logo
Trump faces uproar from MAGA base over possible Iran strike

Trump faces uproar from MAGA base over possible Iran strike

Reuters4 hours ago

WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - The prospect of a U.S. strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought President Donald Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war.
Some of Trump's most prominent Republican allies, including top lieutenant Steve Bannon, have found themselves in the unusual position of being at odds with a president who largely shares their isolationist tendencies.
Bannon, one of many influential voices from Trump's "America First" coalition, on Wednesday urged caution about the U.S. military joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear program in the absence of a diplomatic deal.
"We can't do this again," Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington. "We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq."
The anti-interventionist part of the Republican Party is watching with alarm as Trump has moved swiftly from seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement with Iran to possibly having the United States support Israel's military campaign, including the use of a 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bomb.
The criticism shows the opposition Trump could face from his right-leaning "Make America Great Again" flank should he join the fight, a step that Iran has warned would have big consequences for Americans without specifying what that might be.
A decision by Trump to enter the conflict would be a sharp departure from his usual caution about foreign entanglements. It could impact his campaign to foster good relations in the Gulf and could be a distraction from his efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine and make tariff deals with countries around the world.
The MAGA coalition propelled Trump into office in the 2016 and 2024 elections and remains critically important to him even though he is prevented by the U.S. Constitution from running for a third term.
Upsetting that base could erode Trump's popularity and factor into whether Republicans hang on to control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.
Asked about the rift on Wednesday, Trump appeared unconcerned that some in his base could be turning its back on him, at least on this issue.
"My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time," Trump told reporters at the White House. "I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."
He said some of his supporters "are a little bit unhappy now" but that others agree with him that Iran cannot become a nuclear power.
'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," Trump said.
Marc Short, an ally of former Vice President Mike Pence who served as Trump's legislative director during his first term, called the division over Iran within Trump's party a "pretty large rift." He said he thought Trump's base would stay with him despite the differences, however.
"The divisions are obviously coming out in the open in this moment, but ultimately I think that most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than any worldview," he said.
Short said standing with Israel could help Trump politically, too. Traditionally conservative voters favor standing by Israel. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March, 48% of Republicans agreed with a statement that the U.S. should use its military power to defend Israel from threats no matter where the threats come from, compared to 28% who disagreed. Among Democrats, 25% agreed and 52% disagreed.
International experts believe Iran has been intent on developing a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran's denials, and Israel believes it would be at risk as a result. U.S. officials believe if Iran possessed an atomic weapon it would trigger an nuclear arms race in the Middle East.
Bannon, host of the popular "War Room" podcast, said "the Israelis need to finish what they started" and that Trump should slow down deliberations over U.S. involvement and explain his decision-making.
"This is one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, okay, with 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through at this level, and the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump this on them," he said.
Other influential MAGA voices with similar messages of worry include former Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson and U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and long-time Trump ally.
"Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA," Greene said in a social media post on Sunday. "We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them."
The rift was on full display when Carlson, on his streaming program, clashed with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas late on Tuesday.
A clip from Carlson's interview with Cruz went viral with Carlson strongly criticizing the senator for seeking regime change in Iran, and Cruz expressing support for the president.
"You don't know anything about Iran!' Carlson told Cruz.
'I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz fired back.
'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson retorted.
Vice President JD Vance tried to tamp down talk of a rift on Monday with a social media post defending the president.
"People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue," he said.
Now allies and opponents are waiting on Trump's decision-making process. The president said on Wednesday afternoon he had some ideas on how to proceed but had not made a final decision.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LA archbishop slams Trump's ‘cruel and arbitrary' immigration agenda
LA archbishop slams Trump's ‘cruel and arbitrary' immigration agenda

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

LA archbishop slams Trump's ‘cruel and arbitrary' immigration agenda

The archbishop of Los Angeles sharply criticized the Trump administration 's 'cruel and arbitrary' immigration policy, following widespread protests against the White House migration agenda throughout the city. In a column this week for the Catholic magazine Angelus, Archbishop José Gomez accused the administration of having 'no immigration policy beyond the stated goal of deporting thousands of people each day.' 'This is not policy, it is punishment, and it can only result in cruel and arbitrary outcomes,' the bishop, a longtime advocate of immigration reform and himself a naturalized U.S. citizen from Mexico, continued. 'Already we are hearing stories of innocent fathers and mothers being wrongly deported, with no recourse to appeal.' The bishop added that the Biden administration 'went too far in not securing our borders' and faulted both parties for not passing a major immigration reform since the late 1980s. The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. The comments come after federal troops were dispatched over the protests in Los Angeles, which is home to both the largest Catholic diocese in the United States and a population that's over one-third foreign-born. The bishop's remarks also illustrate the continued schism between the Catholic Church and the administration, which counts devout Catholic convert JD Vance as vice president. Before his death, Pope Francis criticized the administration over its treatment of migrants, arguing the church's values of protecting refugees and immigrants date back to the story of Jesus himself. 'What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly,' Francis said. His successor, Pope Leo, has also been critical, with then-cardinal Robert Prevost chiding Vance in February after he suggested Catholic teaching urged followers to love their families before others in their midst. 'JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others,' he wrote on social media. Prevost also reshared an article sharply criticizing the governments of the U.S. and El Salvador for their handling of the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man the U.S. admitted it mistakenly deported to his home country despite a court order barring his removal, then initially declined to return to America. 'Do you not see the suffering?' the reshared article read. 'Is your conscience not disturbed? How can you stay quiet?' The disagreements have gone beyond just doctrinal disputes, though. The Trump administration's attempts to freeze foreign aid and suspend refugee resettlement have decimated Catholic relief agencies inside the U.S. that contracted with the federal government. In February, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops sued over the administration's abrupt suspension of refugee resettlement work. The following month, the conference announced it was ending its refugee partnerships with the government going forward, bringing to a close a nearly half-century collaboration on refugee resettlement. Last week, a committee in the Republican-controlled House announced it would investigate more than 200 non-governmental organizations that received taxpayer funds for migrant-related work, including major Catholic groups like Catholic Charities USA and the bishops' conference. In January, Vance accused the conference of resettling 'illegal immigrants,' comments New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan called 'scurrilous,' 'nasty,' and incorrect, given the church's history of resettling legal refugees.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store