ORC's ECO Fund Almost 3X Oversubscribed Again
Press Release – Otago Regional Council
Of a total $1.05 million available this year the 69 applicants were seeking a combined $2.87 million for environmental projects around Otago. The 28 shortlisted applications to Council seek a total of $1,059,178 just under the $1,059,500 available.
Applications for Otago Regional Council's annual ECO Fund is again almost three times oversubscribed – with 28 projects having been shortlisted from a total 69 applications.
Of a total $1.05 million available this year the 69 applicants were seeking a combined $2.87 million for environmental projects around Otago. The 28 shortlisted applications to Council seek a total of $1,059,178 – just under the $1,059,500 available.
ORC's Environmental Funding Lead, Elodie Letendre, says with $1,059,500 available and initial requests for $2,872,157, the fund was about 2.7 times oversubscribed; similar to the past two years.
'The oversubscription again this year reflects increasing community awareness, and that people are very keen to help protect the environment. Every year we wish we could fund more applicants,' she says.
The 28* shortlisted applications will go before a full Council meeting this week for consideration, on Wednesday 21 May.
'Again, there were a large number of very good applications this year,' Ms Letendre says.
The successful applicants will be announced following Wednesday's meeting. Further information is now online in the Agenda (10.1) for the Council meeting on the 21st.
'It's the communities who know what matters most locally and these funding programmes can empower them to turn great ideas into action,' she says.
The ECO Fund underpins the ORC's partnership with local communities throughout Otago to improve and enhance the environment, Ms Letendre says.
Included in the total 69 applications, were 28 from the wider Dunedin district area, 17 from around Queenstown Lakes, 10 from Central Otago, seven from the Clutha district and six from around Waitaki – North Otago.
March 2025 Funding Round
ECO Fund Category Number of applications Funds requested Funds available
Large-scale biodiversity projects 15 $1,665,388 $450,000
General (on-ground and education) 26 $715,886 $309,500
Sustained rabbit management 10 $263,959 $100,000
Biodiversity enhancement on protected private land 12 $156,524 $100,000
Critical source area management on private land 1 $15,000 $50,000
Weed removal and revegetation 5 $55,400 $50,000
TOTAL 69 $2,872,157 $1,059,500
*The 28 shortlisted applications could be reduced to 26.
On Wednesday Council will consider endorsing a budget reallocation from two of the ECO Fund funding categories to another ECO Fund funding category, which would allow funding of two additional projects in the General funding category.
The ECO Fund Assessment Panel met on 15 April 2025 to assess the applications, ultimately recommending 28 applications to Council for funding to a total value of $1,059,178. This includes the reallocation of $3502 and $35,000 from the categories of weed removal and revegetation (Biodiversity operations budget) and critical source area management on private land (Land and Water operations budget) respectively, to other specific ECO Fund funding categories due to undersubscription.
The process
ECO Fund applications closed on 31 March. A staff panel then reviewed eligibility and scored the applications before the Assessment Panel, made up of three ORC Councillors and one mana whenua representative, undertook their review and scoring. This panel will next recommend a list of shortlisted applicants at a full Council meeting, on Wednesday, 21 May, which Councillors will vote on.
Successful applicants will then be notified, and an announcement made, outlining each project's objectives and the amount of funding secured.
Last year there was $918,000 available, with a total 65 applicants initially seeking $2.7 million, with ultimately 33 successful applicants sharing a total $854,733.
To date, $2.58 million distributed since 2018.
Over the past 10 rounds of ECO Fund since mid-2018, a total $7.58 million was applied for, with a total 166 applicant (from 351) successful, with a total $2.58 million distributed into the community to achieve environmental outcomes.
On average, each of the nine rounds was oversubscribed by 300%.
Notes:
The successful applicants will be announced following Wednesday's meeting. Further information is now online in the Agenda (10.1) for the Council meeting on the 21st.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘Kremlin' councils need to go
Shaun Jones. PHOTO: ODT FILES Resource Minister Shane Jones has called the Otago Regional Council "the Kremlin of the South Island" after an application to expand the Macraes gold mine ran into trouble. Mr Jones, who is also the regional development minister, said the council was full of "KGB green zealots" and the episode showed why regional councils needed to be scrapped. The Otago council's assessment of environmental effects — which recommended Oceana-Gold's application to expand its mine be declined in full — was "ideological scribbling". Any other investor or miner in New Zealand would now quickly conclude they had to join the fast-track application process, "which will enable these economic saboteurs to be marginalised", he said. Council chairwoman Cr Gretchen Robertson said "name-calling" was unhelpful and the council's views were evidence-based, not ideological. OceanaGold has been granted more time to prepare for a hearing for its proposed expansion at Macraes after the regional council said its application should be declined and the Waitaki district and Dunedin city councils also raised concerns. The regional council's view of the company's Macraes Phase 4 (MP4) Project was troubling, Mr Jones said. "It confirms the worst of my prejudices, that the regional council in the South Island, that the Otago Regional Council is the Kremlin of the South Island," he said. "These are the reasons why people should be backing me to disestablish regional councils in New Zealand. "Their role is as catchment boards and looking at the discharge and the allocation of water, water take. "I am astounded at a time where the economy is still recovering from the Covid experience, a record number of New Zealanders are moving to Australia, and we have these Politburo apparatchiks destroying hundreds of jobs, undermining scores of millions of dollars in the local economy. "For a dead moth. "It's an ideological attempt to defeat mining. "It truly is unbelievable. "This is a part of New Zealand where no-one goes. "There are some easy mitigative steps that can be taken, but the Kremlin and its KGB green zealots completely and utterly show me why regional councils need to be disestablished." The "nationally vulnerable" moth Orocrambus sophistes, which lives in short tussock grasslands, was found at Golden Bar, one of three open pits about 55km north of Dunedin that OceanaGold has applied to expand. The regional council's recommending report highlighted the moth alongside the proposed expansion's actual and potential effects on surface water quality, aquatic ecology, natural inland and ephemeral wetlands, and lizard habitat. The effects would be "significantly adverse" and could not be avoided, minimised, remedied, offset or compensated for. It would also have significant adverse cumulative effects on cultural values, "and it is not yet known if these can be managed by conditions", the report said. Cr Robertson said the report was prepared by qualified professionals under the Resource Management Act. "It is a technical, evidence-based assessment — not a political statement. "Our staff are simply doing their jobs within the law as it stands. "Name-calling only undermines confidence in both central and local government." Regional councils across New Zealand welcomed "meaningful dialogue" on how to best deliver the services they were intended to — flood protection, biosecurity, civil defence, environmental management and public transport, she said. "Here in Otago, we remain focused on our responsibility to protect the environment while supporting sustainable economic development. "That balance is not ideological — it reflects the law, and we believe it reflects the values of our region: caring for both our environment and our livelihoods." A minute issued by independent commissioner Rob van Voorthuysen this week said the hearing for OceanaGold's proposed expansion had been postponed from next month to December at the mining company's request. The company's lawyers advised more time was required to consider the recommendations from the councils, he said. OceanaGold senior vice-president Alison Paul said adjourning the MP4 hearing, originally scheduled for next month, would give the company more time to prepare its evidence, including addressing all three councils' reports and recommendations.
Scoop
18 hours ago
- Scoop
Building Compliance Errors Now Costlier
Auckland Council's new penalties for overdue BWOFs highlight the growing risks of non-compliance. Argest's 39 years of expertise ensures buildings remain safe, legal, and penalty-free. The Risk Just Got Real If you own or manage commercial property in New Zealand, especially in Auckland, this isn't the time to take shortcuts with building compliance. Auckland Council has recently stepped up enforcement of Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) deadlines, hitting property owners with significantly higher fines when critical safety documentation is delayed or incomplete. According to a recent Commercial Realty article, these penalties are no longer just a warning — they're substantial and could seriously impact your investment. Why Building Compliance Is Getting Harder Staying compliant with New Zealand building regulations has never been more complicated. The compliance requirements for commercial buildings are constantly evolving. New safety standards. Increased Council scrutiny. Endless documentation. From fire safety checks to system certifications, keeping your property legally compliant isn't something you can treat as a once-a-year task. It's ongoing, complex, and requires up-to-date knowledge across multiple regulations, including the Building Act, the NZ Building Code, the NZ Fire and Emergency Regulations, and BWOF requirements. And when things go wrong — even by accident — you face the risk of fines, disruptions, or worse, putting occupant safety at risk. One Expert Partner. Total Peace of Mind. That's where Argest comes in. We've been providing building compliance management services across New Zealand for over 39 years. That's four decades of navigating Council processes, system inspections, documentation headaches, and everything in between — for clients ranging from single-site landlords to national facility managers. We don't just help you comply — we manage the entire process on your behalf. Our building compliance services include: Full BWOF management services, tailored to your building type Monthly and annual building inspections by IQP experts Fire safety checks, documentation, and specialist guidance Proactive alerts and reminders to prevent oversights End-to-end coordination with local Councils and third-party contractors No missed deadlines. No last-minute scrambles. No gaps in your compliance records. Independent, Unbiased Advice You Can Trust At Argest, independence is key. Unlike some providers, we're not tied to specific maintenance contractors or upselling additional services. This means our only priority is protecting your property — without bias. With our specialised team overseeing each part of your compliance plan, you'll receive smart, straightforward advice designed to cover your risk, reduce surprises, and keep you Council-ready. Whether you're navigating issues related to fire system maintenance, BWOF renewals, or Council submissions, we've got the knowledge and experience to keep everything aligned. The Real-World Benefits of Expert Compliance Support Working with Argest means more than just ticking boxes. Property owners, landlords, and asset managers come to us for confidence — to know that their buildings are legally compliant, well-documented, and ready for inspection. With Argest's expert support: You avoid devastating Council fines due to non-compliance with BWOF laws You reduce administrative burdens linked to inspections, reminders, and consent documentation You minimise legal and insurance risks by maintaining Council-verified safety systems You gain faster, smoother processes when dealing with tenancy changes or new developments You protect your people — tenants, staff, stakeholders — with a well-managed, safe building What Argest Stands For Christine Scammell, Argest's spokesperson, says it best:The risks and complexities of maintaining building compliance for building owners and facilities managers is growing. Specialist compliance management services, backed up by an experienced and qualified team, allows Argest to take the risk and stress out of meeting stringent compliance obligations and most importantly keep the occupants and users of buildings safe. We know what Councils look for. We know what safety systems work. And we know how to keep your building from becoming a compliance liability. It's Time to Take Control of Your Building Compliance Right now, New Zealand commercial property owners are under more pressure than ever to stay compliant. Fines are up. Scrutiny is growing. And safety regulations are only becoming tighter. The smartest thing you can do? Get ahead of it. If you're unsure where your property stands or worried about upcoming deadlines, talk to Argest. A compliance review will show you what's working, what's not, and exactly how we can help you avoid penalties and secure long-term peace of mind. Explore our full Building Compliance Management service or visit and connect with our team today. When compliance gets complex, we keep it simple. Let's make sure your building stays safe, legal, and compliant — every day of the year.
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Decisions Confirmed On Water Model And City Budget
Porirua City Council today officially adopted the Te Puna Kōrero committee recommendations made earlier this month around the city's budget and rates, and the preferred water services delivery model. The Annual Plan for the 2025/26 year was agreed, with an average rates increase of 6.39 per cent, significantly lower than previously budgeted. When preparing the draft Annual Plan, the starting point for this year's rates increases had hit 15 per cent, due to cost pressures. Council acknowledged this wasn't sustainable for households and businesses, so took a hard look at internal operations to find cost savings. This brought the new starting point for the average rates increase down to 6.75 per cent. After public consultation on five options to further lower the increase, Council agreed to discontinue the Chamber of Commerce grant and increase Council's building consent hourly rate. They voted against increasing the paid parking hourly rate, putting up Cannons Creek Pool entry fees, and discontinuing the Event Investment Programme. With these changes, the average rates increase for residential properties will be 6.39 per cent. For most properties, this equates to around $6 or $7 extra per week. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker said while nobody wanted to see rates go up, she was confident that the Council had done everything possible to keep increases as low as possible. "We know the community is struggling, which is we have done a deep dive internally and made significant cuts, that got us to a lower number than planned. We could have done further cuts, but we listened to your feedback and were guided by that." Water Services preferred delivery model Council also agreed to the committee recommendation of 5 June to jointly establish and co-own a new water organisation with Upper Hutt City Council, Hutt City Council, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council. Mayor Baker said this was another milestone decision for Porirua as we continue to progress towards implementing the Local Water Done Well Policy. "Public consultation undertaken in March and April strongly supported a jointly owned water organisation, and this decision today enables Porirua to continue working with our neighbouring Council towards the stand up of the water company in 2026." Council also agreed today to delegate Mayor Baker and Councillor Ross Leggett, as her alternate, (as the Council's representative on the Advisory Oversight Group) the power to make decisions on two establishment activities. This delegation will enable the next phases of work to continue during the new company's establishment phase. It will remain in place until later in the year when a new shareholders committee will be set up and will take over the governance level decision making.
