South Africa denies being under Chinese pressure
International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has emphasised that the decision to ask Taiwan's Taipei Liaison Office, currently located in Pretoria, to relocate to Johannesburg or any other location of their choice — outside South Africa's political capital — is in keeping with the One-China Policy.
'The vast majority of countries follow this policy, including the United States,' Lamola said in a parliamentary response.
South Africa's senior diplomat was responding to a question posed by Economic Freedom Fighters' (EFFs] Member of Parliament Nqobile Mhlongo.
The EFF parliamentarian had asked Lamola: 'Considering that the government has set the end of March 2025 as the new deadline for Taiwan's diplomatic offices in Tshwane to relocate to another region or province, what steps has he taken to expedite the already protracted process, and by what exact date will the Taiwanese diplomatic offices relocate?'
In his response, Lamola emphasised that South Africa embraces the One-China Policy, which recognises Taiwan as an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China run from the capital Beijing.
He highlighted that only 12 countries across the world recognise Taiwan as being separate from mainland China. These are Belize, Guatemala, Haiti, the Holy See, the Marshall Islands, Paraguay, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Eswatini and Tuvalu.
'Those countries that maintain relations with Taiwan without recognising it as a separate entity from the People's Republic of China do so on the basis that the relationship is trade-related and not political. In our context, these trade relations are an important consideration,' said Lamola.
'Honourable Mhlongo's framing of the question, which refers to the 'Taiwanese diplomatic offices', indicates why the move from the country's political and diplomatic capital is necessary.'
Lamola said since the decision for the Taipei Liaison Office to move was made, Taiwanese authorities have postponed the move for various reasons, including budgetary concerns, and the discussions are ongoing.
'In the interim, we are making administrative adjustments to accurately reflect the status of Taiwanese representation,' he said.
Lamola highlighted that South Africa is 'engaging constructively' with Beijing regarding the One-China Policy.
'I would like to emphasize that we are engaging constructively with the People's Republic of China regarding matters related to South Africa's One-China Policy. It is important to clarify that the People's Republic of China is not exerting undue pressure on us; rather, our interactions are marked by mutual respect,' he said.
'We hope that all stakeholders interested in South Africa's decision will embrace this spirit of constructive diplomatic engagement.'
Last year, IOL reported that Chargé d'affaires of the Embassy of China in South Africa, Li Zhigang reiterated that the Taiwan question bears on China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and is 'a non-negotiable principle' embedded at the heart of China's core interests.
At the time, the topic of Taiwan had been thrust into international news headlines ahead of the auguration of Taiwanese president Lai Ching-te. All African nations, except for Eswatini, ascribe to the one-China policy.
A symposium was held in Pretoria by the Chinese embassy in South Africa, which was attended by ANC representatives, government officials, members of the academia, activists and media representatives.
On behalf of the Chinese government, Li said China will not compromise on the question of Taiwan.
'There is no room for compromise or concession. Seeking foreign support to gain independence is a dead-end. The scheme to use Taiwan to contain China is doomed to fail. Peaceful cross-Strait reunification under the one-China principle will bring huge opportunities for the economic and social development in the Taiwan region and tangible benefits to our compatriots there,' said Li.
He said the unification of China serves the interests of not only the Chinese nation and people, but also the international community and all people around the world.
Li said with a similar destiny in the past, South Africa 'deeply understands and firmly supports Chinese people's just cause of opposing the separatist activities of 'Taiwan independence' to achieve national reunification in China'.First published by IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
China hits back against US ‘coercion'
China has accused the US of breaching a recent trade agreement, saying Washington's 'harmful' restrictions and 'coercion' were not the right way to engage with Beijing. US President Donald Trump last week claimed that Beijing had 'totally violated' the May 12 agreement reached in Geneva but offered no details. The consensus suspended most new tariffs imposed since early April and aimed to stabilize relations between the world's two largest economies. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian rejected the accusation, telling a regular press briefing on Tuesday that China had been 'responsibly and faithfully implementing the consensus' despite Washington's 'false' claims. He said Beijing strongly opposed what he described as 'harmful extreme measures,' including the latest US chip export controls, a block on electronic design automation (EDA) sales, and a pledge to revoke Chinese students' visas. 'Let us stress once again that pressuring and coercion are not the right way to engage China,' the spokesman said, calling on the US to stop spreading disinformation. Last week, multiple outlets reported that the Trump administration had ordered US firms to halt shipments of advanced goods to China, including chip design software and specialty chemicals. Experts warned the decision would likely inflame tensions. As part of the Geneva agreement, the US had paused a 34% tariff hike introduced on April 2 for 90 days, at which point Beijing took reciprocal action. Both sides also pledged to roll back post- April 8 tariff increases while keeping a baseline 10% duty on mutual imports. Beijing also agreed to ease certain non-tariff barriers on US goods starting May 14. However, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said last week that China had not yet lifted some of those restrictions. Trade tensions escalated sharply on April 2 when Trump imposed sweeping new duties on imports from more than 90 countries, including China, citing trade imbalances. Beijing retaliated, which led to Trump hiking US tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, while Chinese duties on US goods reached 125%. The US extended tariff exemptions for 164 Chinese products through August 31, according to a notice by the US trade office published earlier this week. The list covers semiconductors, telecom equipment, aerospace items, and medical device components. Waivers for 14 types of solar panel gear remain in place. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would 'likely talk this week.' Lin said he had no information to share on the matter.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
China is building a power triangle to change the world
The final week of May marked a significant political development with the potential to reshape Asia's geopolitical landscape. Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, hosted the inaugural summit involving China, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). While signs of deepening engagement among these three actors had surfaced in preceding years, the establishment of a formal trilateral cooperation mechanism is a recent development. This event did not occur in a geopolitical vacuum. The region is increasingly exposed to intensifying rivalry among China, the US, and other global powers. In April, Chinese President Xi Jinping embarked on a Southeast Asian tour – visiting Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam – to consolidate Beijing's influence. Almost simultaneously, an envoy dispatched by US President Donald Trump toured Cambodia and Vietnam and met with representatives from all ASEAN member states in an effort to repair relations damaged by Trump's tariffs and to reaffirm the commitment to a 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific'. Meanwhile, the US president visited three Gulf states, making new deals and publicly denouncing the longstanding American policy of mentorship and interference in regional affairs. By the end of May, French President Emmanuel Macron also entered the scene, visiting Indonesia, Singapore, and Vietnam to remind Southeast Asian counterparts that the EU still exists and remains a potential alternative to both Beijing and Washington. It is no coincidence that the China-ASEAN-GCC summit was convened in Malaysia. As the current chair of ASEAN, Malaysia plays a pivotal role, and its prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, is a vocal proponent of regional integration and innovative partnerships. Ahead of the trilateral summit, ASEAN members gathered in Kuala Lumpur to chart their future course. On this occasion, the ten member states adopted ASEAN's first 20-year vision – ASEAN 2045 – articulating the ambition to position Southeast Asia as a global growth engine aligned with other dynamic actors. Among them, China and the GCC member states – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates – stand out prominently. Together, they represent a quarter of the world's population and contribute nearly the same proportion to global GDP. Their economic linkages are already well-established: China is the top trading partner for both ASEAN and the GCC. ASEAN has surpassed the EU as China's foremost economic partner, and Beijing imports over one-third of its crude oil from GCC states. The summit in Kuala Lumpur brought together the world's second- and fifth-largest economies – China and ASEAN – along with key suppliers of energy and raw materials. The leaders did not conceal their optimism. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim advanced a vision of intercultural dialogue between Confucian and Islamic civilizations, aligning with China's Global Civilization Initiative. Chinese Premier Li Qiang envisaged a 'big triangle' as a pillar of global security and prosperity, invoking the 'shared Asian values' of openness, cooperation, and integration in contrast to perceived Western norms. Notably, Beijing's official discourse increasingly emphasizes these 'Asian values'. This narrative underpins a renewed focus on neighboring states. In April, Xi convened a rare high-level conference on relations with the 'near abroad', characterizing it as essential to China's development, security, and diplomatic priorities. Among other regional actors, this recalibration may evoke concerns about a resurgence of a modern-day 'Pax Sinica'. However, Beijing refutes these interpretations, instead invoking alternative historical models such as the Silk Road, which emphasized connectivity, integration, and equality. The China-ASEAN-GCC summit was no exception: Beijing proposed extending the existing China-ASEAN Free Trade Area to include the GCC, a suggestion welcomed by Southeast Asian leaders. This could accelerate China's bid for trade liberalization and amplify the benefits of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership – the world's largest free trade zone, which includes all ASEAN nations. The summit's agenda focused heavily on economic issues, reflecting ASEAN's strategic orientation and the interests of Gulf states. Over the past decade, China has launched numerous projects with ASEAN members under the Belt and Road Initiative. Cooperation with the GCC is also expanding beyond traditional sectors such as raw materials to cutting-edge areas including artificial intelligence, the digital economy, and 5G technology. This economic emphasis is strategic, enabling stakeholders to bypass contentious political and security matters. And these contentious issues abound. While China maintains robust ties with both ASEAN and GCC members, bilateral frictions persist. Within ASEAN, territorial disputes and sovereignty concerns – particularly in the South China Sea – complicate trust-building. China's disputes with Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam are longstanding and strain regional relations. Perceptions of Chinese assertiveness also fuel anxieties over economic overdependence, potential 'debt traps', and Beijing's political leverage. These factors have prompted leaders such as Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to move closer to the US in recent years. The broader China-US rivalry remains a defining dynamic. Both ASEAN and GCC nations have historically strong ties to the US. The US remains ASEAN's largest export market and top foreign investor. GCC countries, long aligned with Washington, now face the challenge of navigating a careful balance between American and Chinese interests, particularly on sensitive technologies and security cooperation. Washington opposes the adoption of Chinese 5G and AI technologies by Saudi Arabia, and similar concerns have led to the suspension of military agreements between the US and UAE. Additionally, discussions about conducting oil trade in the yuan challenge the petrodollar system and attract Western scrutiny. These geopolitical complexities could undermine trilateral collaboration, exposing fault lines and structural vulnerabilities. While sectors such as trade, energy, infrastructure, and advanced technology offer natural areas of convergence, geopolitical competition and cultural divergence present serious obstacles. Moreover, there is a pronounced asymmetry among the actors: Smaller ASEAN economies may lack the institutional and financial capacity to engage fully in this trilateral format. Nonetheless, the China-ASEAN-GCC platform represents a novel configuration within an emerging multipolar world order. It reflects the accelerating momentum of South-South cooperation, which integrates multipolarity with multilateralism and economic globalization. Trump's tariff storm served as a wake-up call for many US partners across ASEAN and the Gulf, underscoring the imperative of diversifying partnerships and embracing pragmatic alternatives. Closer ties with Beijing do not necessarily indicate a wholesale shift from one hegemon to another. Rather, ASEAN and the GCC are striving to engage both China and the US where feasible. Yet, recent developments suggest that Washington's strategy of pressuring states to reduce ties with China in exchange for benefits is losing traction. The key questions now are whether ASEAN can effectively balance great power rivalries to become an autonomous pole in a multipolar world; whether regional actors can sustain this delicate equilibrium and avoid the formation of military blocs in Asia-Pacific and beyond; and whether the trilateral framework itself can endure amid mounting geopolitical tensions. These remain open-ended questions – and the answers will emerge only with time.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
US extends tariff exemptions on certain Chinese imports
The US has extended a tariff pause on certain Chinese imports through August 31. The move comes as negotiations between the globe's two largest economies on the reciprocal tariff hikes from April remain at an impasse. The extension concerns the 10% tariffs introduced under the investigation into China's policies on technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation launched during President Donald Trump's first term. Most of the tariffs were retained by Trump's successor, Joe Biden, along with exemptions on a range of products. These exemptions have undergone regular extensions, with the most recent expiring last month. According to a notice from the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) dated May 31, the extensions will remain in place for an additional three months. They apply to 164 Chinese goods, including semiconductor components, telecommunications hardware, aerospace items, and medical device parts. The notice also maintains exemptions for 14 categories of Chinese solar panel manufacturing equipment, such as wafer slicers and module laminators, granted in September 2024. No new items were added. The extension follows a tentative deal reached between the US and China in May following weeks of tit-for-tat tariff hikes. In April, Trump raised duties on Chinese goods to as high as 145%, citing what he called an unfair trade imbalance. Beijing responded with tariffs of up to 125%. Under the May deal, the countries agreed to suspend most new tariffs for 90 days pending further talks, while maintaining a baseline 10% rate on mutual imports on top of existing US duties. However, both sides have complained that the talks have since faltered. Washington has claimed that China has not delivered on promises to roll back export controls on key industrial products, such as rare-earth minerals and magnets, which Beijing introduced in response to US tariff hikes. On Friday, Trump accused China of 'totally violating' the May agreement. Beijing pushed back on Monday, accusing Washington itself of breaching the terms of the deal. China's Ministry of Commerce cited several US measures it claims violate the agreement, including warnings against Chinese telecom giant Huawei, restrictions on chip design software sales to Chinese firms, and the cancelation of student visas for Chinese nationals.
