logo
Choice, confidence, and care: Strengthening modern contraceptive access in India

Choice, confidence, and care: Strengthening modern contraceptive access in India

Hindustan Times4 days ago

In my consulting room, patients come seeking contraceptive counselling. The questions are in a hushed tone, patients ask: 'Will this affect my fertility later?' 'Is it safe?' 'Will anyone else find out?'. These queries come from women across age groups, professions, and backgrounds. Whether a college student or a homemaker, a shared thread often emerges--hesitation. This is not because they lack awareness, but because they are unsure about safety, stigma, control, and the range of options available to them.
India has made significant progress in expanding access to contraception. Government programs like Mission Parivar Vikas and the rollout of health and wellness centres under Ayushman Bharat have strengthened service delivery in high-focus states. As a result, the modern contraceptive prevalence rate has steadily increased.
Yet, some gaps remain. One common issue is the limited range of choices presented to women, especially when it comes to long-acting reversible methods (LARCs). In many cases, decisions around contraception are made quickly and with limited counselling, particularly after childbirth. Instead of being offered the expanded basket of choices, women are steered toward permanent methods like female sterilisation without adequate time or space to consider other options.
In urban private practice, on the other hand, the challenge is not availability, but approachability. A younger patient may have heard of newer methods like DMPA-SC injectables or subdermal implants, but still feel unsure or embarrassed to ask about them. The gap between knowing a method exists and feeling confident enough to choose it is real, and it's here that both the public and private systems must do better.
As a professional body, the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) sees this as a shared responsibility. We are actively working to sensitise our members across India on method counselling, especially for newly introduced, but highly effective, options that offer women greater flexibility and agency.
Injectables and subdermal implants are especially promising. They reduce the need for frequent follow-ups, offer privacy, and are reversible. However, to successfully introduce them at scale, we need a robust ecosystem like trained providers, consistent supply chains, and supportive counseling environments where women feel heard and respected.
Equally important is making conversations around contraception feel more natural and less clinical. We must embed family planning discussions into routine health care moments, whether during antenatal visits, adolescent health check-ups, or postnatal counselling. These moments offer valuable opportunities to provide information when women are already engaged with the health system.
Destigmatising contraception also means widening the circle of who is part of the conversation. Too often, women are counselled alone, while decisions within families may involve spouses or in-laws. If men are excluded from the discussion, they may also lack accurate information or even oppose contraceptive use. We need more male-inclusive approaches, including workplace health initiatives, community outreach by male health workers, and relatable content via digital media can all help shift attitudes.
As practitioners, we must remember that access does not automatically mean empowerment. A wider basket of contraceptive choices means little if a woman doesn't feel safe or supported in making her own decision. While apps, teleconsults, and anonymous chatbots have made information more accessible, nothing can replace the value of a non-judgmental, face-to-face conversation with a trusted provider.
Our ultimate goal must be to ensure that family planning is seen not as a taboo or a hush-hush conversation, but as a core part of everyday well-being. When a woman walks into a clinic, public or private, she should be asked what she wants, not told what she should use. That shift, rooted in choice, confidence, and care, can transform lives. That is the India we must strive to build.
This article is authored by Dr Sunita Tandulwadkar, president, Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can fine 100% value of mineral quarried sans green nod: Madras High Court
Can fine 100% value of mineral quarried sans green nod: Madras High Court

New Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Can fine 100% value of mineral quarried sans green nod: Madras High Court

By virtue of the authoritative pronouncement of the judgment by the SC in the Common Cause case, read with section 20 (a) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957, it can be seen that the state, as a delegatee in framing rules relating to minor minerals, could not have created any contra rules that overreach or supersede the notifications issued by the centre. 'Consequently, notwithstanding Rule 42 (iii) of the TN Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, which grants 630 days of time, I hold that both the lessees of major and minor minerals of less than 5 ha are mandated to obtain EC, even if they are existing lessees and their renewal is not due as of 15.01.2016,' the order read. Justice Chakravarthy stated once it has been established that it is a mandate of law, merely because there were some actions taken by the state government and the MoEF in issuing clarifications, it cannot be claimed that Section 21 (5) of the MMDR Act, 1957 cannot be enforced. He upheld the individual orders of the collectors, challenged in the writ pleas, which impose 100% penalty of the minerals' value under the MMDR Act. However, he ordered deducting the seiniorage fees already paid by the lessees from the penalty amount and recover the balance which shall be intimated to them within three weeks. The lessees have to pay the amount within two months thereof.

'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court
'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Victims' can challenge acquittal under Sec 372 CrPC: Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: Referring to provision of Section 372 of CrPC which was amended in 2009 on recommendation of Law Commission to allow a victim to file appeal, Supreme Court has held that a "victim" of an offence like in cheque bouncing cases has the right to challenge the order of acquittal of the accused under CrPC and corresponding Section 413 of BNSS. Differentiating between Sec 372 & Sec 378 (which allows a complainant to file appeal), a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Sharma said Section 378 circumcised the right to file an appeal which is not the case with Section 372. "The proviso to Sec 372 of CrPC was inserted in statute book with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of CrPC, irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of Section 378 of CrPC, SC said victim of a crime must have an absolute right to prefer an appeal which cannot be circumscribed by any condition and the right of a victim of a crime must be placed on par with right of an accused who after being convicted has a right to file an appeal under Section 374 of CrPC. TNN

'No change in stance on crypto, concerned over risks to policy, stability'
'No change in stance on crypto, concerned over risks to policy, stability'

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

'No change in stance on crypto, concerned over risks to policy, stability'

MUMBAI: RBI said its stance on cryptocurrency remains unchanged, even as a govt panel continues to examine the issue. "There is no new development following the Supreme Court pronouncement on the crypto matter," RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra said at the post-policy press conference. "RBI has maintained a consistent stance on this issue. A govt committee is currently examining the matter. We remain concerned about the potential risks crypto poses to financial stability and monetary policy," he said. In a recent order, an SC bench led by Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh said that banning crypto is not a viable option given global developments in financial systems. The SC observed that the absence of a regulatory framework has created room for misuse and asked govt to act. Separately, he said RBI has rolled out a new framework for regulation-making, built on three pillars: public consultations with stakeholders, impact analysis-including qualitative assessments-and regular review of regulations to keep pace with steadily evolving conditions. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store