MOD raises 'bird strike' concerns over £16m Craigtoun development in St Andrews
The Ministry of Defence has expressed 'bird strike' concerns over a £16 million St Andrews retail plan.
The proposed Craigtoun site is within the safeguarding zone for Leuchars Army base, just 3.6 miles away.
And the MOD is concerned it could attract flocking birds, which could then collide with aircraft heading to and from the aerodrome.
Assistant safeguarding manager Fi Morrison has now advised on measures to prevent roosting, particularly under solar panels on the roofs of the new buildings.
Developers West Coast Estates say they are confident their proposals fully address the risks.
The MOD was consulted on the planning application due to its proposed location.
Ms Morrison says the department has no objection to the St Andrews development.
However, she adds: 'Within this zone, the principal concern of the MOD is the creation of new habitats may attract and support populations of large or flocking birds close to an aerodrome.'
And she advises that any solar panels with gaps underneath should be proofed to exclude access to pigeons.
'This can be achieved by netting or other material secured to the panel and the roof, or by a solid barrier in the gap,' she said.
A spokesperson for the developer has responded to the MOD's observations.
They said: 'The solar panels proposed are designed as a solid block with no gaps between them, and they sit tightly against the roof sheets.
'This eliminates the usual nesting spaces found behind tilted panels on flat roofs, so we're confident the risk of bird roosting has been addressed.
'Their inclusion reflects West Coast Estates' commitment to incorporating low-carbon technologies into its developments where appropriate.'
Aberdeen-based West Coast Estates says its proposal for the 42-acre site could create 170 new jobs and boost the economy.
The application forms the first stage of a wider development for Craigtoun, which includes more than 1,000 homes.
Planning permission in principle has already been granted for the masterplan as a whole.
'We look forward to Fife Council's determination of the application in the coming months.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
6 minutes ago
- NBC News
Palantir CEO Karp says AI is dangerous and 'either we win or China will win'
Palantir CEO Alex Karp said the artificial intelligence arms race between the U.S. and China will culminate in one country coming out on top. 'My general bias on AI is it is dangerous,' Karp told CNBC's ' Squawk on the Street ' on Thursday. 'There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win.' Karp has been a vocal advocate for U.S. AI dominance. He told CNBC in January that the country needs to 'run harder, run faster' in an 'all-country effort' to develop more advanced AI models. In a recent letter to shareholders, he also touted Palantir's commitment to equipping and enhancing U.S. defense interests. The billionaire tech CEO said Thursday that the U.S. currently has a leg up in the AI race and Palantir is leading the way in making companies more secure and efficient with its tools. 'There is no economy in the world with this kind of corporate leadership which is willing to pivot, which understands technologies, which is willing to look at new things, but also has deep domain expertise,' he said. 'Our allies in the West, in Europe, are going to have to learn from us.' Shares of the Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm outperformed in 2024 and have continued their ascent in 2025 as investors bet on their software and work with key government contractors and agencies. The stock is up 74% this year, but investors have to shell out on a higher earnings multiple than its tech peers. 'You don't like the price, exit,' Karp said Thursday in response. Karp also asserted that the company is 'not surveilling Americans' in response to recent New York Times report that Palantir is helping the Trump administration gather data on Americans.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Do Trump's hardline tariffs and travel bans put off Brits from visiting the US?
Tariffs, travel bans, mass firings – if there's one thing you can be sure about with Donald Trump, it's that he'll make news. Constantly . That's even the case here in the UK, where most of his decisions have no direct impact. But is all that coverage having an effect on Brits hopping across the pond for a vacation? If you look at the dry numbers from the US National Travel and Tourism Office, you might think the answer is no. In January, the month of Trump's second inauguration, the number of UK visitors to the US was 5% higher than the previous January. February and April also saw more Brits going to the US than the same months in 2024, suggesting that far from putting people off, we may even be more keen to visit the country when it's run by Trump. ABTA, the British trade association for the travel industry, tells a similar tale. They 'haven't seen any significant changes in terms of UK-US travel post-Trump administration', a spokesperson told Metro, with 'no noticeable shifts away' from the States. But that may not be the full story. Australia-based tour company Intrepid Travel offers small-group trips to destinations as diverse as Nepal, the Galápagos Islands, Antarctica – and the United States. However, the latter has had a significant fall in interest over the past five months, with bookings from UK customers down 12%. That decline appears to be driven by one age group in particular: 21 to 30-year-olds, with whom bookings have fallen by almost a quarter. There was less of an impact for customers above that age bracket. Joanna Reeve, Intrepid's General Manager for the UK & Ireland, told Metro: 'While there is no way to know for sure what is causing the dip, negative perception of the US under the new administration could be playing a part in people's travel choices. 'New immigration rules and travel restrictions could be off-putting for potential visitors.' The country still remains popular overall, she said. According to the Office for National Statistics, the US was the sixth most popular country visited by UK residents in 2023 – though it wasn't far off Portugal and Greece in fifth and fourth place respectively. A survey for ABTA taken in summer last year – before Trump was elected, but while the presidential election campaign was in full swing – found the US came third after only Spain and France when people were asked where they planned to visit in the next 12 months. Even those who disagree with the direction of the Trump administration might want to consider visiting the US in order to mitigate its impact, Joanna suggested. She said: 'There are ways to travel there in a way that supports local people, like through supporting indigenous-led experiences. More Trending 'We're also encouraging people to visit and support the National Parks as they are facing huge cuts to their funding.' Interestingly, the attitude of young travellers with Intrepid – if they are indeed being put off by Trump – does not appear to reflect the broader UK. An Ipsos poll from just before Inauguration Day in January found 18 to 34-year-olds were the most likely age group in the UK to have a favourable view of the US President. However, 47% of Brits between those ages still disliked him compared to 31% who felt the opposite. Those aged 35 to 54 were 64% unfavourable, while 72% of those aged 55 or over felt the same. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump roasts Elon Musk and suggests he has 'Trump derangement syndrome' MORE: Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans MORE: Fears of a serial killer prowling Texas after 38 bodies pulled from lake in three years
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
'We need a striker' - your transfer window priorities
We asked for your thoughts on what Aberdeen need to do in the transfer what some of you said:Russell: We need an out-and-out number nine. Someone around the age of 23 making a name for themselves. Would also like to see a young, combative central midfielder. [Dunfermline's] Ewan Otoo looked good against us in the cup Another good goalkeeper to add competition. Tall targetman, Sam Dalby is available and a couple of physical midfielders who can go box-to-box. Also a natural left-back who can drive forward out of With the news that Bojan Miovski is to become available, would it not be far fetched to think we could either offer a loan or even sign him, albeit on reduced terms? The club has some money to spend and it would give a clear indication of what they want next Need a left-back, two midfielders and two strikers as a priority. I feel there needs to be a pathway for some of the youngsters to get some game time. Alfie Stewart, Findlay Marshall, Fletcher Boyd, Adam Emslie and Alfie Bavidge and obviously Jack Milne after his outstanding performance in the cup Some players do still need to depart. We don't really want any of the loan players back, and could do with moving Peter Ambrose on. Need a couple of strikers, a centre-back, left-back, a couple more midfielders and a good number Squad needs trimmed. A couple of full-backs and some midfield legs required. This season has to see some of the sterling talent in the youth ranks getting more We need a striker and a left-back as a priority. Kevin Nisbet is too expensive and not really worth the wages so we need to be scouring Europe or further afield. The media will naturally link us with guys like Ronan Hale out of sheer laziness.
