
NatWest customer offended by Pride flags told to bank online
A NatWest customer who complained about an LGBT Pride campaign at his local branch was told to bank online, documents show.
The customer, known only as 'Mr J', went into NatWest last July and was upset by the Pride materials on display.
He claimed that the paraphernalia distressed him both because of his disabilities and religious beliefs but NatWest refused to take them down. The bank pointed out most of the services he required could have been done online.
Mr J escalated his complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in November, alleging the bank had failed to make adjustments required by the Equality Act 2010. The Act prohibits discrimination on a number of personal characteristics.
Investigators ruled in NatWest's favour, adding the bank offered 'multiple ways' for customers to carry out their banking which do not involve visiting a physical branch.
Ombudsman Danielle Padden wrote: 'NatWest is a bank that has chosen to display Pride materials along with other paraphernalia at certain times of the year. As a service, we wouldn't be able to tell them not to do that, as they are entitled to celebrate and raise awareness of the communities they serve.'
Ms Padden added: 'I'm not able to decide that NatWest have acted unfairly here. They have provided alternative methods of banking and are entitled to decide what materials they display in their branches at certain times of the year.'
To challenge NatWest's right to display Pride materials in its branches, Mr J would have to take them to court, the ombudsman said.
The FOS told Mr J that he could use ATM machines outside the branch or a Post Office nearby to avoid the paraphernalia, or that he could use telephone or online banking.
Records shared by NatWest showed that most of the activities he visited the branch to do between July and August 2024 could have been done online.
The bank said Mr J – who claimed he needed to visit the bank in-person – could appoint a third party to visit the branch while Pride materials are prominently displayed.
In the bank's 2024 annual report, it says that it 'celebrates Pride across the UK', and was ranked number 45 in the Top 100 Employers in charity Stonewall's UK Workplace Equality Index.
On its website, NatWest states that it aims to 'continue to deliver a better LGBT+ colleague and customer experience through continuously challenging the status quo.'
The rainbow 'Pride' flag was created in San Francisco in the 1970s, and has been adopted by pro-LGBT supporters worldwide.
In 2018, an updated version, known as the 'Progress Pride Flag' was designed by Daniel Quasar, with a chevron added to represent trans and non-binary people.
It comes after students at the Oxford Union refused to mandate the annual flying of the Pride flag in the month of June.
At a meeting of the Union's standing committee on May 5, president Anita Okunde said that the rule requiring the flying of the flag had mysteriously been removed.
But a motion to restore the rule, and to allow presidents to waive it in cases of national mourning, was rejected by seven votes to four, with critics fearing it would open a 'Pandora's box' of demands for other flags to be flown.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man charged with dangerous driving after Sproston crash death
A man has been charged with causing death by dangerous driving after a woman died after a services were called to a collision between a Range Rover Velar and a Vauxhall Corsa on the A45, Holmes Chapel Road, in Sproston, Cheshire, at about 17:30 GMT on 12 Chadwick, 52, who was driving the Corsa, was injured and died in hospital on 13 December, Cheshire Police Boulton, 36, of Essington Way, Stoke-on-Trent, was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, dangerous driving and drink driving. He has been released on bail and will appear at Crewe Magistrates' Court on 14 July. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Commissioner calls for extra police in Reeves' spending review
The West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) has called on the Chancellor to use Wednesday's Spending Review to restore the region's front-line policing numbers to "pre-austerity levels". Compared to 2010 there were nearly 700 fewer police officers in the West Midlands, "despite rising demand and increasing complexity in the nature of crime", PCC Simon Foster said. He called for a "fairer funding formula" in Rachel Reeves' statement that would allocate resources based on "actual demand and need" rather than "outdated metrics".The BBC has contacted the Home Office for comment. The Spending Review on Wednesday will see Reeves set department allocations for the next three to four on Monday suggested there would be an above-inflation increase for policing, but that the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, had not yet reached agreement on her department's Foster said the region had been left "short-changed for far too long" after "historic under-funding".He added that it was "not fair and not just" that other force areas "had more officers than they had ever had in their force histories". "It's time for the government to take this opportunity to put that right," the PCC said. 'Opportunity to invest' He described the current funding formula as "broken and unfit for purpose"."It fails to account for the scale of demand we face, from serious organised crime to safeguarding vulnerable people. "This is not about more money, it is about delivering a fairer allocation of funding, to keep our people and communities safe and secure."Mr Foster urged the government to use the review as an "opportunity to invest in public safety" and "deliver the resources" the force needed. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man banned from keeping animals after giving ‘rescued' birds marijuana and painting their claws with nail polish
A Scarborough man who took a bubble bath with an injured bird, gave it marijuana and painted another bird's nails with glitter nail polish has been banned from keeping wild animals. Lee Jefferson, 30, failed to seek veterinary treatment for a wood pigeon and a jackdaw that he had collected and kept in a 'puppy pen' at his home in Malton, North Yorkshire. An RSPCA inspector was called to Jefferson's property in June 2024 after receiving a report from a member of the public, who said that Jefferson was keeping injured wild birds at his home with no treatment, and could not afford veterinary care for his injured cat. Upon arriving, Inspector Laura Barber found the 'quiet, withdrawn and lethargic' jackdaw with a metal bracelet around its neck, with Jefferson claiming that he had been treating it with an immune protection paste specifically used for cats. The wood pigeon was found with a bloody injured wing, which Jefferson had attempted to fix with grey gaffer tape. When receiving advice that he should always arrange for injured animals to be seen by a vet, Jefferson told Inspector Barber that he wished to open an animal rescue centre in the future. Upon taking the animals to the vet, Inspector Barber was sent copies of social media posts made by Jefferson, with one showing the jackdaw standing on a red sponge in a bubble bath. The post read, verbatim: 'Meet Raven, im her new surrogate father saved from immediate death (frize in the road with broken leg, slight head injury, and a damaged foot that with two days of a splint has made a recovery. 'She isn't a fan of syringe feed ( 3 days of practising). She has started calling for me when put outside…. Goung to teach her to wolf whistle, YO and Hey. Hopefully her brain recovers with signs of great improvement already. She's happy and with probably now follow me forever.' The RSPCA officer described another of Jefferson's posts as 'awful to watch'. She added '[The video] showed a man's left leg leant up by the taps of the bath, again containing bubbles, to the left was the jackdaw floating on the red sponge, like the previous image, but this time the jackdaw had bubbles on the top of her head. 'There was loud reggae type music being played and the bird was just sitting there. 'At one point the man's leg … moved … back into the water touching the side of the floating sponge, and the bird appeared scared and jilted to correct herself so she didn't fall into the water. [The bird's] eyes were half closed, and (she) appeared to be frozen still, and shut down.' It was suggested in the comments that the jackdaw had ingested some 'weed'. Upon being examined by the vet, the wood pigeon was put to sleep as its wound had become infected, and it would have been suffering 'acute pain' from the open fracture. Meanwhile, the jackdaw was found to have glittery nail polish on its claws, and was treated for dehydration and a dislocated toe. Commenting on the social media post that had featured the jackdaw in the bath and the commentary about her ingesting marijuana, the vet said: 'This video alarmed and concerned me for a number of reasons … it is completely irresponsible to place a bird species that is not water-fowl in a deep area of water, both due to risk of drowning due to a lack of water-proofing and due to intense unnecessary stress that the bird was likely to be feeling, as this was a completely abnormal environment for it to be in. 'Marijuana toxicity could explain the lethargic, glazed demeanour of this bird in an environment that would usually cause panic.' The vet continued: 'I am shocked and appalled that not only was this allowed to happen, but that Mr Jefferson appears,from his social media comments,to find it funny. 'This is a wild bird. It is unacceptable to treat any animal in this way, but the stress levels induced by this environment are appalling'. He was charged with causing unnecessary pain and physical suffering to both birds, with his defence team stating that Jefferson was diagnosed with autism, ADHD and suffers with mental health difficulties. After pleading guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act, he was handed an 18-month community order requiring him to complete 30 days of rehabilitation activity requirements. He has also been fined and handed a lifetime ban preventing him from keeping any wildlife.