ECan chair undecided as election looms
The chair of Canterbury's regional council is undecided about his future, as the local election looms.
Environment Canterbury chairperson Craig Pauling said he is contemplating a tilt at Parliament next year or stepping back from politics.
There has been speculation Mr Pauling could run for the Green Party in the Banks Peninsula electorate in next year's general election.
But he admits he still has unfinished business around the council table.
''There are things I want to do, so I'm still weighing it all up.
''Becoming an MP is certainly one of the options and I have talked about going to Parliament, but I haven't made my mind up.
''The chair role is an awesome honour. It has been rewarding and it has its challenges too.''
Mr Pauling has served two terms on the council.
He was elected chairperson in October, following Peter Scott's resignation the previous month, having served as deputy chair and acting chair.
The pair had contested the role in October 2022, with Mr Scott's name being drawn out of a container after an eight-eight split in the vote.
Nominations for election candidates open on July 1 and close on August 1, ahead of the October elections, so he doesn't have much time if he wants a seat at the council table.
Mr Pauling said if he was to stand for Parliament next year, the selection process would likely begin towards the end of this year.
A third option is to step away from politics and go back to his passion for environmental planning and policy making.
''There is always heaps to do, so it is about making the decision which is right for me and my family.''
Mr Pauling is of Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Mutunga and European descent.
He has whakapapa to Taumutu, Rāpaki and Ngāi Tūāhuriri.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
41 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Italy approves $15.6b project for world's longest suspension bridge
It has been designed with two railway lines in the middle and three lanes of traffic on either side, with a suspended span of 3.3km – a world record – stretching between two 400m high towers. Strait of Messina Bridge, the numbers of the project. Photo / Webuild Strait of Messina bridge. Photo / Webuild Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, who is also responsible for transport and infrastructure, told reporters work could begin as soon as September or October. He said the bridge and the associated new roads, railways and stations would act as a 'development accelerator' for impoverished Sicily and Calabria, boosting economic growth and creating tens of thousands of jobs, many of them skilled. Yet the project has sparked local protests over the environmental impact and the cost, with critics saying the money could be better spent elsewhere. Nicola Fratoianni, an MP of the Greens and Left Alliance, slammed a 'mega-project that will divert a huge amount of public resources' and 'risks turning into a gigantic black hole'. The Italian Court of Auditors has criticised the extent of the debt-laden state's investment in this one project in its assessment of the 2024 budget. The centre-left Democratic Party warned that the project 'tramples environmental, safety and European norms – and common sense'. The public prosecutor of Messina also recently warned of the risk that organised crime would benefit from the project. Salvini on Wednesday insisted the Government would do everything to prevent mafia infiltration. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's coalition claims the bridge will boost the economy, but critics warn of financial and environmental risks. Photo / Webuild Nato spending The longest suspended bridge in the world is currently the 1915 Canakkale Bridge in Turkey, which has a main span of 2.023km between its towers and opened in 2022. Many believe that Italy's ambitious project will never actually materialise, pointing to a long history of public works announced, financed, yet never completed in Italy. The project has had several false starts, with the first plans drawn up more than 50 years ago. Eurolink, a consortium led by Italian group Webuild, won the tender in 2006 only for the government to cancel it after the eurozone debt crisis. The consortium remains the contractor on the revived project. This time, Rome may have an added incentive to press ahead – by classifying the cost of the bridge as defence spending. Italy has agreed with other Nato allies to massively increase its defence expenditure to 5% of GDP, at the demand of US President Donald Trump. Of this, 1.5% can be spent on 'defence-related' areas such as cyber security and infrastructure – and Rome is hoping the Messina bridge will qualify, particularly as Sicily hosts a Nato base. Currently, the only way to cross the Messina Strait is by ferry, taking at least an hour by car and two on the train – where individual carriages are loaded on to the ferry – but the bridge aims to cut journey times to 10 and 15 minutes, respectively. Meloni insisted it was a 'demonstration of Italy's willpower and technical expertise' that would 'form the backbone of a faster and more modern nation'. – Agence France-Presse
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Alcohol Law Roll-Back Will Increase Victims Of Alcohol Harm
The government's plans to restrict the views of communities being heard in alcohol licensing hearings and to roll back the reduction of the hours during which alcohol can be sold will keep alcohol harm high, says Community Law Centres Aotearoa (CLCA). "The news today from a leaked cabinet paper is alarming to us, because of what we have seen from the Alcohol Harm Reduction Project Community Law has operated over the past six years," says CLCA CEO Sue Moroney. "We see the effect of alcohol harm every day through our Community Law Centres from bad decisions people have made when they are affected by alcohol through to those assaulted and abused by people who are drunk." The project operated by CLCA offered free legal help to people who wanted to object to alcohol licences so they could participate properly in the complex process. "Returning to the restrictive measure of only allowing people in the immediate vicinity of the location of the alcohol licence to be involved in licensing hearings leads to more legal arguments about who has "standing" in the process and less ability for the community to have its voice heard about alcohol harm and how it affects safety in our communities." "It's a backwards step to change a new piece of law that was fully consulted on and passed by Parliament just last year. It is wrong of the Minister to say the changes are a "mess" when there is no evidence of that, other than those in the alcohol industry telling her that." "We urge the Government to put the needs of the community ahead of the alcohol industry lobby so that victims of alcohol harm are reduced, not increased."
Newsroom
20 hours ago
- Newsroom
Former Attorney-General criticises Marine and Coastal Areas Act changes
This story first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission A former Attorney-General and National MP has lashed out at the government over its decision to push on with controversial legislation that would make it harder for Māori to get customary marine title. Chris Finlayson is calling the move foolish and 'extremely harmful' to race relations. But Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says it will see the law returned to its 'original intention' and strike a better balance for the rights of all New Zealanders. The changes to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act would toughen the test for judging whether customary rights should be given. Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and 'exclusive' use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. A 2023 Court of Appeal ruling, however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and the government put a pause on any amendments to the law. On Tuesday, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith said after the discussing the ruling, Cabinet felt it still did not achieve the 'balance' the government wanted and the test to win customary rights was still too low. His comment were echoed by Luxon who, speaking from Papua New Guinea, said the change would get the legislation back to its 'original intention'. 'We obviously have looked at the Supreme Court decision pretty closely [and] think it's quite broad and able to be interpreted in quite a broad way,' he said. 'We think the best way to do [that] is actually to get legislation to put it back to its original intent, which struck the right balance.' Chris Finlayson disputes that, and told RNZ the Supreme Court had already expressed 'very well' what Parliament's intention back in 2010 was. 'These amendments do not restore the original intention of Parliament. They undermine them. Let there be no doubt about that at all,' he said. Finlayson was Attorney-General at the time the legislation was enacted in law in 2011, which replaced the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act. 'What they are doing by these foolish amendments is destroying the settlement that the National Party and the Māori Party reached in 2010.' Finlayson said there was no justification for the move, which he said was 'extremely harmful' to race relations in New Zealand. 'Tangata whenua have a few wins in court, and it's ripped away from them by the government, which changes goal posts 15 years later. 'I am very, very saddened by what they have done, and I think it's a very bad day for race relations in New Zealand. 'I just can't believe that they're as foolish as they appear to be,' he said. Labour Party Māori Crown-Relations spokesperson Peeni Henare said the changes would restrict the ability of Māori to test their rights in court. 'In 2011, the National Party made much of their commitment to Māori 'having their day in court' and this proposed change takes that away again.' Henare said the law, as it stands today, does not give Māori ownership rights like control over public access. 'This action by the government does nothing to strengthen the Māori-Crown relationship, despite them saying they value iwi Māori. 'The government needs to be straight up and admit they don't care about Māori. Their actions don't match their words,' he said. The amendments prompted fierce backlash from iwi last year, including Ngāpuhi who walked out of an Iwi Chairs Forum meeting with the Prime Minister in protest of the legislation. It also drew the ire of Northland iwi Ngāti Wai, who said at the time they would not accept the Crown 'exercising an authority we do not believe they possess'.
