Frail-looking Sepp Blatter arrives for fresh fraud appeal hearing alongside Michel Platini
A frail-looking Sepp Blatter, the former Fifa president, and ex-Uefa boss Michel Platini have arrived at court to stand trial on fraud charges following an appeal by prosecutors.
Blatter, who turns 89 next Monday, and Platini 69 were both seen smiling ahead of a fresh hearing at the Extraordinary Appeals Chamber of the Swiss Criminal Court in Muttenz, near Basel, into a 2 million Swiss francs (£1.76 million) payment that saw them banned from world football in the months after the game's biggest corruption scandal.
That scandal forced Blatter to quit as Fifa president, while Platini's plan to succeed him was wrecked by his own suspension for taking the cash.
Each was cleared of criminal charges two-and-a-half years ago over what Fifa's ethics committee ruled in December 2015 had been a 'disloyal payment' made by Blatter to his former protege shortly before he was re-elected as the most powerful man in the game in 2011.
Both have always denied any wrongdoing, including over what they say was a 'gentleman's agreement' to defer money owed to Platini for work carried out on Blatter's campaign for election as Fifa president back in 1998.
At their 2022 trial, that account was accepted as credible by a judge, who said serious doubts existed about the prosecution's allegation that the payment was fraudulent.
The Swiss federal prosecutor appealed the verdict, saying in a statement: 'The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG) has filed an appeal against the first-instance judgment and submitted a statement of appeal in October 2022 requesting that the judgment be set aside in full.'
The indictment against Blatter and Platini states: 'They falsely claimed that Fifa owed Platini, or that Platini was entitled to, the sum of 2 million Swiss francs for advisory work. This deception was achieved through repeated untruthful claims made by both accused parties.'
Prosecutors are seeking a sentence of 20 months, suspended for two years, against Blatter and Platini, the former France captain and manager.
Blatter, who was Fifa president for 17 years until 2015, said before the hearing that he felt he was the subject of a witch hunt.
'The Federal Criminal Court in 2022 said the contract between Platini and me was correct, and I expect the new court will confirm this first decision,' Blatter, 88, said last week, adding the upcoming appeal was 'absolute nonsense'.
'I am completely confident I will be cleared, I am an honest man.'
The criminal action against Blatter has taken a major toll on his health and, in an interview with Telegraph Sport last year, he accused prosecutors of banking on him succumbing to nature before his retrial so he avoided winning again in court.
He also said: 'If I would always go through all my life back [over] what was wrong, what would have been better, then I would start to put myself in situations where I would say, (lowering his voice) 'Oh, you're a bad boy. You are a bad boy already at school'.' He added: 'Let's say I have no regrets [about] what I have done and especially no regrets [about] what I have not done.'
Platini's lawyer Dominic Nellen said: 'The court of first instance was right to find that the disputed payment of 2 million francs was lawful.
'My client denies any criminal behaviour and is relaxed about the appeal hearing. He will also be acquitted there.'
A verdict is expected on March 25.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Crystal Palace's European dream is at risk – it's time for football to wake up
Steve Parish 's face at Uefa this week probably said enough. He didn't need to repeat a view he has pressed on people in private - and now to Uefa executives in Nyon - that Crystal Palace are technically not part of a multi-club ownership. A very different interpretation may now cost his club a place in the Europa League, or perhaps European competition altogether. The challenge for the club this week has arguably been more complicated than beating Pep Guardiola's Manchester City in the FA Cup final. They have had to convince Uefa that John Textor does not have 'decisive influence' on the club. This is due to his 43 per cent stake in Palace, while he also holds 88 per cent of fellow Europa League qualifiers Lyon. That situation could fall foul of Uefa's rules that no one may be simultaneously involved in the management, administration or sporting performance of another club in the same competition. The rules evolved out of EU competition law, which is where the definition of 'decisive influence' is so important. In reality, as Textor himself insisted in Switzerland this week, everyone knows that is just not the level of control the US investor has. His 43 per cent equity only translates into 25 per cent of the votes, where it's basically known that co-owners Josh Harris and David Blitzer go with Parish, who has the casting ballot. Textor himself has publicly complained about this many times. That doesn't necessarily hold much weight, however, next to the legal documents that show his stake. It is quite a grim next chapter to one of the most romantic stories of the season, and yet the real tragedy is that this was one of modern football's inevitabilities. The sport is working against itself as a game, and a cultural value, due to its insistence on business. Palace fans themselves warned of this over a year ago, holding up a banner complaining about 'multi-club ownership', and directly criticising Textor. Parish, Blitzer and Harris might now regret leaving the situation unresolved for so long. This is still the kind of mess football was long headed for, because it is not governed properly, and has a lack of proactive regulation. Uefa's ongoing failure to deal with multi-club ownership is the most pressing illustration. And these situations are simply going to become increasingly more common. Current estimates suggest more than 400 clubs around the globe are involved in almost 150 multi-structures. Like state ownership, it was a problem that became embedded before football even realised it existed, let alone the need to address it. There is frustration even within Fifa about this specific issue, as detailed in this writers' book 'States of Play', with one source claiming 'everyone could see multi-clubs coming'. When some staff raised this, there was pushback. It really goes even deeper than that. Despite the club operating as the basic unit of football, due to its social importance, Fifa has never defined exactly what one is. That is one of many reasons that football has developed what is really an ownership problem, which has been discussed on these pages at length. A multi-faceted issue like multi-club ownership is a natural evolution from that. Football has long since been taken over by capitalist and political interests, so this was always going to the next level. The worst part is not just how the clubs are used. It is how their identities are subsumed. They are not just Strasbourg or Troyes anymore, after all, but Strasbourg and Troyes that serve bigger structures in Chelsea and City Football Group. And the model is almost always going to best serve the biggest club in those structures. Now, we reach the next stage of this, where a club's actual dreams might be denied. It should be a wake-up call for football, but will it be? A further problem is that multi-club ownership straddles so many of the game's major faultlines. Above anything, industry sources complain about the 'vagueness' of the enforcement of regulations around this. There's no legal framework in place. Some in football were already pointing to how 'this never happens to the big clubs'. Others have referenced how Parish worked with the Union of European Clubs, a body casting itself as a voice for those clubs not represented by the European Club Association. Paris Saint-Germain's Nasser Al-Khelaifi is, of course, the chair of the latter, who has been locked in a number of battles with Textor in France. It is ultimately galling that Palace may miss out because they didn't meet the March deadline to put the club in a blind trust, as Evangelos Marinakis did with Nottingham Forest to avoid a similar clash with his Olympiakos. On the other hand, Palace's oversight could just be cast as another consequence of the modern game. The wealthiest clubs almost always win, so why tempt fate - and potential schadenfreude - by opting for a blind trust as early as the FA Cup quarter-final? It would certainly have gone against the sense of romance and defiance. And while multiple lawyers and football officials might point to the absurdity of such a sentiment, it is surely all the more absurd that the situation even exists. There is still hope. Uefa might come down on Palace's side, given the pressure, given the sense of romance. Fans didn't want this. Only a certain type of investor wants it. Multi-club ownership goes against everything football should be, to the point it might somehow sour one of football's great modern stories. It's an almost fitting parable for the modern game.
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Donald Trump's attack dog Marjorie Taylor Greene is furious - with herself'
Moronic Marjorie Taylor Greene is furious - with herself. After voting for her idol Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill, she took to X in a blaze of indignation… because, oops, she didn't read it. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279,' she wrote, as if a 400-page bill was supposed to come with footnotes, emojis, and a TikTok explainer. According to Greene, the part she missed - you know, the one that blocks states from regulating AI for 10 years - is a total dealbreaker. It's the political version of signing a mortgage without noticing your house is underwater. A wild video out of Vancouver, Washington, showed a drunken DoorDash delivery driver throwing hands with a grandfather - all because he allegedly didn't get a tip. Customer Anthony Volino says the man showed up at his home, banged on the door, and demanded money for a grocery order delivered the night before. To add to the insanity, the now ex-DoorDash employee had a gun. In a groundbreaking and honestly eye-watering procedure, surgeons in Maryland removed a spinal tumour through a 19-year-old's eye socket. Karla Flores thought her double vision was a learner-driver problem. Instead, there was a rare jelly-like bump behind her left eye. The successful surgery, a medical first, opens doors for complex tumour removal. Officials near the Canadian border were left swatting for their lives after honeybees made a break for it when a truck flipped over in Washington state. The cargo? Roughly 70,000 pounds of the insects and their hives. Locals were advised to avoid the area unless they were wearing a beekeeper suit or had a death wish involving pollen. Chaos took flight aboard a Delta flight from Minnesota to Wisconsin after not one, but two pigeons started flying around the cabin like it was their personal loft. Passengers preparing for takeoff suddenly found themselves in a live-action remake of The Birds. One flier, Tom Caw, said the first pigeon made its move before the wheels even left the ground. No word yet on whether the pigeons reached their destination or just wanted the free snacks. Police in Independence, Ohio, say a man accidentally shot himself in the leg while trying to show off a handgun to his brother-in-law, whom he was attempting to sell it to. Both men were legally allowed to own firearms, but apparently not legally required to think things through. The man was taken to the hospital and later cited for illegally discharging a weapon. It's safe to say that the sale did not go through, and his street cred and leg took a direct hit.
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes
The former pundit complained the speed camera that caught him was hidden STAR'S ROAD BAN Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RETIRED BBC football pundit Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban yesterday after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, admitted driving his 1.4l Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback at 24mph in a 20mph zone. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban after being caught speeding again Credit: BBC He complained that the speed camera that caught him in Holloway, North London, in January this year was hidden. But JPs at Lavender Hill magistrates' court said the limit applies at all times and not just when a camera is spotted. Crooks already had nine points for two speeding offences and a traffic signal rap. He got a further three — triggering an automatic ban. FA Cup and Uefa Cup-winner Crooks was fined £666 with £110 costs. He was also and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. On seeing a press photographer outside, Crooks covered his face with his jacket as he descended the court steps.
