
‘The Materialists' is a must-see romantic comedy that asks the impossible: choosing between Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans
One of the best things about writer-director Celine Song's 2023 debut feature 'Past Lives' is the way it sneaks up on the viewer with its cumulative emotional resonance.
I wasn't sure if Song could replicate that response with her second film, the romantic comedy 'Materialists,' but watching the movie gave me the same mix of melancholy and hopefulness that I took away from 'Past Lives.'
'Materialists' (in theaters June 13) may be glossier and more comedic than 'Past Lives,' but it has just as much power to move audiences who are open to its perspective on love.
That perspective seems a bit cynical at first, but just as the jaded characters start to embrace the prospect of genuine romance, the movie reveals the pure heart underneath its snarky, aloof exterior.
New York City matchmaker Lucy (Dakota Johnson) is full of snarky observations about the ruthless world of dating, even as she sells her clients on the dream of meeting and falling in love with their perfect match. She tells a co-worker that she plans to die alone, and she clearly doesn't need someone to make her life complete.
That, of course, is exactly when most rom-com characters meet The One.
Lucy meets two competing prospects for The One at the wedding of one of her clients. The groom's brother, Harry (Pedro Pascal), is a suave, wealthy hedge fund manager who isn't interested in engaging the same services that helped his sibling find a match.
Just as Lucy is chatting Harry up and giving him her sales pitch, she spots her ex-boyfriend John (Chris Evans) working as a cater-waiter, still struggling to make ends meet while he pursues his dream of being a theater actor.
From those two chance encounters, Lucy sees two divergent options for her future. She's painfully aware of the compatibility metrics that produce the most fruitful matches, and she tells Harry that he could do much better, even as he pursues her relentlessly and insists he isn't interested in anyone else.
Meanwhile, she stays in touch with John even though — as an uncomfortably relatable flashback reveals — she already knows that it won't work out between them.
In both cases, the conflict often comes down to money, and Song handles that touchy subject with grace and honesty.
Romantic movies often pretend that financial challenges don't matter, but Lucy is upfront with both Harry and John about how their respective financial situations affect her perceptions of them. In her business, income is just as important as any other factor, and building a long-term relationship means forging a life in which both partners are able to contribute.
The first half of 'Materialists' is full of sly humor about this often unspoken but crucial aspect of finding a partner, and Song channels the witty, literary voice of filmmaker Whit Stillman, an expert chronicler of upper-class neuroses in movies like 'Metropolitan' and 'The Last Days of Disco.'
At the same time, Lucy never comes across as unsympathetic, even with her somewhat mercenary tendencies, thanks to Johnson's sparkling, playful performance.
Harry and John may not be professional matchmakers, but they both understand what's at stake as well. Harry doesn't flaunt his wealth, but he doesn't hide it, either, and he knows it's an asset for him with any woman he pursues. But he also truly respects and cares about Lucy, and Pascal exudes enough warmth and tenderness to make up for his character's reprehensible profession.
So many romantic comedies set up obvious rooting interests, with one blatantly superior match who has to wait around for the protagonist to realize what the audience already knows. Song doesn't stack the deck that way, and both Harry and John are equally appealing both for Lucy and for the viewers, until the moment when she realizes what the right choice will be.
There are heavy themes in 'Materialists,' especially in the second half of the movie after Lucy faces devastating news about one of her clients. Even when the story gets more serious, though, Song never loses the aspirational tone. This is a gorgeous movie, shot on luminous 35mm film, recalling smart, swoony romances like Woody Allen's 'Annie Hall' and Richard Linklater's 'Before' trilogy.
Song effortlessly maneuvers Lucy into believing in true love again, and she works the same magic on the audience.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Not Invited to King Charles' Birthday Parade amid Harry's Claim Dad ‘Won't Speak' to Him
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry were not invited to King Charles' birthday parade for the third year in a row The Duke and Duchess of Sussex last attended Trooping the Colour in 2022 — but were kept out of the public spotlight Harry recently said Charles 'won't speak' to him amid their ongoing rift and legal battles over securityFor the third year in a row, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have not been invited to Trooping the Colour — King Charles' official birthday celebration and one of the royal family's most high-profile annual events — set to take place this Saturday, June 14. The decision continues a pattern set after Charles became monarch in 2022. The last time Harry and Meghan attended Trooping was during Queen Elizabeth's Platinum Jubilee in June 2022 — where they were noticeably kept out of the public spotlight, watching the parade from a separate room alongside other non-working royals and not joining the traditional balcony appearance. Their ongoing absence comes as the family rift deepens. The Duke of Sussex, 40, recently lost a legal bid to reinstate his state-funded security in the U.K. and admitted in a BBC interview last month that he cannot envision bringing his wife and their two children — Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4 — back to Britain under the current circumstances. 'I can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the U.K. at this point,' he said. The lack of an invitation to Trooping follows a series of strained moments between father and son — including Harry's statement that King Charles is not currently speaking to him. Despite the silence, Harry has continued to express hope for a reunion. "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore," he told the BBC. "Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has," he continued. "He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile." Meghan, 42, had been scheduled to attend a museum gala in Los Angeles on the same day as Trooping, before the event was canceled earlier this week amid ongoing protests in the city. PEOPLE confirmed that the King, 76, will travel by carriage at Trooping the Colour for the second year in a row (instead of riding on horseback) as his treatment for cancer continues. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex joined the Trooping the Colour celebrations twice as a couple following their 2018 wedding, riding in the royal carriage procession and making balcony appearances at Buckingham Palace in both 2018 and 2019. Like most large-scale events, Trooping was significantly scaled down in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID pandemic. The tradition was brought back in 2022, but the royal event is one that Harry and Meghan's children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet have never attended. Prince Archie, 6, was just a few weeks old when his parents went to Trooping in June 2019. Meanwhile, his sister Princess Lilibet, 4, was born in California in June 2021 after Harry and Meghan stepped back from royal duties. Both Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet traveled with their parents to the U.K. in June 2022 for the Platinum Jubilee celebrations commemorating Queen Elizabeth's record 70-year reign. The Queen likely met Lilibet, who was named after the monarch's childhood nickname, during that trip, which doubled as Harry and Meghan's only trip to the U.K. with their kids after stepping back from their royal roles. It's understood that a sticking point in the rift between Harry and King Charles is the issue of automatic state-funded security while in the U.K. Prince Harry maintains that this essential protection was unfairly stripped when he and his wife stepped back in 2020, and a judge dismissed his latest legal appeal to restore this security on May 2. Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! "The things that they're going to miss is, well, everything. I love my country. I always have done. Despite what some people in that country have done," Harry told the BBC. "I miss the U.K., I miss parts of the U.K., of course I do," he continued. "I think that it's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland." As the distance between the Duke and his father the goes on, royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith tells PEOPLE in an exclusive cover story, "The underlying issue is trust." Read the original article on People


Geek Girl Authority
an hour ago
- Geek Girl Authority
Materialists Archives
Categories Select Category Games GGA Columns Movies Stuff We Like The Daily Bugle TV & Streaming Is Materialists the bundle of joyous "movie love" we're all looking for right now? Or should this one just give back the ring? Read on for our review.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry And Meghan Snubbed From The Trooping The Colour Again As Royal Rift Deepens
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were not invited to the 2025 Trooping the Colour, marking their third consecutive exclusion from the royal event. Despite Harry's recent call for reconciliation, insiders say the rift with the royal family is deepening. King Charles reportedly remains distant due to trust issues, and Prince William is firmly against mending ties. Experts highlight that no palace aides are encouraging reconciliation, and the royals no longer trust Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with private conversations. According to People Magazine, Harry and Meghan have not been invited to this year's Trooping the Colour, the annual military parade held to celebrate King Charles' official birthday, set to take place on Saturday, June 14. This marks the third consecutive year the couple has been excluded from the event amid their ongoing estrangement from the royal family. The last time the pair attended the military parade was in 2022, during Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee. Even then, they weren't permitted on the main royal balcony and instead watched from a separate area reserved for non-working royals. Since Queen Elizabeth's passing and Charles's rise to the throne later that year, Harry and Meghan have been entirely left off the guest list for Trooping the Colour. Royal commentator Richard Eden emphasized the significance of their continued absence. He noted that 2023 was "the first year of his life that Harry hasn't been invited at all." Reflecting on how their status has evolved, Eden said: "With Harry and Meghan, we've always had a sort of 'will they, won't they' before every big royal occasion." "Well, it seems like the palace has tackled this this time by just not inviting them at all," Eden added. "So, you know, it's significant. Despite stepping back from royal duties and relocating to California in 2020, there had once been hope that Harry and Meghan would still be included in major royal traditions. Eden recalled that "When Harry and Meghan quit royal duties, I think officials were very keen to stress that they would still be invited to occasions such as Trooping the Colour." The US-based royals' ongoing absence, however, has now reflected a deeper rift that might never heal between the warring parties. "The fact they haven't been invited is very significant," he noted. News that Harry and Meghan were not invited to Trooping the Colour for the third consecutive year comes amid fresh tensions within the royal family, and just weeks after Harry publicly expressed a desire to reconcile with his father. In a May interview with the BBC, the Duke of Sussex opened up about his strained relationship with the royal family after losing his final bid for taxpayer-funded security in the UK. "There have been so many disagreements between me and some of my family," he said, adding that he had now "forgiven" them. He continued: "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore. Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile." Despite Harry's plea for peace, insiders suggest the damage may be beyond repair. According to royal expert Hilary Fordwich, there is reportedly "no turning back" for Harry and Charles after more than five years of fractured relations. "King Charles remains tender towards his son, but can't risk communication. Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences," Fordwich told Fox News. "The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry," she added. "Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." Fordwich emphasized that "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it." Fordwich's remarks align with recent reports from People Magazine, which also highlighted the king's hesitance to reconnect with his youngest son. In the report, Royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the publication: "The underlying issue is trust. The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders further revealed that Charles is not being advised by anyone within the palace to make amends, and William is firmly against extending any olive branch. As royal author Valentine Low pointed out: "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move.'"