Public backs bold policies to improve health, survey finds
The majority of the public support bold policies to improve health in the UK, such as banning smoking in outdoor spaces, taxing manufacturers of foods high in sugar or salt and banning adverts for alcohol at sporting events, according to a new poll.
Experts said current policies targeting junk food marketing for children are 'inadequate', while there has been 'alarmingly' little movement on comprehensive alcohol policies.
They called for 'bold action' from the Government, or warned it 'risks undermining its objectives for improving health, economic growth, and inequality reduction'.
The Health Foundation survey, conducted by Ipsos, included responses from 2,198 adults.
The policy with the most support was the extension of the smoking ban, which the Government is considering.
Some 73% said they would back the ban in spaces like playgrounds, outside schools and outside hospitals.
And while the Tobacco and Vapes Bill did not include a ban on smoking in the likes of beer gardens, some 49% of the public said they would back this policy compared to a third who said they would oppose it.
Elsewhere, 62% of the public support a proposed tax on producers of food high in sugar and salt, with revenue used to fund fresh fruit and vegetables for low-income families.
The Government has already announced a ban on junk food adverts before 9pm in a bid to tackle childhood obesity, which will come into force in October.
On alcohol, almost half of people in England (46%) would back the introduction of a minimum unit price for alcohol compared to almost a third (30%) who would oppose the measure.
Minimum unit pricing was implemented in Scotland in 2018 and in Wales in 2020, where the minimum price for a unit of alcohol is now 65p and 50p respectively.
However, there is no policy in place in England and Northern Ireland.
Meanwhile, 48% of people would back a ban on alcohol adverts at sporting events compared to 23% who would oppose it.
It comes after think tank the Nuffield Trust warned the 2012 national alcohol strategy 'no longer reflects the reality of problematic drinking in England'.
Its analysts found there was a record 8,274 deaths attributed to conditions including alcoholic liver disease and accidental poisoning in 2023, representing a rise between 2006 and 2023.
A further 14,370 deaths in 2023 were from conditions caused partially by alcohol, while around one in 20 adults are deemed to be heavy drinkers – men who drink more than 50 units a week and women who drink more than 35 units.
Adam Briggs, senior policy fellow at the Health Foundation, said: 'The public supports bolder policy approaches to tackle alcohol, tobacco and unhealthy food and without this, the Government risks undermining its objectives for improving health, economic growth, and inequality reduction.
'Alcohol-related deaths in England have surged for five consecutive years, exceeding pre-pandemic levels by 40%.
'Alarmingly, there has been little movement on comprehensive alcohol policies under both Conservative and Labour governments.
'Current policies targeting junk food marketing and high-caffeine drinks for children are also inadequate.
'Prevention is foundational to fostering a healthy and thriving UK, so now is the time for bold action.'
Mr Briggs also said some of the results show more support for action among people living in less deprived area of the UK.
'While support still outweighs opposition in more deprived areas, it shows that alongside implementing bolder policies, the Government must engage with a wide range of communities to address both real and perceived harms,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
No guarantee waiting lists will fall to hit targets, health leaders say
There is no guarantee NHS waiting times targets can be met, despite a Government boost in funding for the health service, leaders have said. While the 3% increase in real terms for the health service per year has been welcomed, many health leaders are concerned about how they will bring down waiting lists, about possible future industrial action by NHS staff, and which services may need to be cut or redesigned. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, said the NHS funding boost in the spending review was welcome, 'given the precarious state of public finances and will help the NHS to cope with rising demand from an ageing population, often with multiple or more complex physical and mental health conditions'. But he warned that 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So on its own this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Mr Taylor said NHS leaders will need continued backing from the Government to redesign services and balance budgets. 'That means getting political backing when some services are redesigned or cut, including moving hospital services into the community and closer to people's homes as part of the Government's three shifts,' he said. He added that the 'flat settlement' from the Chancellor 'continues to leave a major shortfall in capital funding, and it also fails to lift the ban on private investment that is required to boost NHS capital funding'. There is currently an almost £14 billion maintenance backlog bill to repair NHS hospitals and buildings. Mr Taylor said those issues needed to be addressed in the upcoming national infrastructure strategy and 10-year plan for the health service. Government documents accompanying the spending review show that, on average, from 2023-24 to 2028-29, the NHS in England will receive 3% real terms growth in day-to-day spending, equivalent to a £29 billion real terms increase in annual budgets. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) budget will increase by £2.3 billion in real terms by 2029-30, compared with 2023-24, 'representing a more than 20% real terms increase by the end of the spending review period', the documents said. Overall, the figures suggest DHSC spending will rise 2.8%, though this is less than the average 3.6% in recent years. Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said the 2.8% average increase in DHSC spending – or 3% for day-to-day NHS spending – 'will have been hard-fought for in the spending round negotiations, despite still being lower than the historical average the NHS has received over recent years'. She added: 'We know there are already trade-offs happening in the NHS due to tight finances. 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have 'an NHS there when they need it'. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions – faster ambulance times, more GP appointments and adequate mental health services and more – can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.' However, she said the upcoming 10-year plan for the NHS could lead to better, more efficient services. While capital budgets are increasing, 'they do so by nowhere near enough to rebuild or replace the tired facilities and equipment large parts of the NHS currently relies on, nor to develop the new hospitals and community facilities needed to deliver a modernised health service', she added. According to spending review documents, the Government expects the NHS to deliver 2% productivity growth each year, 'unlocking £17 billion savings over three years' to reinvest back into the NHS to improve patient care, it said. The Government will also invest up to £10 billion in NHS technology and digital transformation by 2028‑29, it said. NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey, speaking at the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester, said the NHS has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. He added: 'But we all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, all things we want to do, the day-to-day cost pressures we're trying to get on top of, etc. 'We're always going to be in a world where we want more money, but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand that we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount of money by any standards.' When it comes to waiting times, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to slash them, saying the NHS will carry out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks by March 2029. However, in March this year, the NHS waiting list for hospital treatment in England rose for the first time in seven months. The data showed an estimated 7.42 million planned treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of March, relating to 6.25 million patients, up slightly from 7.40 million treatments and 6.24 million patients at the end of February. Officials have said that rise was not unusual given the time of year, but only time will tell whether the overall waiting list can continue to drop enough to hit the Prime Minister's target. Most NHS trusts describe the financial position of their organisations as challenging, with recent pressures including the cost of dealing with strike action by staff and more longstanding issues such as inflation, rising energy and fuel costs. NHS England has already budgeted a 2.8% increase in pay for staff in 2025/26, but many leaders the King's Fund spoke to were worried about funding pay rises above this amount. After the spending review, Royal College of Nursing (RCN) general secretary, Professor Nicola Ranger, said staff will now decide whether the 3.6% pay rise offered by the Government is enough. She added: 'Against a backdrop of other cuts, nursing staff will see the NHS being protected but not transformed by today's spending plans. 'When the Government lays out its vision for the future of the NHS and its workforce, it must say how it intends to reverse collapsing student recruitment, boost retention and deliver urgent, structural reform to nursing pay.' Nuffield Trust senior policy Analyst Sally Gainsbury said: 'Compared to the settlements for other departments – from policing to education – the NHS deal looks generous. 'But seen in the context of all the promises made by the Government to the British people – to drive down waiting lists, shift care closer to home, rapidly improve tech – and the commitments to meet staff pay demands and rising costs of new drugs, today's settlement soon melts away. 'With capital funding staying flat in real terms for the rest of the spending review period, it will be difficult for the NHS to invest in the technology and facility upgrades it needs to meet the Government's ambitious productivity targets.'
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
NHS chief gives verdict on funding settlement outlined in spending review
New NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey insists the NHS has done "really well" in the spending review - despite a lower rate of increase than under the Tories in 2023 The new boss of the NHS has said the health service has done 'really well' out of the spending review - despite getting a worse funding settlement than under the Tories. Sir Jim Mackey gave his first major speech at the annual NHS Confed Expo conference in Manchester moments before Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed the health service will get a major funding squeeze. The Chancellor's spending review will mean a 3% annual budget rise, which is lower than the average 3.6% increases the NHS has received since its founding. It is also lower than the 3.3% rise seen in 2023 under the previous Conservative governments. But Sir Jim told health leaders: "The NHS has done really well relative to other parts of the public service but we all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, all things we want to do, the day-to-day cost pressures we're trying to get on top of, etc. "We're always going to be in a world where we want more money, but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand that we've got what the country can afford to give us. We really need to get better value for that money - it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount of money by any standards. "It's a huge amount - (the) Government has done us a really good turn compared to other parts of the public service. But it's not going to allow us all to just take our feet off the pedal and just run loose and do what we want to do in this next period, we have still got an awful lot of difficult things to do." Sir Jim succeeded previous chief executive Amanda Pritchard as the Government took direct control of NHS England, which had previously been operationally independent. Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her Spending Review, setting out budgets for government departments. She said she has made "tough decisions" but is rejecting "austerity". Healthcare spending generally increases to keep pace with a growing and aging population. The UK spends less on healthcare than most other European countries. The 3% rise will add up to about £30 billion a year extra by the end of the parliament. It comes as the NHS is likely to have to find the cash for above-inflation pay rises for staff and a large chunk of a £1 billion-a-year rise in drug prices ministers have promised to the pharmaceutical industry. Sir Jim acknowledged it will be a struggle for the NHS to improve 'delayed discharges' where hospitals are full of frail but otherwise well people because there is no social care places for them. He added: "Social care in local authorities won't do brilliantly in the spending review… so we will be left with what we can do as much as we can within our gift." It comes as internal Government modelling suggests that without more NHS funding Sir Keir Starmer 's government will miss a key pledge to treat 92% of patients requiring routine care within 18 weeks. The NHS constitutional standard has not been met for a decade. Sally Gainsbury, of the Nuffield Trust think tank, told the Times that "an extra 2.8 per cent in real terms will not fully cover the new demands the health service can expect each year, let alone eliminate previous problems like the waiting list backlog".
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Why nurses and midwives dey strike for Ghana
Tears full di eyes of 40-year-old pregnant Rosemary Adjei for di Adabraka polyclinic afta im find say nurses and midwives for di kontri dey strike. Di seven-month-old pregnant mama say im dey feel plenty pain for back and im belle na so she go di facility but im dey disappointed. "I bin dey come antenatal, dis time my body all don dey pain me wey I try waka come di hospital but nobody dey hia; di nurses all dey strike," Rosemary tok. Afta many hours, im carry her pain go back to her house. Many oda patients including children bin dey stranded for many public hospitals and clinics as di strike by di nurses and midwives continue to dey bite hard. For some hospitals, doctors don dey work overtime to cover for nurses. Di strike begin on 2 June, wia di nurses withdraw some of dia services but dem now totally withdraw on 9 June as dem tok say goment neva meet dia demands. Why di nurses and midwives dey strike? At least 128,000 nurses and midwives across di kontri bin declare dis nationwide strike. Di health workers dey protest failure of goment to implement dia conditions of service wey dem sign for May 2024. According to dem, afta dem sign dis document for di previous goment, dem neva implement am till now. Dis na some of di tins inside di conditions of service document - Book & research allowance (determined by goment) - Uniform allowance Ghc 1,000 ($99) - Fuel allowance 180 litres - Non-basic allowance (5% of monthly basic salary top-up) - On-call facilitation allowance (overtime) - Rural incentive allowance - 13th month salary - Licence renewal allowance Why di previous goment no implement di agreement Di nursing and midwifery group bin get five unions inside di group, wia di Ghana registered nurses and midwives association (GRNMA) get di most members ; 96,000. Na so some of di pipo for di group tok say dem no dey involved for di negotiation of di conditions of service, wey dem carry di mata go court for 2024. Di GRNMA tok say, "we no dey aware about dia existence during di negotiation, na so we reach di agreement wit goment. But dem carry di mata go court," GRNMA tok tok pesin Philemon Gyapong explain to BBC. Im add say, "afta di court listen to di mata, dem tok say make all di unions for di association sidon to address di mata through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), na so we do am." Di GRNMA tok say since dem solve di mata wit di oda unions inside dia group, di govment get to implement di agreement but di former govment no do am, na so dem expect say di current goment go take am up. "We bin negotiate dis conditions wit di ministry of health, di fair wages and salaries commission and odas, so afta di court mata, di govment need go ahead and implement di agreement wey suppose last for two years bifor anoda negotiation," deputy PRO Philemon Gyapong explain to BBC. How govment don respond? Di health minister Kwabena Mintah Akandoh tok say di nurses and midwives suppose sit for table make dem tok di mata, instead of going on strike. Im explain say di govment already bin prepare budget for dis year wia dem allocate moni already, so dem no fit create space for di demands of di nurses and midwives. "Govment dey ready to engage wit di nurses about how to implement di conditions of service for di nurses and midwives wey no go dislocate di national budget," oga Mintah Akandoh tok. Im add say, "if we implement dis conditions of service immediately, e go throw di kontri budget out of gear, wia we neva wan do unbudgeted expenditure wey go create wahala for di govment." "Govment dey ready to engage to find wetin go work for both parties for dis mata." Di finance ministry tok say e go cost di govment Ghc 2bn ($200m) to implement all di conditions of service for di ova 138,000 nurses and midwives for di kontri; but dat kind moni no dey. But di nurses bin dey insist say goment fit to implement am if dem dey take health workers serious. Di fair wages and salaries commission don go court to file injunction against di strike as dem tok say di nurses no use di right channel bifore dem go strike. Di commission tok say as far as dem dey concerned, dis strike wey di nurses and midwives don dey on, na illegal. Di health ministry bin publish list of hospitals and health facilities wia few nurses wey decide say dem no go join dia mother association for dis strike, dey work. Di sector minister tok say make sick pipo go dis hospitals for healthcare for di mean time as dem dey continue to dey engage di nurses. Di minister also tok say "govment dey appeal to retired nurses and midwives to volunteer to work for di public hospitals for di period wey dis strike dey continue." "We appreciate nurses wey decide to continue to work despite di strike sake of dia feeling for human being and dia compassion at dis time."
