15-year plan to tackle 'inadequate' electric vehicle charging infrastructure
A 15-YEAR strategy to improve the provision of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in the Cumberland Council area was outlined to senior councillors this week.
Members of Cumberland Council's executive committee met at Allerdale House in Workington on Tuesday (April 8) where they considered a report – Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for general public use 2025-2040.
They were asked to approve permission to procure a contractor for the provision, operation and maintenance of infrastructure across the council area for a period of 15 years with a maximum value of £7million – with £3.465 million grant funded and £3.535million match funded.
Councillor Denise Rollo (Harrington, Labour), the sustainable, resilient and connected places portfolio holder, told members that the current infrastructure was 'inadequate' and moved the recommendations to which the committee agreed.
The report states: 'This will provide a fit for purpose electric vehicle charging infrastructure for general public use that will be maintained in a safe operational condition and to allow emergency and non-emergency repairs to existing infrastructure to be completed in a timely and safe manner.'
According to the report the council area is 'a large, sparsely populated area with a small number of urban centres and only one city, Carlisle'.
It adds: 'The geography of the area presents problems for anyone considering buying an electric car and to make that choice more realistic the council is interested in four market sectors.'
These include:
Dense urban streets where residents have no access to private driveways for parking and recharging;
Rural locations where the volume of demand is likely to be relatively low and therefore unattractive to commercial suppliers;
Popular visitor destinations which may be in remote countryside, but which see parking durations of several hours at a time, allowing good opportunities to recharge;
Larger city and town centre car parks where commercial opportunities may be available.
The report states: 'The initial target is to provide a charge point within five minutes' walk of every home; however, this may not be appropriate in every case.
'Where this is not possible, we will install charging points at public carparks / alternative locations to enable residents to charge their vehicles nearby.
'In isolated situations where the installation of a charging point is not feasible alternative methods will be considered to allow residents to charge their vehicles.'
A range of charge point types and speeds will be permissible, with the Charge Point Operator (CPO) required to install at mandatory sites selected by the council prior to the deployment of infrastructure at additional sites selected in partnership by the CPO and Cumberland Council.
The report states: 'The Invitation to Tender (ITT) will be advertised on the Find a Tender Service and the relevant tender documents will be available from the council's procurement portal (The Chest).'
According to the report the concession contract will incorporate recommendations by Local Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (LEVI) where applicable as well as where appropriate being a similar format to other local government EV Charging Infrastructure contracts which ran with Tranche One of the LEVI funding.
It adds: 'The majority of which have been in place for the last three years and have operated successfully. Once the chargers have been installed for an agreed period; all chargers will be charged a fixed bay fee per annum.
'In addition, chargers with a 3 kW to 22 kW charge will pay Cumberland Council 10 percent of revenue generated and if chargers over 22kW are installed 15 percent revenue will be paid to Cumberland Council.
'Current council chargers adopted by the successful contractor will pay revenue at the above percentages from the start of the contract.
'A minimum of 15 percent of Award and Evaluation Criteria will be allocated to social value questions. They must have access to or hold any required licences to procure, install and maintain existing and new EV chargers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Labour Should Admit to Some Hard Fiscal Truths
British voters value honesty in a politician above all else. Or at least that's what they tell the pollsters. When asked in one recent survey to 'imagine that a future Prime Minister has to choose between acting honestly and delivering the policy that most people want,' 71% chose honesty and only 16% delivery. UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves might beg to differ. In July, she said the country couldn't afford the 'free' winter-fuel allowance for all pensioners — billionaires and those on the breadline alike. Immediately, her personal popularity ratings and those of her government began their dizzying descent. According to a YouGov survey last week, only 12% think she's doing a good job, while a whopping 71% percent says Labour is doing nothing to improve their lives.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing
While we can't rely on the French to help police the Channel – despite paying them £500 million for the privilege, we can always trust our Gallic cousins to bear a grudge. We already knew that the Prime Minister's great EU 'reset' was a sham; that much was clear when all we got in return was the use of e-gates that were already operational in many European countries. Now, we learn that we may not even be granted access to the bloc's industrial defence programme, despite Sir Keir Starmer's insistence that defence and security was a central tenet of the deal. As he boasted last month after selling us out to Brussels: 'We've also struck a new defence and security partnership to strengthen our cooperation and strengthen our security – which is vital in this dangerous new era. 'And it will open the door to working with the EU's new defence fund – providing new opportunities for our defence industry, supporting British jobs and livelihoods.' Except, of course, the French have other ideas. In yet another example of just how bad Labour is at negotiating anything (see also the Chagos surrender and, more recently, the 'deal' to allow Spanish border guards to check passports on Gibraltar) we now learn that Emmanuel Macron is trying to shut out British arms firms from the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP). While different to the defence fund, which is known as SAFE (Security Action for Europe), EDIP will see cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. It was created for the benefit of the EU and 'allies' but French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine – shutting out the UK. So much for Starmer's boast that the reset deal would put Britain 'back on the world stage' and give us 'unprecedented access to the EU market, the best of any country.' Labour is yet to reveal how many billions is being squandered on a reset that has already prompted another big fat 'non' from Paris. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How Labour's winter fuel fiasco paves the way for means-testing the state pension
As Rachel Reeves announced an about-turn on her winter fuel policy this week, she opened a whole new can of worms for pensioners. The Chancellor's decision to return the payments to those with an income of under £35,000 has created a complicated means-test and reignited calls from some commentators to claw back other benefits, such as the state pension, from those deemed 'wealthy'. Means-testing the state pension system would be a radical move that no British chancellor has dared attempt before. But Labour is desperate for cash and has shown it is not afraid to anger older voters. Could Ms Reeves possibly get away with it? Introduced in 1909 and originally worth five shillings a week, the state pension is a cornerstone of the welfare state. Today, workers pay National Insurance contributions for 35 years to receive its full benefit. The full new state pension is £230.25 a week, while the old 'basic' pension – for those who reached state pension age before April 2016 – is £176.45 a week. However, the benefit has become increasingly unaffordable to administer. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicts the country's spending on pensioners will reach £180bn by 2029. The idea of reserving the payment for those who need it most has therefore become increasingly attractive. Both Labour and the Tories pledged to keep the 'triple lock' that means pensions are increased each April by the highest of wage growth, inflation or 2.5pc. Means-testing could be one way to dramatically cut costs, without breaking that pledge. In January, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, caused uproar when she said her party would 'look at means-testing' the state pension. Key Labour advisers, think tanks and academics have also voiced support for the plan. Means-testing would completely upend the system. But this week's winter fuel policy reversal could make it slightly easier. Under the latest changes, all pensioners will receive the winter fuel payment, worth up to £300 a year. However, those who earn more than £35,000 will be expected to return it to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). To administer the new system, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will tell HMRC who they've paid the winter fuel payment to. HMRC will then apply the income test to determine who will need to repay the money. Government departments have long shared data about taxpayers, including doing so specifically to pay or not pay a pensioner benefit, such as free TV licences. But is this Whitehall bureaucracy really a slow slide towards a means-tested state pension? Telegraph Money reader Jim Humphrey fears so. The 69-year-old, a part-time financial adviser from St Albans, is one of the estimated two million pensioners who will still not receive the winter fuel payment. This is because his income exceeds the £35,000 threshold. He is worried Labour is on a 'slippery slope' to means-testing the state pension. He said: 'I don't need the money, but it is a question of principle... I have paid tax for many, many years.' Other state benefits have been means-tested in recent years. Free TV licences for all over-75s were scrapped in August 2020 and restricted to those who qualify for pension credit. Last year's restriction of the winter fuel payment to those on pension credit was also a form of means-testing – as is the payment of pension credit to those on the lowest incomes. Campaigners and economists have also pushed for free prescriptions for the over-60s to be similarly restricted. Last October, Dr Kristian Niemietz, of the Institute for Economic Affairs think tank, said: 'Means-testing old-age benefits is a way to make fiscal savings while insulating the poorest from cuts.' Labour is also gearing up to ban over-60s from taking student loans from 2027, as it introduces a 'Lifetime Learning Entitlement'. Ben Ramanauskas, of think tank Policy Exchange, said: 'The Government's approach to cutting spending through means-testing is the right one. 'However, this alone will not significantly lower the cost of the UK's unsustainable welfare bill, improve public finances, or give younger taxpayers a fair deal.' Other countries already operate means-testing on their state pension payouts. In Canada, which operates a flat-rate benefit system, a maximum of $1,433 (£773.30) is paid each month, and is topped up for those on low incomes. In Chile, a pension is paid to those over 65, unless your family's wealth is deemed to be in the top 10pc of the population. Those with an income of less than $1,210,828 (£955.30) a month are eligible, whether they are still working or not. In Australia, the state pension – or 'age pension' – has no reference to how long a person has worked. Instead, it is granted as an age-based means-tested benefit. About a third of pensioners have their pension cut because they have other sources of income. Moving to an Australian-style system would be highly controversial, angering those who say if you have 'paid in' you should get the full amount irrespective of your income. Mike Ambery, of pension provider Standard Life, said: 'There would need to be a change in applying for state pension as well as the detail to replicate means-testing in other countries. The practicality and change to a universal system now would be operationally significant.' There would be other barriers to overcome. The Government could only make significant savings if people are able to generate big enough private pension savings. But despite the 'automatic enrolment' reforms that made workplace pensions compulsory, millions of people are on course for meagre retirement incomes. Research by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) found that the cost of all but the most basic retirement has increased over the past year. Two retirees running one small car, eating out weekly and taking a four-star foreign holiday each year would now need an income of almost £35,000 each before tax to retire comfortably, rising to £52,000 if they live alone. Meanwhile, anyone living alone on the state pension would even fall short of a basic retirement, which now requires an income of £13,400 a year, the PLSA said. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
