Exclusive-Intel's top strategy officer to depart this month
By Jeffrey Dastin, Stephen Nellis and Max A. Cherney
(Reuters) -Intel's top strategy executive, Safroadu Yeboah-Amankwah, is departing the company, the latest change since Lip-Bu Tan took the chipmaker's helm in March, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Intel confirmed the departure, saying, "We are grateful for Saf's contributions to Intel and wish him the best."
Yeboah-Amankwah, who has served as Intel's chief strategy officer since 2020, is leaving on June 30, said the two people, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Yeboah-Amankwah has overseen growth initiatives, strategic partnerships and equity investments for Intel, among other responsibilities.
Some of Yeboah-Amankwah's strategy functions will now fall to Sachin Katti, whom Intel recently elevated to chief technology and AI officer. Intel Capital, the company's venture arm, is reporting up to Tan, said one of the two people and a third source briefed on the matter.
Tan is a prolific investor and founded San Francisco-based venture capital firm Walden International in 1987.
As Intel's CEO, Tan so far has flattened the semiconductor giant's leadership team and taken direct oversight of its important data center and AI chip group, plus its personal-computer chip group. He has brought in new engineering leaders.
He has also aimed to cut what he viewed as Intel's bloated, slow-moving middle-management layer.
Tan's moves follow years of manufacturing challenges at Intel and lost opportunity for mobile phone and AI chips. His predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, attempted an ambitious turnaround though he compounded some of Intel's problems, Reuters previously reported.
Intel reported an annual net loss attributable to the company - its first since 1986 - of $18.8 billion in 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP leader sets Saturday vote on Trump ‘big, beautiful bill' despite Republican pushback
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told Senate Republicans to expect to see the legislative text of the budget reconciliation package on Friday evening and then to vote at noon Saturday to begin debate on President Trump's tax and spending bill. Thune gave GOP senators the updated schedule after they met with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to discuss a tentative deal between the White House and House Republicans from New York, New Jersey and California to raise the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions from $10,000 to $40,000 for a period of five years. But Thune acknowledged after the meeting that the schedule could slip, calling the Saturday vote 'aspirational.' 'All of it depends on we got a few things we're waiting on, outcomes from the parliamentarian. If we can get some of those questions, issues landed then my expectation is at some point, yeah, tomorrow we'll be ready to go,' Thune told reporters. 'I said, again, aspirationally, that we'd try to do it at some point in the middle of the day,' he said of the plan to vote Saturday to proceed to the bill. Senate Republicans control a 53-seat majority and can afford three GOP defections on the bill and still pass it with a tiebreaking vote from Vice President Vance. Several GOP senators, however, refused to say whether they would vote to proceed to the bill, including Sens. Bill Cassidy (La.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Ron Johnson (Wis.). 'I don't know what we're voting on,' Cassidy told reporters when asked whether he would vote for the motion to proceed to the bill. Murkowski said, 'We have not seen text. I don't have anything more to say other than that.' Hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicare spending are a major problem for several Republican senators, including Murkowski and Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Jerry Moran (Kan.). Johnson appeared angry over the decision to forge ahead with a vote, despite his pleas to spend more time on finding additional spending cuts. 'We'll see,' he said when asked about whether he would vote to move forward. He said before the lunch meeting that the Senate is 'not ready' to begin voting on the bill this weekend. 'We're just not ready for it, I hope that they don't do that,' he said. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) told reporters after the lunch that he's not ready to vote to move forward on the bill unless he sees substantial changes to it. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he's a hard 'no' on the legislation because it includes a provision to raise the debt limit by $5 trillion. 'Some people want to spend more money, some people want to spend less money. And so they're pulling. I don't know if it rips. If they keep going in the current direction, they could rip it apart,' he said. 'I think it eventually is going to be much more of a spending bill than a bill that rectifies the debt problem.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Big Law executive orders go 0-4 after judge slaps down order against Susman Godfrey
A federal judge found the Trump administration's order against Susman Godfrey unconstitutional. Trump has so far lost all four legal challenges brought against his orders targeting Big Law firms. The rulings may be appealed to the Appeals Court. Any subsequent appeal goes to the Supreme Court. President Donald Trump faced another legal loss on Friday after a District Court judge slapped down his executive order against the Big Law firm Susman Godfrey. In her ruling, Judge Loren AliKhan wrote that the order against Susman Godfrey "was one in a series attacking firms that had taken positions with which President Trump disagreed." "In the ensuing months, every court to have considered a challenge to one of these orders has found grave constitutional violations and permanently enjoined enforcement of the order in full," AliKhan wrote. "Today, this court follows suit, concluding that the order targeting Susman violates the US Constitution and must be permanently enjoined." Three other federal judges have already found similar executive orders against Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, and WilmerHale unconstitutional. AliKhan's ruling in the Susman Godfrey case marks a 0-4 record for the Trump administration in legal challenges regarding his executive orders targeting Big Law firms. Susman Godfrey said in a statement that the court's ruling "is a resounding victory for the rule of law and the right of every American to be represented by legal counsel without fear of retaliation." "We applaud the Court for declaring the administration's order unconstitutional," the firm's statement continued. "Our firm is committed to the rule of law and to protecting the rights of our clients without regard to their political or other beliefs. Susman Godfrey's lawyers and staff live these values every day." Harrison Fields, principal White House deputy press secretary, told Business Insider in a statement that the White House opposes Judge AliKhan's ruling. "The decision to grant any individual access to this nation's secrets is a sensitive judgment call entrusted to the President," Fields said. "Weighing these factors and implementing such decisions are core executive powers, and reviewing the President's clearance decisions falls well outside the judiciary's authority." The federal government can appeal AliKhan's ruling, in which case the proceedings will be heard in the court of appeals. Any subsequent appeal would be heard by the Supreme Court. Fields did not immediately respond to Business Insider when asked if the government would appeal Judge AliKhan's decision. Judge AliKhan's ruling represents a major legal victory for the firms that have challenged the president's executive orders in court. While some other Big Law firms chose instead to strike deals with the administration to avoid or reverse punitive executive actions against them — drawing sharp criticism from industry insiders and a spate of resignations among associates and some partners — Business Insider previously reported that Susman Godfrey's decision to fight back in court took just two hours. In the original April 9 executive order against Susman Godfrey, the Trump administration accused the firm of "efforts to weaponize the American legal system and degrade the quality of American elections." Judge AliKahn had granted the firm a temporary restraining order on April 15, preventing enforcement of the order against Susman Godfrey pending further proceedings. In issuing her order granting the TRO, the judge said she believed "the framers of our constitution would see this as a shocking abuse of power," according to The American Lawyer. Susman Godfrey represented Dominion Voting Systems in its suit against Fox News after the 2020 election, which resulted in a $787.5 million settlement, and The New York Times in the publication's copyright suit against OpenAI and Microsoft, which has not yet reached a conclusion. Read the original article on Business Insider
Gizmodo
41 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Tesla's Viral ‘Autonomous' Car Delivery Video Is Splitting the Internet
Elon Musk loves a show. Tesla's marketing machine thrives on spectacle, and on June 27, the company delivered another bold display: a 30-minute video purporting to show the first-ever fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla vehicle, no driver, no remote control. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule!!' Musk posted on X. In a follow-up, the billionaire CEO escalated the hype: 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous!' He added: 'To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway.' There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous! To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 27, 2025 Together, the tweets and accompanying videos amassed nearly 15 million views. Tesla first posted a three-minute timelapse teaser, followed by the full 30-minute video on June 28. In it, a Model Y is seen navigating city streets, highway interchanges, and intersections, from Tesla's Gigafactory in Austin to the home of the new owner. The car stops at signs, yields at red lights, and maneuvers through real traffic, all without a human inside. The delivery ends with the new owner visibly excited as the Model Y rolls up, by itself, to his driveway. Come hang out with us & Model Y for 30 mins Full drive in 1x speed below — Tesla (@Tesla) June 28, 2025But online, the reaction wasn't unanimous awe. While Tesla fans praised the video as historic, many users on X, the platform Musk also owns, pushed back hard. 'Waymo has claimed fully autonomous drives on highways before,' one user wrote, linking to a January post from the Google-owned self-driving company. Waymo has quietly offered fully autonomous highway service to employees in select cities since earlier this year. Waymo has claimed fully autonomous drives on highways beforehttps:// — Jack Geldhart (@jackgeldhart) June 27, 2025Others mocked the presentation as a PR stunt. 'Stunning! So they've just illustrated what Robotaxi will be doing across the USA in 2026. Magnificent marketing, Tesla team!' one user quipped, pointing out that Tesla's robotaxi pilot launched days earlier in Austin, using only a dozen vehicles and a human 'supervisor' in the front seat. In contrast, Waymo and Cruise have offered public rides with no humans in the driver's seat for months. Some users even asked Grok, X's built-in chatbot, to analyze the vehicle's level of autonomy. '@grok which level of autonomous driving is that out of how many levels?' asked one user, referring to the industry-standard SAE scale, which ranks self-driving capabilities from Level 0 (no automation) to Level 5 (fully autonomous in all conditions, no human input needed). @grok which level of autonomous driving is that out of how many levels? — P. I. (@pi1_618) June 28, 2025Still others captured the polarization that defines Tesla discourse online. 'This one's for the true fans! And for the most determined haters! 😂,' someone posted, capturing the tribal divide between Musk loyalists and skeptics. This one's for the true fans! And for the most determined haterz!😂 — 𝕋𝕒𝕧𝕚 (@tavi_chocochip) June 28, 2025Tesla's status as one of the world's most polarizing tech companies is fully on display here. Enthusiasts hailed the video as the start of a new chapter in transportation. Detractors pointed to Musk's long history of broken promises around autonomy, a timeline that includes failed targets for robotaxi rollouts as far back as 2019. To be clear: Tesla has made real progress with its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, a system that uses cameras, sensors, and neural networks to train its vehicles to respond like a human driver. But the system is still classified as Level 2 autonomy, meaning it requires driver supervision and isn't legally recognized as fully autonomous. And that's the rub: Musk's latest claim is exaggerated at best. Waymo, Cruise, and several Chinese companies have conducted similar demos. Some, like Waymo, are already running driverless vehicles in complex environments like downtown San Francisco. What Tesla pulled off here is impressive. But whether it represents a breakthrough or a carefully engineered stunt remains to be seen. The real question now: can Tesla do this again tomorrow? And the day after that? At rush hour? In rain? Without rerunning the same pre-tested route? Until those questions are answered, the skepticism will only grow.
