Walmart fined for shipping realistic toy guns to New York, violating state law
Walmart agreed to pay a small fine and promised to ensure its third-party resellers are unable to sell realistic looking toy guns to buyers in New York, after state Attorney General Letitia James said Tuesday that the retail giant's online store shipped them to the state.
The settlement comes nearly a decade after Walmart, Amazon, Sears and other retailers entered into a consent order and judgment with New York's previous attorney general, in which they agreed to keep toy guns that resemble actual deadly weapons off their shelves statewide and they paid civil penalties that topped $300,000.
The 2015 order was part of a nationwide reckoning over realistic looking toy guns in the wake of the fatal shooting of Tamir Rice, a 12 year-old Cleveland boy who was killed by police in November 2014 while holding a pellet gun.
The New York law bans retailers from selling or shipping toy guns of certain colors — black, dark blue, silver, or aluminum — that look like real weapons.
Toy guns sold in the state must be 'made in bright colors or made entirely of transparent or translucent materials,' with businesses subject to a fine of $1,000 per violation, according to James' office.
James said on Tuesday that an investigation by her office found that Walmart's online store had shipped at least nine realistic-looking toy guns sold by third-party sellers to New York City, Westchester County and Western New York.
But the investigation also found that between March 2020 and November 2023, at least 46 imitation weapons that violate New York state law were purchased by consumers in the state through the Walmart.com platform, the settlement revealed.
'Realistic-looking toy guns can put communities in serious danger and that is why they are banned in New York,' James said in a statement.
'Walmart failed to prevent its third-party sellers from selling realistic-looking toy guns to New York addresses, violating our laws and putting people at risk,' she said.
'The ban on realistic-looking toy guns is meant to keep New Yorkers safe and my office will not hesitate to hold any business that violates that law accountable.'
Walmart must pay $14,000 in penalties and $2,000 in fees under the settlement, the AG's office said.
That total of $16,000 is a tiny fraction of the approximately $49 million in net income Walmart earned on an average day in the most recent financial quarter.
CNBC has requested comment from Walmart, which neither admitted nor denied the findings by James' office in its investigation.
As part of the settlement, Walmart is required to prohibit third parties from offering for sale or selling any of the imitation guns covered by the state law to buyers in New York.
'Walmart shall terminate the ability of a third party from being able to list and sell toy guns and imitation weapons on Walmart.com when it has determined that a third party has engaged in conduct' that violates that restriction on three separate occasions, the settlement said.
And 'Walmart shall implement and maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent such third parties from offering for sale, exposing for sale, or selling Prohibited Items on Walmart.com for importation, holding for sale, or distribution to New York,' the settlement says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Orkney murderer Michael Ross' mum breaks down in tears as she recalls asking him about killing
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Moira Ross, the mother of Michael Ross who was convicted for the 1994 heinous murder of a Bangladeshi waiter in Orkney, couldn't hold back her tears during a revealing new documentary titled The Orkney Assassin. In the heartbreaking moments aired on The Orkney Assassin, a distraught Moira recounted the devastating time she queried her teenage son Michael about being the murderer, reports the Scottish Daily Express. She shared with the creators of the programme: "I remember him coming home with the detective. He was just his normal self." Telling more about that fateful day, she remembered: "All he wanted to do was come down and have a biscuit and something to eat because he'd been starving when he was being questioned at the police station. So he was hungry." Continuing her painful recollection, Moira said: "Then he went up to his room and sat there and I did go up and ask him, I said, 'Did you shoot that man?' And he said , 'No.'" (Image: PRIME VIDEO) This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more Prime Video free trial Get Prime Video free for 30 days TV lovers can get 30 days' free access to tantalising TV like The Boys, Reacher and Clarkson's Farm by signing up to Amazon Prime. Just remember to cancel at the end and you won't be charged. £0 Amazon Get Prime Video here Describing the haunting moment, she added, "And I just can't get over the look on his face when I asked him that." The emotional interview saw Moira breaking down into tears as Eddy Ross, her husband and ex-police officer, sat by her side, visibly upset himself. Ross was only 15 years old when waiter Shamsuddin Mahmood, 26, was fatally shot inside the Mumtaz Restaurant in Kirkwall; the gunman wore a mask and committed the crime in the presence of diners, including children. Mahmood had spent time working on the island the previous year; his death spread fear amongst the Bangladeshi community about relocating to smaller towns due to concerns of facing similar fates. (Image: PRIME VIDEO) Following the murder, the young Ross was detained for questioning before later being released. The case baffled authorities for years, with former soldier Ross eventually convicted of the murder and given a 25-year sentence in 2008. In an unexpected turn of events, ex-Army sniper Ross tried to escape the courtroom after the guilty verdict was announced, nearly succeeding before he was caught. Police later discovered a stash of weapons in a car park nearby, in a vehicle rented by Ross. Launching on Prime Video today (June 8), The Orkney Assassin provides new perspectives on the shocking 31 year old cold-blooded murder. (Image: PRIME VIDEO) From Ross' parents, who firmly maintain his innocence, to eye witnesses, journalists, police detectives and legal representatives involved in the case at the time, The Orkney Assassin examines all aspects of the case. The Orkney Assassin questions whether Mahmood's tragic death was a racist attack or even a professional hit as the evidence is reevaluated. Despite his conviction, Ross has consistently claimed his innocence, with the campaign group J4MR - Justice 4 Michael Ross attempting to overturn the verdict and alleging it's a massive miscarriage of justice. Ross is currently serving his sentence at HMP Shotts in Lanarkshire and has made three attempts to escape prison since his incarceration began. The Orkney Assassin airs on Prime Video on June 8
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Mum's 'TikTok addiction' results in prison sentence for fraud
Katherine Greenall "abused the trust" of the company she worked for with her actions. A mum's "addiction to TikTok" has resulted in her being sent to prison after she stole almost half a million pounds from her employer. Katherine Greenall, 29, was employed by technology company New Reg Ltd, which "specialises in purchasing vehicles for private and commercial clients", from 2021. A promotion in 2022 saw her become an accounts manager, which meant she had access to company bank accounts, Liverpool Crown Court heard on Friday, June 6. The mum-of-two from St Helens, Merseyside, went on to commit a "significant abuse of trust" in manipulating financial reports, allowing her to deposit vast sums into her own accounts over the course of more than a year. She spent most of it on TikTok tokens, which were gifted to content creators for her own "amusement and entertainment". She also splashed out on holidays, hotels and multiple personal purchases from Amazon, supermarkets and other retailers. Appearing in the dock, she wiped her tears away as she was sentenced to 28 months behind bars, after admitting to fraud by abuse of position, the Liverpool ECHO reports. Prosecutor Christopher Taylor described how Greenall had been praised for being a "vital part of the company's growth", "very organised and capable" and "both trusted and respected". However, her scheming saw her make a total of 53 unauthorised deposits to the tune of £57,036 in 2023, according to an analysis of her bank statements. However, her actions would only worsen in early 2024. In January, she made four deposits totalling £8,917, then another 10 in February amounting to £14,916. In March she made a shocking 20 payments worth £146,288, and incredibly, a further 31 in April, which added up to £196,264.26. Eventually, senior management at the company became suspicious after smaller than expected profits were raised with Greenall during a meeting with one of its directors on May 1. Despite promising to look into the issue, she returned to her desk and made a "final deposit" to her own account of £20,000 before leaving the office, claiming what was a "false family illness". Greenall, called Katie by her colleagues, would later "admit her criminality" in another meeting on May 7, and was arrested on May 13. However, in her police interview, she was "emotional", claiming she "not been living a lavish lifestyle" and all she had in her bank account was £700. She explained how the "deposits started small", and were "used to fund household purchases". It was later that she "started using the stolen money to fund TikTok payments", gifting tokens to creators. She described it as having "become an obsession" which came "at a time when she was low". She said she would send the coins to "random" accounts as it "made her feel better", but would "return to a number of particular creators". In total, she siphoned £443,523.26 from the company over 121 separate transactions. £301,162.55 was spent on the tokens, leaving £142,360.71 which was "spent by the defendant on other things". Her actions have reportedly "jeopardised the future" of the company, which has been in business since 1995, and put over 30 of her ex-colleagues at risk of redundancy due to the losses incurred. Paul Becker, defending, said that Greenall, who has no previous convictions, "may have been suffering from a form of addiction to TikTok", but stated that she had "no formal diagnosis to such an addiction". It is believed her children, a six-year-old daughter and 11-year-old son, who has severe ADHD, will be cared for by her sister, a nursery worker, during her time in prison. Mr Becker added: "This is fraud on a massive scale. It started out for personal matters. It was not TikTok initially, but it is right to say that the bulk of the fraud went towards TiKTok. "It started off otherwise, and it became TikTok. It was not for any sort of financial reward. It was amusement. The more she did it, the more she became addicted to being on TikTok. What she was getting out of it was entertainment. That is what she was paying for. That is where the majority of the money was going towards. "Of course, that came from her employer who is massively out of pocket. It placed the business at risk and other members of staff in jeopardy. This was an abuse of trust on a massive scale. She is thoroughly ashamed of what she has done and has come today prepared for what might be said to be the inevitable. "She did not hold back with the police. She told them chapter and verse. It is not really rational thinking, to embark on this voyage of fraud and misadventure. What started out for her own personal benefit very quickly escalated into providing monies to TikTok. " Bringing up children is not easy. This, I am sure, had an effect on her at the time of the offending. It is perhaps some sort of insight as to why somebody embarks upon this sort of fraud. "It may be said that she was just greedy and wanted a better life and that is why she did it, but one has to have a holistic view of the factors in her life. It must have worn her down. It is not to negate what is deplorable behaviour, but she did not have an easy time. She is, if nothing else, a good mum who has done her best." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Judge Neil Flewitt KC, sentencing Greenall, said: "You are 29 years of age and of previous good character. You are a good mum to two young children, one of whom has particular challenges. You were trusted and respected. Your employers were aware of the challenges that you faced at home and made allowed allowances. "You repaid their trust in you by stealing from them on a massive scale. Over a period from January 2023 to the beginning of May 2024, you stole almost £450,000. You covered you what you were doing by manipulating documents that were used for accounting purposes by the company, and you put that money into your own bank account. "It started on a smaller scale. Things escalated on a grander scale in 2024. Having been made aware that the company was concerned, you did something which makes this worse. You went back to your desk and took another £20,000. "As I understand it, it is possible to make payment through tokens to content creators on TikTok to show your appreciation to them for the entertainment that they provide. If the information I have been given is correct, part of that goes to the platform. I make no comment about the morality of all of that, but that seems to be where a substantial amount of this money has gone. "But not all of it. From February 2024, there were 235 payments to TikTok totalling just over £300,000. That leaves over £142,000 that did not go to TikTok. You cannot possibly have needed all of that money just to buy day to day items. Some of it must have gone on extravagant spending. "I do accept that you must have been getting some form of escape from pressures at home by watching this content, that it may have been some sort of release for you. While there is no medical evidence that this became some form of addiction, I recognise that it became a pattern that was difficult to cast aside. "You jeopardised the business and its future trading. More particularly, you put at risk the jobs of your fellow workers because, at one stage, it was thought that some of them might have to be made redundant. That is a serious aggravating feature. "I accept that you are genuinely remorseful. You have found yourself work. I have read references from your mother, father, sister and friend and have read a lot about your two children. "It is a matter of regret that I have a public duty which I have to fulfil. It is a tragedy that those children are going to suffer as a result of your dishonesty. I have taken the view that there is simply no way to avoid what I am sure you have been advised is the inevitable sentence of imprisonment. This is simply too much money and too much damage caused here."
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Democrats who called on Andrew Cuomo to resign in 2021 are endorsing him in 2025
Four years ago, a chorus of fellow New York Democrats called on then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo to resign amid sexual harassment allegations, saying he was not fit to lead the state. Now, a growing group of them are endorsing him for mayor of New York City. On Friday, progressive state Sen. Jessica Ramos became the latest former Cuomo critic to endorse his bid, following at least three members of Congress and additional local politicians who are lining up behind Cuomo for mayor despite once calling on the then-governor to resign. It's an arc reminiscent of of the Republican Party's turnaround on President Donald Trump between the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol and his 2024 presidential comeback, which saw many Republican critics from 2021 fall in line. "Voters are doing for themselves in New York in many ways what Trump voters did during the presidential election, they are overlooking the allegations and the importance of the #MeToo Movement because what they want for their constituents or themselves is more immediately important," said Basil Smikle, a New York Democratic strategist who previously served as the executive director of the state Democratic Party and ran Ray McGuire's 2021 mayoral campaign. "You can determine whether or not this is justifiable or reasonable or in line with what it means to be a public servant," Smikle continued. "But you have someone with allegations against him, allegations made by a very credible individual in [state] Attorney General Tish James, and a lot of people are saying: 'That isn't as important to me as what this person could deliver for my constituents today.'" In a story published on Friday, Ramos told The New York Times that Cuomo is "the one best positioned right now to protect this city" as Trump is "threatening to bulldoze New York." It's a stunning reversal from Ramos' criticism of Cuomo from just weeks prior, when she told the New York Post that Cuomo's "mental acuity is in decline," comparing him derisively to former President Joe Biden. In 2021, after Cuomo's resignation amid sexual harassment allegations, Ramos posted on social media that "New Yorkers deserve better than a man who has played politics with our lives for a decade & couldn't see beyond his ego." Asked about the change of heart Friday, Ramos told reporters that her endorsement "is not about forgiveness or about forgetting anything. This is a very sober take about where we are in this race and the type of leadership that is required at a time when I need workers and I need immigrants protected. I am not going to vacillate at the type of leadership that we need at such a critical juncture for our city." She's not the only New York Democrat to back Cuomo after a previous call to resign. Democratic Reps. Ritchie Torres, Gregory Meeks and Adriano Espaillat all signed onto joint statements in 2021 that called on Cuomo to resign; now, all of them have endorsed Cuomo's mayoral bid. It's the same story for at least five state or local politicians now in Cuomo's corner after calling on him to resign. Representatives for all three members of Congress did not reply to requests for comment. Cuomo's 2021 resignation was a stunning turn of events for the governor, whose prominent role in the state's pandemic recovery made him a darling of many in the Democratic Party. Making the decision after an investigation by the state attorney general found he sexually harassed almost a dozen women, including his own employees, and broke laws, Cuomo said that he never would 'intentionally disrespect a woman' but did acknowledge he 'made mistakes.' He's since fought some of the allegation s in court and more recently, he told The New York Times that 'if i had to do it again, I wouldn't have resigned." Like Ramos, many of these endorsements specifically point to the former governor's past experience, his record of leadership and what the endorsers say is a need at this specific moment for the city. In Espaillat's endorsement of Cuomo, he specifically says that there's "so much at stake for the city of New York" right now and the city needs 'a strong and proven leader who will work to bring solutions to the most pressing issues facing New York City," before coming to the conclusion that "Cuomo is the clear choice." Torres' endorsement touts a similar note, pointing to his "competence and courage," noting that Cuomo "has the courage to stand up to extremist politics — both from the far left and the far right." Some voters who want to give Cuomo another shot agree. Carmen Perez, a 55-year-old city resident who spoke to NBC News earlier this month about her vote, said that she'd give Cuomo a second chance because "I've seen what Cuomo can do." "During the pandemic, he literally took over and said: This is how we're going to do, this is how we're going to get through this," she said. "If we're in a crisis, he's the guy." The politics of it all, and the unique dynamics of the mayoral race, loom large over the decisions by key New York City Democrats to line up behind a candidate. While Cuomo is seen as the front-runner in the Democratic primary, anti-Cuomo Democrats and candidates have been looking to strengthen the coalition against him by encouraging people not to rank Cuomo in any of their slots on the June ranked-choice ballot. Under this system, voters select their top five choices, in order, and votes cast for the lowest finishing candidates are redistributed to subsequent choices during multiple ballots until someone wins a majority. Also this week, progressive New York City Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Cuomo's top opponent, progressive state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, while also noting she would rank other candidates, and not Cuomo, to fill out the five slots on the ballot. For Democrats who believe Mamdani may be too liberal, or worry that he might not fare as well against current Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent now that many Democrats have turned on him after Trump's Justice Department stopped prosecuting him for corruption, Cuomo might seem like the best option. "With Eric Adams now out of the primary, it's only Andrew Cuomo who stands in the way of progressives taking power, and that's bolstered his candidacy," Smikle said.
