US consumer watchdog's enforcement, supervision heads announce resignation
(Reuters) - The top officials for enforcement and supervision at the embattled U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau tendered their resignations on Tuesday, citing the decision by President Donald Trump's administration to halt all activity at the agency, according to internal emails seen by Reuters.
"As you know we have been ordered to cease all work. I don't believe in these conditions I can effectively serve in my role, which is protecting American consumers," said Enforcement Director Eric Halperin. "Today I made the difficult decision to resign effective today."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air France-KLM CEO voices confidence in Boeing 787
PARIS (Reuters) -The head of Air France-KLM voiced confidence in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner as he expressed condolences to Air India and those affected by the deadly crash of a London-bound passenger jet in Ahmedabad on Thursday. "We still have confidence in the airplane; we have 34 787s in the KLM fleet," Ben Smith, CEO of the Franco-Dutch airline group, told the Paris Air Forum conference on Friday, noting that the tragic accident is under investigation. Speaking at the same event, Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury also expressed condolences to families of victims of the crash, the worst aviation disaster in a decade. India's air accident agency is investigating the cause of the crash which killed more than 240 people and safety experts have cautioned it is too early to speculate on the causes. India's aviation regulator on Friday directed Air India to carry out safety inspections on its Boeing 787-8/9 fleet, an order showed on Friday. Sign in to access your portfolio


Vox
14 minutes ago
- Vox
Why Donald Trump soured on some of his own judges
Late last month, approximately 1 billion news cycles ago, an obscure federal court made President Donald Trump very, very mad. The US Court of International Trade ruled unanimously on May 28 that the massive tariffs Trump imposed after taking office again are illegal. That ruling was suspended the next day by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the tariffs will be allowed to remain in effect pending a ruling (arguments are scheduled for late July). But the appellate court's decision didn't soothe Trump. He took to Truth Social on May 29 to post a 510-word screed attacking the judges on the Court of International Trade, before turning his ire toward a more surprising candidate — Leonard Leo, the most important person in the conservative legal movement. 'I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges,' Trump wrote, reminiscing about his first term. 'I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions.' This breakup surprised many commentators. But not David French. 'If you're familiar with how the conservative legal movement has interacted with MAGA, you have seen this coming for a while,' French, a New York Times columnist, lawyer, and onetime member of the Federalist Society, told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. 'You knew this was coming after 2020. Because in 2020, after Trump had really stocked the federal judiciary with an awful lot of FedSoc judges and justices…none of them, zero of them, helped him try to steal the election.' French spoke with Today, Explained about the origins of the (other) big, beautiful breakup and what it means for the Trump administration and the future of the federal judiciary. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Federalist Society? I am not now, but I have been a member of the Federalist Society. I was a member of the Federalist Society either all three years of law school or the first two years of law school. But it was also a very different time. I think the Federalist Society at the law school at that time, when we would have meetings, maybe 10 or 12 people would show up. Things have changed. One of the most conspicuous changes is that FedSoc has become an enemy of the president of the United States. From [2020] forward, you began to see this drifting apart between FedSoc and MAGA. When Trump comes back into office and he doubles down on being Donald Trump, all of this became very, very predictable. Because if the Trump administration's argument dovetailed with their originalist legal philosophy, they would rule for it. But if it was just simply Trump's lawless demands, they were going to reject it. And Trump is baffled by this distinction. He's baffled by it because congressional Republicans haven't drawn this line at all. When Trump's demands conflict with conservative principles, they will yield to Trump's demands every time. And the judges and justices have taken the opposite tack to such an extent that Republican-nominated judges have ruled against Trump about 72 percent of the time, which is remarkably close to about the 80 percent or so of the time that Democratic-appointed judges have ruled against Trump. You mentioned a whole host of issues where FedSoc judges have perhaps not given Trump what he wanted. Does the one that finally tips Trump off to go for it on Truth Social surprise you? It doesn't, because what really set him off was striking down tariffs. To the extent that Trump loves a policy, he loves tariffs. The Court of International Trade struck it down, and it was pointed out to him that one of the judges on the Court of International Trade that struck down the tariffs was appointed by him. He had been ranting about judges in general. Now he got specific with Leonard Leo; he got specific with the FedSoc. People like me who'd been watching this for a very long time were not wondering if this was going to happen. We were just wondering what was going to be the tipping point: Was it going to be a Supreme Court case? Was it going to be an appellate court? It turns out it was the Court of International Trade that brought us to this moment. Leonard Leo did not author a decision from this court. Why is he mad at Leonard Leo? Leonard Leo has long been a key figure in the Federalist Society and was very much a part of the first Trump administration, working closely with the administration to put forward judges. For a long time, Trump looked at his judicial nominations and waved them like a flag to the American conservative public saying, look what I did. But the more the American conservative public started loving Trump as Trump, versus Trump as what policy wins he could deliver, the less he started waving these other ideological flags, and the more it became all about him. And so this meant that this marriage was going to be temporary almost from the beginning, unless FedSoc capitulated. And if you know anything about FedSoc and the people who belong to it, and the people who've come up as judges, I knew they weren't going to capitulate. It's a very different culture from political conservatism. Do you think Donald Trump didn't realize that? I don't think he realized that at all. He's had this entire history politically of when Republicans disagree with him, they either fall in line or they're steamrolled. And so it's so interesting to me that he actually began that Truth Social rant that lacerated Leonard Leo and the FedSoc with this question: What's going on? Why is this happening? And I totally understand his bafflement. Because all of the political people had surrendered, or almost all of them. And so when he turns around and these judges and justices just keep ruling against him, you can understand why he would take that as, 'What's going on here? I don't get this. I don't understand this. I've been assured that these were good judges.' And so that's where you get to that real tension. Do you think this rift with the Federalist Society will affect how he appoints judges going forward? The short answer to that question is yes. The longer answer to that question is heck yes. A lot of people were worried about this because they were thinking, Okay, Trump 1.0: He has General Mattis as his secretary of defense. Trump 2.0: He has Pete Hegseth. You can do this all day long. The Trump 1.0 early nominations — sound, serious, establishment conservatives. Trump 2.0 — often MAGA crazies. The question was, 'Is this same pattern going to establish itself in Trump 2.0 on judges?' And then he appointed to the Third Circuit Emil Bove, this DOJ enforcer of his who was responsible for the effort to dismiss the Eric Adams case. He's nominated him for the Third Circuit, and a lot of people are now saying, 'Oh, now that's your harbinger right there.'
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel strike hits crude market
By Anna Szymanski LONDON (Reuters) -A look at what matters in U.S. and global markets today from Mike Dolan, Editor-At-Large, Finance and Markets Global equity markets were rattled on Friday and oil prices shot higher after Israel conducted a military strike on Iran, pushing investors toward safe havens such as gold and the Swiss franc. Investors have typically shrugged off Middle East tensions in recent years, but this latest move has the potential to be a game changer in the region. I'll provide a quick overview of the market reactions below and then provide some weekend reading suggestions from Mike Dolan. I'm also excited to announce the launch of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for data-driven global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Today's Market Minute * On Friday, after two decades of continually raising the alarm and urging other world leaders to act, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finally decided to go it alone, authorising an Israeli air assault aimed, Israel says, at preventing Iran from obtaining weapons of mass destruction. * World stock markets tumbled on Friday and oil prices surged as Israel launched its strikes, sparking a rush into safe havens such as gold, the dollar and Swiss franc. * Rescuers searched for missing people and aircraft debris in charred buildings in Ahmedabad on Friday after more than 240 people were killed in an Air India Boeing 787 crash, and as local media reported that India was considering grounding the airline's 787 fleet for safety checks. * Israel's strikes on Iran have raised the prospect of global oil prices hitting $100 a barrel. If Tehran seeks to escalate the conflict by retaliating beyond Israeli borders, it could seek to choke off the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important gateway for oil shipping, writes ROI Energy Columnist Ron Bousso. ISRAELI STRIKE HITS CRUDE MARKET Israel launched widescale strikes against Iran on Friday, saying it targeted nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders during the start of a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Alongside extensive air strikes, Israel's Mossad spy agency led a series of covert sabotage operations inside Iran, Axios reported, citing a senior Israeli official. These operations were aimed at damaging Iran's strategic missile sites and its air defence capabilities. Iran launched about 100 drones towards Israeli territory in retaliation, many of which have already been intercepted, according to an Israeli military official. Iran denied it had launched drones, the Fars news agency said. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Israeli offensive a "unilateral action" and said that Washington was not involved. Market reaction was swift. Crude prices jumped on Friday, amid fears that Israel's strike could spark additional Iranian retaliation that could disrupt oil supplies. Brent crude futures hit an intraday high of $78.50 per barrel, the highest since January 27, before settling back down around $74. Meanwhile, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude reached a high of $77.62, its highest level since January 21, before settling back above $73 a barrel. A key investor concern now will be whether the latest developments will cause Iran to disrupt transit in the Strait of Hormuz. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or some 18 to 19 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel. As geopolitical tensions rose, Gold climbed as high as $3,444.06 per ounce, bringing it close to the record high of $3,500.05 from April. "Traders are now on edge over the prospects of a full-blown Middle East conflict," said Matt Simpson, a senior market analyst at City Index. "That will keep uncertainty high and volatility elevated." WEEKEND READING SUGGESTIONS Here are some articles away from the day-to-day headlines that you may find interesting. 1. FED FOOTNOTE: Speculation about President Trump's willingness and ability to remove Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has stoked concerns about Fed independence all year, though a recent Supreme Court ruling seemed to clear up the issue. But writing on the Project Syndicate site, Professor Barry Eichengreen argues that the footnote in the court ruling that supposedly protects the Fed came with no legal basis. "The note reads like a ChatGPT hallucination," he wrote, adding "arbitrarily exempting the Fed opens the door to arbitrarily not exempting the Fed." Advocates of Fed independence should be worried, he concluded. 2. G6 RUSSIAN SANCTIONS: Most G7 countries look set to tighten sanctions on Russia and push for a lower Russian oil price cap at next week's summit in Canada regardless of U.S. objections, according to Reuters' sources. Earlier this month, Brookings economists Robin Brooks and Ben Harris published a detailed analysis of why this approach was workable and makes sense. 3. SELF DRIVERS: Reuters' Norihiko Shirouzu shows how BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its "God's Eye" driver-assistance package for free, undercutting Tesla's more expensive technology. 4. SPIES AND CRYPTO: At a time when Europe is in a heightened state of alarm over Russia's "hybrid war" of sabotage and espionage, Reuters found that Moscow is increasingly recruiting teenagers and complete novices in its efforts. A Special Report by Reuters' Mari Saito, Anna Koper, Anton Zverev, Filipp Lebedev and Polina Nikolskaya details the case of Canadian teenager Laken Pavan. 5. COAL AND WATER: April marks the start of the cruelest months for residents of Solapur, a hot and dry district in western India. In peak summer, the wait for water taps to flow can stretch to a week or more. Reuters Krishna N. Das and Sarita Chaganti Singh show that since 2017 a new 1,320-megawatt coal-fired power plant run by state-controlled NTPC has started to compete with residents and businesses for water from the same reservoir. Chart of the day Friday's gains for Brent crude and WTI futures were the largest intraday moves for both contracts since 2022, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine caused a spike in energy prices. "A key question is whether the Iranian retaliation will be limited to Israel or if the leadership will seek to internationalize the cost of tonight's action by targeting bases and critical economic infrastructure across the wider region," RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft said in a note. TODAY'S EVENTS TO WATCH * University of Michigan June consumer survey (10:00 AM EDT); Canada April manufacturing sales * European Central Bank board member Frank Elderson speaks at IMF-WB annual conference for senior supervisors Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (By Mike Dolan) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data