logo
Can tracking your blood sugar make you fitter, stronger, and healthier?

Can tracking your blood sugar make you fitter, stronger, and healthier?

Yahoo04-03-2025

Almost 2.4 million Americans wear continuous glucose monitors, or CGMs, to track their blood sugar—and not all of them have diabetes. More and more healthy people are wearing them to understand how food, exercise, and other factors impact blood sugar levels—and, by extension, the rest of their bodies. But are they worth the cost, or just another trendy health gadget? Hone Health investigates.
A randomized controlled trial published recently in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that blood sugar responses to the same meal may vary in an individual. In theory, this means the devices may not be very effective at helping us figure out what foods cause our glucose levels to spike, at least not consistently.
However, some experts disagree and think continuous glucose monitors can offer useful information, even to non-diabetics. So who are they good for, and what good can come from using them?
You don't need to monitor your blood sugar unless you're at an increased risk of developing prediabetes or diabetes. Most non-diabetics do so because they want to.
"For patients who are trying to lose weight, seeing what's happening in their body in real-time based on the food that they're eating can be beneficial to make better choices in the future," says Ari Eckman, M.D., an endocrinologist and expert in diabetes and metabolism.
Spikes in blood sugar after eating (called postprandial spikes) are normal, but frequent, super-high spikes can cause oxidative stress and increase inflammation, which can lead to a host of health issues.
Glucose spikes can also weaken blood vessels, cause plaque in the arteries, and increase insulin resistance and the risk of developing diabetes.
Big drops in blood sugar following a spike can trigger hunger, overeating, and weight gain.
For people without diabetes, the goal is to gather data, identify patterns, and make changes to your diet, exercise, and other lifestyle factors.
Glucose levels can fluctuate daily and spike for various reasons, not just following a carb-heavy meal. Inadequate hydration, certain medications, stress (including healthy stress on the body from exercise), illness, and hormonal fluctuations can all affect glucose levels.
Reveals impact of diet on blood sugar
CGMs can show minute-by-minute what happens to your blood sugar after you eat or drink something.
"I'm pretty trim, but I've gone from 210 pounds to 197 pounds in a month," says Bob Arnot, M.D. The former chief medical correspondent for NBC News doesn't have diabetes but has worn a CGM for the past year. "The most fun is seeing how particular foods wreck your blood sugar readings. Mine was a turkey sandwich with stuffing. My glucose was through the stratosphere."
Shows how exercise modulates blood sugar
Aerobic exercise typically leads to a more gradual decline in blood sugar levels, as muscles pull glucose from the blood for fuel.
However, HIIT, heavy lifting, or other strenuous forms of exercise cause the body to release stress hormones, which stimulate glucose production. A CGM can show users when these spikes occur during and after workouts.
More research is needed into how CGMs can provide exercise-related data to wearers who don't have diabetes.
One study found that CGMs may help athletes monitor whether they're fueling adequately, how best they can optimize their carb intake, and how to prevent energy crashes during training and competitions.
Most CGMs require a prescription. However, the FDA recently cleared the first over-the-counter CGM for purchase without a prescription, the Dexcom Stelo.
If you get one, Eckman says you should expect to spend about $50 to $150 on sensors every two weeks. The Dexcom Stelo costs $99 for a one-time purchase of two sensors, $89 for a monthly subscription, and $252 for a three-month supply.
Eckman says some insurance plans may cover a CGM if you don't have diabetes, and notes that they're eligible for FSA/HSA coverage.
A CGM has a small sensor that's inserted underneath the skin and secured with adhesive to your arm or stomach. A transmitter sends the collected data to a smartphone app or another receiver.
People with diabetes set alarms to let you know when your blood sugar levels are too high or too low, but non-diabetics likely won't need to do that, Eckman says.
CGMs measure glucose in the interstitial fluid, which surrounds the cells in your body. CGMs show the direction and rate of change of your glucose levels and calculate the percentage of time they stay within a target range.
"A CGM is just a tool," Arnot says. "It won't magically fix your diet or health. It requires effort, self-reflection, and a willingness to make changes."
Sometimes, there can be such a thing as too much information—and the research isn't totally conclusive yet. Research into the efficacy and reliability of CGMs is largely centered on the diabetic population, not on people who don't have diabetes.
Data is difficult to interpret
As a doctor, Arnot understands what all of the numbers his CGM gathers mean. Experts recommend that non-diabetics who use a CGM work with their physician to better understand the information being collected and then figure out what to do with it.
Some research has found CGMs regularly find different blood sugar reactions to the same foods meal-to-meal, even within the same person. Plus, glucose levels can fluctuate from day to day for reasons other than food and exercise.
"Without proper guidance, people might misinterpret normal glucose fluctuations, leading to unnecessary anxiety or unhealthy dietary restrictions," Arnot says.
Do continuous glucose monitors support hypoglycemia?
Some research has indicated that, in theory, a CGM could help people with hypoglycemia detect when their levels drop too low. Still, manufacturer websites state clearly their sensors have not been designed for and should not be used by people at risk for or who have hypoglycemia.
This story was produced by Hone Health and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic
Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic

Associated Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. Kennedy's decision to 'retire' the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. ___ Associated Press reporter Amanda Seitz contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic
Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kennedy names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. Kennedy's decision to 'retire' the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. ___ Associated Press reporter Amanda Seitz contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits
Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's EPA announces major rollbacks to power plant pollution limits

US power plants will be allowed to pollute nearby communities and the wider world with more unhealthy air toxins and an unlimited amount of planet-heating gases under new regulatory rollbacks proposed by Donald Trump's administration, experts warned. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled a plan on Wednesday that would repeal a landmark climate rule that aims to mostly eliminate greenhouse gases from power plants by the 2030s and would, separately, weaken another regulation that restricts power plants' release of hazardous air pollutants such as mercury. 'We choose to both protect the environment and grow the economy,' said Lee Zeldin, administrator of the EPA, at an event to announce the plans. He said the rollbacks will save households money while also defying what he called 'the climate change cult'. The climate rule has 'saddled our critical power sector with expensive, unreasonable and burdensome regulations', Zeldin said. 'American energy suffered and Americans who rely on reliable, affordable energy suffered. The good news is those days are over.' The EPA's proposals will go out for public comment and are likely to face legal challenges. They target a rule crafted last year by the Biden administration to phase out emissions from electricity-producing fossil fuel plants, which are responsible for around a quarter of US greenhouse gases, and a regulation called the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, which Biden toughened in 2023 to slash harmful pollution suffered by communities. These rollbacks come despite overwhelming scientific evidence of the dire consequences of the worsening climate crisis and the harm caused by pollutants such as mercury, which can seep into water, soils and the air and has been linked to neurological damage in young children as well as heart, lung and immune system ailments in adults. Coal-fired power plants cause nearly half of all mercury emissions in the US, according to the EPA. More than 200 health experts wrote to the EPA on Wednesday warning the moves 'would lead to the biggest pollution increases in decades and is a blatant give-away to polluters'. The experts added the reversals are 'a direct contradiction to the Environmental Protection Agency's mission of protecting public health and the environment'. Trump, however, has vowed to boost fossil fuel production at all costs, having reaped record donations from the oil and gas industry during his election campaign. At Wednesday's EPA event, Zeldin was joined by eight lawmakers, all Republicans – Kevin Cramer, Troy Balderson, Brett Guthrie, Carol Miller, Dan Meuser, Rob Bresnahan, Michael Rulli and Riley Moore – who have collectively received more than $3m from fossil fuel donors in their own election campaigns, a Guardian analysis of the OpenSecrets database shows. Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania representative, holds personal financial interests in more than 20 fossil fuel companies. In justifying the deletion of the Biden climate plan, which the EPA previously estimated would deliver $370bn in net benefits, Zeldin has claimed that US power plants only produce a small and declining fraction of the world's emissions. This is despite the fact that if these power plants were a country, it would be the sixth-largest emitter on the planet. Gina McCarthy, who was EPA administrator under Barack Obama, said that Zeldin's 'dismantling of our nation's protections from power plant pollution is absolutely illogical and indefensible. It's a purely political play that goes against decades of science and policy review.' 'By giving a green light to more pollution, his legacy will forever be someone who does the bidding of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our health,' she added. 'Everyone will be affected by his actions, but the most vulnerable among us, our kids and grandkids, will suffer the most.' The EPA has embarked upon a wide-ranging blitz upon environmental regulations since Trump became president, setting about removing or loosening clean air and water rules that, collectively, were on track to save 200,000 American lives in the decades ahead. Trump, who has adopted the mantra of 'drill, baby, drill', has claimed unhindered fossil fuel production will bring down energy costs, although he has sought to hobble clean energy such as solar and wind, which are typically the cheapest sources of new electricity generation. The rollbacks follow the second-hottest May on record globally, and a record-hot 2024 that unleashed a stunning number of climate-driven disasters and six weeks of extra-dangerously hot days. Experts have warned that sea level rise is on track to cause 'catastrophic inland migration', including to millions of Americans, with climate shocks set to wipe 50% from global GDP by the end of this century. 'It's completely reprehensible that Donald Trump would seek to roll back these lifesaving standards and do more harm to the American people and our planet just to earn some brownie points with the fossil fuel industry,' said Patrick Drupp, climate policy director at the Sierra Club. 'This administration is transparently trading American lives for campaign dollars and the support of fossil fuel companies, and Americans ought to be disgusted and outraged that their government has launched an assault on our health and our future.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store