
Gatwick plots higher parking fees to secure second runway
Gatwick bosses have put forward plans to raise car drop-off and parking charges in an effort to secure approval for a second runway.
The airport has outlined the proposals as part of a submission to the Planning Inspectorate, which earlier this year said Gatwick must ensure that at least 54pc of travellers use public transport to get there if it wants to see unrestricted flights from a second landing strip.
Stewart Wingate, the airport's chief executive, said that since it has no control over trains, the main way it could stop people arriving by car was to raise fees.
He said: 'We'd be trying to influence people who were making that marginal decision of 'should I drive and drop off or use the car parks, or should I use the rail services?'
'The forecourt drop-off charge is the mechanism we can use. We could start to increase that drop-off charge. If we adjust that upwards we would also make changes to the car parking tariffs as well.'
Gatwick currently charges £6 for a drop-off to be completed within 10 minutes, payable by taxis as well as private cars. Every further minute costs an extra £1 up to a maximum of 30 minutes for a total of £26.
The headline fee increased from £5 at the start of 2024, a move that sparked outrage at the time. Drivers on social media branded the increase a 'rip-off' and 'absolute joke'.
Heathrow raised its drop-off fee to £6 in January while Stansted charges £7, so any rise would most likely make Gatwick the city's most expensive airport for drivers.
Mr Wingate said higher charges for cars would be introduced as a last resort if an insufficient number of people used the train and did not specify how big the increase might be.
Proposals to raise the charges come after Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, failed to approve Gatwick's runway plans in an initial ruling on Feb 27.
The airport is seeking approval to bring a second emergency runway into everyday use, with the £2.5bn project set to add 100,000 flights a year, almost doubling capacity to 75m passengers.
While indicating that she was minded to back the scheme, Ms Alexander said the airport should take account of changes proposed by the Planning Inspectorate. Officials are concerned that waving through the plans could lead to more congestion on the already busy roads around Gatwick.
A government source said the submission from Gatwick represented 'encouraging progress.'
Gatwick said it would initially engage with train and coach operators, the Department for Transport and Network Rail on more direct efforts to lift the proportion of people using public transport beyond the current level of 45pc.
Mr Wingate said: 'We're trying to give the Government a pragmatic, sensible and rational pathway which achieves the objective of reduced road congestion and allows them to support the runway.'
Gatwick, owned by French construction giant Vinci, had until Friday to submit a formal response to the blueprint proposed by the Planning Inspectorate.
The airport said it would also accept a reduction in the expanded airport's noise footprint from 135 sq km to 125 sq km, while seeking the disclosure of evidence supporting the tighter restrictions, which it warned could limit the use of some larger aircraft.
While a consultation must be launched to allow all parties to respond, a government source said a final decision on the runway plan will be reached as soon as possible ahead of an October deadline.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Newscast Spending Review: Tussles In The Treasury
Today, we're looking at what's going on in the Treasury as the final decisions are being made ahead of the government's Spending Review on Wednesday. The home secretary and deputy prime minister are both still in dispute with the department over the amount of cash they'll have to spend. Business editor Simon Jack and Paul Johnson, director of the Institute For Fiscal Studies join Laura to look at the numbers and the politics. And we look at Zia Yusuf's return to Reform just two days after quitting. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Laura Kuenssberg. It was made by Chris Flynn and Rufus Gray. The technical producer was Antonio Fernandes. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The editor is Sam Bonham.


North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.

Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.