
No known intelligence Iran moved uranium before US attack
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has said that he is unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from American strikes over the weekend.
US military bombers targeted three nuclear facilities, using more than a dozen bunker-buster bombs.
The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear programme.
"I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Mr Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference.
US President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defence secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything.
"The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of (the) facility," he wrote on social media, without providing evidence.
Several experts cautioned this week that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes.
They also said that the country could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, US and United Nations nuclear inspectors.
The experts noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility.
A senior Iranian source said on Sunday that most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack.
The Financial Times, citing European capitals, reported that Iran's uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at Fordow.
Mr Hegseth's comments denying such claims came at a news conference where he also accused the media of downplaying the success of the US strikes following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months.
He said the analysis was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing that Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged and would take years to rebuild.
Mr Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful".
His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East.
The 86-year-old claimed victory over Israel after 12 days of war and promised that Iran would not surrender despite President Trump's calls.
"The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Mr Khamenei said.
The US "has gained nothing from this war," he said, adding that the strikes "did nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear facilities.
"The Islamic republic won and, in retaliation, dealt a severe slap to the face of America" - a reference to Iran's missile launch on Qatar targeting the largest US base in the Middle East.
"I want to congratulate the great Iranian nation ... for its victory over the fallacious Zionist regime," Mr Khamenei added, claiming that Israel had "almost collapsed" because of his country's strikes.
Both Iran and Israel had already claimed they won, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a "historic victory" for Israel.
During the news conference, Mr Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias.
"It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," the defence secretary said.
"There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he said.
President Trump praised the event on his Truth Social platform, describing it as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!"
On X, Mr Hegseth thanked Mr Trump for his praise.
During the news conference, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used.
Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker similar to the ones struck in Iran.
He declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community.
Gen Caine denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes.
He also said that he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice.
"I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," Gen Caine said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Star
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
Best U.S. state to live in if WW3 breaks out
As the threat of nuclear warfare looms over international politics, a growing number of Americans are seeking the safest havens within the country to move their families. Previously, states like Vermont were considered the ultimate sanctuaries for post-apocalyptic survival , but now Nebraska seems to be the top choice for those fearing a nuclear winter. With Russia's ongoing conflict in Ukraine, persistent turmoil in the Middle East, and various other violent clashes worldwide, concerns are escalating about the possibility of a nuclear attack on American soil . A map suggests that Nebraska's moderate climate and fertile soil make it an ideal place to avoid nuclear attacks - and potentially rebuild society afterward. Read More Related Articles Health concerns swirl as Trump is spotted limping up the stairs to Air Force One Read More Related Articles Lip reader reveals world leaders' brutal 6-letter gossip about Trump at NATO summit Ragusa highlighted spots like Northern California, Florida, and Texas as prime selections (Image: Getty Images) The most dangerous places during an all-out war with a nuclear power would be densely populated urban areas, shopping districts, and regions with extensive public transportation systems. Military bases or data centers could also be likely targets for foreign hostility, making Arlington, Virginia, the most likely candidate for a nuclear strike, according to Mirror US. Additional maps pinpoint areas most at risk in a nuclear strike, seemingly concentrated in the East and along California's coast. They suggest Montana and North Dakota as pivotal locations due to their numerous nuke sites and launch facilities. With a plethora of targets mapped out on security charts, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming sit squarely in danger zones, revealing vital infrastructure like active nuclear plants, which also exist in Alabama, Arizona, Maryland, New Jersey , Pennsylvania , and Tennessee — states that collectively house around 90 such installations. Americans are on edge as the threat of nuclear war looms (Image: Getty Images) In response to potential nuclear threat areas, Andrew Ragusa, CEO of REMI Realty in Long Island , shared some pearls of property-buying wisdom with Daily Mail readers: "What used to be important when purchasing a home such as great school district, close to shopping, and near public transportation, has now changed to warm climate, access to food, and access to water." Ragusa highlighted spots like Northern California , Florida , and Texas as prime selections due to their ideal conditions that align with the updated homebuyer's checklist. He pointed out Nebraska as the top refuge for real estate that could withstand a global war calamity. Moreover, Ragusa identified states along the Mississippi River such as Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Missouri as solid choices because of their access to drinking water sources. The Rocky Mountains area is gaining focus from real estate professionals as a key retreat in the event of a nuclear conflict, thanks to its rugged landscape that could shield from direct hits and high altitudes that may help disperse radioactive fallout after a blast. Chair of the Agent Editorial Board, Jasen Edwards, pinpointed Nebraska as America's optimal haven, noting its "geographical location offers protection against nuclear fallout." For the latest local news and features on Irish America, visit our homepage here .

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
European leaders delay action to suspend trade with Israel
EUROPEAN LEADERS HAVE delayed taking any action to suspend trade with Israel following a review of the agreement this week, which found that the country had breached its human rights obligations included in the deal. EU leaders have been meeting in Brussels today to discuss tariffs, the Middle East and the war in Ukraine. It was expected that leaders would postpone taking action, as there is not a consensus among European governments on Israel's war in Gaza. Following debates at the European Council today, the leaders concluded that the council will continue to discuss the issue at a follow-up meeting next month. Its conclusion read: 'The European Council takes note of the report on Israel's compliance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement and invites the Council to continue discussions on a follow-up, as appropriate, in July 2025, taking into account the evolution of the situation on the ground.' Ireland, Spain, Slovenia and a number of other countries have been calling for concrete action to be taken in respect of the review's findings, which noted that Israel had not fulfil human rights obligations with its war in Gaza and actions in the West Bank. Speaking earlier, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he would be seeking to put pressure on the Council to take action . Advertisement Martin said: 'I will be saying to my European colleagues that the people of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seek to be in a position to put pressure on Israel and leverage on Israel to stop this war in Gaza, to stop the continuing slaughter of children and innocent civilians. 'The war must stop. There must be a humanitarian response and a surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza, an end to the blockade. 'I understand there are historical reasons why some member states have a particular perspective on this, in terms of the Middle East issue, but from a humanitarian perspective, it is incomprehensible what is going on, what continues to go on. 'Europe needs to really articulate that in the strongest possible way, and we will be seeking to pursue mechanisms to entire that this war stops, and that humanitarian aid gets into Gaza.' A third of Israel's imports come from the EU, valued at over €23bn annually, while Europe imports less than 1% of its goods from Israel. Suspending trade ties would require a unanimous decision, which is likely impossible as countries like Austria, Germany and Hungary, that tend to more supportive of Israel's government. The EU has started to engage with Israel's government to outline the recent review's findings. Ireland was among ten member states who requested that a review take place in the context of the EU's compliance with the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice. The non-binding advisory opinion found that 'Israel's continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful and needs to be brought to an end as rapidly as possible'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
The Tánaiste has published the outline of the Occupied Territories Bill - here's what's in it
TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS yesterday published a broad outline of the updated Occupied Territories Bill as he endeavours to soon include services amongst prohibited trade activity. Ireland is the only EU country seeking to pass legislation sanctioning trade with businesses located in Palestinian land that is under the military control of Israel since its declaration of independence in 1967 – otherwise known as the Occupied Territories. These territories include the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights in southwest Syria. Israeli settlements in the territories are illegal under international law, as laid out in Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court which stipulates that the transfer by a state of its own citizens into the land of another territory is illegal. This has been happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – particularly in the West Bank – for decades. A map of modern Israel showing the Occupied Territories of Palestine (marked by grey and white stripes) United Nations United Nations The Occupied Territories Bill was first introduced by Independent Senator Francis Black in 2018 and proposed making it an offence 'for a person to import or sell goods or services originating in an occupied territory or to extract resources from an occupied territory in certain circumstances'. The slightly amended bill proposed now by the Tánaiste, and formally known as the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill, would make it a crime under the Customs Act 2015 to import goods into Ireland that originate in Israeli settlements built over what is legally recognised as Palestinian land. Advertisement New homes being constructed in the West Bank After the Israeli government approved the expansion of Jewish settlements. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo However, services such as tourism and IT are as of yet excluded in the latest draft of the legislation. An estimated 700,000 Israeli settlers currently live in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which were seized by Israel in during the Six Day War in 1967. At present, Ireland is Israel's second largest trading partner after the US, purchasing €2.9 billion of its total exports, according to data from the Central Statistics Office. What will be included in the Bill? In its current form, the Bill only applies to goods imported from the Occupied Territories. The broad outline published by the Tánaiste yesterday breaks down the proposed terminology. Goods – materials and products, animate or inanimate. Material – indicates ingredients or component parts used to manufacture a good. Product – the good being manufactured, even if intended for use in a later manufacturing process. Importation - the act of bringing goods into the State from outside of the State (as per the Customs Act 2015). Israeli settlement - a city, village or industrial zone located in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. Parties found to be importing goods that are subject to prohibition under the Bill will be subject to punishment as outlined in Section 14(1) of the Customs Act. Will services be included? The Government has faced backlash for not including services in its recent outline of banned imports, with Labour accusing the Taoiseach of instead publishing a 'retreat'. Micheál Martin has commented on the difficulty of incorporating services into the Bill, stating that it is 'genuinely more complex than goods transferring' due to issues over defining where the service originates. However, Simon Harris has vowed to seek their inclusion in an enhanced version of the Bill due to go before an Oireachtas committee for examination. 'Let's not forget one thing before we get into the detail of the legislation, there isn't another country in the European Union that you can visit today and ask a government minister about their Bill to ban trade and the detail of it, because they don't have one,' Harris said. He is also understood to be looking for a second opinion from the Attorney General on the legalities surrounding the inclusion of services before passing it through to the pre-legislative stage. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal