logo
Eliminating DEI at state level draws plenty of pushback

Eliminating DEI at state level draws plenty of pushback

Yahoo08-02-2025

Feb. 7—President Donald Trump needed just his pen on a sweeping executive order to end federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, but a conservative Republican ran into a storm of opposition last week with his attempt to achieve the same result in state government.
On Capitol Hill, U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, picked up on Trump's unsubstantiated claim that DEI may have factored in the midair collision that killed 67 people near Washington's Ronald Reagan National Airport on Jan. 30.
"What I think you're going to find is there were a lot of qualified White men that they were not hiring because they were holding spots for DEI hires," Marshall said.
Local officials in Concord and Manchester have had to defend their own DEI initiatives against critics who charge they are a waste of money and seek to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
At the State House, the legislation (HB 392) from Rep. Mike Belcher, R-Wakefield, would dismantle the Office of Health Equity in the state Department of Health and Human Services, the civil rights and environmental justice functions in the Department of Environmental Services and the Governor's Council on Diversity and Inclusion.
Belcher charged that when vaccines and antibodies were in short supply at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, state officials set aside supplies for minority groups in the state based on "skin color."
"These programs ought to be looked at as both unlawful and unconstitutional," Belcher told the House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs Committee. "These concepts have been roundly rejected by the American people and the voters of New Hampshire. They are punitive, discriminatory and divisive."
Yet over a 2 1/2 -hour public hearing, every speaker following Belcher warned that getting rid of these programs would cost the state nearly $100 million in federal support while cutting off a lifeline of services that legal refugees, the disabled and low-income residents depend upon for survival.
Health impact
Belcher was surely not going to sway one member of this key House committee, two-term Rep. Trinidad Telez, D-Manchester.
For a decade including the onset of COVID, Telez was the director of the Office of Health Equity. Telez told Belcher the office's work was upheld twice in court against lawsuits that charged it had practiced bias in its delivery of care.
"Do you have any evidence that discrimination exists here in New Hampshire?" Telez asked Belcher. "There can be no quality of care if we fail to address equity."
There were 30 who endorsed Belcher's bill online while 2,820 opposed it.
Isadora Rodriguez-Legendre is executive director of the New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities.
"We don't want to blanketly eliminate anything just because it has the word equity and justice in it," Rodriguez-Legendre said. "People with disabilities have a significant need for coordination of care and those needs can only be met by equitable access to services and information."
During the pandemic, the Office of Health Equity deployed mobile vans that brought vaccines and other health services to rural parts of the state and urban neighborhoods where low-income residents lacked transportation to make a doctor or hospital visit.
"For example: Are patients able to access appointments? Do they have transportation? Do they need hearing or vision accommodation? Can they follow up with medications, physical and behavioral health therapy, and prescriptions?" asked Cathy Stratton, CEO of the New Hampshire Medical Society.
Andrew Loehrer, a surgical oncologist at Dartmouth Health, said the office's leadership led to the elimination of disparities in access to care for advance-stage cancer, research that will soon be published nationally.
"Health equity is not some straw man that affects everybody else; it impacts all by ensuring that every single individual in our state has access to high-quality care," Loehrer said.
Adam Crepeau, assistant commissioner with the Department of Environmental Services, said with all its federal grants, the department must prove it complies with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
"This would put significant federal funds in jeopardy," Crepeau said, identifying up to $90 million in federal aid at risk.
Heidi Trimarco, a lawyer with the Conservation Law Foundation, was more blunt.
"This will take a wrecking ball to DES," Trimarco said, pointing out the impact is 25% of its entire budget.
Office will stay in budget
Gov. Kelly Ayotte said she hasn't read Belcher's bill and "has not thought about re-creating" the diversity council former Gov. Chris Sununu formed by executive order in 2017. Sununu eliminated the council in December before leaving office.
She told reporters that the two-year state budget proposal she will present on Thursday will include continuing the Office of Health Equity.
"When it comes to diversity, equity, we want everyone to feel they can be engaged; that's a basic premise of who we are," Ayotte said.
The Office of Health Equity was established in 1999 as the Office of Minority Health; its name was changed in 2016. Eliminating it would save $100,000 in state taxpayer funds and forfeit $69,000 in federal grants.
The office runs the Refugee Resettlement Program, which coordinates employment, language skills and cultural assimilation to help those from other countries legally coming here, often to escape oppression.
Health and Human Services Associate Commissioner Ann Landry said Belcher's bill would cause the program to lose state coordination, which ensures refugees get access to all services from food stamp and welfare assistance to job training and English as a second language classes.
Richard Minard of Bow runs Building Community in New Hampshire and his seven-person staff includes former residents of Afghanistan, Ukraine, Haiti and Republic of Congo.
"Together they speak 17 languages," Minard testified. "I don't know when or how 'equity' became a dirty word. To me, the promise of liberty and justice for all Americans is synonymous with the promise of equity and inclusion."
State Rep. Jess Edwards, R-Auburn, chairs the House Finance Committee working group with oversight of the entire Health and Human Services budget. Over six years, Edwards, a fiscal conservative, said he eyed these programs "cynically" and spent more time than any other legislator scrutinizing their work.
"I would say that this is a program that, by and large, most of us can agree to," Edwards said. "We aren't trying to put the thumb on the scale to provide superior access to a select group; it's to provide everyone the same access and to me, that's a goal the state of New Hampshire should strive to meet."
klandrigan@unionleader.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact
Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

UPI

time30 minutes ago

  • UPI

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Naval Base Point Loma in San Diego, Calif. in March of 2023. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles announced Thursday he feels that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal which connects with the United Kingdom and United States, will continue after the Trump administration reviews the pact. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC News, as he believes AUKUS is of strategic interest to all three nations. The Pentagon has expressed that the 2021 deal is being reassessed to make sure it's a fit with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda before he meets with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the G7 summit taking place in Canada next week. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also had met with Marles, who is also Australia's Minister for Defense, earlier this month and recommended Australia increase its defense spending to 3.5 percent of its GDP. Albanese said in a press conference Tuesday that he thinks "that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defense" when asked about a defense spending boost, while not directly addressing if he would risk losing the AUKUS deal over that decision as questioned. The Pentagon review is being led by U.S. Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, who in the past has been critical of the deal made under the Biden administration to arm Australia with nuclear subs that use advanced American and British technology. "In principle it's a great idea," Colby posted to X about AUKUS in August of 2024," but added he's "agnostic" about the program. However, Colby also posted that day he was "convinced we should focus on Asia, readying for a war with China" in order to avoid it. Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian announced Thursday in a press conference when asked about his nation's opinion on the possibility of an end to AUKUS that China opposes "manufacturing bloc confrontation and anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates arms race."

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

E&E News

time33 minutes ago

  • E&E News

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ
Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are pushing for an investigation into top Justice Department official Ed Martin over his stated plans to "shame" political opponents of President Donald Trump who he's unable to charge criminally, as well as a host of other politically charged matters Martin has publicly pledged to pursue in his new position. "I write to express my grave concern about Ed Martin's stated intention to abuse his new roles as lead of the so-called 'Weaponization Working Group' you constituted at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and as DOJ's Pardon Attorney," Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter transmitted to the Justice Department, which was first obtained by ABC News. "Following his disgraceful tenure as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Martin apparently plans to continue his misconduct in his new roles at DOJ." The DOJ did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the letter. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons Martin's controversial tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., in the opening months of Trump's presidency thrust the office into turmoil and led several Senate Republicans to state publicly they wouldn't support his permanent confirmation in the role. But once the White House announced they were pulling Martin's nomination, Trump said Martin would instead be appointed to several top positions working out of DOJ's main headquarters -- serving as an associate deputy attorney general, the U.S. pardon attorney and director of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group." Martin celebrated the news on his X account, posting 'Eagle Unleashed,' and in various interviews celebrated what he described as a mandate from Trump directly to target the alleged 'weaponization' of the department under the Biden administration. 'It's classic Donald Trump, right? That somebody tries to block him and block his pick, and he decides to double down,' Martin told Breitbart News last month. 'This is probably the greatest job I could ever envision.' MORE: Trump US attorney nominee distances himself from antisemitic Jan. 6 rioter he once praised In a news conference announcing his departure from the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, Martin confirmed he planned to launch a probe of last-minute pardons issued by former President Joe Biden just before he left office -- and suggested that officials he's unable to charge would instead be publicly "shamed." "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people," Martin said. "And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them ... And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's how I believe the job operates." The approach would directly conflict with longstanding DOJ policy that prohibits prosecutors from naming or disparaging individuals who they don't intend to charge criminally. When asked about that policy by ABC News during the news conference, Martin said he would "have to look at what the provision you're referring to, to see -- we want to square ourselves with doing the things correctly." The letter from Senate Democrats said Martin's statements "are a brazen admission that Mr. Martin plans to systematically violate the Justice Manual's prohibition on extrajudicial statements by shaming uncharged parties for nakedly partisan reasons. Weaponizing DOJ in this manner will further undermine the public's trust in the department in irreparable ways." MORE: Bondi, as new AG, launches 'Weaponization Working Group' to review officials who investigated Trump In his early days as pardon attorney, Martin said he advised the president in his pardon of former Virginia county sheriff Scott Jenkins, who had been sentenced to ten years in prison for a federal bribery conviction. "No MAGA left behind," Martin posted on X in response to the pardon. Durbin's letter further cited reports Martin has "personally advocated" fast-tracking pardons for members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy stemming from their roles leading up to the attack on the Capitol, after President Trump initially opted to commute their sentences in his sweeping clemency action for the nearly 1600 individuals charged in connection with Jan. 6. Durbin's letter requests Bondi provide a host of records related to Martin's appointment and early days as head of the Weaponization Working Group and Pardon Attorney's Office. It's unclear whether DOJ will ultimately respond to Durbin's demands given Democrats' minority position on the committee. Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store