VA policy change: US doctors can question veterans whether they attended Trump's rallies before treatment?
Doctors and other medical professionals working for the
Department of Veterans Affairs
can now refuse to treat Democrats and
unmarried veterans
, reported The Guardian. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has long had strict anti-discrimination rules and a VA center cannot refuse to treat a veteran because he or she is Black, Jewish, a woman or Latino, for example.
But now an executive order from US President Donald Trump might allow some form of discrimination. The new rules also apply to psychologists, dentists and a host of other occupations and have already gone into effect in at least some
VA medical centers
, The Guardian report said. Experts have also pointed out that under new rules doctors could question veterans about whether they had attended
Trump rallies
or protests.
ALSO READ:
Did Barron, Ivanka Trump skip US President's 79th birthday celebrations and military parade?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Bangladesh: Online Degrees May Be Cheaper Than You Think
Online Degree
Search Now
Undo
Democrats, unmarried veterans to be denied treatment?
Previously, VA hospital bylaws barred medical staff from discriminating against patients 'on the basis of race, age, color, sex, religion, national origin, politics, marital status or disability in any employment matter". But now, in response to Trump's January executive order on 'gender ideology,' 'national origin,' 'politics,' and 'marital status' have been removed from the list.
This allows medical staff to deny treatment based on their personal politics, the report revealed. Language requiring healthcare professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics and marital status has been explicitly eliminated.
Live Events
Doctors and other medical professionals may be prohibited from working at VA hospitals due to their marital status, political party affiliation, or involvement in union activities, according to documents reviewed by The Guardian. The policy changes also extend to chiropractors, nurse practitioners, optometrists, podiatrists, licensed clinical social workers, and speech therapists.
ALSO READ:
American Express hints at a big upgrade to its Platinum Credit card in 'largest investment ever'
The updated policies allow doctors, psychologists, dentists and other healthcare workers at VA hospitals to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly protected by federal law. While veterans are still legally entitled to care, there is now no rule preventing staff from declining service to individuals based on their political beliefs or whether they are unmarried.
Changes already in place
Internal documents reviewed by the outlet show that the changes are already in effect at some VA centers. The VA's press secretary Peter Kasperowicz confirmed the revisions were made to align with Trump's executive order but did not clarify what federal law required such shifts.
"All eligible veterans will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they've earned under the law,' he said in a statement, calling the rule changes a mere 'formality.'
ALSO READ:
Why is Trump admin planning to expand travel ban to 36 more countries? Explained in 10 points
With more than 170 hospitals and more than 1,000 clinics, the VA is the largest integrated hospital system in the U.S. It employs 26,000 doctors and serves 9 million patients annually. The new rules apply to a wide range of professionals, including psychologists, dentists, optometrists, chiropractors, certified nurse practitioners, podiatrists, social workers, and speech therapists.
VA employees told The Guardian that the new rules were imposed without consulting the system's doctors, which would appear to violate the standards established by the nonprofit organization that accredits hospitals.
Medical ethics experts told The Guardian the new rules are 'extremely disturbing and unethical.'
'It seems on its face an effort to exert political control over the VA medical staff,' said Dr. Arthur Caplan, founding head of the division of medical ethics at New York University's Grossman School of Medicine. 'What we typically tell people in health care is: 'You keep your politics at home and take care of your patients."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gulf of Oman: Ships on fire near Strait of Hormuz amid Israel-Iran conflict? Photos emerge
As President Donald Trump returned from the G7 summit on Monday, several social media users cited photos to claim that three ships were on fire in the Gulf of Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz. Authorities are yet to confirm these claims. Hindustan Times cannot verify the authenticity of the photos at the moment.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
US Defeats Teachers Unions' Suit to Restore Columbia Funding
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration won dismissal of a lawsuit by two unions seeking to stop the withholding of $400 million in federal funds from Columbia University, saying the groups didn't have the legal right to challenge the decision. The American Association of University Professors and the American Federation of Teachers filed the lawsuit in response to US Education Secretary Linda McMahon's announcement that the administration was pulling grants and contracts from the school following a series of pro-Palestinian protests on campus. On Monday, US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil dismissed the case, which sought an order that would restore the funding, although she will allow the unions to refile the claims to address her concerns. Late in the day, the unions filed a notice that they will appeal. The decision comes amid a broader fight between the administration and institutions of higher learning. The Department of Education said earlier this month that it was seeking to revoke the accreditation of Columbia, claiming it no longer appeared to meet standards after concluding that the school is in violation of anti-discrimination laws, the latest effort by the Trump administration to punish schools for their handling of pro-Palestinian protests. The judge said that the groups lacked the legal right to bring the lawsuit, saying that while Columbia is the recipient of the grants, the school itself is not a participant in the case. The groups are 'inserting themselves into a quarrel' between the administration and Columbia, which 'Columbia wishes to resolve cooperatively,' the judge said. President Donald Trump and McMahon have previously suggested that negotiations with Columbia were headed in the right direction, especially compared to another Ivy-League institution, Harvard University, which has launched legal challenges against the administration's decision to cancel its federal funding and revoke its license to admit international students. 'This is a disappointing ruling, but by no means the end of the fight,' AAUP President Todd Wolfson, said in a statement. 'The Trump administration's threats and coercion at Columbia University are part of an authoritarian agenda that extends far beyond Columbia.' The case is American Association of University Professors v US Department of Justice, 25-cv-2429, US District Court, Southern District of New York. (Updates with notice of appeal in third paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Oil prices rise as Iran-Israel conflict fans supply worries
Oil prices surged over 2% following escalating Iran-Israel tensions, compounded by Donald Trump's call for evacuations from Tehran, raising concerns about potential oil supply disruptions. Brent crude and U.S. West Texas Intermediate both experienced significant gains. The conflict intensified with reports of explosions in Tehran and air raid sirens in Tel Aviv, heightening fears of regional instability. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Oil prices climbed over 2% on Tuesday as Iran-Israel tension intensified and U.S. President Donald Trump urged "everyone" to evacuate Tehran, increasing the prospect of deepening unrest in the region and disruption to oil Brent crude futures contract was up $1.17, or 1.6%, at $74.4 a barrel as at 0005 GMT and U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was up $1.34, or 1.87%, at $73.11 - both having risen more than 2% earlier in the trading contracts settled more than 1% lower on Monday on hope of easing geopolitical tension after media reports of Iran seeking an end to the conflict took a turn for the worse on its fifth day on Tuesday as Iranian media reported explosions and heavy air defence fire in the capital Tehran. Over in Israel, air raid sirens sounded in Tel Aviv in response to Iranian is the third-largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Hostilities could disrupt its supply of oil and thereby increase Monday, an Israeli strike hit Iran's state broadcaster and the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog also indicated extensive damage to Iran's biggest uranium enrichment said Iran should have signed a nuclear deal with the U.S. before Israeli strikes began and that he believes Iran now wants to reach an of U.S. sanctions as part of any deal would allow Iran to export more oil, weighing on global crude OPEC and allies including Russia - or OPEC+, which pumps about half of the world's oil - said on Monday it expected the global economy to remain resilient in the second half of the year. It also trimmed its forecast for growth in oil supply from the U.S. and other non-OPEC+ countries in 2026.
