapolis-based Lakota artist who blends abstract painting with her tribe's traditions of abstraction, and Newton Harrison, a founder of the eco-art movement, who died in 2022.
Challenging barriers
Various Small Fires started as a series of artist conversations at Kim Varet's Venice Beach home in 2012. The success of her homespun endeavor eventually led to the opening of the approximately 5,000-square-foot Hollywood gallery in 2015. The space features an outdoor sculpture garden.
In the last five years, Kim Varet has opened outposts in Seoul and Dallas. The expansion is fitting for a gallery called Various Small Fires, a name that comes from Edward Ruscha's photo book, printed in 1970, titled 'Various Small Fires and Milk,' which features images of small flames emitted by matches, stoves and the like. According to Kim Varet, her galleries are analogous to prescribed burns — the little fires necessary to maintain a healthy environment.
'In a way I'm tracing my own biography and I'm going back and I'm helping present ideas that directly challenge the barriers I felt there,' Kim Varet said, of founding the outposts in Seoul and Dallas. For instance, she said, a 2023 exhibition of Madeline Donahue's work about motherhood and women's bodies 'felt different' when shown in Texas, a state that enacted a near-total ban on abortion.
While being fertile for cross-cultural dialogue, the locations are also strategic. Dallas is one of the nation's hottest collector markets, while the move to Korea predated Frieze's inaugural fair there. Moving into Asia, Kim Varet said, was an easy choice. 'American artists are very curious about exhibiting in Asia, but are not always sure how to access it,' she said, adding that, at the same time, there is 'high interest in Western artists in Korea specifically.'
Joel Lubin, managing director and head of the motion picture group CAA, is an avid art collector and indicative of a strand of Kim Varet's collector base. He first encountered the gallerist at a fair a decade ago where he said that he quickly sensed her vision. 'She wasn't all about the West Coast prism, or the L.A. scene; she was looking beyond it,' Mr. Lubin recalled in a phone interview.
Making waves
At this year's Art Basel Miami Beach, running Friday through Sunday, the gallery will present a booth focused on the theme of abstraction, highlighting different approaches, and challenging its cited origins as a 20th-century construct. Kim Varet noted that the presentation will feature six artists, two of whom are making their Art Basel Miami Beach debuts.
One of the first-timers is A'Driane Nieves, 42, who said that she has been painting for 15 years after a therapist recommended she pick up a brush as a form of therapy. Nieves, who is forthcoming about having autism and A.D.H.D., contributed 'A New Code' (2024), a painting that depicts solid blue and yellow boxes interrupted by hundreds of frenzied colorful brush strokes.
'The squares represent binary thinking, you know, the boxes we put ourselves and others in, the norms we are conditioned to accept,' Nieves said in a phone interview. The frenzied lines interrupt the clear lines and colors, showing, she theorized, how marginalized people 'have found ways to thrive outside of the bonds and constraints of normative society, despite the retribution that comes with doing so.'
Sarah Rosalena, an artist and scholar in her 40s, is also making her Miami debut. One of her works in the show is 'Gradient Wave' (2024), a basket sculpture created using a 3-D printer that mimics an ancient coiling technique. She explained in her artist statement that the work is an exploration of the displacement and devaluation of craft and female labor in our contemporary technology-fueled economy.
'My work is done by hand and by machine; in a way I'm straddling the ancient and the futuristic,' Rosalena, a member of the Indigenous Wixárika people, said in a phone interview.
For Kim Varet, both artists confront conflicting tensions. On abstraction alone, she said 'they offer a feminine retelling which is obviously so different to what you get taught in a lot of art schools.'
These are the type of conversations that excite Kim Varet. After all, it is what draws her to her job, to her artists and to the locations she has chosen for Various Small Fires.
'I cannot function without tension,' she said, at the end of the post-election conversation. 'What a time to say that.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This is my classroom. ICE isn't welcome here.
This is my classroom. ICE isn't welcome here.

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This is my classroom. ICE isn't welcome here.

By Teresa Puente | Edited by Patricia Guadalupe I teach at a university in Southern California, where almost half my students are Latino. We are what is known as an HSI, a Hispanic-Serving Institution. It's a designation for colleges and universities where at least 25 percent of the full-time students are Hispanic. It's also a designation being erased on some government websites, including the U.S. Department of Education. It's not just the erasure of diversity, equity, and inclusion, known as DEI, that is harming colleges and universities across the country. It's the active threats by the Trump administration to defund universities that support DEI. And it's the threat to deport students and others in our communities. At least seventy international students in the California State University system have had their visas canceled, and that includes some six students on my campus in Long Beach. No explanations were given, but this is part of the nationwide attack on universities by the Trump administration. The Trump Administration then reinstated the international student visas, but their actions have created chaos and confusion. Students who are undocumented or DACA recipients also live in fear, and other students who may have legal status are fearful for their parents who are undocumented. A student told me right after Trump won that her mother is undocumented. 'I'm really worried,' she said. She had missed some assignments, and after she explained the situation, I gave her an extension. Other students have told me they are stressed and have a hard time focusing. After Trump won, some students told me they were too depressed to come to class and felt anxiety. Others were angry. The mood has stabilized as we head toward graduation. We have an annual Latino graduation ceremony and Latino faculty and staff had to consider what could happen if ICE were to crash that ceremony. The organizers decided to go ahead with the event but posted a note on the event website explaining that the university does not share immigration information with U.S. immigration agencies. Fortunately, on my campus, we have some support for our students. We have what is called a Dream Success Center that offers support and free legal services for students and their parents through the immigrant rights group Central American Resource Center (CARECEN). It's hard to know exactly how many undocumented students are on campus, as there is no list. But there are an estimated 9,500 undocumented students at all of the 23 CSU campuses. Only around half of the undocumented students have temporary status with DACA, also known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. This program began in 2012 during the Obama administration and grants temporary work and education authorization to certain undocumented minors. While Trump has vowed to end the program, those who already have DACA can renew for now, but new applications are halted under ongoing legal challenges. Our campus felt like a safe space, but threats of raids are unsettling. I always create a welcoming environment in my classroom. I tell my students they can ask for help beyond what's on the syllabus. I can refer them to various campus services, such as immigration lawyers, counseling, and basic needs to help pay rent, or refer them to our food pantry. Our university system has a website with resources for undocumented students that includes legal services, mental health, and admissions information. Additionally, the California Nonresident Tuition Exemption, known as AB 540, allows eligible students to be exempted from paying out-of-state tuition. We have student clubs on campus that support undocumented students. I'm on the board of the Latinx Faculty & Staff Association (LFSA), and we work to support our immigrant community on campus. Since December of last year, we have hosted two 'Know Your Rights' workshops, which include a guest speaker from the local immigrant rights organization ORALE that does trainings and advocacy work, and operates a hotline to report ICE activity in our city of Long Beach. Our union, the California Faculty Association (CFA), recently co-sponsored one of the 'Know Your Rights' workshops with LFSA and has organized campus protests against ICE. About half of the overall student population on the CSU Long Beach campus is Latino, and around 25 percent are Asian American. Regardless of immigration status, we know that ICE does racial profiling, even if they officially say otherwise. I've had to ask myself, what would I do if ICE came to my classroom? This is a real possibility as the Trump administration has said there are no safe spaces from ICE. Under previous administrations, including Trump's first term, ICE had a policy not to raid churches, hospitals, or schools. But that has changed. Rather than worry, I came up with a plan. It upsets me that I have to prepare for the worst. I was concerned after Trump won in 2016, but they didn't raid schools in his first term. I decided to take a stand for my students. I have a No ICE sign in my office and a stack of red rights cards on my desk. If ICE comes to my classroom, the first thing I would do is start recording and ask my students to record me. I would then explain that this classroom is only for students enrolled in the class, and I would ask ICE agents to leave, something I would do anyway for anyone interrupting my class. I would also advise my students of their constitutional right to remain silent. I learned through the 'Know Your Rights' workshops that, as citizens, we protect those who are not citizens by refusing to answer questions about our own citizenship status. We have also distributed the red rights cards on campus. The university administration has emailed some guidance to faculty, telling us to refer any ICE encounter to university officials. They have suggested using language such as, 'I'm not trying to obstruct you (ICE), but I do not have the authority to respond to your request.' Then ask them to go to the administration office. Now, the tricky part is, what if the ICE officers refuse to leave? We have been advised to contact our administrator or dean, or call the campus police. Our campus police chief told LFSA that he and his officers won't help ICE or give out any information about faculty, staff, and students. We need more campus officials, faculty, staff, and students to stand up. We can follow the example of Harvard University, which is suing the Trump administration. Harvard President Alan M. Garber has said the university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. 'No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,' he wrote. On the heels of Harvard's pushback, the American Association of Colleges and Universities released a statement signed by nearly 250 higher education presidents to speak out 'against the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' CSU Long Beach is one of the signatories. And in the K-12 level, the California Department of Education announced it will defy the Trump order to eliminate DEI in the state's 1,000 school districts, a system with more than 5.8 million students, of which 56% are Latino. 'There is nothing in state or federal law ... that outlaws the broad concepts of 'diversity,' 'equity,' or 'inclusion,'' wrote Chief Deputy Superintendent David Schapira in the letter to school districts, county education offices, and charter schools. We should not tolerate the attacks on DEI, and we must protect our campuses and communities from ICE. We are already seeing cases of wrongful deportations, random cancellations of international student visas, and egregious detentions of U.S. citizens. I'm reminded of the famous 1946 poem, 'First they came…' by German theologian and Lutheran pastor Martin Niemöller. Do not wait until it's you. Read the original article on MassLive.

Federal panel rules in favor of state in Arkansas congressional redistricting lawsuit
Federal panel rules in favor of state in Arkansas congressional redistricting lawsuit

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal panel rules in favor of state in Arkansas congressional redistricting lawsuit

(Getty Images) A three-judge federal court panel on Friday dismissed with prejudice a case challenging Arkansas' congressional district map. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas by a group of voters and the Christian Ministerial Alliance. It claimed boundaries for Arkansas' 2nd Congressional District were racially gerrymandered and diluted the votes of Black Arkansans. Congressional and state legislative districts are redrawn after the U.S. Census each decade in a process known as redistricting. The goal is to create districts that contain roughly the same population. The Ministerial Alliance's lawsuit was one of four filed to challenge Arkansas' 2021 redistricting process and the only one that hadn't been dismissed. On Friday, U.S. Circuit Judge David Stras, U.S. District Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. and U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. granted the state's motion for summary judgment, saying there was not enough evidence to support the plaintiffs' racial discrimination claims. 'Multiple Arkansas citizens challenge how the General Assembly redrew the state's congressional district lines,' Friday's order states. 'Although their allegations were plausible enough to survive a motion to dismiss [Docs. 35, 42], the evidence does not back up their claims of racial discrimination. For that reason, we grant summary judgment to Secretary of State John Thurston.' Thurston, who was secretary of state when the lawsuit was filed in 2023, was elected state treasurer in 2024 during a special election. The governor appointed Cole Jester to succeed Thurston. Previously, the entirety of Pulaski County was included in Arkansas' Second Congressional District, which is represented by Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill. During the 2021 redistricting process, Pulaski County was split between three congressional districts. Plaintiffs alleged the General Assembly considered racial data when redrawing district lines and unconstitutionally 'cracked' the Black voting bloc in southeast Pulaski County. The state's attorneys submitted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the state last October. According to Friday's order, the original complaint alleged two constitutional claims — one for racial gerrymandering under the Fourteenth Amendment and one for vote dilution under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The federal panel said race needed to be 'the predominant factor' motivating the General Assembly's decision and that awareness or acceptance of a 'racially disparate impact is not enough.' Three-judge panel hears arguments but doesn't rule in Arkansas redistricting lawsuit Creating 'an alternative map' is one way to prove redrawn boundaries were racially motivated, the panel said. However, that only works if the alternative map still accomplishes the Legislature's partisan goals. 'If it does not, then it just highlights how the pursuit of a nonracial aim — like retention, partisanship, or geography — could have led to an unintended racial disparity,' the panel wrote. 'All three of the plaintiffs' alternatives fall short in exactly this way.' Citing a U.S. Supreme Court reversal of a decision by a three-judge panel that found South Carolina had discriminated against Black voters in a 2023 redistricting lawsuit, Stras and his counterparts noted the high court emphasized that the courts must 'start with the presumption that the legislature acted in good faith.' 'Absent direct evidence of racial discrimination and with only weak circumstantial evidence supporting the plaintiffs' case, the presumption of legislative good faith tips the balance,' Stras wrote. That coupled with the fact that no alternative map achieves the General Assembly's goals with 'significantly greater racial balance,' meant the judges could not reasonably find that the plaintiffs had proved enough for their claim of racial gerrymandering to survive summary judgment, according to the ruling. The primary obstacle of the presumption of good faith holds true for the plaintiffs' vote-dilution claim, according to Friday's order. While the vote-dilution claim requires race to be a 'motivating factor' instead of the predominant one, the panel argued 'the plaintiffs do not have enough evidence to get there.' 'Most of what the plaintiffs offer are the materials we have already discussed: maps, statistics, and legislative history, none of which are enough to infer a racial motivation,' the panel wrote. The federal judges acknowledged as evidence a report from a university doctoral candidate that describes Arkansas' 'long history' with racism and resistance to Black voters, but wrote that much of that predates the passage of the 1964 Voting Rights Act. 'Even if he identifies a few scattered examples since then, none are 'reasonably contemporaneous with the challenged decision,' giving us little insight into what the General Assembly may have been thinking four years ago,' the panel wrote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans
Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans

After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a 'reverse discrimination' claim, Black Americans are left wondering how this new precedent will impact them. The court's decision came down on Thursday (June 5), adding to the growing list of the judges' past controversial decisions on civil and social liberties. A woman named Marlean Ames is suing her employer in Ohio after she alleged she was passed up on a promotion because she is a straight woman, according to BBC. Instead, her gay boss hired another gay employee for the job, which Ames claims was a clear act of gender discrimination. Several lower level courts didn't agree with her. That's when she took things to the highest court in the land, who ultimately ruled with an unanimous vote. The Root spoke to Marc Brown, founding attorney at Marc Brown law Firm, who said 'the floodgates have been let open' for discrimination cases of all kinds. In a country where anti-DEI legislation and other attacks to Black history and education has become the norm, the court's ruling is a 'rolling back of some protections that the Supreme Court previously made available for minorities– people that have been subjected to centuries of discrimination,' Brown said. 'But it doesn't mean that she [Ames] wins.' The Supreme Court ruled on the principle of the Constitution, not Ames' case itself. She still must present her case in a lower level court. Regardless, it's not lost on Brown the future implications of such a decision. 'There will likely be a heavy increase of these reverse discrimination lawsuits,' Brown continued. For him, this ruling emphasizes a trend started by majority groups. 'I've noticed over the years, whenever the majority feels threatened or upset, new terms are created.' The term 'reverse discrimination' was in direct retaliation to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. 'When you look at the historical systemic inequalities over the years or centuries, you know there is no way that minorities are in the power to really discriminate against these individuals,' Brown added. For anyone paying attention to the conservative-led Supreme Court recent history, Ames decision is one of the many giving legs to right-wing agendas. Whether it's reversing Roe v. Wade or Affirmative action in schools back in 2023, the Justices — three of whom were hand picked by President Donald Trump — have made their position clear. But according to Stacey Marques, ESQ, Black Americans shouldn't panic. 'What I tell my sons is the same thing I tell myself: Make sure you bring your A-game to everything that you have the opportunity to work on,' she said. The mother of two also knows the challenges of being Black in America, and she warned Black folks to get prepared. 'With this anti-DEI climate that we're in — also this climate that is encouraging reverse discrimination lawsuits, it's gonna require the younger generation to adopt the ideals as well as the work ethic of the older generation in order to not only survive but to excel,' she added. Marques has been practicing for 25 years, and she said the ruling only adds more to the already full plates of lawyers nationwide. 'Lawyers are so busy now because there's so many things happening,' she said referring to Trump's blitz of pending lawsuits and court decisions. 'We are in a constitutional crisis.' continued to 11 years 'Anytime the Supreme Court speaks, everyone listens.' '

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store